preparing-fund-valuation-reports
Structures fund NAV reporting with investment-level valuations, methodology disclosure, and fair value hierarchy classification. Use when preparing NAV reports, documenting valuation methodology, or presenting fair value analysis.
Best use case
preparing-fund-valuation-reports is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Structures fund NAV reporting with investment-level valuations, methodology disclosure, and fair value hierarchy classification. Use when preparing NAV reports, documenting valuation methodology, or presenting fair value analysis.
Teams using preparing-fund-valuation-reports should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/preparing-fund-valuation-reports/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How preparing-fund-valuation-reports Compares
| Feature / Agent | preparing-fund-valuation-reports | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Structures fund NAV reporting with investment-level valuations, methodology disclosure, and fair value hierarchy classification. Use when preparing NAV reports, documenting valuation methodology, or presenting fair value analysis.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Preparing Fund Valuation Reports Structures fund NAV reporting with investment-level valuations, methodology disclosure, and fair value hierarchy classification. ## When To Use - Preparing quarterly or annual NAV statements for LP distribution - Documenting valuation methodology for auditor or advisory committee review - Classifying portfolio holdings across the ASC 820 / IFRS 13 fair value hierarchy - Responding to LP requests for investment-level valuation detail - Onboarding a new fund administrator and establishing valuation report templates ## Inputs To Gather - **Portfolio schedule**: Current holdings with cost basis, ownership percentage, investment date, and instrument type (equity, debt, convertible, warrant) - **Valuation data by investment**: Most recent marks, comparable transaction multiples, DCF assumptions, or third-party appraisals - **Prior-period NAV report**: Previous valuations for roll-forward and change commentary - **Fund terms**: Management fee calculation basis, carried interest waterfall parameters, hurdle rate, catch-up provisions - **Fair value hierarchy classifications**: Existing Level 1 / 2 / 3 designations and any reclassification events - **Valuation policy**: Fund's adopted valuation policy, including frequency, governance approvals, and permitted methodologies - **Fee and expense data**: Accrued management fees, fund expenses, organizational costs, and any fee offsets or waivers - **LP commitment schedule**: Committed capital, called capital, unfunded commitments, and distributions to date per LP ## Workflow 1. **Validate source data** — Reconcile the portfolio schedule against the general ledger. Confirm every holding has a current-period valuation input. Flag any investment missing a mark or carrying a stale valuation (>90 days without update) with [VERIFY]. 2. **Classify fair value hierarchy** — Assign each investment to Level 1 (quoted prices in active markets), Level 2 (observable inputs such as comparable company multiples or recent transaction prices), or Level 3 (unobservable inputs such as DCF models or management estimates). Document the primary valuation technique and key inputs for each Level 3 holding. 3. **Build the investment-level valuation table** — For each holding, present: - Company/asset name, instrument type, and acquisition date - Cost basis and current fair value - Valuation methodology (market approach, income approach, or cost approach) - Key assumptions (e.g., revenue multiple of 8.2x applied to LTM revenue; discount rate of 12%) - Unrealized gain/loss and percentage change from prior period 4. **Calculate fund-level NAV** — Sum investment fair values, add cash and receivables, subtract accrued fees, expenses, and payables. Present the NAV roll-forward: beginning NAV → contributions → distributions → realized gains/losses → change in unrealized → expenses → ending NAV. 5. **Prepare methodology disclosure** — Draft a narrative section covering: - Valuation policy summary and governance (e.g., quarterly valuation committee approval) - Description of each methodology used and when it applies - Significant assumptions and sensitivity for material Level 3 positions - Any changes in methodology from prior period and rationale 6. **Compute per-LP allocations** — Apply the waterfall provisions from the LPA to allocate NAV across LP classes. Show each LP's share of NAV, unrealized carry accrual, and management fee charges. [VERIFY] waterfall mechanics against the specific LPA terms. 7. **Draft the report package** — Assemble into standard sections: - Executive summary with headline NAV, period-over-period change, and key drivers - Investment-level valuation schedule - Fair value hierarchy summary table (aggregate by level with percentage of total) - NAV roll-forward bridge - Methodology and assumptions disclosure - LP allocation schedule (if included in the distribution package) ## Output The final deliverable is a fund valuation report containing: - **NAV summary**: Total fund NAV, NAV per unit/share, and comparison to prior period - **Investment schedule**: Line-item valuations with methodology, key inputs, and fair value hierarchy level - **Fair value hierarchy table**: Aggregate amounts at Level 1, 2, and 3 with transfers between levels noted - **Roll-forward bridge**: Beginning-to-ending NAV reconciliation - **Methodology narrative**: Plain-language disclosure of valuation approaches and material assumptions - **LP allocation table** (where applicable): Per-LP NAV, carry accrual, and fee detail Format as a structured report suitable for LP quarterly letters, advisory committee materials, or auditor work papers. ## Quality Checks - Every investment in the portfolio schedule appears in the valuation table — no orphaned or omitted positions - Fair value hierarchy levels are consistent with the valuation inputs actually used (e.g., a DCF-only valuation must not be classified as Level 2) - NAV roll-forward reconciles to the ending investment schedule total within rounding tolerance - Management fee and expense accruals tie to the fund's fee terms and accounting records - Prior-period comparisons use the same methodology unless a change is explicitly disclosed - Sensitivity analysis is provided for any Level 3 position exceeding 10% of total NAV - [VERIFY] compliance with ASC 820 / IFRS 13 disclosure requirements based on the fund's reporting framework - [VERIFY] LP allocation waterfall against the governing LPA, side letters, and any fee arrangement modifications