pentest-checklist
This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan a penetration test", "create a security assessment checklist", "prepare for penetration testing", "define pentest scope", "foll...
Best use case
pentest-checklist is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan a penetration test", "create a security assessment checklist", "prepare for penetration testing", "define pentest scope", "foll...
Teams using pentest-checklist should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/pentest-checklist/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How pentest-checklist Compares
| Feature / Agent | pentest-checklist | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan a penetration test", "create a security assessment checklist", "prepare for penetration testing", "define pentest scope", "foll...
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Pentest Checklist ## Purpose Provide a comprehensive checklist for planning, executing, and following up on penetration tests. Ensure thorough preparation, proper scoping, and effective remediation of discovered vulnerabilities. ## Inputs/Prerequisites - Clear business objectives for testing - Target environment information - Budget and timeline constraints - Stakeholder contacts and authorization - Legal agreements and scope documents ## Outputs/Deliverables - Defined pentest scope and objectives - Prepared testing environment - Security monitoring data - Vulnerability findings report - Remediation plan and verification ## Core Workflow ### Phase 1: Scope Definition #### Define Objectives - [ ] **Clarify testing purpose** - Determine goals (find vulnerabilities, compliance, customer assurance) - [ ] **Validate pentest necessity** - Ensure penetration test is the right solution - [ ] **Align outcomes with objectives** - Define success criteria **Reference Questions:** - Why are you doing this pentest? - What specific outcomes do you expect? - What will you do with the findings? #### Know Your Test Types | Type | Purpose | Scope | |------|---------|-------| | External Pentest | Assess external attack surface | Public-facing systems | | Internal Pentest | Assess insider threat risk | Internal network | | Web Application | Find application vulnerabilities | Specific applications | | Social Engineering | Test human security | Employees, processes | | Red Team | Full adversary simulation | Entire organization | #### Enumerate Likely Threats - [ ] **Identify high-risk areas** - Where could damage occur? - [ ] **Assess data sensitivity** - What data could be compromised? - [ ] **Review legacy systems** - Old systems often have vulnerabilities - [ ] **Map critical assets** - Prioritize testing targets #### Define Scope - [ ] **List in-scope systems** - IPs, domains, applications - [ ] **Define out-of-scope items** - Systems to avoid - [ ] **Set testing boundaries** - What techniques are allowed? - [ ] **Document exclusions** - Third-party systems, production data #### Budget Planning | Factor | Consideration | |--------|---------------| | Asset Value | Higher value = higher investment | | Complexity | More systems = more time | | Depth Required | Thorough testing costs more | | Reputation Value | Brand-name firms cost more | **Budget Reality Check:** - Cheap pentests often produce poor results - Align budget with asset criticality - Consider ongoing vs. one-time testing ### Phase 2: Environment Preparation #### Prepare Test Environment - [ ] **Production vs. staging decision** - Determine where to test - [ ] **Set testing limits** - No DoS on production - [ ] **Schedule testing window** - Minimize business impact - [ ] **Create test accounts** - Provide appropriate access levels **Environment Options:** ``` Production - Realistic but risky Staging - Safer but may differ from production Clone - Ideal but resource-intensive ``` #### Run Preliminary Scans - [ ] **Execute vulnerability scanners** - Find known issues first - [ ] **Fix obvious vulnerabilities** - Don't waste pentest time - [ ] **Document existing issues** - Share with testers **Common Pre-Scan Tools:** ```bash # Network vulnerability scan nmap -sV --script vuln TARGET # Web vulnerability scan nikto -h http://TARGET ``` #### Review Security Policy - [ ] **Verify compliance requirements** - GDPR, PCI-DSS, HIPAA - [ ] **Document data handling rules** - Sensitive data procedures - [ ] **Confirm legal authorization** - Get written permission #### Notify Hosting Provider - [ ] **Check provider policies** - What testing is allowed? - [ ] **Submit authorization requests** - AWS, Azure, GCP requirements - [ ] **Document approvals** - Keep records **Cloud Provider Policies:** - AWS: https://aws.amazon.com/security/penetration-testing/ - Azure: https://docs.microsoft.com/security/pentest - GCP: https://cloud.google.com/security/overview #### Freeze Developments - [ ] **Stop deployments during testing** - Maintain consistent environment - [ ] **Document current versions** - Record system states - [ ] **Avoid critical patches** - Unless security emergency ### Phase 3: Expertise Selection #### Find Qualified Pentesters - [ ] **Seek recommendations** - Ask trusted sources - [ ] **Verify credentials** - OSCP, GPEN, CEH, CREST - [ ] **Check references** - Talk to previous clients - [ ] **Match expertise to scope** - Web, network, mobile specialists **Evaluation Criteria:** | Factor | Questions to Ask | |--------|------------------| | Experience | Years in field, similar projects | | Methodology | OWASP, PTES, custom approach | | Reporting | Sample reports, detail level | | Communication | Availability, update frequency | #### Define Methodology - [ ] **Select testing standard** - PTES, OWASP, NIST - [ ] **Determine access level** - Black box, gray box, white box - [ ] **Agree on techniques** - Manual vs. automated testing - [ ] **Set communication schedule** - Updates and escalation **Testing Approaches:** | Type | Access Level | Simulates | |------|-------------|-----------| | Black Box | No information | External attacker | | Gray Box | Partial access | Insider with limited access | | White Box | Full access | Insider/detailed audit | #### Define Report Format - [ ] **Review sample reports** - Ensure quality meets needs - [ ] **Specify required sections** - Executive summary, technical details - [ ] **Request machine-readable output** - CSV, XML for tracking - [ ] **Agree on risk