pydantic-ai
Build production-ready AI agents with PydanticAI — type-safe tool use, structured outputs, dependency injection, and multi-model support.
Best use case
pydantic-ai is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Build production-ready AI agents with PydanticAI — type-safe tool use, structured outputs, dependency injection, and multi-model support.
Teams using pydantic-ai should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/pydantic-ai/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How pydantic-ai Compares
| Feature / Agent | pydantic-ai | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Build production-ready AI agents with PydanticAI — type-safe tool use, structured outputs, dependency injection, and multi-model support.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
ChatGPT vs Claude for Agent Skills
Compare ChatGPT and Claude for AI agent skills across coding, writing, research, and reusable workflow execution.
AI Agents for Startups
Explore AI agent skills for startup validation, product research, growth experiments, documentation, and fast execution with small teams.
SKILL.md Source
# PydanticAI — Typed AI Agents in Python
## Overview
PydanticAI is a Python agent framework from the Pydantic team that brings the same type-safety and validation guarantees as Pydantic to LLM-based applications. It supports structured outputs (validated with Pydantic models), dependency injection for testability, streamed responses, multi-turn conversations, and tool use — across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Groq, Mistral, and Ollama. Use this skill when building production AI agents, chatbots, or LLM pipelines where correctness and testability matter.
## When to Use This Skill
- Use when building Python AI agents that call tools and return structured data
- Use when you need validated, typed LLM outputs (not raw strings)
- Use when you want to write unit tests for agent logic without hitting a real LLM
- Use when switching between LLM providers without rewriting agent code
- Use when the user asks about `Agent`, `@agent.tool`, `RunContext`, `ModelRetry`, or `result_type`
## How It Works
### Step 1: Installation
```bash
pip install pydantic-ai
# Install extras for specific providers
pip install 'pydantic-ai[openai]' # OpenAI / Azure OpenAI
pip install 'pydantic-ai[anthropic]' # Anthropic Claude
pip install 'pydantic-ai[gemini]' # Google Gemini
pip install 'pydantic-ai[groq]' # Groq
pip install 'pydantic-ai[vertexai]' # Google Vertex AI
```
### Step 2: A Minimal Agent
```python
from pydantic_ai import Agent
# Simple agent — returns a plain string
agent = Agent(
'anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6',
system_prompt='You are a helpful assistant. Be concise.',
)
result = agent.run_sync('What is the capital of Japan?')
print(result.data) # "Tokyo"
print(result.usage()) # Usage(requests=1, request_tokens=..., response_tokens=...)
```
### Step 3: Structured Output with Pydantic Models
```python
from pydantic import BaseModel
from pydantic_ai import Agent
class MovieReview(BaseModel):
title: str
year: int
rating: float # 0.0 to 10.0
summary: str
recommended: bool
agent = Agent(
'openai:gpt-4o',
result_type=MovieReview,
system_prompt='You are a film critic. Return structured reviews.',
)
result = agent.run_sync('Review Inception (2010)')
review = result.data # Fully typed MovieReview instance
print(f"{review.title} ({review.year}): {review.rating}/10")
print(f"Recommended: {review.recommended}")
```
### Step 4: Tool Use
Register tools with `@agent.tool` — the LLM can call them during a run:
```python
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext
from pydantic import BaseModel
import httpx
class WeatherReport(BaseModel):
city: str
temperature_c: float
condition: str
weather_agent = Agent(
'anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6',
result_type=WeatherReport,
system_prompt='Get current weather for the requested city.',
)
@weather_agent.tool
async def get_temperature(ctx: RunContext, city: str) -> dict:
"""Fetch the current temperature for a city from the weather API."""
