feature-design-assistant
Turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Use when planning new features, designing architecture, or making significant changes to the codebase.
Best use case
feature-design-assistant is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Use when planning new features, designing architecture, or making significant changes to the codebase.
Teams using feature-design-assistant should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/feature-design-assistant/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How feature-design-assistant Compares
| Feature / Agent | feature-design-assistant | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Use when planning new features, designing architecture, or making significant changes to the codebase.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Feature Design Assistant
Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through structured information gathering and collaborative validation.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the feature-design-assistant skill to design this feature."
## Phase 1: Context Discovery
First, explore the codebase to understand:
- Project structure and tech stack
- Existing patterns and conventions
- Related features or modules
- Recent changes in relevant areas
## Phase 2: Structured Information Gathering
Use **AskUserQuestion** to batch collect information efficiently. Each call can ask up to 4 questions.
### Round 1: Core Requirements (4 questions)
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What is the primary goal of this feature?",
"header": "Goal",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "New Functionality", "description": "Add entirely new capability to the system" },
{ "label": "Enhancement", "description": "Improve or extend existing feature" },
{ "label": "Bug Fix", "description": "Fix incorrect behavior or issue" },
{ "label": "Refactoring", "description": "Improve code quality without changing behavior" }
]
},
{
"question": "Who are the primary users of this feature?",
"header": "Users",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "End Users", "description": "External customers using the product" },
{ "label": "Admins", "description": "Internal administrators or operators" },
{ "label": "Developers", "description": "Other developers using APIs or SDKs" },
{ "label": "System", "description": "Automated processes or background jobs" }
]
},
{
"question": "What is the expected scope of this feature?",
"header": "Scope",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Small (1-2 days)", "description": "Single component, limited changes" },
{ "label": "Medium (3-5 days)", "description": "Multiple components, moderate complexity" },
{ "label": "Large (1-2 weeks)", "description": "Cross-cutting concerns, significant changes" },
{ "label": "Unsure", "description": "Need to explore further to estimate" }
]
},
{
"question": "Are there any hard deadlines or constraints?",
"header": "Timeline",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Urgent", "description": "Need this ASAP, within days" },
{ "label": "This Sprint", "description": "Should be done within current sprint" },
{ "label": "Flexible", "description": "No hard deadline, quality over speed" },
{ "label": "Planning Only", "description": "Just designing now, implementing later" }
]
}
]
}
```
### Round 2: Technical Requirements (4 questions)
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Which layers of the system will this feature touch?",
"header": "Layers",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Data Model", "description": "Database schema, models, migrations" },
{ "label": "Business Logic", "description": "Services, domain logic, rules" },
{ "label": "API", "description": "REST/GraphQL endpoints, contracts" },
{ "label": "UI", "description": "Frontend components, user interface" }
]
},
{
"question": "What are the key quality requirements?",
"header": "Quality",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "High Performance", "description": "Must handle high load or be very fast" },
{ "label": "Strong Security", "description": "Sensitive data, auth, access control" },
{ "label": "High Reliability", "description": "Cannot fail, needs redundancy" },
{ "label": "Easy Maintenance", "description": "Needs to be easily understood and modified" }
]
},
{
"question": "How should errors be handled?",
"header": "Errors",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Fail Fast", "description": "Stop immediately on any error" },
{ "label": "Graceful Degrade", "description": "Continue with reduced functionality" },
{ "label": "Retry & Recover", "description": "Automatic retry with recovery logic" },
{ "label": "Context Dependent", "description": "Different strategies for different cases" }
]
},
{
"question": "What testing approach is preferred?",
"header": "Testing",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "TDD (Recommended)", "description": "Write tests first, then implementation" },
{ "label": "Test After", "description": "Implement first, add tests after" },
{ "label": "Minimal Tests", "description": "Only critical path testing" },
{ "label": "No Tests", "description": "Skip testing for this feature" }
]
}
]
}
```
### Round 3: Integration & Dependencies (4 questions)
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Does this feature need external integrations?",
"header": "Integrations",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Database", "description": "New tables, queries, or migrations" },
{ "label": "External APIs", "description": "Third-party service calls" },
{ "label": "Message Queue", "description": "Async processing, events" },
{ "label": "None", "description": "No external integrations needed" }
]
},
{
"question": "Are there dependencies on other features or teams?",
"header": "Dependencies",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Auth System", "description": "User authentication or authorization" },
