last30days
Research any topic from the last 30 days on Reddit + X + Web, synthesize findings, and write copy-paste-ready prompts. Use when the user wants recent social/web research on a topic, asks "what are people saying about X", or wants to learn current best practices. Requires OPENAI_API_KEY and/or XAI_API_KEY for full Reddit+X access, falls back to web search.
Best use case
last30days is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Research any topic from the last 30 days on Reddit + X + Web, synthesize findings, and write copy-paste-ready prompts. Use when the user wants recent social/web research on a topic, asks "what are people saying about X", or wants to learn current best practices. Requires OPENAI_API_KEY and/or XAI_API_KEY for full Reddit+X access, falls back to web search.
Teams using last30days should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/last30days/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How last30days Compares
| Feature / Agent | last30days | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Research any topic from the last 30 days on Reddit + X + Web, synthesize findings, and write copy-paste-ready prompts. Use when the user wants recent social/web research on a topic, asks "what are people saying about X", or wants to learn current best practices. Requires OPENAI_API_KEY and/or XAI_API_KEY for full Reddit+X access, falls back to web search.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
# last30days: Research Any Topic from the Last 30 Days
Research ANY topic across Reddit, X, and the web. Surface what people are actually discussing, recommending, and debating right now.
Use cases:
- **Prompting**: "photorealistic people in Nano Banana Pro", "Midjourney prompts", "ChatGPT image generation" → learn techniques, get copy-paste prompts
- **Recommendations**: "best Claude Code skills", "top AI tools" → get a LIST of specific things people mention
- **News**: "what's happening with OpenAI", "latest AI announcements" → current events and updates
- **General**: any topic you're curious about → understand what the community is saying
## CRITICAL: Parse User Intent
Before doing anything, parse the user's input for:
1. **TOPIC**: What they want to learn about (e.g., "web app mockups", "Claude Code skills", "image generation")
2. **TARGET TOOL** (if specified): Where they'll use the prompts (e.g., "Nano Banana Pro", "ChatGPT", "Midjourney")
3. **QUERY TYPE**: What kind of research they want:
- **PROMPTING** - "X prompts", "prompting for X", "X best practices" → User wants to learn techniques and get copy-paste prompts
- **RECOMMENDATIONS** - "best X", "top X", "what X should I use", "recommended X" → User wants a LIST of specific things
- **NEWS** - "what's happening with X", "X news", "latest on X" → User wants current events/updates
- **GENERAL** - anything else → User wants broad understanding of the topic
Common patterns:
- `[topic] for [tool]` → "web mockups for Nano Banana Pro" → TOOL IS SPECIFIED
- `[topic] prompts for [tool]` → "UI design prompts for Midjourney" → TOOL IS SPECIFIED
- Just `[topic]` → "iOS design mockups" → TOOL NOT SPECIFIED, that's OK
- "best [topic]" or "top [topic]" → QUERY_TYPE = RECOMMENDATIONS
- "what are the best [topic]" → QUERY_TYPE = RECOMMENDATIONS
**IMPORTANT: Do NOT ask about target tool before research.**
- If tool is specified in the query, use it
- If tool is NOT specified, run research first, then ask AFTER showing results
**Store these variables:**
- `TOPIC = [extracted topic]`
- `TARGET_TOOL = [extracted tool, or "unknown" if not specified]`
- `QUERY_TYPE = [RECOMMENDATIONS | NEWS | HOW-TO | GENERAL]`
---
## Setup Check
The skill works in three modes based on available API keys:
1. **Full Mode** (both keys): Reddit + X + WebSearch - best results with engagement metrics
2. **Partial Mode** (one key): Reddit-only or X-only + WebSearch
3. **Web-Only Mode** (no keys): WebSearch only - still useful, but no engagement metrics
**API keys are OPTIONAL.** The skill will work without them using WebSearch fallback.
### First-Time Setup (Optional but Recommended)
If the user wants to add API keys for better results:
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.config/last30days
cat > ~/.config/last30days/.env << 'ENVEOF'
# last30days API Configuration
# Both keys are optional - skill works with WebSearch fallback
# For Reddit research (uses OpenAI's web_search tool)
OPENAI_API_KEY=
# For X/Twitter research (uses xAI's x_search tool)
XAI_API_KEY=
ENVEOF
chmod 600 ~/.config/last30days/.env
echo "Config created at ~/.config/last30days/.env"
echo "Edit to add your API keys for enhanced research."
