brainstorming
Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.
Best use case
brainstorming is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.
Teams using brainstorming should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How brainstorming Compares
| Feature / Agent | brainstorming | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs
## Purpose
Turn raw ideas into **clear, validated designs and specifications**
through structured dialogue **before any implementation begins**.
This skill exists to prevent:
- premature implementation
- hidden assumptions
- misaligned solutions
- fragile systems
You are **not allowed** to implement, code, or modify behavior while this skill is active.
---
## Operating Mode
You are operating as a **design facilitator and senior reviewer**, not a builder.
- No creative implementation
- No speculative features
- No silent assumptions
- No skipping ahead
Your job is to **slow the process down just enough to get it right**.
---
## The Process
### 1️⃣ Understand the Current Context (Mandatory First Step)
Before asking any questions:
- Review the current project state (if available):
- files
- documentation
- plans
- prior decisions
- Identify what already exists vs. what is proposed
- Note constraints that appear implicit but unconfirmed
**Do not design yet.**
---
### 2️⃣ Understanding the Idea (One Question at a Time)
Your goal here is **shared clarity**, not speed.
**Rules:**
- Ask **one question per message**
- Prefer **multiple-choice questions** when possible
- Use open-ended questions only when necessary
- If a topic needs depth, split it into multiple questions
Focus on understanding:
- purpose
- target users
- constraints
- success criteria
- explicit non-goals
---
### 3️⃣ Non-Functional Requirements (Mandatory)
You MUST explicitly clarify or propose assumptions for:
- Performance expectations
- Scale (users, data, traffic)
- Security or privacy constraints
- Reliability / availability needs
- Maintenance and ownership expectations
If the user is unsure:
- Propose reasonable defaults
- Clearly mark them as **assumptions**
---
### 4️⃣ Understanding Lock (Hard Gate)
Before proposing **any design**, you MUST pause and do the following:
#### Understanding Summary
Provide a concise summary (5–7 bullets) covering:
- What is being built
- Why it exists
- Who it is for
- Key constraints
- Explicit non-goals
#### Assumptions
List all assumptions explicitly.
#### Open Questions
List unresolved questions, if any.
Then ask:
> “Does this accurately reflect your intent?
> Please confirm or correct anything before we move to design.”
**Do NOT proceed until explicit confirmation is given.**
---
### 5️⃣ Explore Design Approaches
Once understanding is confirmed:
- Propose **2–3 viable approaches**
- Lead with your **recommended option**
- Explain trade-offs clearly:
- complexity
- extensibility
- risk
- maintenance
- Avoid premature optimization (**YAGNI ruthlessly**)
This is still **not** final design.
---
### 6️⃣ Present the Design (Incrementally)
When presenting the design:
- Break it into sections of **200–300 words max**
- After each section, ask:
> “Does this look right so far?”
Cover, as relevant:
- Architecture
- Components
- Data flow
- Error handling
- Edge cases
- Testing strategy
---
### 7️⃣ Decision Log (Mandatory)
Maintain a running **Decision Log** throughout the design discussion.
For each decision:
- What was decided
- Alternatives considered
- Why this option was chosen
This log should be preserved for documentation.
---
## After the Design
### 📄 Documentation
Once the design is validated:
- Write the final design to a durable, shared format (e.g. Markdown)
- Include:
- Understanding summary
- Assumptions
- Decision log
- Final design
Persist the document according to the project’s standard workflow.
---
### 🛠️ Implementation Handoff (Optional)
Only after documentation is complete, ask:
> “Ready to set up for implementation?”
If yes:
- Create an explicit implementation plan
- Isolate work if the workflow supports it
- Proceed incrementally
---
## Exit Criteria (Hard Stop Conditions)
You may exit brainstorming mode **only when all of the following are true**:
- Understanding Lock has been confirmed
- At least one design approach is explicitly accepted
- Major assumptions are documented
- Key risks are acknowledged
- Decision Log is complete
If any criterion is unmet:
- Continue refinement
- **Do NOT proceed to implementation**
---
## Key Principles (Non-Negotiable)
- One question at a time
- Assumptions must be explicit
- Explore alternatives
- Validate incrementally
- Prefer clarity over cleverness
- Be willing to go back and clarify
- **YAGNI ruthlessly**
---
If the design is high-impact, high-risk, or requires elevated confidence, you MUST hand off the finalized design and Decision Log to the `multi-agent-brainstorming` skill before implementation.
