lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking
## Quick start
Best use case
lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
## Quick start
Teams using lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/lm-evaluation-harness/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking Compares
| Feature / Agent | lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
## Quick start
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking
## Quick start
lm-evaluation-harness evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks using standardized prompts and metrics.
**Installation**:
```bash
pip install lm-eval
```
**Evaluate any HuggingFace model**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag \
--device cuda:0 \
--batch_size 8
```
**View available tasks**:
```bash
lm_eval --tasks list
```
## Common workflows
### Workflow 1: Standard benchmark evaluation
Evaluate model on core benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval).
Copy this checklist:
```
Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze results
```
**Step 1: Choose benchmark suite**
**Core reasoning benchmarks**:
- **MMLU** (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) - 57 subjects, multiple choice
- **GSM8K** - Grade school math word problems
- **HellaSwag** - Common sense reasoning
- **TruthfulQA** - Truthfulness and factuality
- **ARC** (AI2 Reasoning Challenge) - Science questions
**Code benchmarks**:
- **HumanEval** - Python code generation (164 problems)
- **MBPP** (Mostly Basic Python Problems) - Python coding
**Standard suite** (recommended for model releases):
```bash
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge
```
**Step 2: Configure model**
**HuggingFace model**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,dtype=bfloat16 \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0 \
--batch_size auto # Auto-detect optimal batch size
```
**Quantized model (4-bit/8-bit)**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,load_in_4bit=True \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0
```
**Custom checkpoint**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=/path/to/my-model,tokenizer=/path/to/tokenizer \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0
```
**Step 3: Run evaluation**
```bash
# Full MMLU evaluation (57 subjects)
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu \
--num_fewshot 5 \ # 5-shot evaluation (standard)
--batch_size 8 \
--output_path results/ \
--log_samples # Save individual predictions
# Multiple benchmarks at once
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge \
--num_fewshot 5 \
--batch_size 8 \
--output_path results/llama2-7b-eval.json
```
**Step 4: Analyze results**
Results saved to `results/llama2-7b-eval.json`:
```json
{
"results": {
"mmlu": {
"acc": 0.459,
"acc_stderr": 0.004
},
"gsm8k": {
"exact_match": 0.142,
"exact_match_stderr": 0.006
},
"hellaswag": {
"acc_norm": 0.765,
"acc_norm_stderr": 0.004
}
},
"config": {
"model": "hf",
"model_args": "pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
"num_fewshot": 5
}
}
```
### Workflow 2: Track training progress
Evaluate checkpoints during training.
```
Training Progress Tracking:
- [ ] Step 1: Set up periodic evaluation
- [ ] Step 2: Choose quick benchmarks
- [ ] Step 3: Automate evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Plot learning curves
```
**Step 1: Set up periodic evaluation**
Evaluate every N training steps:
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# eval_checkpoint.sh
CHECKPOINT_DIR=$1
STEP=$2
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=$CHECKPOINT_DIR/checkpoint-$STEP \
--tasks gsm8k,hellaswag \
--num_fewshot 0 \ # 0-shot for speed
--batch_size 16 \
--output_path results/step-$STEP.json
```
**Step 2: Choose quick benchmarks**
Fast benchmarks for frequent evaluation:
- **HellaSwag**: ~10 minutes on 1 GPU
- **GSM8K**: ~5 minutes
- **PIQA**: ~2 minutes
Avoid for frequent eval (too slow):
- **MMLU**: ~2 hours (57 subjects)
- **HumanEval**: Requires code execution
**Step 3: Automate evaluation**
Integrate with training script:
```python
# In training loop
if step % eval_interval == 0:
model.save_pretrained(f"checkpoints/step-{step}")
# Run evaluation
os.system(f"./eval_checkpoint.sh checkpoints step-{step}")
```
Or use PyTorch Lightning callbacks:
```python
from pytorch_lightning import Callback
class EvalHarnessCallback(Callback):
def on_validation_epoch_end(self, trainer, pl_module):
step = trainer.global_step
checkpoint_path = f"checkpoints/step-{step}"
# Save checkpoint
trainer.save_checkpoint(checkpoint_path)
# Run lm-eval
os.system(f"lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained={checkpoint_path} ...")
