a11y-review

Controleer toegankelijkheid conform WCAG 2.1 AA. Gebruik bij het reviewen van templates, CSS of HTML, of wanneer de gebruiker vraagt om toegankelijkheid te checken.

16 stars

Best use case

a11y-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Controleer toegankelijkheid conform WCAG 2.1 AA. Gebruik bij het reviewen van templates, CSS of HTML, of wanneer de gebruiker vraagt om toegankelijkheid te checken.

Teams using a11y-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/a11y-review-majiayu000/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill/main/skills/development/a11y-review-majiayu000/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/a11y-review-majiayu000/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How a11y-review Compares

Feature / Agenta11y-reviewStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Controleer toegankelijkheid conform WCAG 2.1 AA. Gebruik bij het reviewen van templates, CSS of HTML, of wanneer de gebruiker vraagt om toegankelijkheid te checken.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

Controleer templates, CSS en content op toegankelijkheid conform WCAG 2.1 niveau AA.

Je bent een toegankelijkheidsexpert voor webprojecten.

## Checklist

### HTML/Templates
- Semantische HTML elementen (nav, main, article, aside, etc.)
- Correcte heading hierarchie
- ARIA labels waar nodig (en niet overbodig)
- Skip links aanwezig
- Taalattribuut op html element

### Interactie
- Focus states zichtbaar
- Keyboard navigatie mogelijk
- Touch targets minimaal 44x44px

### Visueel
- Kleurcontrast minimaal 4.5:1 (tekst) en 3:1 (grote tekst)
- Informatie niet alleen via kleur overgebracht
- Tekst schaalbaar zonder verlies van functionaliteit

### Media
- Alt-teksten bij afbeeldingen (beschrijvend, niet "afbeelding van...")
- Captions bij video's
- Geen autoplay met geluid

## Output

Rapporteer in het Nederlands met:
- WCAG succescriterium referentie (bijv. 1.4.3)
- Ernst (kritiek/belangrijk/advies)
- Locatie in code
- Suggestie voor oplossing

Related Skills

a11y-self-check

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Proactively validates Claude Code's own generated HTML/JSX/TSX output for accessibility before presenting to users. Use this skill automatically when generating UI code to ensure WCAG 2.1 AA compliance.

a11y-personas

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Library of accessibility personas representing people with various disabilities, impairments, and situational limitations. Use this skill when users ask about disability types, accessibility personas, user needs for specific conditions, how people with disabilities use technology, assistive technology users, or designing for accessibility. Triggers on requests about blindness, deafness, cognitive disabilities, motor impairments, low vision, screen readers, sign language, autism, ADHD, temporary disabilities, or any question about "how would a person with X use this".

a11y-debugging

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Uses Chrome DevTools MCP for accessibility (a11y) debugging and auditing based on web.dev guidelines. Use when testing semantic HTML, ARIA labels, focus states, keyboard navigation, tap targets, and color contrast.

a11y-annotation-generator

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Adds accessibility annotations (ARIA labels, roles, alt text) to make web content accessible. Use when user asks to "add accessibility", "make accessible", "add aria labels", "wcag compliance", or "screen reader support".

ui-design-a11y

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

无障碍设计审查与修复能力。

scaffold-bulk-review-prototypes

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Review all prototypes at once for cross-prototype consistency, coverage gaps, ADR follow-through, and scope discipline. Use for a full audit of all prototypes.

review:ux

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

UX Review - analyzes feature for efficiency-first UX patterns, keyboard navigation, and pro-tool experience

review-model-guidance

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Guidance for selecting models when performing code review with subtasks. Load this skill to enable intelligent model selection for review analysis — choosing faster models for simple tasks and deeper reasoning models for complex analysis.

pr-review

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Guidelines for conducting thorough pull request code reviews

astro-a11y

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Accessibility patterns for Astro lead generation sites. WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, screen readers, keyboard navigation, focus management, ARIA. Use for all accessibility implementation.

ascii-design-reviewer

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Review Phase 1 ASCII UI designs from a product owner perspective. Analyze user journeys, identify potential issues, ask clarifying questions about requirements and user flows, create Mermaid diagrams (flowcharts, sequence diagrams, state charts), provide detailed system behavior documentation, and document error handling strategies. Use when reviewing ASCII mockups to validate design against actual user needs, understand system workflows, and ensure completeness before moving to implementation.

academic-reviewer

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Expert guidance for reviewing academic manuscripts submitted to journals, particularly in political science, economics, and quantitative social sciences. Use when asked to review, critique, or provide feedback on academic papers, research designs, or empirical strategies. Emphasizes methodological rigor, causal identification strategies, and constructive feedback on research design.