code-review-assistant
Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation. Provides detailed feedback with auto-fix suggestions and merge readiness assessment.
Best use case
code-review-assistant is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation. Provides detailed feedback with auto-fix suggestions and merge readiness assessment.
Teams using code-review-assistant should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/code-review-assistant/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How code-review-assistant Compares
| Feature / Agent | code-review-assistant | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation. Provides detailed feedback with auto-fix suggestions and merge readiness assessment.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
ChatGPT vs Claude for Agent Skills
Compare ChatGPT and Claude for AI agent skills across coding, writing, research, and reusable workflow execution.
SKILL.md Source
# Code Review Assistant
## Purpose
Automated comprehensive code review using specialized multi-agent swarm for PRs.
## Specialist Agent
I am a code review coordinator managing specialized review agents.
**Methodology** (Multi-Agent Swarm Review Pattern):
1. Initialize review swarm with specialized agents
2. Parallel comprehensive review (security, performance, style, tests, docs)
3. Run complete quality audit pipeline
4. Aggregate findings with severity ranking
5. Generate fix suggestions with Codex
6. Assess merge readiness with quality gates
7. Create detailed review comment
**Review Agents** (5 specialists):
- **Security Reviewer**: Vulnerabilities, unsafe patterns, secrets
- **Performance Analyst**: Bottlenecks, optimization opportunities
- **Style Reviewer**: Code style, best practices, maintainability
- **Test Specialist**: Test coverage, quality, edge cases
- **Documentation Reviewer**: Comments, API docs, README updates
## Input Contract
```yaml
input:
pr_number: number (required) or
changed_files: array[string] (file paths)
focus_areas: array[enum] (default: all)
- security
- performance
- style
- tests
- documentation
suggest_fixes: boolean (default: true)
auto_merge_if_passing: boolean (default: false)
```
## Output Contract
```yaml
output:
review_summary:
overall_score: number (0-100)
merge_ready: boolean
blocking_issues: number
warnings: number
suggestions: number
detailed_reviews:
security: object
performance: object
style: object
tests: object
documentation: object
fix_suggestions: array[code_change]
merge_decision: enum[approve, request_changes, needs_work]
```
## Execution Flow
```bash
#!/bin/bash
set -e
PR_NUMBER="$1"
FOCUS_AREAS="${2:-security,performance,style,tests,documentation}"
SUGGEST_FIXES="${3:-true}"
REVIEW_DIR="pr-review-$PR_NUMBER"
mkdir -p "$REVIEW_DIR"
echo "================================================================"
echo "Code Review Assistant: PR #$PR_NUMBER"
echo "================================================================"
# PHASE 1: PR Information Gathering
echo "[1/8] Gathering PR information..."
gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --json title,body,files,additions,deletions > "$REVIEW_DIR/pr-info.json"
PR_TITLE=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/pr-info.json" | jq -r '.title')
CHANGED_FILES=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/pr-info.json" | jq -r '.files[].path' | tr '\n' ' ')
echo "PR: $PR_TITLE"
echo "Files changed: $(echo $CHANGED_FILES | wc -w)"
# Checkout PR branch
gh pr checkout "$PR_NUMBER"
# PHASE 2: Initialize Review Swarm
echo "[2/8] Initializing multi-agent review swarm..."
npx claude-flow coordination swarm-init \
--topology mesh \
--max-agents 5 \
--strategy specialized
# Spawn specialized review agents
npx claude-flow automation auto-agent \
--task "Comprehensive code review of PR#$PR_NUMBER focusing on: $FOCUS_AREAS" \
--strategy optimal \
--max-agents 5
# PHASE 3: Parallel Specialized Reviews
echo "[3/8] Executing specialized reviews in parallel..."
# Security Review
if [[ "$FOCUS_AREAS" == *"security"* ]]; then
echo " → Security Specialist reviewing..."
npx claude-flow security-scan . \
--deep true \
--check-secrets true \
--output "$REVIEW_DIR/security-review.json" &
SEC_PID=$!
fi
# Performance Review
if [[ "$FOCUS_AREAS" == *"performance"* ]]; then
echo " → Performance Analyst reviewing..."
npx claude-flow analysis bottleneck-detect \
--threshold 10 \
--output "$REVIEW_DIR/performance-review.json" &
PERF_PID=$!
fi
# Style Review
if [[ "$FOCUS_AREAS" == *"style"* ]]; then
echo " → Style Reviewer checking..."
npx claude-flow style-audit . \
--fix false \
--output "$REVIEW_DIR/style-review.json" &
STYLE_PID=$!
fi
# Test Review
if [[ "$FOCUS_AREAS" == *"tests"* ]]; then
echo " → Test Specialist analyzing..."
npx claude-flow test-coverage . \
--detailed true \
--output "$REVIEW_DIR/test-review.json" &
TEST_PID=$!
fi
# Documentation Review
if [[ "$FOCUS_AREAS" == *"documentation"* ]]; then
echo " → Documentation Reviewer checking..."