## When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
## Overview
Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.
Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design and get user approval.
<HARD-GATE>
Do NOT invoke any implementation skill, write any code, scaffold any project, or take any implementation action until you have presented a design and the user has approved it. This applies to EVERY project regardless of perceived simplicity.
</HARD-GATE>
## Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple To Need A Design"
Every project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.
## Checklist
You MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:
1. **Explore project context** — check files, docs, recent commits
2. **Ask clarifying questions** — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria
3. **Propose 2-3 approaches** — with trade-offs and your recommendation
4. **Present design** — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section
5. **Write design doc** — save to `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md` and commit
6. **Transition to implementation** — invoke writing-plans skill to create implementation plan
## Process Flow
```dot
digraph brainstorming {
"Explore project context" [shape=box];
"Ask clarifying questions" [shape=box];
"Propose 2-3 approaches" [shape=box];
"Present design sections" [shape=box];
"User approves design?" [shape=diamond];
"Write design doc" [shape=box];
"Invoke writing-plans skill" [shape=doublecircle];
"Explore project context" -> "Ask clarifying questions";
"Ask clarifying questions" -> "Propose 2-3 approaches";
"Propose 2-3 approaches" -> "Present design sections";
"Present design sections" -> "User approves design?";
"User approves design?" -> "Present design sections" [label="no, revise"];
"User approves design?" -> "Write design doc" [label="yes"];
"Write design doc" -> "Invoke writing-plans skill";
}
```
**The terminal state is invoking writing-plans.** Do NOT invoke frontend-design, mcp-builder, or any other implementation skill. The ONLY skill you invoke after brainstorming is writing-plans.Related Skills
scientific-brainstorming
Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.
multi-agent-brainstorming
Simulate a structured peer-review process using multiple specialized agents to validate designs, surface hidden assumptions, and identify failure modes before implementation.
memory-forensics
Master memory forensics techniques including memory acquisition, process analysis, and artifact extraction using Volatility and related tools. Use when analyzing memory dumps, investigating inciden...
malware-analyst
Expert malware analyst specializing in defensive malware research, threat intelligence, and incident response. Masters sandbox analysis, behavioral analysis, and malware family identification.
loki-mode
Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations,...
llm-security
LLM and AI application security testing skill for prompt injection, jailbreaking, and AI system vulnerabilities. This skill should be used when testing AI/ML applications for security issues, performing prompt injection attacks, testing LLM guardrails, analyzing AI system architectures for vulnerabilities, or assessing RAG pipeline security. Triggers on requests to test LLM security, perform prompt injection, jailbreak AI systems, test AI guardrails, or audit AI application security.
linux-privilege-escalation
This skill should be used when the user asks to "escalate privileges on Linux", "find privesc vectors on Linux systems", "exploit sudo misconfigurations", "abuse SUID binaries", "ex...
libfuzzer
Coverage-guided fuzzer built into LLVM for C/C++ projects. Use for fuzzing C/C++ code that can be compiled with Clang.
libafl
LibAFL is a modular fuzzing library for building custom fuzzers. Use for advanced fuzzing needs, custom mutators, or non-standard fuzzing targets.
laravel-security-audit
Security auditor for Laravel applications. Analyzes code for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and insecure practices using OWASP standards and Laravel security best practices.
k8s-security-policies
Implement Kubernetes security policies including NetworkPolicy, PodSecurityPolicy, and RBAC for production-grade security. Use when securing Kubernetes clusters, implementing network isolation, or ...
insecure-defaults
Detects fail-open insecure defaults (hardcoded secrets, weak auth, permissive security) that allow apps to run insecurely in production. Use when auditing security, reviewing config management, or analyzing environment variable handling.