{ "label": "Other Features", "description": "Depends on features being developed" },
{ "label": "External Team", "description": "Needs input from another team" },
{ "label": "None", "description": "Fully independent feature" }
]
},
{
"question": "How should we handle backwards compatibility?",
"header": "Compat",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Must Maintain", "description": "Cannot break existing clients" },
{ "label": "Version API", "description": "Create new version, deprecate old" },
{ "label": "Breaking OK", "description": "Can make breaking changes" },
{ "label": "Not Applicable", "description": "New feature, no existing users" }
]
},
{
"question": "What documentation is needed?",
"header": "Docs",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "API Docs", "description": "Endpoint documentation" },
{ "label": "User Guide", "description": "How-to for end users" },
{ "label": "Dev Guide", "description": "Technical implementation details" },
{ "label": "None", "description": "No documentation needed" }
]
}
]
}
```
### Round 4: Clarifying Questions (Context-Dependent)
Based on previous answers, ask follow-up questions. Examples:
**If UI layer selected:**
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What UI framework/approach should we use?",
"header": "UI Tech",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "React", "description": "React components with hooks" },
{ "label": "Vue", "description": "Vue.js components" },
{ "label": "Server-Side", "description": "Server-rendered HTML templates" },
{ "label": "Existing Pattern", "description": "Follow current project conventions" }
]
}
]
}
```
**If High Security selected:**
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What security measures are required?",
"header": "Security",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Input Validation", "description": "Strict input sanitization" },
{ "label": "Rate Limiting", "description": "Prevent abuse and DoS" },
{ "label": "Audit Logging", "description": "Track all sensitive actions" },
{ "label": "Encryption", "description": "Encrypt data at rest/transit" }
]
}
]
}
```
## Phase 3: Approach Exploration
After gathering requirements, propose 2-3 approaches:
```markdown
## Approach Options
### Option A: [Name] (Recommended)
**Pros:** ...
**Cons:** ...
**Best for:** ...
### Option B: [Name]
**Pros:** ...
**Cons:** ...
**Best for:** ...
### Option C: [Name]
**Pros:** ...
**Cons:** ...
**Best for:** ...
```
Use AskUserQuestion to confirm approach:
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Which approach would you like to proceed with?",
"header": "Approach",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Option A (Recommended)", "description": "Brief summary of approach A" },
{ "label": "Option B", "description": "Brief summary of approach B" },
{ "label": "Option C", "description": "Brief summary of approach C" }
]
}
]
}
```
## Phase 4: Design Presentation
Present design in sections (300-500 words each), validate after each:
1. **Architecture Overview** - High-level structure
2. **Data Model** - Entities, relationships, schema
3. **API Design** - Endpoints, request/response
4. **Component Design** - Internal modules, interfaces
5. **Error Handling** - Error cases, recovery strategies
6. **Testing Strategy** - What and how to test
After each section, use AskUserQuestion:
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Does this section look correct?",
"header": "Review",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Looks Good", "description": "Continue to next section" },
{ "label": "Minor Changes", "description": "Small adjustments needed" },
{ "label": "Major Revision", "description": "Significant changes required" },
{ "label": "Questions", "description": "Need clarification before proceeding" }
]
}
]
}
```
## Phase 5: Documentation & Tasks
### Save Design Document
Write to `docs/designs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md`:
```markdown
# Feature: [Name]
## Summary
[Brief description]
## Requirements
[From Phase 2 answers]
## Architecture
[From Phase 4]
## Implementation Tasks
[Task checklist]
```
### Generate Implementation Tasks
```markdown
## Implementation Tasks
- [ ] **Task Title** `priority:1` `phase:model` `time:15min`
- files: src/file1.py, tests/test_file1.py
- [ ] Write failing test for X
- [ ] Run test, verify it fails
- [ ] Implement minimal code
- [ ] Run test, verify it passes
- [ ] Commit
- [ ] **Another Task** `priority:2` `phase:api` `deps:Task Title` `time:10min`
- files: src/api.py
- [ ] Write failing test
- [ ] Implement and verify
- [ ] Commit
```
## Phase 6: Execution Handoff
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "How would you like to proceed with implementation?",
"header": "Next Step",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Execute Now", "description": "Run /feature-pipeline in this session" },
{ "label": "New Session", "description": "Start fresh session for implementation" },
{ "label": "Later", "description": "Save design, implement manually later" },
{ "label": "Revise Design", "description": "Go back and modify the design" }
]
}
]
}
```
## Key Principles
- **Batch questions efficiently** - Use all 4 question slots when appropriate
- **Use multiSelect for non-exclusive options** - Layers, features, requirements
- **Use single-select for decisions** - Approach, timeline, strategy
- **Mark recommendations** - Add "(Recommended)" to preferred options
- **Progressive refinement** - General → Specific questions
- **Validate incrementally** - Check understanding at each phase
- **YAGNI ruthlessly** - Remove unnecessary features from designsRelated Skills
vpc-network-designer
Vpc Network Designer - Auto-activating skill for AWS Skills. Triggers on: vpc network designer, vpc network designer Part of the AWS Skills skill category.