# Check for README updates, JSDoc comments, etc.
npx claude-flow docs-checker . \
--output "$REVIEW_DIR/docs-review.json" &
DOCS_PID=$!
fi
# Wait for all reviews to complete
wait $SEC_PID $PERF_PID $STYLE_PID $TEST_PID $DOCS_PID 2>/dev/null || true
# PHASE 4: Complete Quality Audit
echo "[4/8] Running complete quality audit..."
npx claude-flow audit-pipeline . \
--phase all \
--model codex-auto \
--output "$REVIEW_DIR/quality-audit.json"
# PHASE 5: Aggregate Review Findings
echo "[5/8] Aggregating review findings..."
cat > "$REVIEW_DIR/aggregated-review.json" <<EOF
{
"pr_number": $PR_NUMBER,
"pr_title": "$PR_TITLE",
"reviews": {
"security": $(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/security-review.json" 2>/dev/null || echo "{}"),
"performance": $(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/performance-review.json" 2>/dev/null || echo "{}"),
"style": $(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/style-review.json" 2>/dev/null || echo "{}"),
"tests": $(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/test-review.json" 2>/dev/null || echo "{}"),
"documentation": $(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/docs-review.json" 2>/dev/null || echo "{}"),
"quality_audit": $(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/quality-audit.json")
}
}
EOF
# Calculate scores
SECURITY_SCORE=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/security-review.json" 2>/dev/null | jq '.score // 100')
PERF_SCORE=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/performance-review.json" 2>/dev/null | jq '.score // 100')
STYLE_SCORE=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/style-review.json" 2>/dev/null | jq '.quality_score // 100')
TEST_SCORE=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/test-review.json" 2>/dev/null | jq '.coverage_percent // 100')
QUALITY_SCORE=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/quality-audit.json" | jq '.overall_score // 100')
OVERALL_SCORE=$(echo "($SECURITY_SCORE + $PERF_SCORE + $STYLE_SCORE + $TEST_SCORE + $QUALITY_SCORE) / 5" | bc)
# PHASE 6: Generate Fix Suggestions
if [ "$SUGGEST_FIXES" = "true" ]; then
echo "[6/8] Generating fix suggestions with Codex..."
# Collect all issues
ISSUES=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/aggregated-review.json" | jq '[.reviews[] | .issues? // [] | .[]]')
if [ "$(echo $ISSUES | jq 'length')" -gt 0 ]; then
codex --reasoning-mode "Suggest fixes for code review issues" \
--context "$REVIEW_DIR/aggregated-review.json" \
--output "$REVIEW_DIR/fix-suggestions.md"
fi
fi
# PHASE 7: Assess Merge Readiness
echo "[7/8] Assessing merge readiness..."
CRITICAL_SECURITY=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/security-review.json" 2>/dev/null | jq '.critical_issues // 0')
TESTS_PASSING=$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/quality-audit.json" | jq '.functionality_audit.all_passed // false')
MERGE_READY="false"
MERGE_DECISION="request_changes"
if [ "$CRITICAL_SECURITY" -eq 0 ] && [ "$TESTS_PASSING" = "true" ] && [ "$OVERALL_SCORE" -ge 80 ]; then
MERGE_READY="true"
if [ "$OVERALL_SCORE" -ge 90 ]; then
MERGE_DECISION="approve"
else
MERGE_DECISION="approve_with_suggestions"
fi
fi
# PHASE 8: Create Review Comment
echo "[8/8] Creating review comment..."
cat > "$REVIEW_DIR/review-comment.md" <<EOF
# 🤖 Automated Code Review
**Overall Score**: $OVERALL_SCORE/100
**Merge Ready**: $([ "$MERGE_READY" = "true" ] && echo "✅ Yes" || echo "⚠️ No")
## Review Summary
| Category | Score | Status |
|----------|-------|--------|
| 🔒 Security | $SECURITY_SCORE/100 | $([ "$SECURITY_SCORE" -ge 80 ] && echo "✅" || echo "⚠️") |
| ⚡ Performance | $PERF_SCORE/100 | $([ "$PERF_SCORE" -ge 80 ] && echo "✅" || echo "⚠️") |
| 🎨 Style | $STYLE_SCORE/100 | $([ "$STYLE_SCORE" -ge 80 ] && echo "✅" || echo "⚠️") |
| 🧪 Tests | $TEST_SCORE/100 | $([ "$TEST_SCORE" -ge 80 ] && echo "✅" || echo "⚠️") |
| 📊 Quality | $QUALITY_SCORE/100 | $([ "$QUALITY_SCORE" -ge 80 ] && echo "✅" || echo "⚠️") |
## Detailed Findings
### 🔒 Security Review
$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/security-review.json" 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.summary // "No issues found ✅"')
### ⚡ Performance Review
$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/performance-review.json" 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.summary // "No bottlenecks detected ✅"')
### 🎨 Style Review
$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/style-review.json" 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.summary // "Code style looks good ✅"')
### 🧪 Test Review
- Test Coverage: $TEST_SCORE%
- All Tests Passing: $([ "$TESTS_PASSING" = "true" ] && echo "✅ Yes" || echo "❌ No")
## Fix Suggestions
$(cat "$REVIEW_DIR/fix-suggestions.md" 2>/dev/null || echo "No suggestions needed - code looks great! 🎉")
---
🤖 Generated by Claude Code Review Assistant
EOF
# Post review comment
gh pr comment "$PR_NUMBER" --body-file "$REVIEW_DIR/review-comment.md"
# Approve or request changes
if [ "$MERGE_DECISION" = "approve" ]; then
gh pr review "$PR_NUMBER" --approve --body "Code review passed! Overall score: $OVERALL_SCORE/100 ✅"
elif [ "$MERGE_DECISION" = "approve_with_suggestions" ]; then
gh pr review "$PR_NUMBER" --approve --body "Approved with suggestions. See detailed review comment. Score: $OVERALL_SCORE/100 ✅"
else
gh pr review "$PR_NUMBER" --request-changes --body "Please address review findings before merging. Score: $OVERALL_SCORE/100"
fi
echo ""
echo "================================================================"
echo "Code Review Complete!"
