evaluation

Imported skill evaluation from anthropic

16 stars

Best use case

evaluation is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Imported skill evaluation from anthropic

Teams using evaluation should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/evaluation/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill/main/skills/ai-agents/evaluation/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/evaluation/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How evaluation Compares

Feature / AgentevaluationStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Imported skill evaluation from anthropic

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

"""MCP Server Evaluation Harness

This script evaluates MCP servers by running test questions against them using Claude.
"""

import argparse
import asyncio
import json
import re
import sys
import time
import traceback
import xml.etree.ElementTree as ET
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any

from anthropic import Anthropic

from connections import create_connection

EVALUATION_PROMPT = """You are an AI assistant with access to tools.

When given a task, you MUST:
1. Use the available tools to complete the task
2. Provide summary of each step in your approach, wrapped in <summary> tags
3. Provide feedback on the tools provided, wrapped in <feedback> tags
4. Provide your final response, wrapped in <response> tags

Summary Requirements:
- In your <summary> tags, you must explain:
  - The steps you took to complete the task
  - Which tools you used, in what order, and why
  - The inputs you provided to each tool
  - The outputs you received from each tool
  - A summary for how you arrived at the response

Feedback Requirements:
- In your <feedback> tags, provide constructive feedback on the tools:
  - Comment on tool names: Are they clear and descriptive?
  - Comment on input parameters: Are they well-documented? Are required vs optional parameters clear?
  - Comment on descriptions: Do they accurately describe what the tool does?
  - Comment on any errors encountered during tool usage: Did the tool fail to execute? Did the tool return too many tokens?
  - Identify specific areas for improvement and explain WHY they would help
  - Be specific and actionable in your suggestions

Response Requirements:
- Your response should be concise and directly address what was asked
- Always wrap your final response in <response> tags
- If you cannot solve the task return <response>NOT_FOUND</response>
- For numeric responses, provide just the number
- For IDs, provide just the ID
- For names or text, provide the exact text requested
- Your response should go last"""


def parse_evaluation_file(file_path: Path) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
    """Parse XML evaluation file with qa_pair elements."""
    try:
        tree = ET.parse(file_path)
        root = tree.getroot()
        evaluations = []

        for qa_pair in root.findall(".//qa_pair"):
            question_elem = qa_pair.find("question")
            answer_elem = qa_pair.find("answer")

            if question_elem is not None and answer_elem is not None:
                evaluations.append({
                    "question": (question_elem.text or "").strip(),
                    "answer": (answer_elem.text or "").strip(),
                })

        return evaluations
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error parsing evaluation file {file_path}: {e}")
        return []


def extract_xml_content(text: str, tag: str) -> str | None:
    """Extract content from XML tags."""
    pattern = rf"<{tag}>(.*?)</{tag}>"
    matches = re.findall(pattern, text, re.DOTALL)
    return matches[-1].strip() if matches else None


async def agent_loop(
    client: Anthropic,
    model: str,
    question: str,
    tools: list[dict[str, Any]],
    connection: Any,
) -> tuple[str, dict[str, Any]]:
    """Run the agent loop with MCP tools."""
    messages = [{"role": "user", "content": question}]

    response = await asyncio.to_thread(
        client.messages.create,
        model=model,
        max_tokens=4096,
        system=EVALUATION_PROMPT,
        messages=messages,
        tools=tools,
    )

    messages.append({"role": "assistant", "content": response.content})

    tool_metrics = {}

    while response.stop_reason == "tool_use":
        tool_use = next(block for block in response.content if block.type == "tool_use")
        tool_name = tool_use.name
        tool_input = tool_use.input

        tool_start_ts = time.time()
        try:
            tool_result = await connection.call_tool(tool_name, tool_input)
            tool_response = json.dumps(tool_result) if isinstance(tool_result, (dict, list)) else str(tool_result)
        except Exception as e:
            tool_response = f"Error executing tool {tool_name}: {str(e)}\n"
            tool_response += traceback.format_exc()
        tool_duration = time.time() - tool_start_ts

        if tool_name not in tool_metrics:
            tool_metrics[tool_name] = {"count": 0, "durations": []}
        tool_metrics[tool_name]["count"] += 1
        tool_metrics[tool_name]["durations"].append(tool_duration)

        messages.append({
            "role": "user",
            "content": [{
                "type": "tool_result",
                "tool_use_id": tool_use.id,
                "content": tool_response,
            }]
        })

        response = await asyncio.to_thread(
            client.messages.create,
            model=model,
            max_tokens=4096,
            system=EVALUATION_PROMPT,
            messages=messages,
            tools=tools,
        )
        messages.append({"role": "assistant", "content": response.content})