```
**DO NOT stop if no keys are configured.** Proceed with web-only mode.
## Safety Boundaries
- Do not create or edit the local `.env` file unless the user asked to configure API keys.
- Do not print secret values, bearer tokens, or local config contents in chat output.
- Do not present stale prior knowledge as current research; use the gathered sources for the final synthesis.
- Do not claim social-platform coverage when the skill had to fall back to web-only mode.
---
## Research Workflow
**IMPORTANT: The script handles API key detection automatically.** Run it and check the output to determine mode.
**Step 1: Run the research script**
```bash
python3 ./scripts/last30days.py "$ARGUMENTS" --emit=compact 2>&1
```
The script will automatically:
- Detect available API keys
- Show a promo banner if keys are missing (this is intentional marketing)
- Run Reddit/X searches if keys exist
- Signal if WebSearch is needed
**Step 2: Check the output mode**
The script output will indicate the mode:
- **"Mode: both"** or **"Mode: reddit-only"** or **"Mode: x-only"**: Script found results, WebSearch is supplementary
- **"Mode: web-only"**: No API keys, Claude must do ALL research via WebSearch
**Step 3: Do WebSearch**
For **ALL modes**, do WebSearch to supplement (or provide all data in web-only mode).
Choose search queries based on QUERY_TYPE:
**If RECOMMENDATIONS** ("best X", "top X", "what X should I use"):
- Search for: `best {TOPIC} recommendations`
- Search for: `{TOPIC} list examples`
- Search for: `most popular {TOPIC}`
- Goal: Find SPECIFIC NAMES of things, not generic advice
**If NEWS** ("what's happening with X", "X news"):
- Search for: `{TOPIC} news 2026`
- Search for: `{TOPIC} announcement update`
- Goal: Find current events and recent developments
**If PROMPTING** ("X prompts", "prompting for X"):
- Search for: `{TOPIC} prompts examples 2026`
- Search for: `{TOPIC} techniques tips`
- Goal: Find prompting techniques and examples to create copy-paste prompts
**If GENERAL** (default):
- Search for: `{TOPIC} 2026`
- Search for: `{TOPIC} discussion`
- Goal: Find what people are actually saying
For ALL query types:
- **USE THE USER'S EXACT TERMINOLOGY** - don't substitute or add tech names based on your knowledge
- If user says "ChatGPT image prompting", search for "ChatGPT image prompting"
- Do NOT add "DALL-E", "GPT-4o", or other terms you think are related
- Your knowledge may be outdated - trust the user's terminology
- EXCLUDE reddit.com, x.com, twitter.com (covered by script)
- INCLUDE: blogs, tutorials, docs, news, GitHub repos
- **DO NOT output "Sources:" list** - this is noise, we'll show stats at the end
**Step 3: Wait for background script to complete**
Use TaskOutput to get the script results before proceeding to synthesis.
