summary-judgment-motion

Drafts a Motion for Summary Judgment package for personal injury litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalent. Trigger when the user needs an MSJ, summary judgment brief, dispositive motion, no-genuine-dispute motion, or judgment-as-a-matter-of-law motion during pre-trial or discovery phases.

11 stars

Best use case

summary-judgment-motion is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Drafts a Motion for Summary Judgment package for personal injury litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalent. Trigger when the user needs an MSJ, summary judgment brief, dispositive motion, no-genuine-dispute motion, or judgment-as-a-matter-of-law motion during pre-trial or discovery phases.

Teams using summary-judgment-motion should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/summary-judgment-motion/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/summary-judgment-motion/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/summary-judgment-motion/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How summary-judgment-motion Compares

Feature / Agentsummary-judgment-motionStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Drafts a Motion for Summary Judgment package for personal injury litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalent. Trigger when the user needs an MSJ, summary judgment brief, dispositive motion, no-genuine-dispute motion, or judgment-as-a-matter-of-law motion during pre-trial or discovery phases.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Motion for Summary Judgment

Produces a complete MSJ filing package showing no genuine dispute of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law under FRCP 56 or state equivalent.

## Prerequisites

Collect before drafting:

1. **Complaint & Answer** — all claims/defenses at issue
2. **Discovery record** — depositions, interrogatory responses, RFAs, document productions with Bates numbers
3. **Jurisdiction & local rules** — page limits, separate-statement requirements, briefing schedule, formatting
4. **Contracts/policies** — if breach or coverage claims involved
5. **Expert reports** — if needed for causation, damages, or standard of care

## Filing Package Components

### 1. Caption & Notice of Motion

Include: full court name, case title (all parties per operative pleading), case number, document title ("Motion for Summary Judgment" or "Partial"), exact claims/counts sought, FRCP 56 or state rule citation, hearing date if required, and list of supporting documents.

### 2. Memorandum of Points and Authorities

Draft in this order:

1. **Introduction** (1–2 paragraphs) — parties, claims, why MSJ is warranted
2. **Statement of the Case** — procedural history + factual background with record citations
3. **Legal Standard** — cite the trilogy plus controlling circuit/state authority:
   - *Celotex Corp. v. Catrett*, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)
   - *Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.*, 477 U.S. 242 (1986)
   - *Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.*, 475 U.S. 574 (1986)
4. **Argument** — per claim/defense: identify elements under governing law → map to undisputed evidence → show opponent lacks evidence for genuine dispute → address counterarguments → cite analogous MSJ grants with parentheticals
5. **Conclusion** — restate entitlement, request specific relief

### 3. Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (SUF)

Numbered paragraphs. Each fact must be a single discrete assertion, material to an element, with pinpoint citation to admissible evidence.

Citation formats:

| Type | Format |
|------|--------|
| Deposition | [Name] Dep. [page]:[line]–[line] |
| Interrogatory | [Party] Resp. to Interrog. No. [#], at [page] |
| Document | [Description], [Bates range] or Ex. [letter] |
| RFA | [Party] Resp. to RFA No. [#] |
| Declaration | [Name] Decl. ¶ [#] |

Cross-check every fact against source documents for accuracy of quotes, dates, and figures.

### 4. Supporting Declarations

Each declaration must: open with personal-knowledge/competency statement; contain only direct-knowledge facts (no conclusions, speculation, or "information and belief"); authenticate exhibits by reference; close with perjury declaration for the relevant jurisdiction.

Draft for: moving party, percipient witnesses, expert witnesses (if applicable), custodian of records.

### 5. Proposed Order

1–2 pages: grants MSJ on specified claims/counts, states no-genuine-dispute finding, directs judgment entry or identifies remaining claims (if partial), includes signature line per local rules.

### 6. Signature Block & Certifications

Attorney identification (name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email), certificate of service, word-count certification (if required), meet-and-confer certification (if required).

