academic-research-writer
Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.
Best use case
academic-research-writer is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.
Teams using academic-research-writer should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/academic-research-writer/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How academic-research-writer Compares
| Feature / Agent | academic-research-writer | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for ChatGPT
Find the best AI skills to adapt into ChatGPT workflows for research, writing, summarization, planning, and repeatable assistant tasks.
AI Agent for YouTube Script Writing
Find AI agent skills for YouTube script writing, video research, content outlining, and repeatable channel production workflows.
SKILL.md Source
# Academic Research Writer
This skill enables creation of high-quality academic research documents with proper scholarly standards, verified peer-reviewed sources, and IEEE-format citations.
## Core Principles
1. **Academic Rigor**: Follow scholarly writing conventions and maintain objectivity
2. **Source Verification**: Use only peer-reviewed, credible academic sources
3. **Proper Citation**: Generate accurate IEEE-format references
4. **Research Integrity**: Ensure all claims are supported by verified sources
## Workflow
### 1. Understanding Requirements
Clarify the research document type and requirements:
- Document type (research paper, literature review, thesis chapter, etc.)
- Research topic and scope
- Target length
- Specific guidelines (institution, journal, conference)
- Required sections
- Deadline considerations
### 2. Research Planning
Develop a research strategy:
- Identify key research questions
- Define search terms and keywords
- Determine relevant academic databases (Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect)
- Establish inclusion/exclusion criteria for sources
- Plan document structure
### 3. Source Discovery and Verification
**Finding Sources:**
Use web_search to find peer-reviewed sources from:
- Google Scholar (scholar.google.com)
- IEEE Xplore (ieeexplore.ieee.org)
- PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
- ACM Digital Library (dl.acm.org)
- arXiv (arxiv.org) - for preprints in relevant fields
- Domain-specific databases
**Search Strategy:**
- Start with broad searches: "machine learning healthcare"
- Refine with specific terms: "deep learning medical diagnosis 2023"
- Use quotation marks for exact phrases: "convolutional neural networks"
- Combine terms strategically
- Search for recent publications (last 5-7 years unless historical context needed)
**Verification Checklist:**
For each source, verify:
- [ ] Published in peer-reviewed journal or conference
- [ ] Author credentials and institutional affiliation
- [ ] Publication venue reputation
- [ ] Citation count (higher indicates impact)
- [ ] Methodology soundness
- [ ] Relevance to research question
**Red Flags:**
- Predatory journals (check journalquality.info or beallslist)
- Lack of peer review process
- No institutional affiliation
- Suspicious publication practices
- Pay-to-publish without legitimate review
### 4. Document Structure
Create documents following this standard academic structure:
**Research Paper:**
1. Title
2. Abstract (150-250 words)
3. Keywords (5-7 terms)
4. Introduction
- Background and context
- Problem statement
- Research objectives
- Contribution statement
- Paper organization
5. Literature Review / Related Work
- Theoretical framework
- Previous research synthesis
- Research gap identification
6. Methodology (if applicable)
- Research design
- Data collection
- Analysis approach
7. Results / Findings
8. Discussion
- Interpretation
- Implications
- Limitations
9. Conclusion
- Summary of findings
- Future work
10. References (IEEE format)
**Literature Review:**
1. Title
2. Abstract
3. Introduction
4. Review Methodology
5. Thematic Sections (organized by themes/topics)
6. Discussion and Synthesis
7. Conclusion
8. References
### 5. Writing Guidelines
**Academic Tone:**
- Use formal, objective language
- Write in third person (avoid "I" or "we" unless methodologically appropriate)
- Use precise technical terminology
- Maintain neutral stance (present multiple perspectives)
- Use hedging language appropriately ("suggests," "indicates," "may")
**Paragraph Structure:**
- Topic sentence
- Supporting evidence with citations
- Analysis and interpretation
- Transition to next point
**Citation Integration:**
- Introduce sources with context
- Use signal phrases ("According to Smith et al. [1]...", "Research by Jones [2] demonstrates...")
- Balance direct quotations (use sparingly) with paraphrasing
- Cite after every factual claim from external sources
- Use citation numbers in square brackets [1], [2], [3]
**Avoid:**
- Plagiarism (always paraphrase and cite)
- Unsupported claims
- Casual or colloquial language
- Personal opinions without evidence
- Excessive quotations
- Wikipedia or non-academic sources
### 6. IEEE Reference Format
Generate references in IEEE format following these patterns:
**Journal Article:**
```
[1] A. Author, B. Author, and C. Author, "Title of article," Journal Name, vol. X, no. Y, pp. ZZ-ZZ, Month Year.
```
**Conference Paper:**
```
[2] A. Author and B. Author, "Title of paper," in Proc. Conference Name, City, Country, Year, pp. ZZ-ZZ.
```
**Book:**
```
[3] A. Author, Title of Book, Edition. City, State: Publisher, Year.
```
**Book Chapter:**
```
[4] A. Author, "Title of chapter," in Book Title, Edition, Ed. City, State: Publisher, Year, pp. ZZ-ZZ.
```
**Website/Online:**
```
[5] A. Author. "Title of webpage." Website Name. URL (accessed Month Day, Year).
```
**Technical Report:**
```
[6] A. Author, "Title," Institution, City, State, Rep. Number, Month Year.
```
**Thesis/Dissertation:**
```
[7] A. Author, "Title," Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Abbrev., University, City, State, Year.
```
**Patent:**
```
[8] A. Inventor, "Title," Country Patent Number, Month Day, Year.
```
**Standards:**
```
[9] Title of Standard, Standard Number, Year.