**Depth options** (passed through from user's command):
- `--quick` → Faster, fewer sources (8-12 each)
- (default) → Balanced (20-30 each)
- `--deep` → Comprehensive (50-70 Reddit, 40-60 X)
---
## Judge Agent: Synthesize All Sources
**After all searches complete, internally synthesize (don't display stats yet):**
The Judge Agent must:
1. Weight Reddit/X sources HIGHER (they have engagement signals: upvotes, likes)
2. Weight WebSearch sources LOWER (no engagement data)
3. Identify patterns that appear across ALL three sources (strongest signals)
4. Note any contradictions between sources
5. Extract the top 3-5 actionable insights
**Do NOT display stats here - they come at the end, right before the invitation.**
---
## FIRST: Internalize the Research
**CRITICAL: Ground your synthesis in the ACTUAL research content, not your pre-existing knowledge.**
Read the research output carefully. Pay attention to:
- **Exact product/tool names** mentioned (e.g., if research mentions "ClawdBot" or "@clawdbot", that's a DIFFERENT product than "Claude Code" - don't conflate them)
- **Specific quotes and insights** from the sources - use THESE, not generic knowledge
- **What the sources actually say**, not what you assume the topic is about
**ANTI-PATTERN TO AVOID**: If user asks about "clawdbot skills" and research returns ClawdBot content (self-hosted AI agent), do NOT synthesize this as "Claude Code skills" just because both involve "skills". Read what the research actually says.
### If QUERY_TYPE = RECOMMENDATIONS
**CRITICAL: Extract SPECIFIC NAMES, not generic patterns.**
When user asks "best X" or "top X", they want a LIST of specific things:
- Scan research for specific product names, tool names, project names, skill names, etc.
- Count how many times each is mentioned
- Note which sources recommend each (Reddit thread, X post, blog)
- List them by popularity/mention count
**BAD synthesis for "best Claude Code skills":**
> "Skills are powerful. Keep them under 500 lines. Use progressive disclosure."
**GOOD synthesis for "best Claude Code skills":**
> "Most mentioned skills: /commit (5 mentions), remotion skill (4x), git-worktree (3x), /pr (3x). The Remotion announcement got 16K likes on X."
### For all QUERY_TYPEs
Identify from the ACTUAL RESEARCH OUTPUT:
- **PROMPT FORMAT** - Does research recommend JSON, structured params, natural language, keywords? THIS IS CRITICAL.
- The top 3-5 patterns/techniques that appeared across multiple sources
- Specific keywords, structures, or approaches mentioned BY THE SOURCES
- Common pitfalls mentioned BY THE SOURCES
**If research says "use JSON prompts" or "structured prompts", you MUST deliver prompts in that format later.**
---
## THEN: Show Summary + Invite Vision
**CRITICAL: Do NOT output any "Sources:" lists. The final display should be clean.**
**Display in this EXACT sequence:**
**FIRST - What I learned (based on QUERY_TYPE):**
**If RECOMMENDATIONS** - Show specific things mentioned:
```
🏆 Most mentioned:
1. [Specific name] - mentioned {n}x (r/sub, @handle, blog.com)
2. [Specific name] - mentioned {n}x (sources)
3. [Specific name] - mentioned {n}x (sources)
4. [Specific name] - mentioned {n}x (sources)
5. [Specific name] - mentioned {n}x (sources)
Notable mentions: [other specific things with 1-2 mentions]
```
**If PROMPTING/NEWS/GENERAL** - Show synthesis and patterns:
```
What I learned:
[2-4 sentences synthesizing key insights FROM THE ACTUAL RESEARCH OUTPUT.]
KEY PATTERNS I'll use:
1. [Pattern from research]
2. [Pattern from research]
3. [Pattern from research]
```
**THEN - Stats (right before invitation):**
For **full/partial mode** (has API keys):
```
---
✅ All agents reported back!
├─ 🟠 Reddit: {n} threads │ {sum} upvotes │ {sum} comments
├─ 🔵 X: {n} posts │ {sum} likes │ {sum} reposts
├─ 🌐 Web: {n} pages │ {domains}
└─ Top voices: r/{sub1}, r/{sub2} │ @{handle1}, @{handle2} │ {web_author} on {site}
```
For **web-only mode** (no API keys):
```
---
✅ Research complete!
