ui-review
Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.
Best use case
ui-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.
Teams using ui-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How ui-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | ui-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
# UI Review ## Overview Part of [StyleSeed](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed), this skill audits UI code against the Toss seed's conventions instead of reviewing it as generic frontend work. It focuses on design-token discipline, component ergonomics, accessibility, mobile readiness, typography, and spacing consistency. ## When to Use - Use when a component or page should follow the StyleSeed Toss design language - Use when reviewing a UI-heavy PR for consistency and design-system violations - Use when the output looks "mostly fine" but feels off in subtle ways - Use when you need a structured review with concrete fixes ## Review Checklist ### Design Tokens - no hardcoded hex colors when semantic tokens exist - no improvised shadow values when tokenized shadows exist - no arbitrary radius choices outside the system scale - no random spacing values that break the seed rhythm ### Component Conventions - uses the project's class merge helper - supports `className` extension when appropriate - uses the agreed typing pattern - avoids wrapper components that only forward one class string - reuses existing primitives before inventing new ones ### Accessibility - touch targets large enough for mobile - visible keyboard focus states - labels and `aria-*` attributes where needed - adequate color contrast - reduced-motion respect for animation ### Mobile UX - no horizontal overflow - safe-area handling where relevant - readable text sizes - thumb-friendly interaction spacing - bottom nav or sticky actions do not obscure content ### Typography and Spacing - uses the system type hierarchy - display and headings are not overly loose - body text remains readable - spacing follows the seed grid instead of arbitrary values ## Output Format Return: 1. A verdict: Pass, Needs Improvement, or Fail 2. A prioritized list of issues with file and line references when available 3. Concrete fixes for each issue 4. Any open questions where the design intent is ambiguous ## Best Practices - Review against the seed, not against personal taste - Separate stylistic drift from real usability or accessibility bugs - Prefer actionable diffs over abstract criticism - Call out duplication when an existing component already solves the problem ## Additional Resources - [StyleSeed repository](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed) - [Source skill](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed/blob/main/seeds/toss/.claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md) ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Related Skills
vibers-code-review
Human review workflow for AI-generated GitHub projects with spec-based feedback, security review, and follow-up PRs from the Vibers service.
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review
Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review
performance-testing-review-ai-review
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C
lightning-architecture-review
Review Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs, compare channel factory approaches, and analyze Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs. Covers trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, HTLC/PTLC compatibility, liveness, and watchtower support.
git-pr-review
Generate a concise and structured PR description from commit history with minimal token usage
gha-security-review
Find exploitable vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions workflows. Every finding MUST include a concrete exploitation scenario — if you can't build the attack, don't report it.
gh-review-requests
Fetch unread GitHub notifications for open PRs where review is requested from a specified team or opened by a team member. Use when asked to "find PRs I need to review", "show my review requests", "what needs my review", "fetch GitHub review requests", or "check team review queue".
fix-review
Verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs
error-debugging-multi-agent-review
Use when working with error debugging multi agent review
django-perf-review
Django performance code review. Use when asked to "review Django performance", "find N+1 queries", "optimize Django", "check queryset performance", "database performance", "Django ORM issues", or audit Django code for performance problems.
django-access-review
django-access-review