research
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
Best use case
research is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
Teams using research should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/research-majiayu000/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How research Compares
| Feature / Agent | research | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for ChatGPT
Find the best AI skills to adapt into ChatGPT workflows for research, writing, summarization, planning, and repeatable assistant tasks.
AI Agent for Product Research
Browse AI agent skills for product research, competitive analysis, customer discovery, and structured product decision support.
SKILL.md Source
# Research ## Research Methodology Always honoring **YAGNI**, **KISS**, and **DRY** principles. **Be honest, be brutal, straight to the point, and be concise.** ### Phase 1: Scope Definition First, you will clearly define the research scope by: - Identifying key terms and concepts to investigate - Determining the recency requirements (how current must information be) - Establishing evaluation criteria for sources - Setting boundaries for the research depth ### Phase 2: Systematic Information Gathering You will employ a multi-source research strategy: 1. **Search Strategy**: - Check if `gemini` bash command is available, if so, execute `gemini -m gemini-3-preview-p "...your search prompt..."` bash command (timeout: 10 minutes) and save the output to `./plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md` file (including all citations). - If `gemini` bash command is not available, fallback to `WebSearch` tool. - Run multiple `gemini` bash commands or `WebSearch` tools in parallel to search for relevant information. - Craft precise search queries with relevant keywords - Include terms like "best practices", "2024", "latest", "security", "performance" - Search for official documentation, GitHub repositories, and authoritative blogs - Prioritize results from recognized authorities (official docs, major tech companies, respected developers) - **IMPORTANT:** You are allowed to perform at most **5 researches (max 5 tool calls)**, user might request less than this amount, **strictly respect it**, think carefully based on the task before performing each related research topic. 2. **Deep Content Analysis**: - When you found a potential Github repository URL, use `docs-seeker` skill to find read it. - Focus on official documentation, API references, and technical specifications - Analyze README files from popular GitHub repositories - Review changelog and release notes for version-specific information 3. **Video Content Research**: - Prioritize content from official channels, recognized experts, and major conferences - Focus on practical demonstrations and real-world implementations 4. **Cross-Reference Validation**: - Verify information across multiple independent sources - Check publication dates to ensure currency - Identify consensus vs. controversial approaches - Note any conflicting information or debates in the community ### Phase 3: Analysis and Synthesis You will analyze gathered information by: - Identifying common patterns and best practices - Evaluating pros and cons of different approaches - Assessing maturity and stability of technologies - Recognizing security implications and performance considerations - Determining compatibility and integration requirements ### Phase 4: Report Generation **Notes:** - Research reports are saved in `./plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md`. - If you are not given a plan name, ask main agent to provide it and continue the process. You will create a comprehensive markdown report with the following structure: ```markdown # Research Report: [Topic] ## Executive Summary [2-3 paragraph overview of key findings and recommendations] ## Research Methodology - Sources consulted: [number] - Date range of materials: [earliest to most recent] - Key search terms used: [list] ## Key Findings ### 1. Technology Overview [Comprehensive description of the technology/topic] ### 2. Current State & Trends [Latest developments, version information, adoption trends] ### 3. Best Practices [Detailed list of recommended practices with explanations] ### 4. Security Considerations [Security implications, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies] ### 5. Performance Insights [Performance characteristics, optimization techniques, benchmarks] ## Comparative Analysis [If applicable, comparison of different solutions/approaches] ## Implementation Recommendations ### Quick Start Guide [Step-by-step getting started instructions] ### Code Examples [Relevant code snippets with explanations] ### Common Pitfalls [Mistakes to avoid and their solutions] ## Resources & References ### Official Documentation - [Linked list of official docs] ### Recommended Tutorials - [Curated list with descriptions] ### Community Resources - [Forums, Discord servers, Stack Overflow tags] ### Further Reading - [Advanced topics and deep dives] ## Appendices ### A. Glossary [Technical terms and definitions] ### B. Version Compatibility Matrix [If applicable] ### C. Raw Research Notes [Optional: detailed notes from research process] ``` ## Quality Standards You will ensure all research meets these criteria: - **Accuracy**: Information is verified across multiple sources - **Currency**: Prioritize information from the last 12 months unless historical context is needed - **Completeness**: Cover all aspects requested by the user - **Actionability**: Provide practical, implementable recommendations - **Clarity**: Use clear language, define technical terms, provide examples - **Attribution**: Always cite sources and provide links for verification ## Special Considerations - When researching security topics, always check for recent CVEs and security advisories - For performance-related research, look for benchmarks and real-world case studies - When investigating new technologies, assess community adoption and support levels - For API documentation, verify endpoint availability and authentication requirements - Always note deprecation warnings and migration paths for older technologies ## Output Requirements Your final report must: 1. Be saved as a markdown file with a descriptive filename in `./plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md` 2. Include a timestamp of when the research was conducted 3. Provide clear section navigation with a table of contents for longer reports 4. Use code blocks with appropriate syntax highlighting 5. Include diagrams or architecture descriptions where helpful (in mermaid or ASCII art) 6. Conclude with specific, actionable next steps **IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports. **IMPORTANT:** In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any. **Remember:** You are not just collecting information, but providing strategic technical intelligence that enables informed decision-making. Your research should anticipate follow-up questions and provide comprehensive coverage of the topic while remaining focused and practical.
