finishing-a-development-branch
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Best use case
finishing-a-development-branch is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Teams using finishing-a-development-branch should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How finishing-a-development-branch Compares
| Feature / Agent | finishing-a-development-branch | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Finishing a Development Branch ## Overview Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow. **Core principle:** Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up. **Announce at start:** "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work." ## The Process ### Step 1: Verify Tests **Before presenting options, verify tests pass:** ```bash # Run project's test suite npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./... ``` **If tests fail:** ``` Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing: [Show failures] Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass. ``` Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2. **If tests pass:** Continue to Step 2. ### Step 2: Determine Base Branch ```bash # Try common base branches git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null ``` Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?" ### Step 3: Present Options Present exactly these 4 options: ``` Implementation complete. What would you like to do? 1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally 2. Push and create a Pull Request 3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later) 4. Discard this work Which option? ``` **Don't add explanation** - keep options concise. ### Step 4: Execute Choice #### Option 1: Merge Locally ```bash # Switch to base branch git checkout <base-branch> # Pull latest git pull # Merge feature branch git merge <feature-branch> # Verify tests on merged result <test command> # If tests pass git branch -d <feature-branch> ``` Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5) #### Option 2: Push and Create PR ```bash # Push branch git push -u origin <feature-branch> # Create PR gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <2-3 bullets of what changed> ## Test Plan - [ ] <verification steps> EOF )" ``` Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5) #### Option 3: Keep As-Is Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>." **Don't cleanup worktree.** #### Option 4: Discard **Confirm first:** ``` This will permanently delete: - Branch <name> - All commits: <commit-list> - Worktree at <path> Type 'discard' to confirm. ``` Wait for exact confirmation. If confirmed: ```bash git checkout <base-branch> git branch -D <feature-branch> ``` Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5) ### Step 5: Cleanup Worktree **For Options 1, 2, 4:** Check if in worktree: ```bash git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current) ``` If yes: ```bash git worktree remove <worktree-path> ``` **For Option 3:** Keep worktree. ## Quick Reference | Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------| | 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | - | ✓ | | 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | ✓ | - | | 3. Keep as-is | - | - | ✓ | - | | 4. Discard | - | - | - | ✓ (force) | ## Common Mistakes **Skipping test verification** - **Problem:** Merge broken code, create failing PR - **Fix:** Always verify tests before offering options **Open-ended questions** - **Problem:** "What should I do next?" → ambiguous - **Fix:** Present exactly 4 structured options **Automatic worktree cleanup** - **Problem:** Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3) - **Fix:** Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4 **No confirmation for discard** - **Problem:** Accidentally delete work - **Fix:** Require typed "discard" confirmation ## Red Flags **Never:** - Proceed with failing tests - Merge without verifying tests on result - Delete work without confirmation - Force-push without explicit request **Always:** - Verify tests before offering options - Present exactly 4 options - Get typed confirmation for Option 4 - Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only ## Integration **Called by:** - **subagent-driven-development** (Step 7) - After all tasks complete - **executing-plans** (Step 5) - After all batches complete **Pairs with:** - **using-git-worktrees** - Cleans up worktree created by that skill
Related Skills
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
subagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
nextflow-development
Run nf-core bioinformatics pipelines (rnaseq, sarek, atacseq) on sequencing data. Use when analyzing RNA-seq, WGS/WES, or ATAC-seq data—either local FASTQs or public datasets from GEO/SRA. Triggers on nf-core, Nextflow, FASTQ analysis, variant calling, gene expression, differential expression, GEO reanalysis, GSE/GSM/SRR accessions, or samplesheet creation.
zinc-database
Access ZINC (230M+ purchasable compounds). Search by ZINC ID/SMILES, similarity searches, 3D-ready structures for docking, analog discovery, for virtual screening and drug discovery.
zarr-python
Chunked N-D arrays for cloud storage. Compressed arrays, parallel I/O, S3/GCS integration, NumPy/Dask/Xarray compatible, for large-scale scientific computing pipelines.
xlsx
Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like "the xlsx in my downloads") — and wants something done to it or produced from it. Also trigger for cleaning or restructuring messy tabular data files (malformed rows, misplaced headers, junk data) into proper spreadsheets. The deliverable must be a spreadsheet file. Do NOT trigger when the primary deliverable is a Word document, HTML report, standalone Python script, database pipeline, or Google Sheets API integration, even if tabular data is involved.
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
wikipedia-search
Search and fetch structured content from Wikipedia using the MediaWiki API for reliable, encyclopedic information
wellally-tech
Integrate digital health data sources (Apple Health, Fitbit, Oura Ring) and connect to WellAlly.tech knowledge base. Import external health device data, standardize to local format, and recommend relevant WellAlly.tech knowledge base articles based on health data. Support generic CSV/JSON import, provide intelligent article recommendations, and help users better manage personal health data.
weightloss-analyzer
分析减肥数据、计算代谢率、追踪能量缺口、管理减肥阶段
<!--
# COPYRIGHT NOTICE