jira-task

Creates Jira tasks following Prowler's standard format. Trigger: When user asks to create a Jira task, ticket, or issue.

23 stars

Best use case

jira-task is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Creates Jira tasks following Prowler's standard format. Trigger: When user asks to create a Jira task, ticket, or issue.

Teams using jira-task should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/jira-task/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/christophacham/agent-skills-library/main/skills/business/jira-task/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/jira-task/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How jira-task Compares

Feature / Agentjira-taskStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Creates Jira tasks following Prowler's standard format. Trigger: When user asks to create a Jira task, ticket, or issue.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

## When to Use

Use this skill when creating Jira tasks for:
- Bug reports
- Feature requests
- Refactoring tasks
- Documentation tasks

## Multi-Component Work: Split into Multiple Tasks

**IMPORTANT:** When work requires changes in multiple components (API, UI, SDK), create **separate tasks for each component** instead of one big task.

### Why Split?
- Different developers can work in parallel
- Easier to review and test
- Better tracking of progress
- API needs to be done before UI (dependency)

### Bug vs Feature: Different Structures

#### For BUGS: Create separate sibling tasks
Bugs are typically urgent fixes, so create independent tasks per component:

**Task 1 - API:**
- Title: `[BUG] Add aws_region field to AWS provider secrets (API)`
- Must be done first (UI depends on it)

**Task 2 - UI:**
- Title: `[BUG] Add region selector to AWS provider connection form (UI)`
- Blocked by API task

#### For FEATURES: Create parent + child tasks
Features need business context for stakeholders, so use a parent-child structure:

**Parent Task (for PM/Stakeholders):**
- Title: `[FEATURE] AWS GovCloud support`
- Contains: Feature overview, user story, acceptance criteria from USER perspective
- NO technical details
- Links to child tasks

**Child Task 1 - API:**
- Title: `[FEATURE] AWS GovCloud support (API)`
- Contains: Technical details, affected files, API-specific acceptance criteria
- Links to parent

**Child Task 2 - UI:**
- Title: `[FEATURE] AWS GovCloud support (UI)`
- Contains: Technical details, component paths, UI-specific acceptance criteria
- Links to parent, blocked by API task

### Parent Task Template (Features Only)

```markdown
## Description

{User-facing description of the feature - what problem does it solve?}

## User Story

As a {user type}, I want to {action} so that {benefit}.

## Acceptance Criteria (User Perspective)

- [ ] User can {do something}
- [ ] User sees {something}
- [ ] {Behavior from user's point of view}

## Out of Scope

- {What this feature does NOT include}

## Design

- Figma: {link if available}
- Screenshots/mockups if available

## Child Tasks

- [ ] `[FEATURE] {Feature name} (API)` - Backend implementation
- [ ] `[FEATURE] {Feature name} (UI)` - Frontend implementation

## Priority

{High/Medium/Low} ({business justification})
```

### Child Task Template (Features Only)

```markdown
## Description

Technical implementation of {feature name} for {component}.

## Parent Task

`[FEATURE] {Feature name}`

## Acceptance Criteria (Technical)

- [ ] {Technical requirement 1}
- [ ] {Technical requirement 2}

## Technical Notes

- Affected files:
  - `{file path 1}`
  - `{file path 2}`
- {Implementation hints}

## Testing

- [ ] {Test case 1}
- [ ] {Test case 2}

## Related Tasks

- Parent: `[FEATURE] {Feature name}`
- Blocked by: {if any}
- Blocks: {if any}
```

### Linking Tasks

In each task description, add:
```markdown
## Related Tasks
- Parent: [Parent task title/link] (for child tasks)
- Blocked by: [API task title/link]
- Blocks: [UI task title/link]
```

## Task Template

```markdown
## Description

{Brief explanation of the problem or feature request}

**Current State:**
- {What's happening now / What's broken}
- {Impact on users}

**Expected State:**
- {What should happen}
- {Desired behavior}

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] {Specific, testable requirement}
- [ ] {Another requirement}
- [ ] {Include both API and UI tasks if applicable}

## Technical Notes

- {Implementation hints}
- {Affected files with full paths}
- {Dependencies or related components}

## Testing

- [ ] {Test case 1}
- [ ] {Test case 2}
- [ ] {Include regression tests}

## Priority

{High/Medium/Low} ({justification})
```

