aget-review-budget
Review budget allocation and ROI
Best use case
aget-review-budget is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Review budget allocation and ROI
Teams using aget-review-budget should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/aget-review-budget/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How aget-review-budget Compares
| Feature / Agent | aget-review-budget | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Review budget allocation and ROI
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# aget-review-budget Review budget allocation, ROI, and resource distribution. Provides financial analysis and optimization recommendations. ## Instructions When this skill is invoked: 1. **Gather Budget Data** - Planned allocation - Actual expenditure - Time period scope 2. **Categorize Expenditures** - By type (operational, capital, etc.) - By department/project - By priority 3. **Calculate ROI** - Investment amount - Return measurement - ROI percentage 4. **Variance Analysis** - Planned vs. actual - Significant variances - Root causes 5. **Optimization Opportunities** - Cost reduction areas - Reallocation suggestions - Efficiency improvements ## Output Format ```markdown ## Budget Review: [Period/Scope] ### Overview | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Total Budget | $[X] | | Total Spent | $[Y] | | Variance | $[Z] ([N]%) | | Period | [Date range] | --- ### Expenditure by Category | Category | Planned | Actual | Variance | |----------|---------|--------|----------| | [Cat 1] | $[X] | $[Y] | $[Z] | | [Cat 2] | $[X] | $[Y] | $[Z] | | **Total** | $[X] | $[Y] | $[Z] | --- ### ROI Analysis | Investment | Cost | Return | ROI | |------------|------|--------|-----| | [Project 1] | $[X] | $[Y] | [N]% | | [Project 2] | $[X] | $[Y] | [N]% | --- ### Variance Analysis #### Significant Variances 1. **[Category]**: $[Amount] ([N]%) - Root cause: [Explanation] - Action: [Recommended response] --- ### Optimization Recommendations 1. **[Area]**: [Recommendation] - Potential savings: $[X] - Implementation effort: [Low/Med/High] --- ### Risks - [Financial risk to monitor] ``` ## Constraints - **C1**: NEVER fabricate financial data — financial integrity essential - **C2**: NEVER make spending decisions — executive reviews, doesn't automate decisions - **C3**: NEVER expose sensitive financial details in logs — financial data requires confidentiality ## Related - SKILL-026: aget-review-budget specification - ONTOLOGY_executive.yaml: Budget, ROI, Delegation concepts - CAP-EXE-002: Budget Review capability
Related Skills
budget-ui-components
Componentes de UI para orçamentos seguindo o padrão de components do Easy Budget.
ascii-design-reviewer
Review Phase 1 ASCII UI designs from a product owner perspective. Analyze user journeys, identify potential issues, ask clarifying questions about requirements and user flows, create Mermaid diagrams (flowcharts, sequence diagrams, state charts), provide detailed system behavior documentation, and document error handling strategies. Use when reviewing ASCII mockups to validate design against actual user needs, understand system workflows, and ensure completeness before moving to implementation.
academic-reviewer
Expert guidance for reviewing academic manuscripts submitted to journals, particularly in political science, economics, and quantitative social sciences. Use when asked to review, critique, or provide feedback on academic papers, research designs, or empirical strategies. Emphasizes methodological rigor, causal identification strategies, and constructive feedback on research design.
systematic-literature-review
当用户明确要求"做系统综述/文献综述/related work/相关工作/文献调研"时使用。AI 自定检索词，多源检索→去重→AI 逐篇阅读并评分（1–10分语义相关性与子主题分组）→按高分优先比例选文→自动生成"综/述"字数预算→资深领域专家自由写作（固定摘要/引言/子主题/讨论/展望/结论），保留正文字数与参考文献数硬校验，强制导出 PDF 与 Word。支持多语言翻译与智能编译（en/zh/ja/de/fr/es）。
spec-review
How to verify implementation against OpenSpec artifacts
reviewing-agent-prompting
Review and improve prompts for coding agents. Use PROACTIVELY when auditing, checking, or evaluating agent instructions, system prompts, or task delegation text. Applies state-machine thinking to identify structural gaps and improve effectiveness.
review-changes
Orchestrate multiple review agents for a comprehensive pre-PR code review. Analyzes diff, verifies intent alignment with linked issues, and checks for broader codebase impacts. Use before opening a PR to catch bugs, security issues, silent failures, and performance problems. Keywords: review, code review, pre-PR, diff review, check changes, audit changes
review-agents-md
Creates minimal, effective AGENTS.md files using progressive disclosure. Triggers on "create agents.md", "refactor agents.md", "review my agents.md", "claude.md", or questions about agent configuration files. Also triggers proactively when a project is missing AGENTS.md.
review-agent-native
Use this skill when reviewing code to ensure features are agent-native - that any action a user can take, an agent can also take, and anything a user can see, an agent can see. This enforces the principle that agents should have parity with users in capability and context.
quant-plan-reviewer
Use when reviewing implementation plans for quantitative trading systems before execution - catches data leakage, look-ahead bias, scalability risks, and production pitfalls
observability-review
AI agent that analyzes operational signals (metrics, logs, traces, alerts, SLO/SLI reports) from observability platforms (Prometheus, Datadog, New Relic, CloudWatch, Grafana, Elastic) and produces practical, risk-aware triage and recommendations. Use when reviewing system health, investigating performance issues, analyzing monitoring data, evaluating service reliability, or providing SRE analysis of operational metrics. Distinguishes between critical issues requiring action, items needing investigation, and informational observations requiring no action.
multi-model-reviewer
協調多個 AI 模型（ChatGPT、Gemini、Codex、QWEN、Claude）進行三角驗證，確保「Specification == Program == Test」一致性。過濾假警報後輸出報告，大幅減少人工介入時間。