feature-design-assistant
Turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Use when planning new features, designing architecture, or making significant changes to the codebase.
Best use case
feature-design-assistant is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Use when planning new features, designing architecture, or making significant changes to the codebase.
Teams using feature-design-assistant should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/feature-design-assistant/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How feature-design-assistant Compares
| Feature / Agent | feature-design-assistant | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Use when planning new features, designing architecture, or making significant changes to the codebase.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Feature Design Assistant
Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through structured information gathering and collaborative validation.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the feature-design-assistant skill to design this feature."
## Phase 1: Context Discovery
First, explore the codebase to understand:
- Project structure and tech stack
- Existing patterns and conventions
- Related features or modules
- Recent changes in relevant areas
## Phase 2: Structured Information Gathering
Use **AskUserQuestion** to batch collect information efficiently. Each call can ask up to 4 questions.
### Round 1: Core Requirements (4 questions)
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What is the primary goal of this feature?",
"header": "Goal",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "New Functionality", "description": "Add entirely new capability to the system" },
{ "label": "Enhancement", "description": "Improve or extend existing feature" },
{ "label": "Bug Fix", "description": "Fix incorrect behavior or issue" },
{ "label": "Refactoring", "description": "Improve code quality without changing behavior" }
]
},
{
"question": "Who are the primary users of this feature?",
"header": "Users",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "End Users", "description": "External customers using the product" },
{ "label": "Admins", "description": "Internal administrators or operators" },
{ "label": "Developers", "description": "Other developers using APIs or SDKs" },
{ "label": "System", "description": "Automated processes or background jobs" }
]
},
{
"question": "What is the expected scope of this feature?",
"header": "Scope",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Small (1-2 days)", "description": "Single component, limited changes" },
{ "label": "Medium (3-5 days)", "description": "Multiple components, moderate complexity" },
{ "label": "Large (1-2 weeks)", "description": "Cross-cutting concerns, significant changes" },
{ "label": "Unsure", "description": "Need to explore further to estimate" }
]
},
{
"question": "Are there any hard deadlines or constraints?",
"header": "Timeline",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Urgent", "description": "Need this ASAP, within days" },
{ "label": "This Sprint", "description": "Should be done within current sprint" },
{ "label": "Flexible", "description": "No hard deadline, quality over speed" },
{ "label": "Planning Only", "description": "Just designing now, implementing later" }
]
}
]
}
```
### Round 2: Technical Requirements (4 questions)
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Which layers of the system will this feature touch?",
"header": "Layers",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Data Model", "description": "Database schema, models, migrations" },
{ "label": "Business Logic", "description": "Services, domain logic, rules" },
{ "label": "API", "description": "REST/GraphQL endpoints, contracts" },
{ "label": "UI", "description": "Frontend components, user interface" }
]
},
{
"question": "What are the key quality requirements?",
"header": "Quality",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "High Performance", "description": "Must handle high load or be very fast" },
{ "label": "Strong Security", "description": "Sensitive data, auth, access control" },
{ "label": "High Reliability", "description": "Cannot fail, needs redundancy" },
{ "label": "Easy Maintenance", "description": "Needs to be easily understood and modified" }
]
},
{
"question": "How should errors be handled?",
"header": "Errors",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Fail Fast", "description": "Stop immediately on any error" },
{ "label": "Graceful Degrade", "description": "Continue with reduced functionality" },
{ "label": "Retry & Recover", "description": "Automatic retry with recovery logic" },
{ "label": "Context Dependent", "description": "Different strategies for different cases" }
]
},
{
"question": "What testing approach is preferred?",
"header": "Testing",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "TDD (Recommended)", "description": "Write tests first, then implementation" },
{ "label": "Test After", "description": "Implement first, add tests after" },
{ "label": "Minimal Tests", "description": "Only critical path testing" },
{ "label": "No Tests", "description": "Skip testing for this feature" }
]
}
]
}
```
### Round 3: Integration & Dependencies (4 questions)
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Does this feature need external integrations?",
"header": "Integrations",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Database", "description": "New tables, queries, or migrations" },
{ "label": "External APIs", "description": "Third-party service calls" },
{ "label": "Message Queue", "description": "Async processing, events" },
{ "label": "None", "description": "No external integrations needed" }
]
},
{
"question": "Are there dependencies on other features or teams?",
"header": "Dependencies",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Auth System", "description": "User authentication or authorization" },
{ "label": "Other Features", "description": "Depends on features being developed" },
{ "label": "External Team", "description": "Needs input from another team" },
{ "label": "None", "description": "Fully independent feature" }
]
},
{
"question": "How should we handle backwards compatibility?",
"header": "Compat",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Must Maintain", "description": "Cannot break existing clients" },
{ "label": "Version API", "description": "Create new version, deprecate old" },
{ "label": "Breaking OK", "description": "Can make breaking changes" },
{ "label": "Not Applicable", "description": "New feature, no existing users" }
]
},
{
"question": "What documentation is needed?",
"header": "Docs",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "API Docs", "description": "Endpoint documentation" },
{ "label": "User Guide", "description": "How-to for end users" },
{ "label": "Dev Guide", "description": "Technical implementation details" },
{ "label": "None", "description": "No documentation needed" }
]
}
]
}
```
### Round 4: Clarifying Questions (Context-Dependent)
Based on previous answers, ask follow-up questions. Examples:
**If UI layer selected:**
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What UI framework/approach should we use?",
"header": "UI Tech",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "React", "description": "React components with hooks" },
{ "label": "Vue", "description": "Vue.js components" },
{ "label": "Server-Side", "description": "Server-rendered HTML templates" },
{ "label": "Existing Pattern", "description": "Follow current project conventions" }
]
}
]
}
```
**If High Security selected:**
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What security measures are required?",
"header": "Security",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Input Validation", "description": "Strict input sanitization" },
{ "label": "Rate Limiting", "description": "Prevent abuse and DoS" },
{ "label": "Audit Logging", "description": "Track all sensitive actions" },
{ "label": "Encryption", "description": "Encrypt data at rest/transit" }
]
}
]
}
```
## Phase 3: Approach Exploration
After gathering requirements, propose 2-3 approaches:
```markdown
## Approach Options
### Option A: [Name] (Recommended)
**Pros:** ...
**Cons:** ...
**Best for:** ...
### Option B: [Name]
**Pros:** ...
**Cons:** ...
**Best for:** ...
### Option C: [Name]
**Pros:** ...
**Cons:** ...
**Best for:** ...
```
Use AskUserQuestion to confirm approach:
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Which approach would you like to proceed with?",
"header": "Approach",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Option A (Recommended)", "description": "Brief summary of approach A" },
{ "label": "Option B", "description": "Brief summary of approach B" },
{ "label": "Option C", "description": "Brief summary of approach C" }
]
}
]
}
```
## Phase 4: Design Presentation
Present design in sections (300-500 words each), validate after each:
1. **Architecture Overview** - High-level structure
2. **Data Model** - Entities, relationships, schema
3. **API Design** - Endpoints, request/response
4. **Component Design** - Internal modules, interfaces
5. **Error Handling** - Error cases, recovery strategies
6. **Testing Strategy** - What and how to test
After each section, use AskUserQuestion:
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Does this section look correct?",
"header": "Review",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Looks Good", "description": "Continue to next section" },
{ "label": "Minor Changes", "description": "Small adjustments needed" },
{ "label": "Major Revision", "description": "Significant changes required" },
{ "label": "Questions", "description": "Need clarification before proceeding" }
]
}
]
}
```
## Phase 5: Documentation & Tasks
### Save Design Document
Write to `docs/designs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md`:
```markdown
# Feature: [Name]
## Summary
[Brief description]
## Requirements
[From Phase 2 answers]
## Architecture
[From Phase 4]
## Implementation Tasks
[Task checklist]
```
### Generate Implementation Tasks
```markdown
## Implementation Tasks
- [ ] **Task Title** `priority:1` `phase:model` `time:15min`
- files: src/file1.py, tests/test_file1.py
- [ ] Write failing test for X
- [ ] Run test, verify it fails
- [ ] Implement minimal code
- [ ] Run test, verify it passes
- [ ] Commit
- [ ] **Another Task** `priority:2` `phase:api` `deps:Task Title` `time:10min`
- files: src/api.py
- [ ] Write failing test
- [ ] Implement and verify
- [ ] Commit
```
## Phase 6: Execution Handoff
```json
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "How would you like to proceed with implementation?",
"header": "Next Step",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Execute Now", "description": "Start implementation in this session" },
{ "label": "New Session", "description": "Start fresh session for implementation" },
{ "label": "Later", "description": "Save design, implement manually later" },
{ "label": "Revise Design", "description": "Go back and modify the design" }
]
}
]
}
```
## Key Principles
- **Batch questions efficiently** - Use all 4 question slots when appropriate
- **Use multiSelect for non-exclusive options** - Layers, features, requirements
- **Use single-select for decisions** - Approach, timeline, strategy
- **Mark recommendations** - Add "(Recommended)" to preferred options
- **Progressive refinement** - General -> Specific questions
- **Validate incrementally** - Check understanding at each phase
- **YAGNI ruthlessly** - Remove unnecessary features from designsRelated Skills
prioritize-python-3-10-features
Prioritizes the use of new features available in Python 3.12 and later versions.
plan-feature
Plan a new feature from concept to approved implementation plan. Activates Product Council for strategic evaluation, then Feature Council for technical planning. Produces a documented decision and scoped task breakdown. Use when starting any new feature work.
new-feature
Use when starting new feature development - sets up Agent Teams, gathers requirements, creates plan, implements with parallel agents, runs code review/QA/security checks, and commits with conventional commits
Implementing Features
Execute specification-driven implementation with automatic quality gates, multi-agent orchestration, and progress tracking. Use when building features from specs, fixing bugs with test coverage, or refactoring with validation.
genomic-feature-annotation
This skill is used to perform genomic feature annotation and visualization for any file containing genomic region information using Homer (Hypergeometric Optimization of Motif EnRichment). It annotates regions such as promoters, exons, introns, intergenic regions, and TSS proximity, and generates visual summaries of feature distributions. ChIPseeker mode is also supported according to requirements.
full-stack-orchestration-full-stack-feature
Use when working with full stack orchestration full stack feature
feature-status
Count features marked as @failing and write to status JSON file. Used to determine when the autonomous coding loop should end.
feature-investigation
[Investigation] Use when the user asks to investigate, explore, understand, explain, or analyze how an existing feature or logic works. Triggers on keywords like "how does", "explain", "what is the logic", "investigate", "understand", "where is", "trace", "walk through", "show me how".
feature-implementation
[Implementation] Use when the user asks to implement a new feature, enhancement, add functionality, build something new, or create new capabilities. Triggers on keywords like "implement", "add feature", "build", "create new", "develop", "enhancement".
feature-engineering
モデルの性能を向上させるために、既存のデータから新しい特徴量を作成する。
feature-dev-workflow
Complete end-to-end feature development workflow from issue tracking through PR delivery. Use for implementing features, building new functionality, and adding capabilities. Includes requirements discovery, architecture planning, implementation, testing, code review, design audit, and comprehensive validation.
docker-2025-features
Latest Docker 2025 features including AI Assistant, Enhanced Container Isolation, and Moby 25