## Title Conventions

Format: `[TYPE] Brief description (components)`

**Types:**
- `[BUG]` - Something broken that worked before
- `[FEATURE]` - New functionality
- `[ENHANCEMENT]` - Improvement to existing feature
- `[REFACTOR]` - Code restructure without behavior change
- `[DOCS]` - Documentation only
- `[CHORE]` - Maintenance, dependencies, CI/CD

**Components (when multiple affected):**
- `(API)` - Backend only
- `(UI)` - Frontend only
- `(SDK)` - Prowler SDK only
- `(API + UI)` - Both backend and frontend
- `(SDK + API)` - SDK and backend
- `(Full Stack)` - All components

**Examples:**
- `[BUG] AWS GovCloud accounts cannot connect - STS region hardcoded (API + UI)`
- `[FEATURE] Add dark mode toggle (UI)`
- `[REFACTOR] Migrate E2E tests to Page Object Model (UI)`
- `[ENHANCEMENT] Improve scan performance for large accounts (SDK)`

## Priority Guidelines

| Priority | Criteria |
|----------|----------|
| **Critical** | Production down, data loss, security vulnerability |
| **High** | Blocks users, no workaround, affects paid features |
| **Medium** | Has workaround, affects subset of users |
| **Low** | Nice to have, cosmetic, internal tooling |

## Affected Files Section

Always include full paths when known:

```markdown
## Technical Notes

- Affected files:
  - `api/src/backend/api/v1/serializers.py`
  - `ui/components/providers/workflow/forms/aws-credentials-form.tsx`
  - `prowler/providers/aws/config.py`
```

## Component-Specific Sections

### API Tasks
Include:
- Serializer changes
- View/ViewSet changes
- Migration requirements
- API spec regeneration needs

### UI Tasks
Include:
- Component paths
- Form validation changes
- State management impact
- Responsive design considerations

### SDK Tasks
Include:
- Provider affected
- Service affected
- Check changes
- Config changes

## Checklist Before Submitting

1. ✅ Title follows `[TYPE] description (components)` format
2. ✅ Description has Current/Expected State
3. ✅ Acceptance Criteria are specific and testable
4. ✅ Technical Notes include file paths
5. ✅ Testing section covers happy path + edge cases
6. ✅ Priority has justification
7. ✅ **Multi-component work is split into separate tasks**
8. ✅ **Titles are recommended for all tasks**

## Output Format

### For BUGS (sibling tasks):

```markdown
## Recommended Tasks

### Task 1: [BUG] {Description} (API)
{Full task content}

---

### Task 2: [BUG] {Description} (UI)
{Full task content}
```

### For FEATURES (parent + children):

```markdown
## Recommended Tasks

### Parent Task: [FEATURE] {Feature name}
{User-facing content, no technical details}

---

### Child Task 1: [FEATURE] {Feature name} (API)
{Technical content for API team}

---

### Child Task 2: [FEATURE] {Feature name} (UI)
{Technical content for UI team}
```

## Formatting Rules

**CRITICAL:** All output MUST be in Markdown format, ready to paste into Jira.

- Use `##` for main sections (Description, Acceptance Criteria, etc.)
- Use `**bold**` for emphasis
- Use `- [ ]` for checkboxes
- Use ``` for code blocks with language hints
- Use `backticks` for file paths, commands, and code references
- Use tables where appropriate
- Use `---` to separate multiple tasks

## Jira MCP Integration

**CRITICAL:** When creating tasks via MCP, use these exact parameters:

### Required Fields

```json
{
  "project_key": "PROWLER",
  "summary": "[TYPE] Task title (component)",
  "issue_type": "Task",
  "additional_fields": {
    "parent": "PROWLER-XXX",
    "customfield_10359": {"value": "UI"}
  }
}
```

### Team Field (REQUIRED)

The `customfield_10359` (Team) field is **REQUIRED**. Options:
- `"UI"` - Frontend tasks
- `"API"` - Backend tasks
- `"SDK"` - Prowler SDK tasks

### Work Item Description Field

**IMPORTANT:** The project uses `customfield_10363` (Work Item Description) instead of the standard `description` field for display in the UI.

