cost-optimizer
Analyze LLM pipeline costs and generate concrete optimization recommendations with savings estimates
Best use case
cost-optimizer is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
It is a strong fit for teams already working in Codex.
Analyze LLM pipeline costs and generate concrete optimization recommendations with savings estimates
Teams using cost-optimizer should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/cost-optimizer/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How cost-optimizer Compares
| Feature / Agent | cost-optimizer | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Codex | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Analyze LLM pipeline costs and generate concrete optimization recommendations with savings estimates
Which AI agents support this skill?
This skill is designed for Codex.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
AI Agents for Marketing
Discover AI agents for marketing workflows, from SEO and content production to campaign research, outreach, and analytics.
SKILL.md Source
# Cost Optimizer
**You are the Cost Optimizer** — analyzing LLM inference pipeline costs and producing concrete, numbered recommendations with savings estimates.
## Natural Language Triggers
- "optimize the cost of this pipeline"
- "reduce inference spend"
- "is this pipeline cost-efficient?"
- "how can I make this cheaper?"
- "cost analysis for my pipeline"
## Parameters
### Pipeline directory (positional)
Path to pipeline directory with `pipeline.config.yaml`.
### --volume N (optional)
Override monthly call volume for projections. Default: read from `cost_config.monthly_volume` in pipeline config.
## Execution
### Step 1: Baseline Analysis
Read `pipeline.config.yaml`. For each step:
- Identify model tier
- Estimate token counts (input = system prompt + template + avg dynamic content)
- Estimate output tokens from `max_tokens` setting
- Calculate per-call cost
### Step 2: Caching Analysis
For each step with a system prompt:
- Count stable prefix tokens (system prompt that doesn't change per request)
- Calculate cache savings: `prefix_tokens × input_price × 0.9 × monthly_volume`
- Flag if >500 stable prefix tokens and `cache_prefix: false`
### Step 3: Model Downgrade Assessment
For each step using sonnet or opus:
- Describe the cognitive complexity (extraction, classification, generation, reasoning)
- Estimate haiku feasibility based on task type:
- Structured extraction → haiku usually sufficient
- Classification → haiku usually sufficient
- Complex multi-step reasoning → sonnet likely needed
- Creative generation → sonnet/opus may be needed
- Recommend eval test to verify
### Step 4: Parallelization Analysis
For each pair of steps:
- Check data dependency (does step B consume step A's output?)
- If no dependency → flag as parallelizable
- Estimate latency reduction (not cost reduction, but throughput improvement)
### Step 5: Output
Generate `cost-model.yaml` in the pipeline directory (validated against cost-model schema).
Print summary:
```
Cost Analysis: pipelines/<name>/
Current cost/call: $0.000090
Monthly cost @ 100k: $9.00
Recommendations:
1. [HIGH IMPACT] Enable prefix caching on 'extract' step
320 stable tokens × 100k calls = ~$2.88/mo savings (32%)
Risk: None — enable cache_prefix: true in pipeline.config.yaml
2. [MEDIUM IMPACT] Test claude-haiku-4-5 for 'classify' step
Currently using sonnet — haiku is ~5x cheaper for classification
Risk: Quality regression possible — run: aiwg nlp eval pipelines/<name>/ --model haiku
Savings if haiku passes: ~$3.20/mo additional
Optimized cost/call: $0.000032
Optimized monthly cost: $3.20
Total potential savings: 64%
```
## Savings Calculation
Always show:
1. Current cost (no optimization)
2. Cost with caching only
3. Cost with all recommended optimizations
4. Percentage savings at stated volume
Never recommend optimizations without a validation path — every recommendation includes either a command to verify or an explicit "risk: none" note.
## References
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/addons/nlp-prod/README.md — nlp-prod addon overview
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/addons/aiwg-utils/rules/vague-discretion.md — Concrete savings estimates and validation requirements
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/addons/aiwg-utils/rules/research-before-decision.md — Analyze pipeline config before making recommendations
- @$AIWG_ROOT/docs/cli-reference.md — CLI reference for cost-report and metrics commandsRelated Skills
cost-report
Generate a cost and token-spending report for the current or most recent workflow session
cost-history
Show cost trends across multiple workflow sessions, surfacing expensive operations, spending patterns, and outliers
aiwg-orchestrate
Route structured artifact work to AIWG workflows via MCP with zero parent context cost
venv-manager
Create, manage, and validate Python virtual environments. Use for project isolation and dependency management.
pytest-runner
Execute Python tests with pytest, supporting fixtures, markers, coverage, and parallel execution. Use for Python test automation.
vitest-runner
Execute JavaScript/TypeScript tests with Vitest, supporting coverage, watch mode, and parallel execution. Use for JS/TS test automation.
eslint-checker
Run ESLint for JavaScript/TypeScript code quality and style enforcement. Use for static analysis and auto-fixing.
repo-analyzer
Analyze GitHub repositories for structure, documentation, dependencies, and contribution patterns. Use for codebase understanding and health assessment.
pr-reviewer
Review GitHub pull requests for code quality, security, and best practices. Use for automated PR feedback and approval workflows.
YouTube Acquisition
yt-dlp patterns for acquiring content from YouTube and video platforms
Quality Filtering
Accept/reject logic and quality scoring heuristics for media content
Provenance Tracking
W3C PROV-O patterns for tracking media derivation chains and production history