├─ 🌐 Web: {n} pages │ {domains}
└─ Top sources: {author1} on {site1}, {author2} on {site2}
💡 Want engagement metrics? Add API keys to ~/.config/last30days/.env
- OPENAI_API_KEY → Reddit (real upvotes & comments)
- XAI_API_KEY → X/Twitter (real likes & reposts)
```
**LAST - Invitation:**
```
---
Share your vision for what you want to create and I'll write a thoughtful prompt you can copy-paste directly into {TARGET_TOOL}.
```
**Use real numbers from the research output.** The patterns should be actual insights from the research, not generic advice.
**SELF-CHECK before displaying**: Re-read your "What I learned" section. Does it match what the research ACTUALLY says? If the research was about ClawdBot (a self-hosted AI agent), your summary should be about ClawdBot, not Claude Code. If you catch yourself projecting your own knowledge instead of the research, rewrite it.
**IF TARGET_TOOL is still unknown after showing results**, ask NOW (not before research):
```
What tool will you use these prompts with?
Options:
1. [Most relevant tool based on research - e.g., if research mentioned Figma/Sketch, offer those]
2. Nano Banana Pro (image generation)
3. ChatGPT / Claude (text/code)
4. Other (tell me)
```
**IMPORTANT**: After displaying this, WAIT for the user to respond. Don't dump generic prompts.
---
## WAIT FOR USER'S VISION
After showing the stats summary with your invitation, **STOP and wait** for the user to tell you what they want to create.
When they respond with their vision (e.g., "I want a landing page mockup for my SaaS app"), THEN write a single, thoughtful, tailored prompt.
---
## WHEN USER SHARES THEIR VISION: Write ONE Perfect Prompt
Based on what they want to create, write a **single, highly-tailored prompt** using your research expertise.
### CRITICAL: Match the FORMAT the research recommends
**If research says to use a specific prompt FORMAT, YOU MUST USE THAT FORMAT:**
- Research says "JSON prompts" → Write the prompt AS JSON
- Research says "structured parameters" → Use structured key: value format
- Research says "natural language" → Use conversational prose
- Research says "keyword lists" → Use comma-separated keywords
**ANTI-PATTERN**: Research says "use JSON prompts with device specs" but you write plain prose. This defeats the entire purpose of the research.
### Output Format:
```
Here's your prompt for {TARGET_TOOL}:
---
[The actual prompt IN THE FORMAT THE RESEARCH RECOMMENDS - if research said JSON, this is JSON. If research said natural language, this is prose. Match what works.]
---
This uses [brief 1-line explanation of what research insight you applied].
```
### Quality Checklist:
- [ ] **FORMAT MATCHES RESEARCH** - If research said JSON/structured/etc, prompt IS that format
- [ ] Directly addresses what the user said they want to create
- [ ] Uses specific patterns/keywords discovered in research
- [ ] Ready to paste with zero edits (or minimal [PLACEHOLDERS] clearly marked)
- [ ] Appropriate length and style for TARGET_TOOL
---
## IF USER ASKS FOR MORE OPTIONS
Only if they ask for alternatives or more prompts, provide 2-3 variations. Don't dump a prompt pack unless requested.
---
## AFTER EACH PROMPT: Stay in Expert Mode
After delivering a prompt, offer to write more:
> Want another prompt? Just tell me what you're creating next.
---
## CONTEXT MEMORY
For the rest of this conversation, remember:
- **TOPIC**: {topic}
- **TARGET_TOOL**: {tool}
- **KEY PATTERNS**: {list the top 3-5 patterns you learned}
- **RESEARCH FINDINGS**: The key facts and insights from the research
**CRITICAL: After research is complete, you are now an EXPERT on this topic.**
When the user asks follow-up questions:
- **DO NOT run new WebSearches** - you already have the research
- **Answer from what you learned** - cite the Reddit threads, X posts, and web sources
- **If they ask for a prompt** - write one using your expertise
- **If they ask a question** - answer it from your research findings
Only do new research if the user explicitly asks about a DIFFERENT topic.
