audit-report

Phase 3: Generate and present audit report for user review

6 stars

Best use case

audit-report is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Phase 3: Generate and present audit report for user review

Teams using audit-report should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/audit-report/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/edwinhu/workflows/main/skills/bluebook-audit/skills/audit-report/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/audit-report/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How audit-report Compares

Feature / Agentaudit-reportStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Phase 3: Generate and present audit report for user review

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Phase 3: Report

Generate a human-readable audit report and present to the user for review before applying corrections.

## What This Phase Does

1. Merge three-layer findings: mechanical + Gemini per-footnote + Claude cross-footnote review (**mechanical > Claude > Gemini priority** — see audit-check merge rules)
2. Categorize by issue type and severity
3. Flag items needing manual review (low-confidence cross-refs, ambiguous citations)
4. Generate `scratch/AUDIT_REPORT.md`
5. Present summary to user

### Three-Layer Merge Priority

**Mechanical > Claude cross-review > Gemini per-footnote**

- Mechanical findings (signal italic, terminal periods, Id. chains, small caps patterns) are deterministic and **must never be dropped**
- Claude cross-review adds cross-footnote patterns (supra chains, hereinafter consistency) and filters Gemini false positives
- Gemini per-footnote adds individual source type classification and abbreviation checks

## Report Structure

```markdown
# Bluebook Audit Report

## Summary
- Total footnotes: N
- Clean: N (XX%)
- Issues found: N across M footnotes

## Fix Counts by Category
| Category | Count | Auto-fixable |
|----------|-------|-------------|
| Journal name small caps | N | Yes |
| Book title small caps | N | Yes |
| Cross-reference resolution | N | Yes (high confidence) |
| Id. chain errors | N | Partial |
| Signal formatting | N | Yes |
| Terminal periods | N | Yes |
| Typeface errors (other) | N | Manual |

## Issues by Footnote
[sorted by footnote number]

## Items Needing Manual Review
[low-confidence cross-refs, ambiguous citations, judgment calls]

## Correct As-Is (Gemini False Positives)
[Items Gemini flagged but are actually correct, with reasoning]
[Group by source type: SEC releases (roman), exec orders (roman), etc.]
[Reference: audit-patterns.md Source Type Typeface Reference table]
```

### Why "Correct As-Is" Matters

Many Gemini suggestions are wrong — especially for non-standard source types (SEC releases, exec orders, working paper designations). Documenting WHY these are correct:
1. Prevents re-flagging if someone re-runs the audit
2. Forces the reviewer to consciously evaluate each judgment call
3. Creates a record of the source type classification decisions

## Gate: Exit Report

This is a **user gate**. The workflow pauses here.

- [ ] `scratch/AUDIT_REPORT.md` exists
- [ ] User has reviewed the report
- [ ] User approves proceeding to corrections

**Do NOT proceed to corrections without user acknowledgment.**

## Next Phase

After user approval:
Read `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../../skills/bluebook-audit/skills/audit-correct/SKILL.md` and follow its instructions.

Related Skills

audit-verify

6
from edwinhu/workflows

Phase 5: Verify all corrections were applied correctly

audit-extract

6
from edwinhu/workflows

Phase 1: Extract footnotes from DOCX with formatting annotations

audit-crossrefs

6
from edwinhu/workflows

Phase 7: Convert hardcoded cross-references to auto-updating NOTEREF fields

audit-correct

6
from edwinhu/workflows

Phase 4: Apply corrections to DOCX

audit-check

6
from edwinhu/workflows

Phase 2: Run mechanical checks and Gemini formatted audit

audit-archive

6
from edwinhu/workflows

Phase 6: Archive URLs via perma.cc

bluebook-audit

6
from edwinhu/workflows

This skill should be used when the user asks to 'audit footnotes', 'check Bluebook formatting', 'audit citations', 'run footnote audit', 'check my footnotes', 'bluebook audit', or needs systematic Bluebook compliance checking of a law review manuscript.

audit-fix-loop

6
from edwinhu/workflows

Canonical doctrine for scored iterative improvement, and the generic fallback for ad-hoc 'iteratively improve / audit and fix / grade and improve / hill-climb quality / score and fix' requests that don't map to a domain workflow.

writing

6
from edwinhu/workflows

This skill should be used when the user asks to 'write a paper', 'start a writing project', 'draft an article', 'write about', 'brainstorm writing topics', 'gather sources for a paper', 'what should I write about', or needs the writing workflow entry point for any writing task.

writing-validate

6
from edwinhu/workflows

Validate draft sections cover all PRECIS claims before review.

writing-setup

6
from edwinhu/workflows

Internal skill for creating PRECIS.md, OUTLINE.md, and ACTIVE_WORKFLOW.md. Called after brainstorm sources are gathered.

writing-revise

6
from edwinhu/workflows

This skill should be used when the user asks to 'revise writing', 'fix review issues', 'polish draft', 'apply review feedback', 'complete writing workflow', or after /writing-review produces REVIEW.md with issues to fix.