u3550-plan-quality-evaluation-for-civic-participation-platforms
Operate the "plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms" capability in production for plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms workflows. Use when mission execution explicitly requires this capability and outcomes must be reproducible, policy-gated, and handoff-ready.
Best use case
u3550-plan-quality-evaluation-for-civic-participation-platforms is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Operate the "plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms" capability in production for plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms workflows. Use when mission execution explicitly requires this capability and outcomes must be reproducible, policy-gated, and handoff-ready.
Teams using u3550-plan-quality-evaluation-for-civic-participation-platforms should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/u3550-plan-quality-evaluation-for-civic-participation-platforms/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How u3550-plan-quality-evaluation-for-civic-participation-platforms Compares
| Feature / Agent | u3550-plan-quality-evaluation-for-civic-participation-platforms | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Operate the "plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms" capability in production for plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms workflows. Use when mission execution explicitly requires this capability and outcomes must be reproducible, policy-gated, and handoff-ready.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
# plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms ## Why This Skill Exists This skill hardens a generated capability for production execution so plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms workflows remain deterministic, auditable, and fail-closed under risk. ## When To Use Use this skill only when the request explicitly needs `plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms` and a downstream consumer requires contract-bound artifacts. ## Step-by-Step Implementation Guide 1. Validate production trigger criteria: explicit capability request, approved source-tagged inputs, and named downstream consumer. 2. Enforce deterministic normalization workflow with pinned mapping/ruleset versions and stable serialization order. 3. Apply explicit determinism tolerance checks (score delta <= 0.005 absolute; identical input must produce zero artifact hash drift). 4. Execute fail-closed validation gates (schema, determinism, policy-risk) and block output on any failure. 5. Require explicit human sign-off token for high-risk runs before publication or downstream routing. 6. Emit handoff envelope with artifact paths, gate results, risk tier, and approval state for the next stage. ## Deterministic Workflow Constraints - Replay score variance: <= 0.005 absolute per item. - Artifact hash drift for identical replay: 0 allowed. - Time-dependent fields allowed only in metadata and excluded from scoring. ## Validation Gates 1. **schema-gate** — all required fields present and schema-valid; otherwise block and return error bundle. 2. **determinism-gate** — replay output within tolerance; otherwise quarantine and escalate. 3. **policy-risk-gate** — policy and risk checks pass; otherwise block routing. 4. **approval-gate-high-risk** — if risk is high, require human sign-off token; otherwise fail closed. ## Handoff Contract - Inputs: source-tagged signals, claims, evidence, confidence traces, run context. - Outputs: deterministic artifact, scorecard, and handoff envelope with approval metadata. - Routing rule: forward only when every gate passes; high-risk requires explicit sign-off token. ## Immediate Hardening Additions - Fixture: `fixtures/minimal-valid.json` - Regression case: `tests/regression-case.md` - Machine-readable summary: `hardening-summary.json`
Related Skills
sw-tech-stack-planner
Use when user wants a tech stack recommendation, technology choices, docker-compose setup, or architecture decisions for a software project – reads vision.md, user-stories.md, use-cases.md and generates requirements/tech-stack.yaml silently.
self-explanatory-code-commenting
Guidelines for GitHub Copilot to write comments to achieve self-explanatory code with less comments. Examples are in JavaScript but it should work on any language that has comments. Triggers on: **
prd-planner
Analyzes PRDs and creates beads task breakdown for multi-agent implementation
plans-management
Manages Plans.md tasks and marker operations. Use when user mentions タスクを追加, Plans.md更新, 完了マーク, タスク状態変更, add task, update plans, mark complete. Do NOT load for: 実装作業, レビュー, Plans.md以外のファイル操作.
planning-with-files
Transforms workflow to use Manus-style persistent markdown files for planning, progress tracking, and knowledge storage. Use when starting complex tasks, multi-step projects, research tasks, or when the user mentions planning, organizing work, tracking progress, or wants structured output.
plan
Creates detailed implementation plan from validated research. Produces task breakdown with dependencies.
plan-writing
Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.
plan-reduce-max-lines
This skill should be used when reducing the maximum class/module lines threshold and fixing all violations. It updates the RuboCop configuration, identifies classes and modules exceeding the new limit, generates a brief with refactoring strategies, and creates a plan with tasks to split oversized files.
plan-maker
Create implementation plans with testable acceptance criteria, validation strategies, integration touchpoints, and risk analysis before coding begins.
niko-plan
Niko Memory Bank System - Plan Phase - Implementation Planning
mcp-server-evaluations
Test MCP servers for quality and reliability. Verify tool functionality, test error handling, generate tests, and assess response quality with no dependencies other than curl. Use this when validating MCP server implementations, testing OpenAPI-to-MCP conversions, or assessing API tool quality.
implementation-planner
专业的软件架构师,根据用户需求和设计方案创建详细的实施(开发)计划。将设计方案转化为可执行的任务列表,支持测试驱动开发和渐进式实现。