echo "================================================================"
echo ""
echo "Overall Score: $OVERALL_SCORE/100"
echo "Merge Ready: $MERGE_READY"
echo "Decision: $MERGE_DECISION"
echo ""
echo "Review artifacts in: $REVIEW_DIR/"
echo "Review comment posted to PR #$PR_NUMBER"
echo ""
```
## Integration Points
### Cascades
- Part of `/github-automation-workflow` cascade
- Used by `/pr-quality-gate` cascade
- Invoked by `/review-pr` command
### Commands
- Uses: `/swarm-init`, `/auto-agent`, `/security-scan`
- Uses: `/bottleneck-detect`, `/style-audit`, `/test-coverage`
- Uses: `/audit-pipeline`, `/codex-reasoning`
- Uses GitHub CLI: `gh pr view`, `gh pr checkout`, `gh pr comment`, `gh pr review`
### Other Skills
- Invokes: `quick-quality-check`, `smart-bug-fix` (if issues)
- Output to: `merge-decision-maker`, `pr-enhancer`
## Usage Example
```bash
# Review PR with all checks
code-review-assistant 123
# Review focusing on security
code-review-assistant 123 security
# Review with auto-merge
code-review-assistant 123 "security,tests" true --auto-merge true
```
## Failure Modes
- **PR not found**: Verify PR number and repository access
- **Critical security issues**: Block merge, escalate to security team
- **Tests failing**: Request changes, provide fix suggestions
- **GitHub CLI not authenticated**: Guide user to authenticateRelated Skills
Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill
Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.
performing-security-code-review
Execute this skill enables AI assistant to conduct a security-focused code review using the security-agent plugin. it analyzes code for potential vulnerabilities like sql injection, xss, authentication flaws, and insecure dependencies. AI assistant uses this skill wh... Use when assessing security or running audits. Trigger with phrases like 'security scan', 'audit', or 'vulnerability'.
iam-policy-reviewer
Iam Policy Reviewer - Auto-activating skill for Security Advanced. Triggers on: iam policy reviewer, iam policy reviewer Part of the Security Advanced skill category.
backlog-grooming-assistant
Backlog Grooming Assistant - Auto-activating skill for Enterprise Workflows. Triggers on: backlog grooming assistant, backlog grooming assistant Part of the Enterprise Workflows skill category.
reviewing-cli-command
Provides checklist for reviewing Typer CLI command implementations. Covers structure, Annotated syntax, error handling, exit codes, display module usage, destructive action patterns, and help text conventions. Use when user asks to review/check/verify a CLI command, wants feedback on implementation, or asks if a command follows best practices.
resume-assistant
智能简历助手,通过五个AI代理提供全流程求职支持:(1)故事挖掘-发现经历亮点;(2)职位推荐-匹配合适岗位;(3)简历优化-针对JD定制内容;(4)模拟面试-实战演练与反馈;(5)能力提升-差距分析与计划。适用于简历创建、优化、面试准备、职业规划等求职相关任务。
Paper Summary & Review Skill
## 功能描述
recipe-review-overdue-tasks
Find Google Tasks that are past due and need attention.
recipe-review-meet-participants
Review who attended a Google Meet conference and for how long.
persona-exec-assistant
Manage an executive's schedule, inbox, and communications.
web-design-reviewer
This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage, then performs fixes at the source code level.
sql-code-review
Universal SQL code review assistant that performs comprehensive security, maintainability, and code quality analysis across all SQL databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle). Focuses on SQL injection prevention, access control, code standards, and anti-pattern detection. Complements SQL optimization prompt for complete development coverage.