    response_text = next(
        (block.text for block in response.content if hasattr(block, "text")),
        None,
    )
    return response_text, tool_metrics


async def evaluate_single_task(
    client: Anthropic,
    model: str,
    qa_pair: dict[str, Any],
    tools: list[dict[str, Any]],
    connection: Any,
    task_index: int,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
    """Evaluate a single QA pair with the given tools."""
    start_time = time.time()

    print(f"Task {task_index + 1}: Running task with question: {qa_pair['question']}")
    response, tool_metrics = await agent_loop(client, model, qa_pair["question"], tools, connection)

    response_value = extract_xml_content(response, "response")
    summary = extract_xml_content(response, "summary")
    feedback = extract_xml_content(response, "feedback")

    duration_seconds = time.time() - start_time

    return {
        "question": qa_pair["question"],
        "expected": qa_pair["answer"],
        "actual": response_value,
        "score": int(response_value == qa_pair["answer"]) if response_value else 0,
        "total_duration": duration_seconds,
        "tool_calls": tool_metrics,
        "num_tool_calls": sum(len(metrics["durations"]) for metrics in tool_metrics.values()),
        "summary": summary,
        "feedback": feedback,
    }


REPORT_HEADER = """
# Evaluation Report

## Summary

- **Accuracy**: {correct}/{total} ({accuracy:.1f}%)
- **Average Task Duration**: {average_duration_s:.2f}s
- **Average Tool Calls per Task**: {average_tool_calls:.2f}
- **Total Tool Calls**: {total_tool_calls}

---
"""

TASK_TEMPLATE = """
### Task {task_num}

**Question**: {question}
**Ground Truth Answer**: `{expected_answer}`
**Actual Answer**: `{actual_answer}`
**Correct**: {correct_indicator}
**Duration**: {total_duration:.2f}s
**Tool Calls**: {tool_calls}

**Summary**
{summary}

**Feedback**
{feedback}

---
"""


async def run_evaluation(
    eval_path: Path,
    connection: Any,
    model: str = "claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219",
) -> str:
    """Run evaluation with MCP server tools."""
    print("🚀 Starting Evaluation")

    client = Anthropic()

    tools = await connection.list_tools()
    print(f"📋 Loaded {len(tools)} tools from MCP server")

    qa_pairs = parse_evaluation_file(eval_path)
    print(f"📋 Loaded {len(qa_pairs)} evaluation tasks")

    results = []
    for i, qa_pair in enumerate(qa_pairs):
        print(f"Processing task {i + 1}/{len(qa_pairs)}")
        result = await evaluate_single_task(client, model, qa_pair, tools, connection, i)
        results.append(result)

    correct = sum(r["score"] for r in results)
    accuracy = (correct / len(results)) * 100 if results else 0
    average_duration_s = sum(r["total_duration"] for r in results) / len(results) if results else 0
    average_tool_calls = sum(r["num_tool_calls"] for r in results) / len(results) if results else 0
    total_tool_calls = sum(r["num_tool_calls"] for r in results)

    report = REPORT_HEADER.format(
        correct=correct,
        total=len(results),
        accuracy=accuracy,
        average_duration_s=average_duration_s,
        average_tool_calls=average_tool_calls,
        total_tool_calls=total_tool_calls,
    )

    report += "".join([
        TASK_TEMPLATE.format(
            task_num=i + 1,
            question=qa_pair["question"],
            expected_answer=qa_pair["answer"],
            actual_answer=result["actual"] or "N/A",
            correct_indicator="✅" if result["score"] else "❌",
            total_duration=result["total_duration"],
            tool_calls=json.dumps(result["tool_calls"], indent=2),
            summary=result["summary"] or "N/A",
            feedback=result["feedback"] or "N/A",
        )
        for i, (qa_pair, result) in enumerate(zip(qa_pairs, results))
    ])

    return report


def parse_headers(header_list: list[str]) -> dict[str, str]:
    """Parse header strings in format 'Key: Value' into a dictionary."""
    headers = {}
    if not header_list:
        return headers

    for header in header_list:
        if ":" in header:
            key, value = header.split(":", 1)
            headers[key.strip()] = value.strip()
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Ignoring malformed header: {header}")
    return headers


def parse_env_vars(env_list: list[str]) -> dict[str, str]:
    """Parse environment variable strings in format 'KEY=VALUE' into a dictionary."""
    env = {}
    if not env_list:
        return env

    for env_var in env_list:
        if "=" in env_var:
            key, value = env_var.split("=", 1)
            env[key.strip()] = value.strip()
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Ignoring malformed environment variable: {env_var}")
    return env


async def main():
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
        description="Evaluate MCP servers using test questions",
        formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter,
        epilog="""
Examples:
  # Evaluate a local stdio MCP server
  python evaluation.py -t stdio -c python -a my_server.py eval.xml

