witness-prep-ethics

Evaluates witness preparation activities for ethical compliance under ABA Formal Opinion 508 and Model Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.4. Distinguishes permissible preparation from prohibited coaching. Use when planning deposition or trial prep, reviewing proposed prep activities, or checking witness coaching ethics. Triggers: witness prep, deposition prep, coaching ethics, ABA 508, testimony preparation.

11 stars

Best use case

witness-prep-ethics is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Evaluates witness preparation activities for ethical compliance under ABA Formal Opinion 508 and Model Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.4. Distinguishes permissible preparation from prohibited coaching. Use when planning deposition or trial prep, reviewing proposed prep activities, or checking witness coaching ethics. Triggers: witness prep, deposition prep, coaching ethics, ABA 508, testimony preparation.

Teams using witness-prep-ethics should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/witness-prep-ethics/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/witness-prep-ethics/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/witness-prep-ethics/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How witness-prep-ethics Compares

Feature / Agentwitness-prep-ethicsStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Evaluates witness preparation activities for ethical compliance under ABA Formal Opinion 508 and Model Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.4. Distinguishes permissible preparation from prohibited coaching. Use when planning deposition or trial prep, reviewing proposed prep activities, or checking witness coaching ethics. Triggers: witness prep, deposition prep, coaching ethics, ABA 508, testimony preparation.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Witness Preparation Ethics Boundaries

Defines lawful witness preparation boundaries and compliance workflow under ABA guidance and Model Rules. Core principle: preparation is expected, but truth is the touchstone—genuine recollection must be preserved.

## Prerequisites

1. Jurisdiction and governing ethics rules (state bar, local court orders).
2. Witness type and setting (fact or expert; deposition, hearing, trial).
3. Core materials: pleadings, key documents, prior statements, discovery responses.
4. Any in-court communication limits (Geders, Perry).

## Authority Baseline

| Source | Constraint |
|---|---|
| Model Rule 3.3 | No false evidence or testimony (candor to tribunal) |
| Model Rule 3.4 | No falsifying evidence or counseling false testimony |
| Model Rule 8.4 | No dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation |
| ABA Formal Op. 508 (2023) | Preparation expected but must preserve genuine recollection |
| Restatement (Third) Law Governing Lawyers §116 | Preparation allowed; no coaching to fabricate or alter |
| Local ethics opinions | Follow stricter local rule when applicable |

## Permissible vs. Prohibited

| Area | Permissible | Prohibited |
|---|---|---|
| Procedure | Explain mechanics, oath, objections, transcript | — |
| Documents | Review to refresh recollection | Use documents to override memory |
| Recollection | Ask what witness remembers; test basis and confidence | Supply facts or fill gaps |
| Legal relevance | Explain claims and why topics matter | Instruct how to shape testimony |
| Anticipated topics | Identify likely areas; practice Q&A | Provide preferred answers |
| Expression | Suggest clearer wording; avoid jargon | Change substance by rephrasing |
| Demeanor | Advise calm, listen fully, ask for clarification | — |
| Coordination | Prepare witnesses separately | Align stories across witnesses |

## Session Workflow

1. State purpose: truthful, complete testimony is required.
2. Cover procedure and demeanor guidance.
3. Review documents to refresh memory, then test recollection.
4. Elicit narrative in witness's own words.
5. Practice anticipated topics with neutral prompts.
6. Correct clarity issues without changing substance.
7. Run ethics checklist; obtain witness confirmation.

## Unfavorable Recollection Protocol

**Required:** Accept recollection as stated. Advise truthful testimony. Adjust case strategy.

**Allowed:** Explore basis and confidence level. Check for question misunderstanding. Review documents to test memory without pressure.

**Forbidden:** Pressure to change truthful recollection. Suggest recollection is wrong because harmful. Coach to minimize or hide unfavorable facts.

## Gray-Area Tests

- After document review, does witness have present recollection or only adoption of the document?
- Are you clarifying expression without changing substance?
- Are you explaining legal relevance without instructing how to answer?
- Would you be comfortable with the prep transcript before a disciplinary committee?