```
**Step 4: Plot learning curves**
```python
import json
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Load all results
steps = []
mmlu_scores = []
for file in sorted(glob.glob("results/step-*.json")):
with open(file) as f:
data = json.load(f)
step = int(file.split("-")[1].split(".")[0])
steps.append(step)
mmlu_scores.append(data["results"]["mmlu"]["acc"])
# Plot
plt.plot(steps, mmlu_scores)
plt.xlabel("Training Step")
plt.ylabel("MMLU Accuracy")
plt.title("Training Progress")
plt.savefig("training_curve.png")
```
### Workflow 3: Compare multiple models
Benchmark suite for model comparison.
```
Model Comparison:
- [ ] Step 1: Define model list
- [ ] Step 2: Run evaluations
- [ ] Step 3: Generate comparison table
```
**Step 1: Define model list**
```bash
# models.txt
meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf
meta-llama/Llama-2-13b-hf
mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1
microsoft/phi-2
```
**Step 2: Run evaluations**
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# eval_all_models.sh
TASKS="mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa"
while read model; do
echo "Evaluating $model"
# Extract model name for output file
model_name=$(echo $model | sed 's/\//-/g')
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=$model,dtype=bfloat16 \
--tasks $TASKS \
--num_fewshot 5 \
--batch_size auto \
--output_path results/$model_name.json
done < models.txt
```
**Step 3: Generate comparison table**
```python
import json
import pandas as pd
models = [
"meta-llama-Llama-2-7b-hf",
"meta-llama-Llama-2-13b-hf",
"mistralai-Mistral-7B-v0.1",
"microsoft-phi-2"
]
tasks = ["mmlu", "gsm8k", "hellaswag", "truthfulqa"]
results = []
for model in models:
with open(f"results/{model}.json") as f:
data = json.load(f)
row = {"Model": model.replace("-", "/")}
for task in tasks:
# Get primary metric for each task
metrics = data["results"][task]
if "acc" in metrics:
row[task.upper()] = f"{metrics['acc']:.3f}"
elif "exact_match" in metrics:
row[task.upper()] = f"{metrics['exact_match']:.3f}"
results.append(row)
df = pd.DataFrame(results)
print(df.to_markdown(index=False))
```
Output:
```
| Model | MMLU | GSM8K | HELLASWAG | TRUTHFULQA |
|------------------------|-------|-------|-----------|------------|
| meta-llama/Llama-2-7b | 0.459 | 0.142 | 0.765 | 0.391 |
| meta-llama/Llama-2-13b | 0.549 | 0.287 | 0.801 | 0.430 |
| mistralai/Mistral-7B | 0.626 | 0.395 | 0.812 | 0.428 |
| microsoft/phi-2 | 0.560 | 0.613 | 0.682 | 0.447 |
```
### Workflow 4: Evaluate with vLLM (faster inference)
Use vLLM backend for 5-10x faster evaluation.
```
vLLM Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Install vLLM
- [ ] Step 2: Configure vLLM backend
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation
```
**Step 1: Install vLLM**
```bash
pip install vllm
```
**Step 2: Configure vLLM backend**
```bash
lm_eval --model vllm \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,tensor_parallel_size=1,dtype=auto,gpu_memory_utilization=0.8 \
--tasks mmlu \
--batch_size auto
```
**Step 3: Run evaluation**
vLLM is 5-10× faster than standard HuggingFace:
```bash
# Standard HF: ~2 hours for MMLU on 7B model
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu \
--batch_size 8
# vLLM: ~15-20 minutes for MMLU on 7B model
lm_eval --model vllm \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,tensor_parallel_size=2 \
--tasks mmlu \
--batch_size auto
```
## When to use vs alternatives
**Use lm-evaluation-harness when:**
- Benchmarking models for academic papers
- Comparing model quality across standard tasks
- Tracking training progress
- Reporting standardized metrics (everyone uses same prompts)
- Need reproducible evaluation
**Use alternatives instead:**
- **HELM** (Stanford): Broader evaluation (fairness, efficiency, calibration)
- **AlpacaEval**: Instruction-following evaluation with LLM judges
- **MT-Bench**: Conversational multi-turn evaluation
- **Custom scripts**: Domain-specific evaluation
## Common issues
**Issue: Evaluation too slow**
Use vLLM backend:
```bash
lm_eval --model vllm \
--model_args pretrained=model-name,tensor_parallel_size=2
```
Or reduce fewshot examples:
```bash
--num_fewshot 0 # Instead of 5
```
Or evaluate subset of MMLU:
```bash
--tasks mmlu_stem # Only STEM subjects
```
**Issue: Out of memory**
Reduce batch size:
```bash
--batch_size 1 # Or --batch_size auto
```
Use quantization:
```bash
--model_args pretrained=model-name,load_in_8bit=True
```
Enable CPU offloading:
```bash
--model_args pretrained=model-name,device_map=auto,offload_folder=offload
```
**Issue: Different results than reported**
Check fewshot count:
```bash
--num_fewshot 5 # Most papers use 5-shot
```
Check exact task name:
```bash
--tasks mmlu # Not mmlu_direct or mmlu_fewshot
```
Verify model and tokenizer match:
```bash
--model_args pretrained=model-name,tokenizer=same-model-name
```
**Issue: HumanEval not executing code**
Install execution dependencies:
```bash
pip install human-eval
```
Enable code execution:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=model-name \
--tasks humaneval \
--allow_code_execution # Required for HumanEval
```
## Advanced topics
**Benchmark descriptions**: See [references/benchmark-guide.md](references/benchmark-guide.md) for detailed description of all 60+ tasks, what they measure, and interpretation.