```
**Key IEEE Rules:**
- Number references consecutively in order of appearance
- Use square brackets [1], [2], [3]
- For multiple authors: list all if ≤6; use "et al." if >6
- Use initials for first/middle names
- Abbreviate journal names per IEEE standards
- Include DOI when available
- Maintain consistent formatting
### 7. Quality Assurance
Before finalizing, verify:
**Content:**
- [ ] Clear research question/objective
- [ ] Logical flow and organization
- [ ] Adequate source coverage (minimum 15-20 for research paper)
- [ ] All sources verified as peer-reviewed
- [ ] Claims supported by citations
- [ ] Methodology clearly explained (if applicable)
- [ ] Results/findings clearly presented
- [ ] Limitations acknowledged
**Technical:**
- [ ] IEEE reference format correct
- [ ] All in-text citations match reference list
- [ ] No missing references
- [ ] Consistent citation numbering
- [ ] Proper figure/table captions and numbering
**Writing Quality:**
- [ ] Academic tone maintained
- [ ] Clear and concise language
- [ ] No grammatical errors
- [ ] Transitions between sections smooth
- [ ] Abstract accurately summarizes paper
## Implementation Approach
When creating an academic document:
1. Use web_search extensively to find peer-reviewed sources
2. Verify each source's academic credibility
3. Extract relevant information and synthesize findings
4. Write in formal academic style
5. Integrate citations naturally throughout
6. Generate complete IEEE reference list
7. Create document using appropriate tool (docx, pdf, or markdown)
## Reference Resources
For detailed guidance on specific aspects:
- Academic writing conventions: See [ACADEMIC-WRITING.md](references/ACADEMIC-WRITING.md)
- IEEE citation examples: See [IEEE-CITATION-GUIDE.md](references/IEEE-CITATION-GUIDE.md)
- Source verification: See [SOURCE-VERIFICATION.md](references/SOURCE-VERIFICATION.md)
## Output Format
Create documents as:
- **DOCX**: For full research papers, theses, dissertations (use docx skill)
- **PDF**: For final submission versions (use pdf skill)
- **Markdown**: For drafts, literature reviews, or online publication
## Notes
- Always prioritize source quality over quantity
- Recent sources (last 5-7 years) preferred unless historical context required
- Maintain research integrity throughout
- When in doubt about a source, search for additional verification
- Use web_fetch to access full articles when availableRelated Skills
academic-review
Interactive review sessions with academic PDFs (lectures, research papers, book chapters). Extract concepts, run Q&A sessions, generate quizzes with scoring. Preserves mathematical formulas in LaTeX format. Privacy-preserving local processing - PDFs never uploaded. Use when studying academic materials, reviewing research, or preparing for exams.
Academic Researcher
Academic paper search across 14+ scholarly platforms including arXiv, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Semantic Scholar, Sci-Hub, and more. Use for literature review, research discovery, and citation management.
academic-research
Create comprehensive academic research notes with deep literature coverage. Auto-detects language (EN prompt→EN output, TR prompt→TR output). Supports Obsidian markdown and PDF. Performs 8-15 iterative search cycles with 25-50+ sources for comprehensive coverage. Uses footnote citations and visual overviews.
academic-deep-research
Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.
Academic Bluebook
Citation formatting rules for law review articles using The Bluebook (21st ed.) academic style
academic-bibtex-manager
When the user requests to add academic papers to a BibTeX bibliography file while maintaining format consistency and sourcing from appropriate repositories. This skill handles 1) Reading existing BibTeX files to understand formatting conventions, 2) Searching for academic papers across multiple sources (OpenReview for conference papers, arXiv for preprints), 3) Extracting proper BibTeX metadata from conference pages or arXiv entries, 4) Determining appropriate citation format (@article vs @inproceedings) based on publication venue, 5) Appending new entries while preserving existing file structure and formatting. Triggers include requests to 'add to ref.bib', 'update bibliography', 'cite papers', or when working with academic reference files.
21-understand-research-150
[21] UNDERSTAND. Deep research workflow for this project using 150% scope (100% core + 50% boundary), evidence-based reasoning, and structured investigation notes. Use when the task requires investigation, root-cause analysis, or mapping unknown areas. Always maintain a research log file that captures findings, hypotheses, and next branches; use web.run when external verification is needed.
latex-research-posters
Create professional research posters in LaTeX using beamerposter, tikzposter, or baposter. Layout design, typography, color schemes, figure integration, accessibility, and quality control for conference presentations. Includes ready-to-use templates. For programmatic figure generation use matplotlib-scientific-plotting or plotly-interactive-visualization.
design-research
Research website design, styling, and frontend implementation using Playwright CLI to capture screenshots and analyze structure. Use when a software engineer wants to understand and implement a similar design. Keywords: design research, website design, frontend analysis, UI study, design system, screenshot, Playwright
brutalist-academic-ui
Skriptoteket-specific brutalist/academic UI design. Use for Vue/Vite SPA and SSR templates when you want grid-based layouts, systematic typography, and high-contrast “academic” aesthetics, while staying compatible with Skriptoteket’s pure-CSS + HuleEdu token stack (no Tailwind).
analyzing-research-documents
Extracts high-value insights from research documents, RCAs, design docs, and memos - filters aggressively to return only actionable information. Research equivalent of analyzing-implementations skill.
agent-ux-researcher
Expert UX researcher specializing in user insights, usability testing, and data-driven design decisions. Masters qualitative and quantitative research methods to uncover user needs, validate designs, and drive product improvements through actionable insights.