interpreting-emergency-ecgs
Analyzes 12-lead ECGs for acute findings requiring emergent intervention. Use when reading emergency ECGs, identifying STEMI patterns, or flagging critical arrhythmias.
Best use case
interpreting-emergency-ecgs is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Analyzes 12-lead ECGs for acute findings requiring emergent intervention. Use when reading emergency ECGs, identifying STEMI patterns, or flagging critical arrhythmias.
Teams using interpreting-emergency-ecgs should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/interpreting-emergency-ecgs/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How interpreting-emergency-ecgs Compares
| Feature / Agent | interpreting-emergency-ecgs | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Analyzes 12-lead ECGs for acute findings requiring emergent intervention. Use when reading emergency ECGs, identifying STEMI patterns, or flagging critical arrhythmias.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Interpreting Emergency ECGs
Analyzes 12-lead ECGs for acute findings requiring emergent intervention, using a systematic approach to identify STEMI patterns, life-threatening arrhythmias, and high-risk ECG signatures.
## Why This Skill Exists
The 12-lead ECG is the single most important initial diagnostic test in acute chest pain evaluation and is required within 10 minutes of ED arrival per ACC/AHA guidelines. STEMI misdiagnosis or delayed cath lab activation carries catastrophic consequences — door-to-balloon time >90 minutes is associated with a 7.5% increase in in-hospital mortality per 30-minute delay. Conversely, false-positive cath lab activations waste resources and expose patients to unnecessary invasive procedures (false activation rates range 10-30% across institutions).
Beyond ACS, the emergency ECG must be screened for lethal arrhythmias (complete heart block, wide-complex tachycardia), metabolic emergencies (severe hyperkalemia), drug toxicity (sodium channel blockade, QT prolongation), and structural pathology (PE, pericarditis, Brugada). Emergency physicians must interpret ECGs with higher sensitivity than specificity — the cost of a miss far exceeds the cost of a false alarm. This skill provides a systematic, reproducible framework for emergency ECG interpretation.
---
## Checkpoint A: Pre-Draft Intake (Mandatory)
1. What is the clinical context (chief complaint, age, sex)? (Default: always interpret in clinical context)
2. Is a prior ECG available for comparison? (Default: request from EMR if available)
3. What is the time of symptom onset relative to the ECG acquisition? (Default: document both timestamps)
4. Is the patient currently symptomatic during this ECG? (Default: document symptom status at time of tracing)
5. What medications is the patient taking (digoxin, antiarrhythmics, QT-prolonging agents)? (Default: query medication list)
6. Does the patient have a pacemaker or ICD? (Default: document device presence and type)
7. What is the patient's potassium level if known? (Default: check point-of-care metabolic panel)
### Documents to Request
- Prior ECG tracings (most recent and baseline)
- Current medication list with focus on cardiac and QT-prolonging drugs
- Pacemaker/ICD interrogation report if applicable
- Prior cardiac catheterization or stress test results
- Known baseline bundle branch block or axis deviation
---
## Step 1: Systematic Rate and Rhythm Assessment
Follow this exact sequence on every ECG before pattern recognition:
### Rate Calculation
- Regular rhythm: 300 / (number of large boxes between R-R) = rate
- Irregular rhythm: count QRS complexes in 10 seconds × 6
- Normal: 60-100 bpm | Bradycardia: <60 | Tachycardia: >100
### Rhythm Determination Checklist
1. Is the rhythm regular or irregular?
2. Is there a P wave before every QRS?
3. Is there a QRS after every P wave?
4. Is the PR interval constant?
5. Is the QRS narrow (<120 ms) or wide (≥120 ms)?
### Axis Assessment
- Normal axis: Lead I (+), aVF (+)
- Left axis deviation: Lead I (+), aVF (−) — consider LAFB, LVH, inferior MI
- Right axis deviation: Lead I (−), aVF (+) — consider RVH, PE, lateral MI, LPFB
- Extreme axis: Lead I (−), aVF (−) — consider ventricular rhythm, lead misplacement
---
## Step 2: Interval Measurement and Block Identification
| Interval | Normal | Abnormal | Emergency Significance |
|----------|--------|----------|----------------------|
| PR | 120-200 ms | >200 ms = 1st degree AV block; progressively lengthening = 2nd degree Type I; dropped beats without lengthening = 2nd degree Type II; complete dissociation = 3rd degree | 2nd degree Type II and 3rd degree = emergent pacing |
| QRS | <120 ms | 120-200 ms = BBB or aberrancy; >200 ms = ventricular origin or severe toxicity | New BBB in ACS context = consider STEMI equivalent |
| QTc | <440 ms (M), <460 ms (F) | >500 ms = high risk for Torsades de Pointes | Discontinue offending agents, replete Mg2+ and K+ |
### Bundle Branch Block Differentiation
**RBBB (V1 = rSR', V6 = qRS, wide S in I and V6):**
- Commonly benign but new RBBB in acute chest pain = consider PE or RV strain
**LBBB (V1 = rS or QS, V6 = tall R without Q, I = monomorphic R):**
- New LBBB + symptoms = cath lab activation per Sgarbossa criteria
- **Sgarbossa Criteria (≥3 points = STEMI):**
- Concordant ST elevation ≥1 mm in leads with positive QRS = 5 points
- ST depression ≥1 mm in V1-V3 = 3 points
- Discordant ST elevation ≥5 mm (or use Smith-modified ratio >0.25) = 2 points
---
## Step 3: ST Segment and Acute Ischemia Evaluation
### STEMI Recognition by Territory
| Territory | Leads with ST Elevation | Culprit Artery |
|-----------|------------------------|----------------|
| Anterior | V1-V4 | LAD |
| Lateral | I, aVL, V5-V6 | LCx or diagonal |
| Inferior | II, III, aVF | RCA (85%) or LCx (15%) |
| Right ventricular | V4R (obtain if inferior STEMI) | Proximal RCA |
| Posterior | V7-V9 (obtain if tall R in V1-V2 with ST depression) | PDA or LCx |
**STEMI criteria (in ≥2 contiguous leads):**
- ST elevation ≥1 mm in limb leads
- ST elevation ≥2 mm in V2-V3 (men ≥40), ≥2.5 mm V2-V3 (men <40), ≥1.5 mm V2-V3 (women)
### STEMI Equivalents (require same urgency)
- de Winter T waves: upsloping ST depression at J point with tall symmetric T waves in precordial leads (LAD occlusion)
- Wellens syndrome: deep T-wave inversions or biphasic T waves in V2-V3 (critical LAD stenosis — NOT during pain)
- Hyperacute T waves: tall, broad, symmetric T waves preceding ST elevation (very early STEMI)
- New LBBB with positive Sgarbossa criteria
- Posterior STEMI: ST depression V1-V3 with tall R waves (confirm with V7-V9)
### Non-STEMI Patterns
- Diffuse ST depression with ST elevation in aVR = left main or severe 3-vessel disease — cardiology emergent consult
- Dynamic T-wave inversions in the same territory = unstable angina or NSTEMI evolution
---
## Step 4: Non-ACS Emergency Patterns
| Pattern | ECG Findings | Emergency Action |
|---------|-------------|------------------|
| Hyperkalemia | Peaked T waves → widened QRS → sine wave → asystole | Calcium gluconate 10 mL of 10% IV over 2-3 min |
| Severe hypokalemia | Prominent U waves, flattened T waves, ST depression | Replete K+ aggressively, cardiac monitoring |
| PE (right heart strain) | S1Q3T3, RBBB, TWI V1-V4, sinus tachycardia, RAD | CTA pulmonary angiography, anticoagulation |
| Pericarditis | Diffuse ST elevation (concave up), PR depression, Spodick sign | NSAIDs + colchicine, rule out myocarditis |
| Brugada Type 1 | Coved ST elevation ≥2 mm in V1-V2 with T-wave inversion | Cardiology consult, avoid triggering drugs, consider ICD |
| Digitalis toxicity | Scooped ST ("Salvador Dali"), PAT with block, bidirectional VT | Digibind (digoxin-specific Fab fragments) |
| Sodium channel blockade (TCA, cocaine) | Wide QRS >100 ms, tall R in aVR >3 mm | Sodium bicarb boluses 1-2 mEq/kg IV |
| WPW | Short PR, delta wave, wide QRS | If AFib with WPW: procainamide or cardioversion; AVOID AV nodal blockers |
---
## Step 5: Documentation and Communication
### ECG Interpretation Documentation Template
```
ECG Time: [HH:MM] | Clinical Context: [chief complaint, age, sex]
Rate: [ ] bpm | Rhythm: [regular/irregular, sinus/non-sinus]
Axis: [normal/LAD/RAD] | PR: [ ] ms | QRS: [ ] ms | QTc: [ ] ms
ST Changes: [describe by lead group]
T-Wave Changes: [describe]
Comparison to Prior: [new/unchanged/improved]
Interpretation: [final impression]
Action Taken: [cath lab activation / serial ECG ordered / cardiology consulted / none needed]
```
### Critical Value Communication
- STEMI or STEMI-equivalent: verbal notification to attending + cath lab activation within 3 minutes of identification
- New complete heart block or wide-complex tachycardia: immediate bedside physician notification