top-design
Create award-winning, immersive web experiences at the level of Awwwards-featured agencies. Use when the user mentions "premium website", "portfolio site", "scroll animations", "Awwwards quality", or "brand experience". Covers dramatic typography, purposeful motion, scroll-based composition, and performance-optimized animation. For foundational UI, see refactoring-ui. For type selection, see web-typography. Trigger with 'top', 'design'.
rest-endpoint-designer
Rest Endpoint Designer - Auto-activating skill for API Development. Triggers on: rest endpoint designer, rest endpoint designer Part of the API Development skill category.
ios-hig-design
Build native iOS interfaces following Apple Human Interface Guidelines. Use when the user mentions "iPhone app", "iPad layout", "SwiftUI", "UIKit", "Dynamic Island", "safe areas", or "HIG compliance". Covers navigation patterns, accessibility, SF Symbols, and platform conventions. For general UI polish, see refactoring-ui. For affordance design, see design-everyday-things. Trigger with 'ios', 'hig', 'design'.
feature-store-connector
Feature Store Connector - Auto-activating skill for ML Deployment. Triggers on: feature store connector, feature store connector Part of the ML Deployment skill category.
feature-importance-analyzer
Feature Importance Analyzer - Auto-activating skill for ML Training. Triggers on: feature importance analyzer, feature importance analyzer Part of the ML Training skill category.
engineering-features-for-machine-learning
This skill empowers Claude to perform feature engineering tasks for machine learning. It creates, selects, and transforms features to improve model performance. Use this skill when the user requests feature creation, feature selection, feature transformation, or any request that involves improving the features used in a machine learning model. Trigger terms include "feature engineering", "feature selection", "feature transformation", "create features", "select features", "transform features", "improve model performance", and similar phrases related to feature manipulation.
feature-engineering-helper
Feature Engineering Helper - Auto-activating skill for ML Training. Triggers on: feature engineering helper, feature engineering helper Part of the ML Training skill category.
dynamodb-table-designer
Dynamodb Table Designer - Auto-activating skill for AWS Skills. Triggers on: dynamodb table designer, dynamodb table designer Part of the AWS Skills skill category.
designing-database-schemas
Process use when you need to work with database schema design. This skill provides schema design and migrations with comprehensive guidance and automation. Trigger with phrases like "design schema", "create migration", or "model database".
design-sprint
Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate in a week", "rapid prototype", "test with users", or "de-risk before building". Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing. For ongoing experimentation, see lean-startup. For customer job analysis, see jobs-to-be-done. Trigger with 'design', 'sprint'.
design-everyday-things
Analyze and apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models. Use when the user mentions "why is this confusing", "affordance", "error prevention", "discoverability", "human-centered design", or "fault tolerance". Covers the gulfs of execution and evaluation. For usability scoring, see ux-heuristics. For iOS-specific patterns, see ios-hig-design. Trigger with 'design', 'everyday', 'things'.