## Ethics Checklist

Permissible:
- [ ] Explain procedure and roles
- [ ] Review documents to refresh memory
- [ ] Ask witness to describe recollection
- [ ] Explain legal significance of topics
- [ ] Identify anticipated topics and practice questions
- [ ] Suggest clearer expression of witness's own recollection
- [ ] Advise on demeanor and non-substantive behavior

Prohibited:
- [ ] Suggest facts the witness does not recall
- [ ] Tell the witness what happened
- [ ] Coach false or misleading testimony
- [ ] Share other witnesses' testimony to align stories
- [ ] Pressure witness to change truthful testimony
- [ ] Use documents to override genuine recollection

## Neutral Prompt Templates

```text
"Tell me what you remember about [event]."
"What is the basis for that memory?"
"Does this document refresh your recollection, or are you relying only on what it says?"
"Please answer in your own words, even if the answer is not helpful to our case."
"If you do not know or do not recall, say so."
```

## Guidelines

- Apply the stricter rule when state or local guidance is more restrictive.
- Never show or summarize other witnesses' testimony to a witness.
- If you know testimony is false, follow Model Rule 3.3 remediation duties.
- Document preparation steps to show compliance if challenged.

## Cross-References

- `deposition-witness-prep-session`
- `deposition-deponent-coaching`
- `deposition-preparation`

Related Skills

preparing-transfer-summaries

11
from CaseMark/skills

Creates comprehensive transfer documentation for ICU-to-floor or facility-to-facility transitions. Use when transferring patients between units, preparing transfer notes, or coordinating level-of-care changes.

managing-emergency-preparedness

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures public health emergency preparedness with hazard vulnerability and response planning. Use when planning emergency preparedness, conducting vulnerability assessments, or developing response plans.

witness-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured summaries of witness statements for litigation, extracting chronological narratives, key facts, credibility indicators, and evidentiary value. Use when summarizing depositions, declarations, affidavits, or witness testimony during discovery, pre-trial, or trial preparation.

witness-prep

11
from CaseMark/skills

Guides attorneys through deposition witness preparation using a two-session model with document review, practice examination, and day-of logistics. Covers party witnesses, fact witnesses, 30(b)(6) corporate representatives, and experts. Produces preparation memos, document review lists, topic summaries, and day-of checklists. Enforces ABA Opinion 508 ethical boundaries. Use when preparing any witness for deposition, scheduling prep sessions, or building witness preparation materials.

witness-prep-session

11
from CaseMark/skills

Runs ethics-compliant deposition witness-prep workflows for US civil litigation. Use when preparing party, fact, expert, or 30(b)(6) witnesses for deposition, including mock cross-examination, exhibit review, vulnerability mapping, day-of logistics, and post-deposition debrief. Covers intake through deposition day under FRCP 30.

trial-prep-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates a structured courtroom-ready trial preparation summary synthesizing procedural history, facts, legal issues, evidence, witnesses, and strategy into a quick-reference document. Trigger when preparing trial binders, pre-trial review documents, courtroom reference materials, or trial strategy memos in commercial litigation.

hearing-prep

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured hearing preparation briefings from case documents, evidence, authorities, and procedural details. Use when preparing for court hearings, administrative hearings, arbitrations, trials, motion hearings, evidentiary hearings, or status conferences.

hearing-prep-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces a quick-reference hearing preparation summary synthesizing pleadings, evidence, witnesses, and governing law into issue matrices, exhibit cross-references, and procedural checklists. Use when preparing for motion hearings, evidentiary hearings, trials, administrative or arbitration hearings, or when asked for "hearing prep," "trial prep summary," "hearing brief," or "prep memo."

expert-witness-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured, citation-anchored summaries of expert witness reports for depositions, hearings, and trial preparation. Distills qualifications, methodology, opinions, assumptions, and quantitative findings into a navigable reference. Use when summarizing expert witness reports, retained expert disclosures, or rebuttal expert reports in US litigation.

expert-witness-report-analysis

11
from CaseMark/skills

Critiques opposing expert witness reports for admissibility challenges, disclosure deficiencies, and cross-examination vulnerabilities. Triggers when the user provides an expert report for analysis, needs Daubert/Frye assessment, requests a motion to exclude or limit expert testimony, or prepares deposition or trial cross-examination of an opposing expert.

expert-witness-omissions

11
from CaseMark/skills

Identifies medical records an expert witness failed to review, cite, or address by cross-referencing the expert's materials-reviewed list against the full case record set. Produces a tiered omissions register, methodology critique, bias analysis, and strategic recommendations for cross-examination and exclusion motions. Use in personal injury or medical malpractice litigation when challenging or defending expert credibility during discovery, pre-trial, or trial preparation.

expert-witness-impeachment

11
from CaseMark/skills

Analyzes expert witness materials (reports, depositions, CVs, publications) to identify inconsistencies, opinion drift, and methodological failures for impeachment. Produces a prioritized inconsistency register, cross-examination questions, and Daubert/Frye challenge assessment. Use when challenging expert reliability or credibility during discovery, pre-trial, or trial in commercial litigation.