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
r = await client.get(f'https://wttr.in/{city}?format=j1')
data = r.json()
return {
'temp_c': float(data['current_condition'][0]['temp_C']),
'description': data['current_condition'][0]['weatherDesc'][0]['value'],
}
import asyncio
result = asyncio.run(weather_agent.run('What is the weather in Tokyo?'))
print(result.data)
```
### Step 5: Dependency Injection
Inject services (database, HTTP clients, config) into agents for testability:
```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext
from pydantic import BaseModel
@dataclass
class Deps:
db: Database
user_id: str
class SupportResponse(BaseModel):
message: str
escalate: bool
support_agent = Agent(
'openai:gpt-4o-mini',
deps_type=Deps,
result_type=SupportResponse,
system_prompt='You are a support agent. Use the tools to help customers.',
)
@support_agent.tool
async def get_order_history(ctx: RunContext[Deps]) -> list[dict]:
"""Fetch recent orders for the current user."""
return await ctx.deps.db.get_orders(ctx.deps.user_id, limit=5)
@support_agent.tool
async def create_refund(ctx: RunContext[Deps], order_id: str, reason: str) -> dict:
"""Initiate a refund for a specific order."""
return await ctx.deps.db.create_refund(order_id, reason, ctx.deps.user_id)
# Usage
async def handle_support(user_id: str, message: str):
deps = Deps(db=get_db(), user_id=user_id)
result = await support_agent.run(message, deps=deps)
return result.data
```
### Step 6: Testing with TestModel
Write unit tests without real LLM calls:
```python
from pydantic_ai.models.test import TestModel
def test_support_agent_escalates():
with support_agent.override(model=TestModel()):
# TestModel returns a minimal valid response matching result_type
result = support_agent.run_sync(
'I want to cancel my account',
deps=Deps(db=FakeDb(), user_id='user-123'),
)
# Test the structure, not the LLM's exact words
assert isinstance(result.data, SupportResponse)
assert isinstance(result.data.escalate, bool)
```
**FunctionModel** for deterministic test responses:
```python
from pydantic_ai.models.function import FunctionModel, ModelContext
def my_model(messages, info):
return ModelResponse(parts=[TextPart('Always this response')])
with agent.override(model=FunctionModel(my_model)):
result = agent.run_sync('anything')
```
### Step 7: Streaming Responses
```python
import asyncio
from pydantic_ai import Agent
agent = Agent('anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6')
async def stream_response():
async with agent.run_stream('Write a haiku about Python') as result:
async for chunk in result.stream_text():
print(chunk, end='', flush=True)
print() # newline
print(f"Total tokens: {result.usage()}")
asyncio.run(stream_response())
```
### Step 8: Multi-Turn Conversations
```python
from pydantic_ai import Agent
from pydantic_ai.messages import ModelMessagesTypeAdapter
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', system_prompt='You are a helpful assistant.')
# First turn
result1 = agent.run_sync('My name is Alice.')
history = result1.all_messages()
# Second turn — passes conversation history
result2 = agent.run_sync('What is my name?', message_history=history)
print(result2.data) # "Your name is Alice."
```
## Examples
### Example 1: Code Review Agent
```python
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from pydantic_ai import Agent
from typing import Literal
class CodeReview(BaseModel):
quality: Literal['excellent', 'good', 'needs_work', 'poor']
issues: list[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
suggestions: list[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
approved: bool
code_review_agent = Agent(
'anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6',
result_type=CodeReview,
system_prompt="""
You are a senior engineer performing code review.
Evaluate code quality, identify issues, and provide actionable suggestions.
Set approved=True only for good or excellent quality code with no security issues.
""",
)
def review_code(diff: str) -> CodeReview:
result = code_review_agent.run_sync(f"Review this code:\n\n{diff}")
return result.data
```
### Example 2: Agent with Retry Logic
```python
from pydantic_ai import Agent, ModelRetry
from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
class StrictJson(BaseModel):
value: int
@field_validator('value')
def must_be_positive(cls, v):
if v <= 0:
raise ValueError('value must be positive')
return v
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o-mini', result_type=StrictJson)
@agent.result_validator
async def validate_result(ctx, result: StrictJson) -> StrictJson:
if result.value > 1000:
raise ModelRetry('Value must be under 1000. Try again with a smaller number.')
