ln-634-test-coverage-auditor
Coverage Gaps audit worker (L3). Identifies missing tests for critical paths (Money 20+, Security 20+, Data Integrity 15+, Core Flows 15+). Returns list of untested critical business logic with priority justification.
Best use case
ln-634-test-coverage-auditor is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Coverage Gaps audit worker (L3). Identifies missing tests for critical paths (Money 20+, Security 20+, Data Integrity 15+, Core Flows 15+). Returns list of untested critical business logic with priority justification.
Teams using ln-634-test-coverage-auditor should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/ln-634-test-coverage-auditor/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How ln-634-test-coverage-auditor Compares
| Feature / Agent | ln-634-test-coverage-auditor | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Coverage Gaps audit worker (L3). Identifies missing tests for critical paths (Money 20+, Security 20+, Data Integrity 15+, Core Flows 15+). Returns list of untested critical business logic with priority justification.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Coverage Gaps Auditor (L3 Worker)
Specialized worker identifying missing tests for critical business logic.
## Purpose & Scope
- **Worker in ln-630 coordinator pipeline**
- Audit **Coverage Gaps** (Category 4: High Priority)
- Identify untested critical paths
- Classify by category (Money, Security, Data, Core Flows)
- Calculate compliance score (X/10)
## Inputs (from Coordinator)
Receives `contextStore` with critical paths classification, codebase structure, test file list.
**Domain-aware fields (NEW):**
- `domain_mode`: `"domain-aware"` | `"global"` (optional, defaults to "global")
- `current_domain`: `{name, path}` when domain_mode="domain-aware"
**Example contextStore (domain-aware):**
```json
{
"tech_stack": {...},
"best_practices": {...},
"testFilesMetadata": [...],
"codebase_root": "/project",
"domain_mode": "domain-aware",
"current_domain": {
"name": "orders",
"path": "src/orders"
}
}
```
## Workflow
1) **Parse context from contextStore**
- Extract tech_stack, best_practices, testFilesMetadata
- **Determine scan_path (NEW):**
```
IF domain_mode == "domain-aware":
scan_path = codebase_root + "/" + current_domain.path
domain_name = current_domain.name
ELSE:
scan_path = codebase_root
domain_name = null
```
2) **Identify critical paths in scan_path** (not entire codebase)
- Scan production code in `scan_path` for money/security/data keywords
- All Grep/Glob patterns use `scan_path` (not codebase_root)
- Example: `Grep(pattern="payment|refund|discount", path=scan_path)`
3) **Check test coverage for each critical path**
- Search ALL test files for coverage (tests may be in different location than production code)
- Match by function name, module name, or test description
4) **Collect missing tests**
- Tag each finding with `domain: domain_name` (if domain-aware)
5) **Calculate score**
6) **Return JSON with domain metadata**
- Include `domain` and `scan_path` fields (if domain-aware)
## Critical Paths Classification
### 1. Money Flows (Priority 20+)
**What:** Any code handling financial transactions
**Examples:**
- Payment processing (`/payment`, `processPayment()`)
- Discounts/promotions (`calculateDiscount()`, `applyPromoCode()`)
- Tax calculations (`calculateTax()`, `getTaxRate()`)
- Refunds (`processRefund()`, `/refund`)
- Invoices/billing (`generateInvoice()`, `createBill()`)
- Currency conversion (`convertCurrency()`)
**Min Priority:** 20
**Why Critical:** Money loss, fraud, legal compliance
### 2. Security Flows (Priority 20+)
**What:** Authentication, authorization, encryption
**Examples:**
- Login/logout (`/login`, `authenticate()`)
- Token refresh (`/refresh-token`, `refreshAccessToken()`)
- Password reset (`/forgot-password`, `resetPassword()`)
- Permissions/RBAC (`checkPermission()`, `hasRole()`)
- Encryption/hashing (custom crypto logic, NOT bcrypt/argon2)
- API key validation (`validateApiKey()`)
**Min Priority:** 20
**Why Critical:** Security breach, data leak, unauthorized access
### 3. Data Integrity (Priority 15+)
**What:** CRUD operations, transactions, validation
**Examples:**
- Critical CRUD (`createUser()`, `deleteOrder()`, `updateProduct()`)
- Database transactions (`withTransaction()`)
- Data validation (custom validators, NOT framework defaults)
- Data migrations (`runMigration()`)
- Unique constraints (`checkDuplicateEmail()`)
**Min Priority:** 15
**Why Critical:** Data corruption, lost data, inconsistent state
### 4. Core User Journeys (Priority 15+)
**What:** Multi-step flows critical to business
**Examples:**
- Registration → Email verification → Onboarding
- Search → Product details → Add to cart → Checkout
- Upload file → Process → Download result
- Submit form → Approval workflow → Notification
**Min Priority:** 15
**Why Critical:** Broken user flow = lost customers
## Audit Rules
### 1. Identify Critical Paths
**Process:**
- Scan codebase for money-related keywords: `payment`, `refund`, `discount`, `tax`, `price`, `currency`
- Scan for security keywords: `auth`, `login`, `password`, `token`, `permission`, `encrypt`
- Scan for data keywords: `transaction`, `validation`, `migration`, `constraint`
- Scan for user journeys: multi-step flows in routes/controllers
### 2. Check Test Coverage
**For each critical path:**
- Search test files for matching test name/description
- If NO test found → add to missing tests list
- If test found but inadequate (only positive, no edge cases) → add to gaps list
### 3. Categorize Gaps
**Severity by Priority:**
- **CRITICAL:** Priority 20+ (Money, Security)
- **HIGH:** Priority 15-19 (Data, Core Flows)
- **MEDIUM:** Priority 10-14 (Important but not critical)
### 4. Provide Justification
**For each missing test:**
- Explain WHY it's critical (money loss, security breach, etc.)
