modeling-event-driven-trading-analysis
Analyzes event-driven opportunities with catalyst identification, pricing efficiency assessment, and risk/reward evaluation. Use when analyzing event-driven situations, evaluating catalysts, or assessing event timing.
Best use case
modeling-event-driven-trading-analysis is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Analyzes event-driven opportunities with catalyst identification, pricing efficiency assessment, and risk/reward evaluation. Use when analyzing event-driven situations, evaluating catalysts, or assessing event timing.
Teams using modeling-event-driven-trading-analysis should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/modeling-event-driven-trading-analysis/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How modeling-event-driven-trading-analysis Compares
| Feature / Agent | modeling-event-driven-trading-analysis | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Analyzes event-driven opportunities with catalyst identification, pricing efficiency assessment, and risk/reward evaluation. Use when analyzing event-driven situations, evaluating catalysts, or assessing event timing.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Modeling Event Driven Trading Analysis ## When To Use - Evaluating M&A arbitrage spreads (merger arb, tender offers, spin-offs) - Analyzing corporate actions as catalysts (earnings, restructurings, dividend changes, share buybacks) - Assessing regulatory or legal event outcomes (FDA decisions, antitrust rulings, litigation verdicts) - Pricing event-driven situations where a discrete catalyst will resolve pricing uncertainty within a known timeframe - Screening for mispriced optionality around scheduled or anticipated corporate/macro events ## Inputs To Gather - **Event specification**: Type of event, expected date or date range, involved entities, and deal/event terms - **Security data**: Current price, implied volatility, options chain (if applicable), historical price action around prior similar events, short interest, borrow cost - **Deal/event terms**: Consideration offered (cash, stock, mixed), conditions precedent, regulatory approvals required, breakup/termination fees [VERIFY deal terms against latest proxy/filing] - **Comparable precedents**: Historical completion rates for similar event types, typical timeline from announcement to close, historical spread behavior - **Market microstructure**: Liquidity profile, bid-ask spreads, average daily volume, institutional ownership concentration - **Risk factors**: Identified deal/event risks—antitrust, financing contingencies, shareholder vote thresholds, MAC clauses ## Workflow 1. **Classify the event type and define the scenario tree** - Identify the primary catalyst (e.g., merger close, FDA approval, earnings surprise) - Map discrete outcomes: success/close, failure/break, modified terms, delayed timeline - Assign initial probability estimates to each branch based on precedent data 2. **Establish pricing under each scenario** - For M&A: calculate deal-close value (offer price adjusted for proration, collar, CVR), break price (standalone or re-rate target) - For binary events (FDA, litigation): estimate upside and downside price targets using comps, DCF, or historical event-day moves - For earnings/guidance: model beat/miss/inline scenarios with magnitude estimates anchored to consensus dispersion 3. **Compute expected value and spread analysis** - Calculate probability-weighted expected return across scenarios - Annualize the gross spread for time-value comparison: `Annualized Return = (Gross Spread / Current Price) × (365 / Days to Close)` - Compare annualized return to cost of capital, financing costs, and borrow costs for short legs 4. **Assess risk/reward asymmetry** - Calculate downside-to-upside ratio: `D/U = |Break Loss| / |Deal Gain|` - Determine implied probability of completion priced into the current spread: `Implied Prob = Downside / (Downside + Upside)` - Compare implied probability to your estimated probability—identify edge or lack thereof 5. **Model timing and carry dynamics** - Estimate timeline to resolution with confidence intervals - Calculate carry cost: financing, borrow fees, dividend differentials, opportunity cost - Stress-test returns under delayed-close scenarios (e.g., +30, +60, +90 days) 6. **Run sensitivity analysis** - Vary completion probability (±10–20%) and observe impact on expected return - Vary break price (±5–15% from base case) to capture valuation uncertainty - Test portfolio-level impact if running multiple event positions simultaneously 7. **Construct position sizing and hedging framework** - Size based on Kelly criterion or fractional-Kelly given confidence level - Identify hedging instruments: put spreads for downside, index hedges for systematic risk, pairs for sector exposure - Define stop-loss triggers tied to fundamental milestones (e.g., regulatory objection, financing withdrawal) rather than arbitrary price levels ## Output - **Event summary table**: Event type, key dates, involved parties, current spread, implied probability - **Scenario matrix**: Each outcome branch with probability, target price, return, and annualized return - **Expected value calculation**: Probability-weighted return, edge vs. implied market pricing - **Risk metrics**: Downside/upside ratio, max loss, carry cost per month, breakeven hold period - **Sensitivity tables**: Return sensitivity to probability changes, break-price changes, and timeline delays - **Position recommendation**: Suggested sizing, entry levels, hedge structure, and catalyst-driven exit triggers ## Quality Checks - Implied probability derived from the spread must be internally consistent with the scenario prices used - Annualized returns must account for actual expected days-to-close, not just announced target date - Break price estimates should be supported by at least two independent methods (comps, pre-announcement price, DCF) - Verify all deal terms against the most recent SEC filing or equivalent disclosure [VERIFY] - Confirm borrow availability and cost for any short legs before finalizing the model [VERIFY] - Cross-check event timeline against regulatory calendars (e.g., HSR waiting periods, FDA PDUFA dates) [VERIFY] - Flag any position where gross spread is less than 2× estimated carry cost as marginal - Ensure scenario probabilities sum to 100% and no outcome branch is omitted