review-pr
Review-only GitHub pull request analysis with the gh CLI. Use when asked to review a PR, provide structured feedback, or assess readiness to land. Do not merge, push, or make code changes you intend to keep.
Best use case
review-pr is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Review-only GitHub pull request analysis with the gh CLI. Use when asked to review a PR, provide structured feedback, or assess readiness to land. Do not merge, push, or make code changes you intend to keep.
Teams using review-pr should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/review-pr-termix-official/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How review-pr Compares
| Feature / Agent | review-pr | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Review-only GitHub pull request analysis with the gh CLI. Use when asked to review a PR, provide structured feedback, or assess readiness to land. Do not merge, push, or make code changes you intend to keep.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Review PR
## Overview
Perform a thorough review-only PR assessment and return a structured recommendation on readiness for /preparepr.
## Inputs
- Ask for PR number or URL.
- If missing, always ask. Never auto-detect from conversation.
- If ambiguous, ask.
## Safety
- Never push to `main` or `origin/main`, not during review, not ever.
- Do not run `git push` at all during review. Treat review as read only.
- Do not stop or kill the gateway. Do not run gateway stop commands. Do not kill processes on port 18792.
## Execution Rule
- Execute the workflow. Do not stop after printing the TODO checklist.
- If delegating, require the delegate to run commands and capture outputs, not a plan.
## Known Failure Modes
- If you see "fatal: not a git repository", you are in the wrong directory. Use `~/openclaw`.
- Do not stop after printing the checklist. That is not completion.
## Writing Style for Output
- Write casual and direct.
- Avoid em dashes and en dashes. Use commas or separate sentences.
## Completion Criteria
- Run the commands in the worktree and inspect the PR directly.
- Produce the structured review sections A through J.
- Save the full review to `.local/review.md` inside the worktree.
## First: Create a TODO Checklist
Create a checklist of all review steps, print it, then continue and execute the commands.
## Setup: Use a Worktree
Use an isolated worktree for all review work.
```sh
cd ~/Development/openclaw
# Sanity: confirm you are in the repo
git rev-parse --show-toplevel
WORKTREE_DIR=".worktrees/pr-<PR>"
git fetch origin main
# Reuse existing worktree if it exists, otherwise create new
if [ -d "$WORKTREE_DIR" ]; then
cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
git checkout temp/pr-<PR> 2>/dev/null || git checkout -b temp/pr-<PR>
git fetch origin main
git reset --hard origin/main
else
git worktree add "$WORKTREE_DIR" -b temp/pr-<PR> origin/main
cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
fi
# Create local scratch space that persists across /reviewpr to /preparepr to /mergepr
mkdir -p .local
```
Run all commands inside the worktree directory.
Start on `origin/main` so you can check for existing implementations before looking at PR code.
## Steps
1. Identify PR meta and context
```sh
gh pr view <PR> --json number,title,state,isDraft,author,baseRefName,headRefName,headRepository,url,body,labels,assignees,reviewRequests,files,additions,deletions --jq '{number,title,url,state,isDraft,author:.author.login,base:.baseRefName,head:.headRefName,headRepo:.headRepository.nameWithOwner,additions,deletions,files:.files|length,body}'
```
2. Check if this already exists in main before looking at the PR branch
- Identify the core feature or fix from the PR title and description.
- Search for existing implementations using keywords from the PR title, changed file paths, and function or component names from the diff.
```sh
# Use keywords from the PR title and changed files
rg -n "<keyword_from_pr_title>" -S src packages apps ui || true
rg -n "<function_or_component_name>" -S src packages apps ui || true
git log --oneline --all --grep="<keyword_from_pr_title>" | head -20
```
If it already exists, call it out as a BLOCKER or at least IMPORTANT.
3. Claim the PR
Assign yourself so others know someone is reviewing. Skip if the PR looks like spam or is a draft you plan to recommend closing.
```sh
gh_user=$(gh api user --jq .login)
gh pr edit <PR> --add-assignee "$gh_user"
```
4. Read the PR description carefully
Use the body from step 1. Summarize goal, scope, and missing context.
5. Read the diff thoroughly
Minimum:
```sh
gh pr diff <PR>
```
If you need full code context locally, fetch the PR head to a local ref and diff it. Do not create a merge commit.
```sh
git fetch origin pull/<PR>/head:pr-<PR>
# Show changes without modifying the working tree
git diff --stat origin/main..pr-<PR>
git diff origin/main..pr-<PR>
```
If you want to browse the PR version of files directly, temporarily check out `pr-<PR>` in the worktree. Do not commit or push. Return to `temp/pr-<PR>` and reset to `origin/main` afterward.