- Suggest test type (E2E, Integration, Unit)
- Estimate effort (S/M/L)
## Scoring Algorithm
```
critical_paths = count of critical paths
tested_paths = count of critical paths with tests
coverage_percentage = (tested_paths / critical_paths) * 100
score = coverage_percentage / 10 // 100% coverage = 10 score
score = max(0, min(10, score))
```
## Output Format
**Global mode output:**
```json
{
"category": "Coverage Gaps",
"score": 6,
"critical_paths_total": 25,
"tested_paths": 15,
"untested_paths": 10,
"coverage_percentage": 60,
"findings": [
{
"severity": "CRITICAL",
"category": "Money",
"missing_test": "E2E: Payment with discount code",
"location": "services/payment.ts:processPayment()",
"priority": 25,
"justification": "Money calculation with discount logic — high risk of incorrect total",
"test_type": "E2E",
"effort": "M"
}
]
}
```
**Domain-aware mode output (NEW):**
```json
{
"category": "Coverage Gaps",
"score": 7,
"domain": "orders",
"scan_path": "src/orders",
"critical_paths_total": 12,
"tested_paths": 8,
"untested_paths": 4,
"coverage_percentage": 67,
"findings": [
{
"severity": "CRITICAL",
"category": "Money",
"missing_test": "E2E: applyDiscount() with edge cases",
"location": "src/orders/services/order.ts:45",
"priority": 25,
"justification": "Discount calculation in orders domain — high risk of incorrect total",
"test_type": "E2E",
"effort": "M",
"domain": "orders"
},
{
"severity": "HIGH",
"category": "Data Integrity",
"missing_test": "Integration: orderTransaction() rollback",
"location": "src/orders/repositories/order.ts:78",
"priority": 18,
"justification": "Data corruption risk in orders domain",
"test_type": "Integration",
"effort": "M",
"domain": "orders"
}
]
}
```
## Critical Rules
- **Domain-aware scanning:** If `domain_mode="domain-aware"`, scan ONLY `scan_path` production code (not entire codebase)
- **Tag findings:** Include `domain` field in each finding when domain-aware
- **Test search scope:** Search ALL test files for coverage (tests may be in different location than production code)
- **Match by name:** Use function name, module name, or test description to match tests to production code
## Definition of Done
- contextStore parsed (including domain_mode and current_domain)
- scan_path determined (domain path or codebase root)
- Critical paths identified in scan_path (Money, Security, Data, Core Flows)
- Test coverage checked for each critical path
- Missing tests collected with severity, priority, justification, domain
- Score calculated
- JSON returned to coordinator with domain metadata
---
**Version:** 3.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-23Related Skills
Property Testing
Property-based testing with fast-check for business logic validation
playwright-test
Generate robust, zero-flakiness Playwright E2E tests following OpenMetadata patterns. Creates comprehensive test files with proper waits, API validation, multi-role permissions, and complete entity lifecycle management.
Playwright E2E Testing
Comprehensive Playwright end-to-end testing patterns with Page Object Model, fixtures, and best practices
playwright-e2e-tester
Expert in end-to-end testing with Playwright, the modern cross-browser testing framework. Specializes in test generation, page object patterns, visual regression testing, and CI/CD integration. Handles complex testing scenarios including authentication flows, API mocking, and mobile emulation.
pentest-outbound-interaction-oob-detection
Security assessment skill for outbound interaction and out-of-band (OOB) validation. Use when prompts include SSRF callback confirmation, blind XSS beacons, webhook abuse, XXE/OOB behavior, DNS/HTTP callback correlation, or asynchronous server-side interaction proof. Do not use when vulnerabilities are fully in-band and require no external callback correlation.
Pentest Commands
This skill should be used when the user asks to "run pentest commands", "scan with nmap", "use metasploit exploits", "crack passwords with hydra or john", "scan web vulnerabilities with nikto", "enumerate networks", or needs essential penetration testing command references.
Pentest Checklist
This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan a penetration test", "create a security assessment checklist", "prepare for penetration testing", "define pentest scope", "follow security testing best practices", or needs a structured methodology for penetration testing engagements.
OWASP Security Testing
OWASP Top 10 security testing patterns and vulnerability scanning
mobile-testing
Executes automated tests on mobile apps via MCP. Use when testing iOS/Android apps, verifying UI states, automating interactions, or performing end-to-end validation. Not for web testing, API validation, or desktop applications.
moai-workflow-testing
AI-powered enterprise web application testing orchestrator with Context7 integration, intelligent test generation, visual regression testing, cross-browser coordination, and automated QA workflows for modern web applications
midnight-dapp:testing-patterns
Use when writing unit tests for Midnight contract interaction code, integration testing without ZK proofs, E2E testing with Playwright or Cypress, or setting up CI/CD pipelines for Midnight DApps.
memo-stress-tester
Use when evaluating business documents for structural integrity and persuasive logic.