**Custom tasks**: See [references/custom-tasks.md](references/custom-tasks.md) for creating domain-specific evaluation tasks.
**API evaluation**: See [references/api-evaluation.md](references/api-evaluation.md) for evaluating OpenAI, Anthropic, and other API models.
**Multi-GPU strategies**: See [references/distributed-eval.md](references/distributed-eval.md) for data parallel and tensor parallel evaluation.
## Hardware requirements
- **GPU**: NVIDIA (CUDA 11.8+), works on CPU (very slow)
- **VRAM**:
- 7B model: 16GB (bf16) or 8GB (8-bit)
- 13B model: 28GB (bf16) or 14GB (8-bit)
- 70B model: Requires multi-GPU or quantization
- **Time** (7B model, single A100):
- HellaSwag: 10 minutes
- GSM8K: 5 minutes
- MMLU (full): 2 hours
- HumanEval: 20 minutes
## Resources
- GitHub: https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness
- Docs: https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/main/docs
- Task library: 60+ tasks including MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag, ARC, WinoGrande, etc.
- Leaderboard: https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard (uses this harness)Related Skills
model-evaluation-metrics
Model Evaluation Metrics - Auto-activating skill for ML Training. Triggers on: model evaluation metrics, model evaluation metrics Part of the ML Training skill category.
Writing Fuzzing Harnesses
A fuzzing harness is the entrypoint function that receives random data from the fuzzer and routes it to your system under test (SUT). The quality of your harness directly determines which code paths get exercised and whether critical bugs are found. A poorly written harness can miss entire subsystems or produce non-reproducible crashes.
promptfoo-evaluation
Configures and runs LLM evaluation using Promptfoo framework. Use when setting up prompt testing, creating evaluation configs (promptfooconfig.yaml), writing Python custom assertions, implementing llm-rubric for LLM-as-judge, or managing few-shot examples in prompts. Triggers on keywords like "promptfoo", "eval", "LLM evaluation", "prompt testing", or "model comparison".
llm-evaluation
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
agent-evaluation
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
harness-model-protocol
Analyze the protocol layer between agent harness and LLM model. Use when (1) understanding message wire formats and API contracts, (2) examining tool call encoding/decoding mechanisms, (3) evaluating streaming protocols and partial response handling, (4) identifying agentic chat primitives (system prompts, scratchpads, interrupts), (5) comparing multi-provider abstraction strategies, or (6) understanding how frameworks translate between native LLM APIs and internal representations.
advanced-evaluation
This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.
evaluation
Build evaluation frameworks for agent systems. Use when testing agent performance, validating context engineering choices, or measuring improvements over time.
smc-harness
SMC trading agent skill for Alpha Harness backtesting. Provides ICT/SMC methodology, decision frameworks, and behavioral guidelines for autonomous trading in simulated environments. USE WHEN agent wakes in harness, needs to analyze markets, decide on setups, or place orders.
content-evaluation-framework
This skill should be used when evaluating the quality of book chapters, lessons, or educational content. It provides a systematic 6-category rubric with weighted scoring (Technical Accuracy 30%, Pedagogical Effectiveness 25%, Writing Quality 20%, Structure & Organization 15%, AI-First Teaching 10%, Constitution Compliance Pass/Fail) and multi-tier assessment (Excellent/Good/Needs Work/Insufficient). Use this during iterative drafting, after content completion, on-demand review requests, or before validation phases.
eval-harness
Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles
agent-harness-construction
Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.