  # Evaluate an SSE MCP server
  python evaluation.py -t sse -u https://example.com/mcp -H "Authorization: Bearer token" eval.xml

  # Evaluate an HTTP MCP server with custom model
  python evaluation.py -t http -u https://example.com/mcp -m claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 eval.xml
        """,
    )

    parser.add_argument("eval_file", type=Path, help="Path to evaluation XML file")
    parser.add_argument("-t", "--transport", choices=["stdio", "sse", "http"], default="stdio", help="Transport type (default: stdio)")
    parser.add_argument("-m", "--model", default="claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219", help="Claude model to use (default: claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219)")

    stdio_group = parser.add_argument_group("stdio options")
    stdio_group.add_argument("-c", "--command", help="Command to run MCP server (stdio only)")
    stdio_group.add_argument("-a", "--args", nargs="+", help="Arguments for the command (stdio only)")
    stdio_group.add_argument("-e", "--env", nargs="+", help="Environment variables in KEY=VALUE format (stdio only)")

    remote_group = parser.add_argument_group("sse/http options")
    remote_group.add_argument("-u", "--url", help="MCP server URL (sse/http only)")
    remote_group.add_argument("-H", "--header", nargs="+", dest="headers", help="HTTP headers in 'Key: Value' format (sse/http only)")

    parser.add_argument("-o", "--output", type=Path, help="Output file for evaluation report (default: stdout)")

    args = parser.parse_args()

    if not args.eval_file.exists():
        print(f"Error: Evaluation file not found: {args.eval_file}")
        sys.exit(1)

    headers = parse_headers(args.headers) if args.headers else None
    env_vars = parse_env_vars(args.env) if args.env else None

    try:
        connection = create_connection(
            transport=args.transport,
            command=args.command,
            args=args.args,
            env=env_vars,
            url=args.url,
            headers=headers,
        )
    except ValueError as e:
        print(f"Error: {e}")
        sys.exit(1)

    print(f"🔗 Connecting to MCP server via {args.transport}...")

    async with connection:
        print("✅ Connected successfully")
        report = await run_evaluation(args.eval_file, connection, args.model)

        if args.output:
            args.output.write_text(report)
            print(f"\n✅ Report saved to {args.output}")
        else:
            print("\n" + report)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    asyncio.run(main())

Related Skills

Agent Evaluation

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.

advanced-evaluation

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Master LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation techniques including direct scoring, pairwise comparison, rubric generation, and bias mitigation. Use when building evaluation systems, comparing model outputs, or establishing quality standards for AI-generated content.

llm-evaluation

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.

anthropic-evaluations

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create evals", "evaluate an agent", "build evaluation suite", or mentions agent testing, graders, or benchmarks. Also suggest when building coding agents, conversational agents, or research agents that need quality assurance.

bgo

10
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Automates the complete Blender build-go workflow, from building and packaging your extension/add-on to removing old versions, installing, enabling, and launching Blender for quick testing and iteration.

Coding & Development

moai-lang-r

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

R 4.4+ best practices with testthat 3.2, lintr 3.2, and data analysis patterns.

moai-lang-python

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Python 3.13+ development specialist covering FastAPI, Django, async patterns, data science, testing with pytest, and modern Python features. Use when developing Python APIs, web applications, data pipelines, or writing tests.

moai-icons-vector

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Vector icon libraries ecosystem guide covering 10+ major libraries with 200K+ icons, including React Icons (35K+), Lucide (1000+), Tabler Icons (5900+), Iconify (200K+), Heroicons, Phosphor, and Radix Icons with implementation patterns, decision trees, and best practices.

moai-foundation-trust

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Complete TRUST 4 principles guide covering Test First, Readable, Unified, Secured. Validation methods, enterprise quality gates, metrics, and November 2025 standards. Enterprise v4.0 with 50+ software quality standards references.

moai-foundation-memory

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Persistent memory across sessions using MCP Memory Server for user preferences, project context, and learned patterns

moai-foundation-core

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

MoAI-ADK's foundational principles - TRUST 5, SPEC-First TDD, delegation patterns, token optimization, progressive disclosure, modular architecture, agent catalog, command reference, and execution rules for building AI-powered development workflows

moai-cc-claude-md

16
from diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill

Authoring CLAUDE.md Project Instructions. Design project-specific AI guidance, document workflows, define architecture patterns. Use when creating CLAUDE.md files for projects, documenting team standards, or establishing AI collaboration guidelines.