## Critical Checks

- **Viewing standard**: present all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, then show judgment is still compelled
- **Admissibility gate**: every cited item must be trial-admissible — authenticate documents, verify personal-knowledge basis, apply hearsay rules
- **Pinpoint citations**: never cite depositions or documents generally; always include page, line, or Bates number
- **Bluebook format**: use Bluebook unless local rules specify otherwise
- **Local rule compliance**: verify page limits, font/margins, separate-statement format, and jurisdiction-specific MSJ procedures before finalizing
- **Partial MSJ**: clearly delineate which claims are addressed vs. which remain for trial
- **PI element mapping**: for personal injury claims, map evidence to duty, breach, causation (actual + proximate), and damages — causation and damages are the most common genuine-dispute battlegrounds

Related Skills

managing-range-of-motion-assessments

11
from CaseMark/skills

Documents goniometric measurements with active/passive ROM and comparison to normative values. Use when measuring joint ROM, documenting mobility assessments, or tracking ROM progress.

witness-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured summaries of witness statements for litigation, extracting chronological narratives, key facts, credibility indicators, and evidentiary value. Use when summarizing depositions, declarations, affidavits, or witness testimony during discovery, pre-trial, or trial preparation.

verdict-judgment-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured post-trial verdict and judgment analysis memoranda for commercial litigation. Triggers when summarizing a jury verdict, bench trial decision, post-trial motion assessment, or appellate viability review. Covers liability determinations, damages breakdowns, critical rulings, and post-trial strategy.

urban-planning-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Summarizes legal issues in urban development projects covering zoning, land use disputes, and environmental compliance. Generates structured briefings for municipalities, developers, and legal counsel. Use when reviewing zoning ordinances, land use applications, environmental impact statements, or comprehensive plans before development or planning decisions.

trial-prep-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates a structured courtroom-ready trial preparation summary synthesizing procedural history, facts, legal issues, evidence, witnesses, and strategy into a quick-reference document. Trigger when preparing trial binders, pre-trial review documents, courtroom reference materials, or trial strategy memos in commercial litigation.

traffic-enforcement-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured summaries of traffic law enforcement data covering DUI metrics, violation trends, enforcement outcomes, and resource allocation. Use when analyzing citation records, arrest statistics, violation reports, or preparing public safety strategic planning documents for law enforcement leadership.

trade-law-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured U.S.-focused international trade law summaries covering tariffs, customs, export controls, sanctions, trade remedies, and trade agreements. Triggers when asked for international trade law summaries, tariff/customs analysis, export controls, sanctions guidance, WTO/GATT, USMCA, ITAR, EAR, OFAC, or import/export compliance updates.

telecom-law-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates executive-level summaries of recent US telecommunications law developments covering spectrum rights, network access, privacy, infrastructure, and enforcement. Structures analysis by topic with compliance deadlines and business impact. Use when briefing counsel, regulatory teams, or executives on FCC rulemakings, net neutrality, CPNI, 5G deployment, robocall enforcement, or the broader telecom legal landscape.

tax-summary-spousal-support

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured financial summaries from tax returns, W-2s, 1099s, K-1s, and business filings for spousal support proceedings. Trigger when preparing income analyses for alimony discovery, settlement negotiations, pre-trial, or court filings in family law matters.

tax-return-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured, citation-backed summaries of tax returns (Form 1040, schedules, W-2s, 1099s) for divorce, personal injury, and bankruptcy litigation. Extracts income sources, deductions, credits, and flags anomalies. Use when summarizing tax returns, analyzing financial discovery, assessing earning capacity, reviewing 1040s, or preparing financial profiles for litigation.

summary-judgment

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured summaries of summary judgment motions, orders, and decisions. Use when the user needs to summarize an MSJ ruling, prepare a case status report, evaluate appeal posture, or brief a client on a dispositive motion outcome.

summary-judgment-brief

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts FRCP 56 summary judgment motion briefs for U.S. commercial litigation. Synthesizes discovery evidence with controlling authority to show no genuine dispute of material fact. Use when drafting MSJ briefs, dispositive motions, or partial summary judgment papers post-discovery.