ratings** - CVSS, custom scale **Report Should Include:** - Executive summary for management - Technical findings with evidence - Risk ratings and prioritization - Remediation recommendations - Retesting guidance ### Phase 4: Monitoring #### Implement Security Monitoring - [ ] **Deploy IDS/IPS** - Intrusion detection systems - [ ] **Enable logging** - Comprehensive audit trails - [ ] **Configure SIEM** - Centralized log analysis - [ ] **Set up alerting** - Real-time notifications **Monitoring Tools:** ```bash # Check security logs tail -f /var/log/auth.log tail -f /var/log/apache2/access.log # Monitor network tcpdump -i eth0 -w capture.pcap ``` #### Configure Logging - [ ] **Centralize logs** - Aggregate from all systems - [ ] **Set retention periods** - Keep logs for analysis - [ ] **Enable detailed logging** - Application and system level - [ ] **Test log collection** - Verify all sources working **Key Logs to Monitor:** - Authentication events - Application errors - Network connections - File access - System changes #### Monitor Exception Tools - [ ] **Track error rates** - Unusual spikes indicate testing - [ ] **Brief operations team** - Distinguish testing from attacks - [ ] **Document baseline** - Normal vs. pentest activity #### Watch Security Tools - [ ] **Review IDS alerts** - Separate pentest from real attacks - [ ] **Monitor WAF logs** - Track blocked attempts - [ ] **Check endpoint protection** - Antivirus detections ### Phase 5: Remediation #### Ensure Backups - [ ] **Verify backup integrity** - Test restoration - [ ] **Document recovery procedures** - Know how to restore - [ ] **Separate backup access** - Protect from testing #### Reserve Remediation Time - [ ] **Allocate team availability** - Post-pentest analysis - [ ] **Schedule fix implementation** - Address findings - [ ] **Plan verification testing** - Confirm fixes work #### Patch During Testing Policy - [ ] **Generally avoid patching** - Maintain consistent environment - [ ] **Exception for critical issues** - Security emergencies only - [ ] **Communicate changes** - Inform pentesters of any changes #### Cleanup Procedure - [ ] **Remove test artifacts** - Backdoors, scripts, files - [ ] **Delete test accounts** - Remove pentester access - [ ] **Restore configurations** - Return to original state - [ ] **Verify cleanup complete** - Audit all changes #### Schedule Next Pentest - [ ] **Determine frequency** - Annual, quarterly, after changes - [ ] **Consider continuous testing** - Bug bounty, ongoing assessments - [ ] **Budget for future tests** - Plan ahead **Testing Frequency Factors:** - Release frequency - Regulatory requirements - Risk tolerance - Past findings severity ## Quick Reference ### Pre-Pentest Checklist ``` □ Scope defined and documented □ Authorization obtained □ Environment prepared □ Hosting provider notified □ Team briefed □ Monitoring enabled □ Backups verified ``` ### Post-Pentest Checklist ``` □ Report received and reviewed □ Findings prioritized □ Remediation assigned □ Fixes implemented □ Verification testing scheduled □ Environment cleaned up □ Next test scheduled ``` ## Constraints - Production testing carries inherent risks - Budget limitations affect thoroughness - Time constraints may limit coverage - Tester expertise varies significantly - Findings become stale quickly ## Examples ### Example 1: Quick Scope Definition ```markdown **Target:** Corporate web application (app.company.com) **Type:** Gray box web application pentest **Duration:** 5 business days **Excluded:** DoS testing, production database access **Access:** Standard user account provided ``` ### Example 2: Monitoring Setup ```bash # Enable comprehensive logging sudo systemctl restart rsyslog sudo systemctl restart auditd # Start packet capture tcpdump -i eth0 -w /tmp/pentest_capture.pcap & ``` ## Troubleshooting | Issue | Solution | |-------|----------| | Scope creep | Document and require change approval | | Testing impacts production | Schedule off-hours, use staging | | Findings disputed | Provide detailed evidence, retest | | Remediation delayed | Prioritize by risk, set deadlines | | Budget exceeded | Define clear scope, fixed-price contracts | ## When to Use This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Related Skills
pentest-commands
This skill should be used when the user asks to "run pentest commands", "scan with nmap", "use metasploit exploits", "crack passwords with hydra or john", "scan web vulnerabilities ...
sqlmap-database-pentesting
This skill should be used when the user asks to "automate SQL injection testing," "enumerate database structure," "extract database credentials using sqlmap," "dump tables and columns...
code-review-checklist
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability
web-design-guidelines
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices". Focuses on visual design and interaction patterns. Do NOT use for performance audits (use core-web-vitals), SEO (use seo), or comprehensive site audits (use web-quality-audit).
web-browse
Browse and interact with web pages headlessly. Use when agent needs to navigate websites, click elements, fill forms, read content, or take screenshots.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state ma...
accessibility
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible". Do NOT use for SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive site audits covering multiple areas (use web-quality-audit).
vueuse-functions
Apply VueUse composables where appropriate to build concise, maintainable Vue.js / Nuxt features.
vue
Vue 3 Composition API, script setup macros, reactivity system, and built-in components. Use when writing Vue SFCs, defineProps/defineEmits/defineModel, watchers, or using Transition/Teleport/Suspense/KeepAlive.
vue-testing-best-practices
Use for Vue.js testing. Covers Vitest, Vue Test Utils, component testing, mocking, testing patterns, and Playwright for E2E testing.
vue-router-best-practices
Vue Router 4 patterns, navigation guards, route params, and route-component lifecycle interactions.
vue-best-practices
MUST be used for Vue.js tasks. Strongly recommends Composition API with `<script setup>` and TypeScript as the standard approach. Covers Vue 3, SSR, Volar, vue-tsc. Load for any Vue, .vue files, Vue Router, Pinia, or Vite with Vue work. ALWAYS use Composition API unless the project explicitly requires Options API.