structuring-infrastructure-fund-terms
Designs infrastructure fund structures with longer fund lives, NAV-based distributions, and co-investment programs for illiquid assets. Use when structuring infra funds, designing open-ended vehicles, or analyzing infrastructure fund terms.
Best use case
structuring-infrastructure-fund-terms is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Designs infrastructure fund structures with longer fund lives, NAV-based distributions, and co-investment programs for illiquid assets. Use when structuring infra funds, designing open-ended vehicles, or analyzing infrastructure fund terms.
Teams using structuring-infrastructure-fund-terms should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/structuring-infrastructure-fund-terms/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How structuring-infrastructure-fund-terms Compares
| Feature / Agent | structuring-infrastructure-fund-terms | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Designs infrastructure fund structures with longer fund lives, NAV-based distributions, and co-investment programs for illiquid assets. Use when structuring infra funds, designing open-ended vehicles, or analyzing infrastructure fund terms.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Structuring Infrastructure Fund Terms Designs infrastructure fund structures with longer fund lives, NAV-based distributions, and co-investment programs for illiquid assets. ## When To Use - Structuring a new closed-end or open-end infrastructure fund (greenfield, brownfield, or core/core-plus) - Designing fund life, extension, and recycling provisions for long-duration assets (toll roads, airports, utilities, renewables) - Setting NAV-based distribution waterfalls, preferred return mechanics, or hybrid carried-interest structures - Building co-investment and sidecar vehicle terms alongside a main fund - Benchmarking proposed LP terms against market norms for infrastructure vintages - Evaluating GP commitment, fee structures, and alignment mechanisms for infrastructure mandates ## Inputs To Gather - **Fund strategy and asset profile**: Core/core-plus/value-add/opportunistic; target sectors (transport, energy, digital, social); greenfield vs. brownfield mix; geography - **Target fund size and LP base**: Anchor LP requirements, sovereign wealth fund or pension mandates, minimum ticket sizes - **Fund life parameters**: Proposed investment period, fund term, number and length of extensions, recycling rights - **Return targets**: Target net IRR, cash yield expectations, preferred return rate, catch-up and carried interest split - **Fee structure inputs**: Management fee basis (committed vs. invested capital), step-down schedule, transaction/monitoring fee offsets - **Co-investment program scope**: Allocation policy, fee/carry treatment for co-investors, sidecar structuring preferences - **Distribution preferences**: Cash vs. in-kind, NAV-based redemption mechanics (for open-end), distribution frequency, reinvestment elections - **Regulatory and tax constraints**: Domicile jurisdiction, AIFMD/SEC registration status, tax-exempt LP structuring needs, UBTI/ECI considerations [VERIFY] ## Workflow 1. **Classify strategy and vehicle type** - Determine closed-end vs. open-end vs. semi-liquid structure based on asset duration and LP liquidity needs - For closed-end: set investment period (typically 3–5 years for infra), fund term (12–15+ years with extensions), and recycling parameters - For open-end: define subscription/redemption windows, lock-up periods (commonly 1–3 years), redemption queue mechanics, and NAV calculation methodology 2. **Design the economic waterfall** - Set preferred return (typically 6–8% for core infra; 8–10% for value-add) [VERIFY against current market] - Structure carry: standard 80/20 after pref with GP catch-up, or tiered carry (e.g., 10% carry to 12% IRR, 20% above) - Decide whole-fund vs. deal-by-deal carry — whole-fund is market standard for infra given long hold periods - Define distribution policy: quarterly cash distributions from yield-generating assets vs. lumpy capital gains on exits - For NAV-based vehicles: specify NAV calculation frequency, independent valuation cadence, and distribution-per-unit mechanics 3. **Set fee terms** - Management fee: typically 1.25–1.75% on committed capital during investment period, stepping down to invested capital or lower rate post-investment period [VERIFY market benchmarks] - Address fee offsets: 80–100% offset of transaction, monitoring, and directors' fees against management fees - Organizational expense cap: market range $2–5M depending on fund size - Define GP commitment: typically 2–5% of total commitments; specify whether funded in cash or via management fee waiver 4. **Structure co-investment and sidecar terms** - Allocation policy: pro-rata vs. discretionary; minimum deal size thresholds for offering co-invest - Fee and carry on co-investments: no-fee/no-carry is LP expectation for most infra co-invest; document exceptions - Sidecar vehicles: define governance, information rights, and transfer restrictions - Address conflicts: specify how GP resolves allocation between main fund, co-invest vehicles, and successor funds 5. **Draft governance and LP protections** - LPAC composition, quorum, and scope of authority (conflicts, valuation, extensions, key-person events) - Key-person provisions: identify named individuals, define trigger consequences (investment period suspension vs. cause event) - No-fault removal and dissolution rights: supermajority thresholds (typically 66.7–75%) - Excuse and exclusion rights for regulatory or legal restrictions (important for sovereign and public pension LPs) - ESG/sustainability reporting commitments — increasingly expected for infra funds (SFDR classification, GRESB participation) [VERIFY applicable framework] 6. **Address infrastructure-specific provisions** - Recycling rights: specify what proceeds may be reinvested (return of cost only vs. cost plus realized gains), time limits, and aggregate cap - Concentration limits: per-asset, per-sector, per-geography caps - Leverage limits: fund-level subscription lines and asset-level project finance parameters - Valuation methodology: DCF-based with independent appraiser; define frequency (quarterly marks, annual full valuation) - Insurance and force majeure provisions relevant to physical asset portfolios ## Output Deliver a structured infrastructure fund terms report containing: - **Executive summary**: Fund strategy, target size, vehicle type, and key economic terms at a glance - **Fund structure and life**: Vehicle type, domicile, term, extensions, investment period, recycling - **Economics table**: Preferred return, carry structure, management fees, GP commitment, fee offsets — presented in a comparison format against market benchmarks where available - **Distribution mechanics**: Waterfall diagram or step-through, NAV-based distribution details if applicable - **Co-investment program**: Allocation policy, fee/carry treatment, sidecar structure summary - **Governance framework**: LPAC terms, key-person, removal rights, reporting obligations - **Infrastructure-specific terms**: Concentration limits, leverage parameters, valuation approach, recycling - **Open items and negotiation points**: Flag terms where GP/LP positions typically diverge with suggested ranges ## Quality Checks - Confirm waterfall math is internally consistent — preferred return, catch-up, and carry percentages must produce correct splits at sample return scenarios - Verify fee step-down triggers align with investment period end and any extension mechanics - Ensure co-investment allocation policy does not conflict with main fund concentration limits - Check that fund life and extension provisions give adequate runway given typical infra asset hold periods (7–15 years per asset) - Confirm NAV calculation and distribution mechanics are consistent (e.g., no conflict between quarterly distributions and semi-annual NAV) - Validate that GP commitment and clawback provisions are sufficient to maintain alignment - Mark all jurisdiction-dependent items (tax structuring, regulatory classification, ESG framework) with [VERIFY] - Cross-check proposed terms against ILPA principles and current infra fund market standards