```sh
# Use only if needed
# git checkout pr-<PR>
# ...inspect files...
git checkout temp/pr-<PR>
git reset --hard origin/main
```
6. Validate the change is needed and valuable
Be honest. Call out low value AI slop.
7. Evaluate implementation quality
Review correctness, design, performance, and ergonomics.
8. Perform a security review
Assume OpenClaw subagents run with full disk access, including git, gh, and shell. Check auth, input validation, secrets, dependencies, tool safety, and privacy.
9. Review tests and verification
Identify what exists, what is missing, and what would be a minimal regression test.
10. Check docs
Check if the PR touches code with related documentation such as README, docs, inline API docs, or config examples.
- If docs exist for the changed area and the PR does not update them, flag as IMPORTANT.
- If the PR adds a new feature or config option with no docs, flag as IMPORTANT.
- If the change is purely internal with no user-facing impact, skip this.
11. Check changelog
Check if `CHANGELOG.md` exists and whether the PR warrants an entry.
- If the project has a changelog and the PR is user-facing, flag missing entry as IMPORTANT.
- Leave the change for /preparepr, only flag it here.
12. Answer the key question
Decide if /preparepr can fix issues or the contributor must update the PR.
13. Save findings to the worktree
Write the full structured review sections A through J to `.local/review.md`.
Create or overwrite the file and verify it exists and is non-empty.
```sh
ls -la .local/review.md
wc -l .local/review.md
```
14. Output the structured review
Produce a review that matches what you saved to `.local/review.md`.
A) TL;DR recommendation
- One of: READY FOR /preparepr | NEEDS WORK | NEEDS DISCUSSION | NOT USEFUL (CLOSE)
- 1 to 3 sentences.
B) What changed
C) What is good
D) Security findings
E) Concerns or questions (actionable)
- Numbered list.
- Mark each item as BLOCKER, IMPORTANT, or NIT.
- For each, point to file or area and propose a concrete fix.
F) Tests
G) Docs status
- State if related docs are up to date, missing, or not applicable.
H) Changelog
- State if `CHANGELOG.md` needs an entry and which category.
I) Follow ups (optional)
J) Suggested PR comment (optional)
## Guardrails
- Worktree only.
- Do not delete the worktree after review.
- Review only, do not merge, do not push.Related Skills
tla-review
Comprehensive TLA+ specification review with checklist and automated validation
term-sheet-review
Review VC term sheets for pre-seed, seed, and Series A rounds. Analyzes each clause from investor or startup perspective, identifies investor-friendly vs. founder-friendly terms, flags deviations from market standards, and provides negotiation guidance. Use when reviewing any VC term sheet, evaluating investment terms, or preparing for funding negotiations. Triggers on term sheet, VC financing, Series A, seed round, liquidation preference, anti-dilution, protective provisions.
tc-review
Review QA test case documents (Markdown) against source code to find coverage gaps. Use when reviewing test cases, analyzing test coverage, suggesting missing scenarios, or learning codebase to extract testable scenarios. Supports project-based learning from multiple GitHub repos with dual memory (local + Dify RAG).
self-review
Local code review comparing branches/diffs without GitHub integration. Use when the user wants to review their code, self-review changes, check for bugs before committing, or mentions code review, diff review, or branch comparison.
review-implementation
Use after hyperpowers:executing-plans completes all tasks - verifies implementation against bd spec, all success criteria met, anti-patterns avoided
review-github-actions
Reviews GitHub Actions workflow files for best practices, ensuring workflows delegate commands to Makefile targets for maintainability and DRY principles. Enforces clean CI/CD patterns including proper caching, matrix strategies, and security practices.
priority-review
Evidence-based code review for diffs, PRs, and commits using P0-P3 severity. Finds actionable defects in changed code (security, correctness, reliability) and avoids style-only feedback.
paw-review-understanding
Analyzes PR changes to create ReviewContext.md and DerivedSpec.md artifacts. Handles both initial analysis and resumption after baseline research.
gitlab-mr-review-flow
标准化“需求描述 → 规范检索 (QMD) → 实现改动 → GitLab MCP 创建 MR → 代码评审报告”的流程技能。
github-pr-review-comments
Comprehensive workflow for managing GitHub PR review comments using gh CLI and GraphQL API. Use when asked to address review comments, find unreplied comments, reply to review threads, or resolve/unresolve review conversations. Supports finding ALL comments across pagination boundaries, replying to threads, and resolving conversations.
differential-review
Perform security-focused review of code diffs and pull requests, identifying newly introduced vulnerabilities, security regressions, and unsafe patterns in changed code.
codex-code-review
Perform comprehensive code reviews using OpenAI Codex CLI. This skill should be used when users request code reviews, want to analyze diffs/PRs, need security audits, performance analysis, or want automated code quality feedback. Supports reviewing staged changes, specific files, entire directories, or git diffs.