return result
```
### Example 3: Multi-Agent Pipeline
```python
from pydantic_ai import Agent
from pydantic import BaseModel
class ResearchSummary(BaseModel):
key_points: list[str]
conclusion: str
class BlogPost(BaseModel):
title: str
body: str
meta_description: str
researcher = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', result_type=ResearchSummary)
writer = Agent('anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6', result_type=BlogPost)
async def research_and_write(topic: str) -> BlogPost:
# Stage 1: research
research = await researcher.run(f'Research the topic: {topic}')
# Stage 2: write based on research
post = await writer.run(
f'Write a blog post about: {topic}\n\nResearch:\n' +
'\n'.join(f'- {p}' for p in research.data.key_points) +
f'\n\nConclusion: {research.data.conclusion}'
)
return post.data
```
## Best Practices
- ✅ Always define `result_type` with a Pydantic model — avoid returning raw strings in production
- ✅ Use `deps_type` with a dataclass for dependency injection — makes agents testable
- ✅ Use `TestModel` in unit tests — never hit a real LLM in CI
- ✅ Add `@agent.result_validator` for business-logic checks beyond Pydantic validation
- ✅ Use `run_stream` for long outputs in user-facing applications to show progressive results
- ❌ Don't put secrets (API keys) in `Agent()` arguments — use environment variables
- ❌ Don't share a single `Agent` instance across async tasks if deps differ — create per-request instances or use `agent.run()` with per-call `deps`
- ❌ Don't catch `ValidationError` broadly — let PydanticAI retry with `ModelRetry` for recoverable LLM output errors
## Security & Safety Notes
- Set API keys via environment variables (`OPENAI_API_KEY`, `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`, etc.) — never hardcode them.
- Validate all tool inputs before passing to external systems — use Pydantic models or manual checks.
- Tools that mutate data (write to DB, send emails, call payment APIs) should require explicit user confirmation before the agent invokes them in production.
- Log `result.all_messages()` for audit trails when agents perform consequential actions.
- Set `retries=` limits on `Agent()` to prevent runaway loops on persistent validation failures.
## Common Pitfalls
- **Problem:** `ValidationError` on every LLM response — structured output never validates
**Solution:** Simplify `result_type` fields. Use `Optional` and `default` where appropriate. The model may struggle with overly strict schemas.
- **Problem:** Tool is never called by the LLM
**Solution:** Write a clear, specific docstring for the tool function — PydanticAI sends the docstring as the tool description to the LLM.
- **Problem:** `RunContext` dependency is `None` inside a tool
**Solution:** Pass `deps=` when calling `agent.run()` or `agent.run_sync()`. Dependencies are not set globally.
- **Problem:** `asyncio.run()` error when calling `agent.run()` inside FastAPI
**Solution:** Use `await agent.run()` directly in async FastAPI route handlers — don't wrap in `asyncio.run()`.
## Related Skills
- `@langchain-architecture` — Alternative Python AI framework (more flexible, less type-safe)
- `@llm-application-dev-ai-assistant` — General LLM application development patterns
- `@fastapi-templates` — Serving PydanticAI agents via FastAPI endpoints
- `@agent-orchestration-multi-agent-optimize` — Orchestrating multiple PydanticAI agentsRelated Skills
async-python-patterns
Comprehensive guidance for implementing asynchronous Python applications using asyncio, concurrent programming patterns, and async/await for building high-performance, non-blocking systems.
slack-automation
Automate Slack workspace operations including messaging, search, channel management, and reaction workflows through Composio's Slack toolkit.
linear-automation
Automate Linear tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): issues, projects, cycles, teams, labels. Always search tools first for current schemas.
jira-automation
Automate Jira tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): issues, projects, sprints, boards, comments, users. Always search tools first for current schemas.
gitops-workflow
Complete guide to implementing GitOps workflows with ArgoCD and Flux for automated Kubernetes deployments.
github-automation
Automate GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, branches, CI/CD, and permissions via Rube MCP (Composio). Manage code workflows, review PRs, search code, and handle deployments programmatically.
github-actions-templates
Production-ready GitHub Actions workflow patterns for testing, building, and deploying applications.
zustand-store-ts
Create Zustand stores following established patterns with proper TypeScript types and middleware.
zod-validation-expert
Expert in Zod — TypeScript-first schema validation. Covers parsing, custom errors, refinements, type inference, and integration with React Hook Form, Next.js, and tRPC.
tanstack-query-expert
Expert in TanStack Query (React Query) — asynchronous state management. Covers data fetching, stale time configuration, mutations, optimistic updates, and Next.js App Router (SSR) integration.
tailwind-design-system
Build production-ready design systems with Tailwind CSS, including design tokens, component variants, responsive patterns, and accessibility.
sveltekit
Build full-stack web applications with SvelteKit — file-based routing, SSR, SSG, API routes, and form actions in one framework.