u0195-governance-community-feedback-harvester
Build and operate the "Governance Community Feedback Harvester" capability for Safety and Governance. Use only when production execution explicitly requires this exact capability and output contract.
Best use case
u0195-governance-community-feedback-harvester is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Build and operate the "Governance Community Feedback Harvester" capability for Safety and Governance. Use only when production execution explicitly requires this exact capability and output contract.
Teams using u0195-governance-community-feedback-harvester should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/u0195-governance-community-feedback-harvester/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How u0195-governance-community-feedback-harvester Compares
| Feature / Agent | u0195-governance-community-feedback-harvester | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Build and operate the "Governance Community Feedback Harvester" capability for Safety and Governance. Use only when production execution explicitly requires this exact capability and output contract.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Governance Community Feedback Harvester ## Why This Skill Exists We need this skill because high-speed autonomy needs enforceable guardrails to stay aligned. This specific skill integrates lived user feedback into planning cycles. ## Production Trigger Criteria - Trigger only when the requested outcome explicitly maps to **Governance Community Feedback Harvester** in the **Safety and Governance** capability family. - Require a named production consumer and execution window before running (no exploratory/ad-hoc execution). - Require complete upstream signals; if any required signal is absent, stop and return a remediation request (fail closed). ## Step-by-Step Implementation Guide 1. Define the scope and success metrics for `Governance Community Feedback Harvester`, including at least three measurable KPIs tied to unsafe actions and policy drift. 2. Design and version the input/output contract for policies, violations, and mitigation actions, then add schema validation and failure-mode handling. 3. Implement the core capability using feedback normalization and clustering, and produce theme-prioritized feedback digests with deterministic scoring. 4. Integrate the skill into swarm orchestration: task routing, approval gates, retry strategy, and rollback controls. 5. Add unit, integration, and simulation tests that explicitly cover unsafe actions and policy drift, then run regression baselines. 6. Deploy behind a feature flag, monitor telemetry/alerts for two release cycles, and iterate thresholds based on observed outcomes. ## Deterministic Workflow Constraints - Core method: feedback normalization and clustering - Archetype: normalization-engine - Routing tag: safety-and-governance:normalization-engine - Determinism tolerance: repeated runs on identical normalized inputs must keep score/output delta within **<= 0.5%**. - Retry budget: max 4 attempts with exponential backoff; then rollback. ## Input Contract - `policies` (signal, source=upstream, required=true) - `violations` (signal, source=upstream, required=true) - `mitigation actions` (signal, source=upstream, required=true) - `claims` (signal, source=upstream, required=true) - `evidence` (signal, source=upstream, required=true) - `confidence traces` (signal, source=upstream, required=true) ## Output Contract - `theme_prioritized_feedback_digests_report` (structured-report, consumer=orchestrator, guaranteed=true) - `theme_prioritized_feedback_digests_scorecard` (scorecard, consumer=operator, guaranteed=true) ## Validation Gates (Fail-Closed) 1. **schema-contract-check** — Reject execution unless all required inputs are present and schema-valid (on fail: quarantine + remediation request). 2. **determinism-check** — Re-run fixed test vector; block publish-level output if variance exceeds 0.5% (on fail: escalate + hold). 3. **policy-approval-check** — Enforce policy gates before any publish-level artifact (on fail: block). 4. **high-risk-human-signoff** — If risk >= critical threshold or policy marks high-impact, require explicit human approval before release (on fail: block). ## Failure Handling - `E_INPUT_SCHEMA`: Missing or malformed required signals → Reject payload, emit validation error, request corrected payload - `E_NON_DETERMINISM`: Determinism delta exceeds allowed threshold → Freeze output, escalate to human approval router - `E_DEPENDENCY_TIMEOUT`: Downstream or external dependency timeout → Apply retry policy then rollback to last stable baseline - Rollback strategy: rollback-to-last-stable-baseline ## Handoff Contract - Produces: Governance Community Feedback Harvester normalized artifacts; execution scorecard; risk posture - Consumes: policies; violations; mitigation actions; claims; evidence; confidence traces - Downstream