**CRITICAL:** Use **Jira Wiki markup**, NOT Markdown:
- `h2.` instead of `##`
- `*text*` for bold instead of `**text**`
- `* item` for bullets (same)
- `** subitem` for nested bullets

After creating the issue, update the description with:

```json
{
  "customfield_10363": "h2. Description\n\n{content}\n\n*Current State:*\n* {problem 1}\n* {problem 2}\n\n*Expected State:*\n* {solution 1}\n* {solution 2}\n\nh2. Acceptance Criteria\n\n* {criteria 1}\n* {criteria 2}\n\nh2. Technical Notes\n\nPR: [{pr_url}]\n\nAffected files:\n* {file 1}\n* {file 2}\n\nh2. Testing\n\n* [ ] PR - Local environment\n** {test case 1}\n** {test case 2}\n* [ ] After merge in prowler - dev\n** {test case 3}"
}
```

### Common Epics

| Epic | Key | Use For |
|------|-----|---------|
| UI - Bugs & Improvements | PROWLER-193 | UI bugs, enhancements |
| API - Bugs / Improvements | PROWLER-XXX | API bugs, enhancements |
| LightHouse AI | PROWLER-594 | AI features |
| Technical Debt - UI | PROWLER-502 | Refactoring |

### Workflow Transitions

```
Backlog (10037) → To Do (14) → In Progress (11) → Done (21)
                → Blocked (10)
```

### MCP Commands Sequence

1. **Create issue:**
```
mcp__mcp-atlassian__jira_create_issue
```

2. **Update Work Item Description:**
```
mcp__mcp-atlassian__jira_update_issue with customfield_10363
```

3. **Assign and transition:**
```
mcp__mcp-atlassian__jira_update_issue (assignee)
mcp__mcp-atlassian__jira_transition_issue (status)
```

## Keywords
jira, task, ticket, issue, bug, feature, prowler

Related Skills

jira-issues

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Create, update, and manage Jira issues from natural language. Use when the user wants to log bugs, create tickets, update issue status, or manage their Jira backlog.

jira-epic

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Creates Jira epics for large features following Prowler's standard format. Trigger: When user asks to create an epic, large feature, or multi-task initiative.

jira-cli

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Interact with Jira from the command line to create, list, view, edit, and transition issues, manage sprints and epics, and perform common Jira workflows. Use when the user asks about Jira tasks, tickets, issues, sprints, or needs to manage project work items.

jira-assistant

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Manage Jira issues via Atlassian MCP — search, create, update, transition status, and handle sprint tasks. Auto-detects workspace configuration. Use when user says "create a Jira ticket", "update my sprint", "check Jira status", "transition this issue", "search Jira", or "move ticket to done". Do NOT use for Confluence pages (use confluence-assistant).

jira-automation

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Automate Jira tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): issues, projects, sprints, boards, comments, users. Always search tools first for current schemas.

googletasks-automation

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Automate Google Tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): create, list, update, delete, move, and bulk-insert tasks and task lists. Always search tools first for current schemas.

event-store-design

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Design and implement event stores for event-sourced systems. Use when building event sourcing infrastructure, choosing event store technologies, or implementing event persistence patterns.

etetoolkit

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Phylogenetic tree toolkit (ETE). Tree manipulation (Newick/NHX), evolutionary event detection, orthology/paralogy, NCBI taxonomy, visualization (PDF/SVG), for phylogenomics.

environment-setup-guide

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Guide developers through setting up development environments with proper tools, dependencies, and configurations

drift-analysis

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Use when the user asks about plan drift, reality check, comparing docs to code, project state analysis, roadmap alignment, implementation gaps, or needs guidance on identifying discrepancies between documented plans and actual implementation state.

dotnet-design-pattern-review

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Review the C#/.NET code for design pattern implementation and suggest improvements.

designing-workflow-skills

23
from christophacham/agent-skills-library

Guides the design and structuring of workflow-based Claude Code skills with multi-step phases, decision trees, subagent delegation, and progressive disclosure. Use when creating skills that involve sequential pipelines, routing patterns, safety gates, task tracking, phased execution, or any multi-step workflow. Also applies when reviewing or refactoring existing workflow skills for quality.