engineering-fundamentals
Auto-invoke for general code quality review. Enforces naming conventions, function size, DRY principles, SOLID principles, and code organization.
Best use case
engineering-fundamentals is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Auto-invoke for general code quality review. Enforces naming conventions, function size, DRY principles, SOLID principles, and code organization.
Teams using engineering-fundamentals should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/engineering-fundamentals/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How engineering-fundamentals Compares
| Feature / Agent | engineering-fundamentals | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Auto-invoke for general code quality review. Enforces naming conventions, function size, DRY principles, SOLID principles, and code organization.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
# Engineering Fundamentals Review
> "Code is read more than it is written. Write for the reader, not the machine."
## When to Apply
Activate this skill when reviewing:
- Any code changes
- Function and variable naming
- Code organization and structure
- General refactoring decisions
---
## Review Checklist
### Naming
- [ ] **Descriptive**: Can you understand the variable without context?
- [ ] **No abbreviations**: Are names spelled out? (`user` not `usr`)
- [ ] **No generic names**: No `data`, `temp`, `info`, `stuff`?
- [ ] **Boolean prefix**: Do booleans start with `is`, `has`, `can`, `should`?
- [ ] **Function verbs**: Do functions start with action verbs?
### Function Design
- [ ] **Single responsibility**: Does each function do ONE thing?
- [ ] **Size limit**: Are functions under 20-30 lines?
- [ ] **Parameter count**: Are there fewer than 4 parameters?
- [ ] **No side effects**: Are pure functions actually pure?
- [ ] **Early returns**: Are guard clauses used instead of deep nesting?
### Code Organization
- [ ] **DRY**: Is duplicated code extracted into functions?
- [ ] **But not too DRY**: Are abstractions justified (rule of three)?
- [ ] **Cohesion**: Are related things grouped together?
- [ ] **Separation**: Are unrelated things separated?
### Comments & Documentation
- [ ] **Why, not what**: Do comments explain reasoning, not obvious code?
- [ ] **No commented-out code**: Is dead code deleted, not commented?
- [ ] **JSDoc on public APIs**: Are exported functions documented?
---
## Common Mistakes (Anti-Patterns)
### 1. Magic Numbers
```
❌ if (status === 2) { ... }
setTimeout(callback, 86400000);
✅ const STATUS = { ACTIVE: 2, INACTIVE: 1 };
if (status === STATUS.ACTIVE) { ... }
const ONE_DAY_MS = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000;
setTimeout(callback, ONE_DAY_MS);
```
### 2. Unclear Naming
```
❌ const d = new Date();
const temp = getUser();
const flag = true;
✅ const createdAt = new Date();
const currentUser = getUser();
const isAuthenticated = true;
```
### 3. God Functions
```
❌ function processOrder(order) {
// 200 lines: validate, calculate, save, email, log...
}
✅ function processOrder(order) {
validateOrder(order);
const total = calculateTotal(order);
await saveOrder(order, total);
await sendConfirmationEmail(order);
logOrderProcessed(order);
}
```
### 4. Deep Nesting
```
❌ function check(user) {
if (user) {
if (user.active) {
if (user.role === 'admin') {
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}
✅ function check(user) {
if (!user) return false;
if (!user.active) return false;
if (user.role !== 'admin') return false;
return true;
}
```
### 5. Premature Abstraction
```
❌ // Used once, but has 10 configuration options
createFlexibleReusableButton({ ... });
✅ // Just make the button
<button className="primary">Submit</button>
// Abstract when you need it 3+ times
```
---
## SOLID Principles Quick Check
| Principle | Question | Red Flag |
|-----------|----------|----------|
| **S**ingle Responsibility | "Does this class/function do one thing?" | Class with 10+ methods |
| **O**pen/Closed | "Can I extend without modifying?" | Switch statements for types |
| **L**iskov Substitution | "Can I swap implementations?" | Overriding methods that break contracts |
| **I**nterface Segregation | "Are interfaces focused?" | Clients forced to depend on unused methods |
| **D**ependency Inversion | "Do high-level modules depend on abstractions?" | Direct instantiation of dependencies |
---
## Socratic Questions
Ask the junior these questions instead of giving answers:
1. **Naming**: "Would a new developer understand this name without context?"
2. **Function Size**: "Can you describe what this function does in one sentence?"
3. **Duplication**: "I see this pattern in three places. What happens if it needs to change?"
4. **Abstraction**: "How many times is this abstraction actually used?"
5. **Readability**: "If you came back to this code in 6 months, would you understand it?"
---
## Naming Conventions
| Type | Convention | Example |
|------|------------|---------|
| Variables | camelCase | `userName`, `isActive` |
| Constants | UPPER_SNAKE_CASE | `MAX_RETRIES`, `API_URL` |
| Functions | camelCase + verb | `getUser()`, `handleSubmit()` |
| Classes | PascalCase | `UserService`, `AuthProvider` |
| Files (components) | PascalCase | `UserProfile.tsx` |
| Files (utilities) | camelCase | `formatDate.ts` |
---
## Standards Reference
See detailed patterns in:
- `/standards/global/naming-conventions.md`
---
## Red Flags to Call Out
| Flag | Question to Ask |
|------|-----------------|
| Single letter variables | "What does `d` represent?" |
| Functions > 30 lines | "Can we break this into smaller functions?" |
| > 3 levels of nesting | "Can we use early returns?" |
| Copy-pasted code | "If this logic changes, how many places need updating?" |
| Commented-out code | "Is this needed? Can we delete it?" |
| TODO without tracking | "Is there a ticket for this?" |
| Magic strings/numbers | "Should this be a named constant?" |Related Skills
engineering-features-for-machine-learning
This skill empowers Claude to perform feature engineering tasks for machine learning. It creates, selects, and transforms features to improve model performance. Use this skill when the user requests feature creation, feature selection, feature transformation, or any request that involves improving the features used in a machine learning model. Trigger terms include "feature engineering", "feature selection", "feature transformation", "create features", "select features", "transform features", "improve model performance", and similar phrases related to feature manipulation.
feature-engineering-helper
Feature Engineering Helper - Auto-activating skill for ML Training. Triggers on: feature engineering helper, feature engineering helper Part of the ML Training skill category.
conducting-chaos-engineering
This skill enables Claude to design and execute chaos engineering experiments to test system resilience. It is used when the user requests help with failure injection, latency simulation, resource exhaustion testing, or resilience validation. The skill is triggered by discussions of chaos experiments (GameDays), failure injection strategies, resilience testing, and validation of recovery mechanisms like circuit breakers and retry logic. It leverages tools like Chaos Mesh, Gremlin, Toxiproxy, and AWS FIS to simulate real-world failures and assess system behavior.
ROS 2 Engineering Skills
A progressive-disclosure skill for ROS 2 development — from first workspace to
using-dbt-for-analytics-engineering
Builds and modifies dbt models, writes SQL transformations using ref() and source(), creates tests, and validates results with dbt show. Use when doing any dbt work - building or modifying models, debugging errors, exploring unfamiliar data sources, writing tests, or evaluating impact of changes.
../../../engineering-team/playwright-pro/skills/testrail/SKILL.md
No description provided.
../../../engineering/autoresearch-agent/skills/status/SKILL.md
No description provided.
../../../engineering/autoresearch-agent/skills/run/SKILL.md
No description provided.
../../../engineering-team/playwright-pro/skills/review/SKILL.md
No description provided.
../../../engineering/agenthub/skills/init/SKILL.md
No description provided.
../../../engineering/skill-security-auditor/SKILL.md
No description provided.
../../../engineering/skill-tester/assets/sample-skill/SKILL.md
No description provided.