- QTc >500 ms: alert provider, review medication list, place on telemetry
- Hyperkalemia pattern: immediate point-of-care potassium + treatment protocol
---
## Checkpoint B: Post-Draft Alignment (Mandatory)
1. Was the ECG interpreted using a systematic approach (rate → rhythm → axis → intervals → ST/T)?
2. Were STEMI criteria applied correctly with contiguous lead requirements and sex-specific thresholds?
3. Were STEMI equivalents (de Winter, Wellens, posterior MI) actively screened for?
4. Were non-ACS emergencies (hyperkalemia, PE, toxicity) considered in the differential?
5. Was the interpretation communicated to the treating provider with appropriate urgency?
---
## Quality Audit
- [ ] ECG acquisition time documented and within 10 minutes of arrival for chest pain
- [ ] Rate, rhythm, axis, and all intervals (PR, QRS, QTc) explicitly stated
- [ ] ST segment changes described by lead group with millimeter measurements
- [ ] STEMI criteria evaluated using sex-and-age-appropriate thresholds
- [ ] STEMI equivalents actively screened (de Winter, Wellens, hyperacute T, posterior MI)
- [ ] Comparison to prior ECG documented (or "no prior available")
- [ ] Non-ACS emergency patterns screened (hyperkalemia, PE, WPW, toxicity)
- [ ] Clinical context stated in interpretation (not interpreted in isolation)
- [ ] Critical findings communicated verbally with time and recipient documented
- [ ] Serial ECG plan documented if initial ECG non-diagnostic with ongoing symptoms
- [ ] Lead placement quality assessed (appropriate R-wave progression, no lead reversal signs)
- [ ] QTc calculated and medication list cross-checked if prolonged
- [ ] Pacemaker or device presence noted in interpretation if applicable
---
## Guidelines
1. Never interpret an ECG in clinical isolation — always correlate with the presenting complaint, age, sex, and symptom timeline.
2. Obtain a 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes of arrival for any patient with chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, or palpitations — this is a CMS core quality measure.
3. If the first ECG is non-diagnostic but symptoms persist, repeat the ECG every 15-30 minutes — STEMI can evolve from a normal baseline in minutes.
4. Always obtain right-sided leads (V4R) in inferior STEMI to evaluate for RV involvement — RV infarction contraindicates nitroglycerin and requires volume resuscitation.
5. A normal ECG does not exclude ACS — sensitivity of a single ECG for acute MI is only 45-60%.
6. Treat the patient, not the ECG — if clinical suspicion for STEMI is high despite an ambiguous tracing, activate the cath lab and let the interventionalist make the final call.
7. QTc >500 ms is a medical emergency requiring medication review, electrolyte repletion (Mg2+ ≥2.0, K+ ≥4.0), and continuous telemetry monitoring.
8. In wide-complex tachycardia of uncertain origin, treat as ventricular tachycardia until proven otherwise — the safest initial approach is always to assume the worst-case diagnosis.Related Skills
triaging-emergency-presentations
Applies ESI triage methodology to assign acuity levels based on presenting complaints, vital signs, and resource needs. Use when triaging ED patients, assigning acuity scores, or prioritizing emergency cases.
performing-emergency-procedures
Documents procedural indications, consent, technique, and complications for ED procedures. Use when performing emergency procedures, documenting procedural notes, or recording bedside procedures.
managing-emergency-preparedness
Structures public health emergency preparedness with hazard vulnerability and response planning. Use when planning emergency preparedness, conducting vulnerability assessments, or developing response plans.
interpreting-urinalysis
Structures complete urinalysis interpretation with microscopy correlation and clinical significance. Use when interpreting UA results, correlating microscopy findings, or evaluating renal function markers.
interpreting-tumor-markers
Tracks tumor marker trends with diagnostic and monitoring interpretive frameworks. Use when tracking tumor markers, interpreting biomarker trends, or monitoring treatment response.
interpreting-toxicology-screens
Structures drug screen interpretation with confirmation testing and clinical correlation. Use when interpreting drug screens, managing confirmatory testing, or documenting toxicology results.
interpreting-surgical-pathology
Structures surgical pathology reports with diagnosis, staging, margins, and prognostic markers. Use when interpreting biopsies, creating pathology reports, or documenting tissue diagnoses.
interpreting-routine-labs
Analyzes comprehensive metabolic panels, CBCs, lipid panels, and thyroid function with clinical correlation. Use when reviewing outpatient labs, identifying abnormalities, or correlating lab trends.
interpreting-pediatric-imaging
Adapts imaging interpretation for pediatric anatomy with age-appropriate normal variants. Use when reading pediatric imaging, differentiating normal variants, or documenting pediatric-specific findings.
interpreting-neuroradiology
Structures brain and spine imaging interpretation with stroke, mass, and degenerative disease assessment. Use when reading neuroimaging, evaluating stroke imaging, or documenting intracranial findings.
interpreting-musculoskeletal-imaging
Structures MSK imaging interpretation with fracture classification and joint assessment protocols. Use when reading MSK imaging, classifying fractures, or documenting orthopedic findings.
interpreting-molecular-pathology
Structures molecular test interpretation including NGS panels, FISH, and PCR-based assays. Use when interpreting molecular results, reporting genetic variants, or documenting molecular findings.