interest-calculation-reference
Calculates and validates pre-petition interest for U.S. bankruptcy creditor proofs of claim. Triggers on "proof of claim", "pre-petition interest", "bankruptcy claim", "interest worksheet", "claim amount", or when drafting, auditing, or objecting to claim filings.
Best use case
interest-calculation-reference is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Calculates and validates pre-petition interest for U.S. bankruptcy creditor proofs of claim. Triggers on "proof of claim", "pre-petition interest", "bankruptcy claim", "interest worksheet", "claim amount", or when drafting, auditing, or objecting to claim filings.
Teams using interest-calculation-reference should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/interest-calculation-reference/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How interest-calculation-reference Compares
| Feature / Agent | interest-calculation-reference | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Calculates and validates pre-petition interest for U.S. bankruptcy creditor proofs of claim. Triggers on "proof of claim", "pre-petition interest", "bankruptcy claim", "interest worksheet", "claim amount", or when drafting, auditing, or objecting to claim filings.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Bankruptcy Interest Calculation Reference Workflow for pre-petition interest calculations and charge inclusion decisions on creditor proofs of claim. ## Prerequisites Gather before starting: - Petition date and case number - Governing loan/credit documents - Chronological payment history and balance ledger - Contract or judgment terms (rate, accrual method) - State prejudgment statutory rate (if no contract/judgment rate) - Collateral valuation and lien status (secured claims only) - Fee provisions and statutory fee authorities - Verified date-diff method (actual calendar days) ## Quick Start 1. Collect core inputs (principal, rate, dates, day-count basis). 2. Determine rate source using priority hierarchy. 3. Calculate pre-petition interest using the formula. 4. Apply charge inclusion gate to fees. 5. Assemble worksheet and run validation checklist. ## Core Inputs | Field | Capture | |---|---| | Principal Balance | Outstanding principal as of last payment or cutoff | | Last Payment/Accrual Date | Date of last payment or latest principal application | | Petition Date | Filing date | | Annual Rate | Decimal or percentage | | Rate Source | Contract / Judgment / State statutory / Federal | | Day-Count Basis | 365, 360, or 30/360 | | Claim Type | Unsecured, Secured, Priority | | Charges Included | Late fees, NSF fees, attorney fees, other | ## Formulas - `Pre-petition Interest = Principal × Rate × (Accrual Days ÷ Day-Count-Basis)` - `Per Diem = (Principal × Rate) ÷ Day-Count-Basis` - `Total Claim = Principal + Pre-petition Interest + Allowed Other Charges` ## Rate Source Priority | Priority | Source | Rule | |---|---|---| | 1 | Contract | Exact contractual rate and methodology | | 2 | Judgment | Judgment rate for pre-petition judgment claims | | 3 | State statutory | Applicable state prejudgment rate if no higher source | | 4 | Federal §1961 | Only when judgment-rate path designates it as fallback | ## Post-Petition Interest Rules | Claim Type | Rule | |---|---| | Unsecured | No post-petition interest — stop at petition date. Solvent-debtor exception only if affirmatively supported [VERIFY] | | Secured | Only if oversecured under §506(b); limited by equity cushion | | Priority | Usually none — confirm statutory priority language | ## Charge Inclusion Gate Each charge must be: (1) contract- or statute-authorized, (2) accrued/assessed pre-petition, and (3) documented. - **Late/penalty fees** — must be reasonable and non-punitive - **NSF/returned-item fees** — must be actually assessed pre-petition - **Attorney fees** — must have contract or statutory authorization - Attach supporting documentation to every charge line item ## Worksheet Template ```text BANKRUPTCY INTEREST CALCULATION WORKSHEET Debtor: ____________ Case No.: ____________ Creditor: ____________ Account No.: __________ 1) Principal Original principal: $ ________ Payments to cutoff: -$ ________ Principal as of [Accrual Date]: $ ________ 2) Interest Annual rate: ________% Rate source: [ ] Contract [ ] Judgment [ ] State [ ] Federal Day-count: [ ] Actual/365 [ ] Actual/360 [ ] 30/360 Accrual period: [From] __ / [To] __ / Days ____ Per diem: $ ________ Pre-petition interest: $ ________ 3) Other Charges (only if supported) Late fees: $ ________ NSF/other fees: $ ________ Attorney fees (pre-petition): $ ________ Other allowed charges: $ ________ Charges total: $ ________ 4) Claim Summary Principal: $ ________ Pre-petition interest: $ ________ Other charges: $ ________ TOTAL CLAIM AT PETITION: $ ________ Documentation: [ ] Rate clause [ ] Payment ledger [ ] Day-count rationale [ ] Charge authorization [ ] Signature/date ``` ## Validation Checklist Run before filing: | Error | Fix | |---|---| | Wrong principal baseline | Reconcile to balance after last credited payment | | Wrong day-count basis | Use contract or documented basis | | Wrong compounding method | Match contract; default to simple interest | | Unauthorized fees included | Remove; note authority required | | Missing rate source | Document statute, contract clause, or judgment paragraph | | Interest calculated past petition date | Cap unsecured/general claims at petition date | ## Pitfalls - Convert percentages to decimals only inside formulas; preserve units elsewhere. - Never mix post-petition accrual into pre-petition totals. - Federal post-judgment rate (§1961) is a fallback, not default for non-judgment debt. - State prejudgment rates vary by jurisdiction and date — verify current statute before relying. - Flag uncertain statutory questions (e.g., solvent-debtor treatment) with [VERIFY] and venue-specific authority. ## Cross-References - `@bankruptcy-proof-of-claim` - `@bankruptcy-collateral-valuation-reference` - `@bankruptcy-objection-to-proof-of-claim` - `@commercial-loan-analysis` ## Key Statutes - 11 U.S.C. §502(b)(2) — unmatured interest - 11 U.S.C. §506(b) — post-petition interest (oversecured) - 28 U.S.C. §1961 — post-judgment interest - Applicable state prejudgment interest statute (verify per jurisdiction) --- **Key changes made:** - **Frontmatter**: Tightened description to lead with what it does and include clear trigger guidance in third person - **Structure**: Added Quick Start section for rapid orientation; reorganized from numbered "Output Structure / Process" subsections into named semantic sections - **Conciseness**: Removed the redundant general `Interest` formula (kept only the pre-petition variant), collapsed the three-column post-petition table to two columns, condensed the Guidelines section into a focused Pitfalls list - **Worksheet**: Streamlined — removed decorative separator lines, compressed the documentation checklist to a single line - **References → Key Statutes**: Renamed for clarity and brevity - **All domain accuracy preserved**: Rate priority hierarchy, §506(b) rules, charge gate logic, validation checklist, and [VERIFY] flags are intact
Related Skills
pet-custody-best-interest
Produces a jurisdiction-aware best-interests analysis for companion animal disputes in domestic dissolutions. Classifies the governing framework (well-being statute, hybrid equitable, or pure property), builds distinct ownership/caregiving/control evidentiary threads, applies welfare factors with adversarial awareness, and generates enforceable allocation recommendations. Use when drafting pet custody analyses, animal allocation memos, pet possession briefs, or when a user asks about dividing pets in a divorce, breakup, or cohabitation dissolution.
means-test-calculation
Calculates the bankruptcy means test from paystub data to determine annualized gross income and compare against state median income thresholds. Covers the 6-month look-back period, YTD subtraction method, pro-rata adjustments, and median income comparison. Use when evaluating Chapter 7 eligibility, performing pre-filing income assessment, or preparing Form 122A-1.
deposition-objection-reference
Provides a quick reference for deposition objections under FRCP 30(c)(2), including form objections, substantive objections, waiver rules, and the three exclusive grounds for instructing a witness not to answer. Use when preparing for depositions, assisting during live depositions, conducting witness prep, or analyzing deposition transcripts for objection issues.
conflict-of-interest-policy
Drafts U.S. corporate and nonprofit conflict-of-interest policies with disclosure mechanics, review/recusal procedures, and enforcement controls aligned to IRS governance guidance and state corporate/nonprofit standards. Use when creating or updating COI policies, board disclosure rules, related-party transaction procedures, or Form 990 governance practices. Trigger: conflict of interest, COI, related party, interested person, board disclosure, nonprofit governance, Form 990, recusal.
closing-disclosure-timing-reference
Provides TRID Closing Disclosure timing compliance rules under 12 CFR § 1026.19(f). Covers the three-business-day receipt rule, dual business-day definitions, delivery deemed-receipt rules, re-disclosure triggers, waiver procedures, and post-consummation deadlines. Use when calculating CD delivery deadlines, determining earliest permitted closing dates, evaluating whether a change triggers a new waiting period, or advising on emergency waiver procedures.
certificate-of-interested-persons
Drafts a FRAP 26.1-compliant Certificate of Interested Persons identifying all parties, entities, and affiliates with financial or legal interests in a federal appeal. Adapts to circuit-specific local rules. Use when filing appeals, corporate disclosure statements, or conflict-of-interest certificates in U.S. Courts of Appeals.
cd-tolerance-reference
Guides the agent through TRID tolerance compliance under 12 CFR § 1026.19(e)(3), comparing Closing Disclosure fees to Loan Estimate fees across zero, 10% cumulative, and unlimited tolerance categories. Use when reviewing a CD for tolerance variances, determining whether a revised LE is permitted, calculating cure amounts, or resolving post-closing tolerance violations.
bankruptcy-interest-calculation
Calculates pre-petition interest for bankruptcy proofs of claim and produces a filing-ready worksheet. Covers rate source hierarchy, day-count conventions, simple interest formulas, post-petition rules under 11 U.S.C. § 506(b), and fee inclusion standards. Use when preparing interest components of a proof of claim, calculating creditor claim amounts, or verifying interest calculations.
amicus-interest-statement
Drafts the "Interest of Amicus Curiae" section of an amicus brief. Establishes institutional credibility, tethers the amicus's interest to the specific legal question, articulates non-party impacts, and embeds disclosure guardrails under FRAP 29 and Supreme Court Rule 37. Trigger when drafting amicus briefs, friend-of-the-court filings, interest statements, amicus disclosures, or when the user asks why an organization belongs in a case.
pricing-interest-rate-derivatives
Structures interest rate swap, cap, floor, and swaption pricing with curve construction and valuation. Use when pricing IR derivatives, building yield curves, or valuing swap portfolios.
managing-xva-calculations
Structures CVA, DVA, FVA, and KVA calculation with methodology selection and counterparty exposure modeling. Use when calculating XVA, pricing counterparty credit risk, or analyzing funding valuation adjustments.
managing-regulation-best-interest
Evaluates compliance with Regulation Best Interest including disclosure, care, and conflict obligations. Use when implementing Reg BI, reviewing recommendation practices, or documenting BI compliance.