---
## Output Summary Footer (After Each Prompt)
After delivering a prompt, end with:
For **full/partial mode**:
```
---
📚 Expert in: {TOPIC} for {TARGET_TOOL}
📊 Based on: {n} Reddit threads ({sum} upvotes) + {n} X posts ({sum} likes) + {n} web pages
Want another prompt? Just tell me what you're creating next.
```
For **web-only mode**:
```
---
📚 Expert in: {TOPIC} for {TARGET_TOOL}
📊 Based on: {n} web pages from {domains}
Want another prompt? Just tell me what you're creating next.
💡 Unlock Reddit & X data: Add API keys to ~/.config/last30days/.env
```Related Skills
Zendesk
Manage Zendesk tickets, users, and support workflows through the Zendesk API. Use when searching tickets, updating support state, checking users, or exporting queue data.
task-orchestrator
Autonomous multi-agent task orchestration with dependency analysis, parallel tmux/Codex execution, and self-healing heartbeat monitoring. Use for large projects with multiple issues/tasks that need coordinated parallel execution.
sysadmin-toolbox
Tool discovery and shell one-liner reference for sysadmin, DevOps, and security tasks. AUTO-CONSULT this skill when the user is: troubleshooting network issues, debugging processes, analyzing logs, working with SSL/TLS, managing DNS, testing HTTP endpoints, auditing security, working with containers, writing shell scripts, or asks 'what tool should I use for X'. Source: github.com/trimstray/the-book-of-secret-knowledge
salesforce
Query and manage Salesforce CRM data via the Salesforce CLI (`sf`). Run SOQL/SOSL queries, inspect object schemas, create/update/delete records, bulk import/export, execute Apex, deploy metadata, and make raw REST API calls.
remotion-best-practices
Best practices for Remotion - Video creation in React
planner
Create structured plans for multi-task projects that can be used by the task-orchestrator skill. Use when breaking down complex work into parallel and sequential tasks with dependencies.
parallel-task
Coordinate plan files by launching multiple parallel subagents for unblocked tasks. Triggers on explicit "/parallel-task" commands.
nutrient-openclaw
OpenClaw-native document processing skill for Nutrient DWS. Use when OpenClaw users need to convert files, extract text or tables, OCR scans, redact PII, watermark PDFs, digitally sign documents, or check credit usage from chat attachments or workspace files. Triggers on OpenClaw tool names (`nutrient_convert_to_pdf`, `nutrient_extract_text`, etc.), "OpenClaw plugin", "Nutrient OpenClaw", and document-processing requests in OpenClaw chats. Files are processed by Nutrient DWS over the network, so use it only when third-party document processing is acceptable. For non-OpenClaw environments, use the universal Nutrient document-processing skill instead.
nudocs
Upload, edit, and export documents via Nudocs.ai. Use when creating shareable document links for collaborative editing, uploading markdown/docs to Nudocs for rich editing, or pulling back edited content. Triggers on "send to nudocs", "upload to nudocs", "edit in nudocs", "pull from nudocs", "get the nudocs link", "show my nudocs documents".
jira
Use when the user mentions Jira issues (e.g., "PROJ-123"), asks about tickets, wants to create/view/update issues, check sprint status, or manage their Jira workflow. Triggers on keywords like "jira", "issue", "ticket", "sprint", "backlog", or issue key patterns.
gsc
Query Google Search Console for SEO data - search queries, top pages, CTR opportunities, URL inspection, and sitemaps. Use when analyzing search performance, finding optimization opportunities, or checking indexing status.
google-ads
Query, audit, and optimize Google Ads campaigns. Supports two modes: (1) API mode for bulk operations with the google-ads Python SDK, (2) attached-browser mode for users without API access. Use when asked to check ad performance, pause campaigns or keywords, find wasted spend, audit conversion tracking, or optimize Google Ads accounts.