agent-evaluation
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
Best use case
agent-evaluation is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
Teams using agent-evaluation should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/agent-evaluation/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How agent-evaluation Compares
| Feature / Agent | agent-evaluation | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
ChatGPT vs Claude for Agent Skills
Compare ChatGPT and Claude for AI agent skills across coding, writing, research, and reusable workflow execution.
SKILL.md Source
# Agent Evaluation You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct" often has no single answer. You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't 100% test pass rate—it ## Capabilities - agent-testing - benchmark-design - capability-assessment - reliability-metrics - regression-testing ## Requirements - testing-fundamentals - llm-fundamentals ## Patterns ### Statistical Test Evaluation Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions ### Behavioral Contract Testing Define and test agent behavioral invariants ### Adversarial Testing Actively try to break agent behavior ## Anti-Patterns ### ❌ Single-Run Testing ### ❌ Only Happy Path Tests ### ❌ Output String Matching ## ⚠️ Sharp Edges | Issue | Severity | Solution | |-------|----------|----------| | Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation | | Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation | | Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming | | Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation | ## Related Skills Works well with: `multi-agent-orchestration`, `agent-communication`, `autonomous-agents`
Related Skills
llm-evaluation
Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.
Scholar Evaluation
## Overview
async-python-patterns
Comprehensive guidance for implementing asynchronous Python applications using asyncio, concurrent programming patterns, and async/await for building high-performance, non-blocking systems.
slack-automation
Automate Slack workspace operations including messaging, search, channel management, and reaction workflows through Composio's Slack toolkit.
linear-automation
Automate Linear tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): issues, projects, cycles, teams, labels. Always search tools first for current schemas.
jira-automation
Automate Jira tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): issues, projects, sprints, boards, comments, users. Always search tools first for current schemas.
gitops-workflow
Complete guide to implementing GitOps workflows with ArgoCD and Flux for automated Kubernetes deployments.
github-automation
Automate GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, branches, CI/CD, and permissions via Rube MCP (Composio). Manage code workflows, review PRs, search code, and handle deployments programmatically.
github-actions-templates
Production-ready GitHub Actions workflow patterns for testing, building, and deploying applications.
zustand-store-ts
Create Zustand stores following established patterns with proper TypeScript types and middleware.
zod-validation-expert
Expert in Zod — TypeScript-first schema validation. Covers parsing, custom errors, refinements, type inference, and integration with React Hook Form, Next.js, and tRPC.
tanstack-query-expert
Expert in TanStack Query (React Query) — asynchronous state management. Covers data fetching, stale time configuration, mutations, optimistic updates, and Next.js App Router (SSR) integration.