routing hint: Route next to safety-and-governance:normalization-engine consumers with approval-gate context ## Immediate Hardening Additions (Required Before Promotion) - Add/refresh fixture file: `fixtures/golden-input.json` with deterministic sample payload and expected checksum. - Add/refresh regression case: `tests/regression-case.md` for highest-risk failure path and expected fail-closed behavior. - Emit machine-readable run summary to `hardening-summary.json` with fields: `status`, `risk_score`, `confidence`, `next_handoff`, `human_signoff_required`. - Do not emit publish-level outputs when any validation gate fails. ## Production Trigger Clarity - Use only when this capability produces production-facing outcomes with measurable acceptance criteria. - Do not invoke for exploratory brainstorming or unrelated domains; route those requests to the correct capability family. ## Deterministic Tolerances - Repeated runs on identical inputs must remain within **<=1% output variance** for scoring fields and preserve schema-identical artifact shape. - Any variance beyond tolerance is a hard failure and must trigger escalation. ## Fail-Closed Validation Gates 1. Schema validity gate (required inputs present and valid). 2. Determinism gate (variance within tolerance). 3. Policy/approval gate (required approvals satisfied). If any gate fails: **block output publication and fail closed**. ## High-Risk Human Sign-Off - Any high-risk change, policy-impacting output, or publish-level action requires explicit human sign-off before release. - Missing sign-off is a blocking condition. ## Explicit Handoff Contract - **Produces:** normalized artifacts, decision scorecard, risk/confidence metadata. - **Consumes:** validated upstream inputs for this capability. - **Next hop:** route only to declared downstream consumers with gate/approval context attached.
Related Skills
u06250-community-feedback-harvesting-for-entrepreneurship-operations
Build and operate the "Community Feedback Harvesting for entrepreneurship operations" capability for entrepreneurship operations. Use when this exact capability is required by autonomous or human-guided missions.
u05141-disaster-recovery-orchestration-for-community-mediation-programs
Operate the "Disaster recovery orchestration for community mediation programs" capability in production for community mediation programs workflows. Use when mission execution explicitly requires this capability and outcomes must be reproducible, policy-gated, and handoff-ready.
pcf-community-resources
PCF community resources including gallery, videos, blogs, and development tools Triggers on: **
aos-constitutional-governance
Create, sign (Ed25519), verify, and audit an AOS-style immutable constitution for OpenClaw. Use when implementing constitutional governance beneath SOUL.md, designing deny/confirm/allow policy evaluation, generating constitution.yaml + constitution.sig, validating GitTruth attestations, building tamper-evident tool-call logs, or preparing a reference implementation skill/plugin for OpenClaw.
ai-governance
AI governance and compliance guidance covering EU AI Act risk classification, NIST AI RMF, responsible AI principles, AI ethics review, and regulatory compliance for AI systems.
ai-feedback-loop-optimizer
AIフィードバックループ最適化スキル。プロンプト→出力→評価→改善の反復サイクルを自動化。段階的改善、A/Bテスト、収束判定、ベスト出力選択で最高品質の結果を生成。
cgr-docs-governance
Use this skill when updating project documentation after backend/frontend operational changes, incidents, workflow behavior changes, or new runbooks.
azure-enterprise-governance
Enterprise-grade Azure governance, security, and compliance framework. Combines Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF) naming standards with comprehensive security architecture (Zero Trust), compliance frameworks (NIST, SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA), and best practices. Provides naming validation, security audits, RBAC design, and compliance checklists for production-ready Azure deployments.
rlhf-feedback
Autonomous RLHF feedback capture - Claude self-captures mistakes and successes
regulatory-community-analysis-ChIA-PET
This skill performs protein-mediated regulatory community analysis from ChIA-PET datasets and provide a way for visualizing the communities. Use this skill when you have a annotated peak file (in BED format) from ChIA-PET experiment and you want to identify the protein-mediated regulatory community according to the BED and BEDPE file from ChIA-PET.
governance
Engineering standards and code governance enforcement with parallel agent execution. Triggers during code reviews, commits, and standards discussions. 70-90% token savings via delegated execution.
analyzing-user-feedback
Help users synthesize and act on customer feedback. Use when someone is analyzing NPS responses, processing support tickets, reviewing user research, synthesizing feedback from multiple channels, or trying to identify patterns in customer input.