Related Skills
ring:pre-dev-research
Gate 0 research phase for pre-dev workflow. Dispatches 4 parallel research agents to gather codebase patterns, external best practices, framework documentation, and UX/product research BEFORE creating PRD/TRD. Outputs research.md with file:line references and user research findings.
research-web
Deep web research with parallel investigators, multi-wave exploration, and structured synthesis. Spawns multiple web-researcher agents to explore different facets of a topic simultaneously, launches additional waves when gaps are identified, then synthesizes findings. Use when asked to research, investigate, compare options, find best practices, or gather comprehensive information from the web.\n\nThoroughness: quick for factual lookups | medium for focused topics | thorough for comparisons/evaluations (waves continue while critical gaps remain) | very-thorough for comprehensive research (waves continue until satisficed). Auto-selects if not specified.
research-free
APIキー不要の統合リサーチスキル。Claude Code組み込みのWebSearch/WebFetchを使用。他人に配布してもそのまま使える。
research-first-principle-deconstructor
Rigorous Socratic interrogator and research architect that helps researchers overcome incremental thinking by applying First Principles analysis. Use when a researcher presents a research problem, proposed methodology, draft idea, or scientific hypothesis and wants to expose hidden assumptions, identify fundamental physical/mathematical constraints, generate unconventional radical alternatives, or deepen mechanistic understanding through probing questions. Triggers on phrases like "I want to improve X by doing Y", academic research brainstorming, scientific hypothesis generation, or any request to stress-test, challenge, or deconstruct a research idea. Do NOT trigger for pure literature reviews, writing assistance, or non-research tasks.
research-cog
#1 on DeepResearch Bench (Feb 2026). Deep research agent powered by CellCog. Market research, competitive analysis, stock analysis, investment research, academic research with citations.
research-cascade
Multi-source research orchestration. Chains deepwiki, submodules, WebSearch, and codebase search. Defines when to escalate and how to synthesize findings.
repo-research-analyst
Conducts thorough research on repository structure, documentation, conventions, and implementation patterns. Use when onboarding to a new codebase or understanding project conventions.
lead-research-assistant
Researches and identifies potential customers, leads, and business opportunities for your product or service. Analyzes your offering, finds relevant companies and decision makers, provides contact information, and suggests outreach strategies. Use when looking for leads, researching target customers, identifying decision makers, or planning sales outreach.
evaluative-research
Methodology for evaluating options, comparing technologies, and making evidence-based decisions between alternatives. Use when the user needs to choose between competing approaches, libraries, or architectures with a structured comparison. Triggers when user says "compare these options", "which approach should we use", "evaluate alternatives", "help me decide between X and Y", "technology comparison", or wants a structured pros/cons/recommendation analysis.
deep-research
Multi-agent deep research pipeline for complex questions (EIP analysis, architecture decisions, cross-client comparisons, protocol design). Use when single-shot answers are insufficient and you need decomposition, parallel investigation, adversarial critique, and a formal output document.
context7-auto-research
Automatically fetch latest library/framework documentation for Claude Code via Context7 API
code-surgeon-context-researcher
Use when analyzing a codebase to select relevant files, build dependency maps, and extract architectural patterns for informed implementation planning