managing-reinsurance-programs

Structures reinsurance program analysis with cession optimization, pricing, and counterparty evaluation. Use when analyzing reinsurance, optimizing cession structures, or evaluating reinsurer credit.

11 stars

Best use case

managing-reinsurance-programs is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Structures reinsurance program analysis with cession optimization, pricing, and counterparty evaluation. Use when analyzing reinsurance, optimizing cession structures, or evaluating reinsurer credit.

Teams using managing-reinsurance-programs should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/managing-reinsurance-programs/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/finance/managing-reinsurance-programs/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/managing-reinsurance-programs/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How managing-reinsurance-programs Compares

Feature / Agentmanaging-reinsurance-programsStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Structures reinsurance program analysis with cession optimization, pricing, and counterparty evaluation. Use when analyzing reinsurance, optimizing cession structures, or evaluating reinsurer credit.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Managing Reinsurance Programs

## When To Use

- Analyzing an existing reinsurance program for renewal strategy or restructuring
- Optimizing cession structures across quota share, surplus, excess-of-loss, and catastrophe layers
- Evaluating reinsurer counterparty credit quality and concentration risk
- Pricing treaty or facultative placements and comparing broker submissions
- Assessing net retained risk positions after cessions and retrocessions
- Preparing reinsurance program summaries for board, rating agency, or regulatory review

## Inputs To Gather

- **Current treaty/facultative schedule**: All active reinsurance contracts with attachment points, limits, rates, and reinstatement provisions
- **Loss history**: At least 5–10 years of gross and net incurred/paid loss triangles by line of business
- **Exposure data**: Premium volume, policy counts, PMLs (probable maximum losses), and aggregate exposure by geography/peril
- **Counterparty information**: Reinsurer names, AM Best / S&P / Fitch ratings, collateral arrangements, and outstanding recoverables
- **Pricing indications**: Broker market submissions, rate-on-line quotes, and sliding-scale commission terms
- **Regulatory/rating constraints**: RBC requirements, rating agency capital model outputs, and jurisdictional cession limits [VERIFY]
- **Retrocession details**: Any retro covers purchased by reinsurers that affect credit assessment

## Workflow

1. **Map the current program**
   - Diagram each layer: proportional (quota share, surplus) and non-proportional (per-risk XOL, catastrophe XOL, aggregate stop-loss)
   - Record attachment points, co-participation, limits, reinstatement terms, and sunset/commutation clauses
   - Identify gaps or overlaps between layers and any uncovered exposure corridors

2. **Analyze cession efficiency**
   - Calculate cession ratios by line of business and compare to peer benchmarks
   - Model net retained volatility under current structure using historical and stochastic loss scenarios
   - Evaluate whether proportional vs. non-proportional mix appropriately balances earnings stability against cost of risk transfer
   - Test alternative structures: higher retentions, aggregate deductibles, multi-year deals, or indexed triggers

3. **Assess counterparty credit and concentration**
   - Review each reinsurer's financial strength rating and trend (stable, positive, negative outlook)
   - Calculate single-reinsurer and top-5-reinsurer concentration as a percentage of total ceded premium and recoverable balances
   - Evaluate collateral adequacy: letters of credit, trust accounts, funds-withheld arrangements
   - Flag any reinsurer on regulatory watch lists or with disputed balances [VERIFY]

4. **Price and benchmark layers**
   - Compute rate-on-line (ROL), rate-on-line adjusted for reinstatements, and expected loss ratio for each layer
   - Compare current pricing to catastrophe model output (e.g., AIR, RMS, Verisk) expected losses and historical burn cost
   - Evaluate sliding-scale and profit-sharing commissions for proportional treaties — model commission outcomes under different loss scenarios
   - Benchmark against market indices (Guy Carpenter ROL Index, Gallagher Re rate monitors) where available

5. **Model net retained position**
   - Run deterministic and stochastic scenarios (1-in-100, 1-in-250 return periods) on the net retained book
   - Calculate impact on RBC ratio, rating agency capital adequacy, and economic capital metrics
   - Stress-test for adverse development: reserve deterioration, clash events, correlated catastrophe losses
   - Quantify earnings-at-risk and capital-at-risk with and without proposed program changes

6. **Formulate renewal/restructuring recommendations**
   - Rank alternative structures by cost efficiency (cost of reinsurance per unit of volatility reduction)
   - Identify optimal retention levels balancing premium retention, capital relief, and tail-risk protection
   - Recommend reinsurer panel adjustments based on credit quality, pricing, and relationship value
   - Outline transition plan if restructuring mid-term (commutation mechanics, notice periods)

## Output

- **Program summary table**: Layer-by-layer breakdown showing type, attachment, limit, rate, reinsurer panel, and ratings
- **Cession optimization analysis**: Current vs. proposed structures with modeled net retained loss distributions
- **Counterparty scorecard**: Each reinsurer rated on financial strength, collateral, claims-paying history, and concentration share
- **Pricing comparison matrix**: ROL, expected loss, and margin analysis across layers and competing submissions
- **Net retained risk profile**: Capital adequacy metrics, earnings volatility, and tail-risk exposure under recommended structure
- **Executive recommendation memo**: Board-ready summary with key trade-offs, cost impacts, and action items for renewal

## Quality Checks

- Verify all attachment points and limits sum correctly with no unintended gaps between layers
- Confirm loss data used for pricing is developed to ultimate and adjusted for trend/IBNR
- Cross-check reinsurer ratings against the most recent agency publications — ratings can change quarterly [VERIFY]
- Ensure cession ratios comply with jurisdictional limits (e.g., credit-for-reinsurance statutes, authorized vs. unauthorized reinsurer rules) [VERIFY]
- Validate that collateral requirements satisfy domiciliary state regulations for non-admitted reinsurers [VERIFY]
- Confirm reinstatement premium calculations match contract language (pro-rata as to time, pro-rata as to amount, or both)
- Flag any assumptions about correlation between perils or lines of business in stochastic models — document model limitations explicitly

Related Skills

We are still matching the closest adjacent skills for this page. In the meantime, continue through the full directory.