flow-iteration-dual-track
Orchestrate dual-track iteration with synchronized Discovery (next) and Delivery (current) workflows
Best use case
flow-iteration-dual-track is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
It is a strong fit for teams already working in Codex.
Orchestrate dual-track iteration with synchronized Discovery (next) and Delivery (current) workflows
Teams using flow-iteration-dual-track should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/flow-iteration-dual-track/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How flow-iteration-dual-track Compares
| Feature / Agent | flow-iteration-dual-track | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Codex | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Orchestrate dual-track iteration with synchronized Discovery (next) and Delivery (current) workflows
Which AI agents support this skill?
This skill is designed for Codex.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
AI Agent for Product Research
Browse AI agent skills for product research, competitive analysis, customer discovery, and structured product decision support.
SKILL.md Source
# Dual-Track Iteration Flow
**You are the Core Orchestrator** for dual-track agile iteration management.
## Your Role
**You orchestrate multi-agent workflows. You do NOT execute bash scripts.**
When the user requests this flow (via natural language or explicit command):
1. **Interpret the request** and confirm understanding
2. **Read this template** as your orchestration guide
3. **Extract agent assignments** and workflow steps
4. **Launch agents via Task tool** in correct sequence
5. **Synthesize results** and finalize artifacts
6. **Report completion** with summary
## Dual-Track Overview
**Discovery Track**: Planning iteration N+1 (next iteration's work)
- Requirements refinement
- Design elaboration
- Risk investigation
- Acceptance criteria definition
**Delivery Track**: Implementing iteration N (current iteration's work)
- Coding committed stories
- Testing implementation
- Integration work
- Quality assurance
**Key Principle**: Discovery stays 1 iteration ahead to ensure Delivery always has ready backlog.
## Natural Language Triggers
Users may say:
- "Run iteration 3"
- "Start iteration 5"
- "Execute dual-track iteration"
- "Begin next sprint"
- "Start iteration planning"
- "Run sprint 4 with dual tracks"
You recognize these as requests for this orchestration flow.
## Parameter Handling
### --guidance Parameter
**Purpose**: User provides upfront direction to tailor iteration priorities
**Examples**:
```
--guidance "Focus on security stories first, compliance audit next week"
--guidance "Performance optimization critical, defer UI polish"
--guidance "Team velocity reduced this sprint, plan conservatively"
--guidance "Integration with payment gateway is blocking, prioritize spikes"
```
**How to Apply**:
- Parse guidance for keywords: security, performance, integration, velocity
- Adjust Discovery focus (requirements vs. spikes vs. design)
- Modify Delivery priorities (feature vs. tech debt vs. fixes)
- Influence synchronization points (more/less frequent)
### --interactive Parameter
**Purpose**: You ask 5-7 strategic questions to understand iteration context
**Questions to Ask** (if --interactive):
```
I'll ask 7 questions to optimize this dual-track iteration:
Q1: What's the primary goal for this iteration?
(e.g., feature delivery, technical debt, integration, quality)
Q2: How much ready backlog do you have?
(Helps me assess Discovery urgency and Delivery capacity)
Q3: What's your team's current velocity?
(Story points per iteration - influences planning)
Q4: Are there any blocking risks or dependencies?
(Integration points, external teams, technical unknowns)
Q5: What's the team composition this iteration?
(Available developers, testers, any absences)
Q6: What's the deadline pressure?
(Release date, demo, compliance deadline)
Q7: Any carry-over work from previous iteration?
(Incomplete stories that need to be finished)
Based on your answers, I'll adjust:
- Discovery/Delivery balance
- Story allocation
- Risk investigation priority
- Synchronization frequency
```
**Synthesize Guidance**: Combine answers into structured guidance for execution
## Iteration Structure
### Day 1: Kickoff (Week Start)
**Delivery Track Kickoff**:
- Review ready backlog from previous Discovery
- Commit to iteration goals
- Assign work to team members
- Set success criteria
**Discovery Track Planning**:
- Identify next iteration candidates
- Schedule stakeholder sessions
- Plan spikes and investigations
- Allocate Discovery capacity
### Midpoint: Checkpoint (Mid-Week)
**Delivery Progress Check**:
- Review implementation status
- Identify blockers
- Run quality gates
- Adjust if needed
**Discovery Validation**:
- Review refined requirements
- Check acceptance criteria
- Validate architectural decisions
- Prepare handoff materials
### End: Handoff and Retrospective (Week End)
**Delivery Completion**:
- Finalize work to Definition of Done
- Run all quality gates
- Deploy to staging
- Generate metrics
**Discovery Handoff**:
- Complete Definition of Ready
- Package backlog items
- Transfer to Delivery backlog
- Document decisions
**Joint Activities**:
- Handoff meeting
- Retrospective
- Metrics review
- Next iteration planning
## Multi-Agent Orchestration Workflow
### Step 1: Initialize Iteration
**Purpose**: Set up iteration structure and read context
**Your Actions**:
1. **Create Iteration Workspace**:
```
mkdir -p .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/
mkdir -p .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/discovery/
mkdir -p .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/
mkdir -p .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/reports/
```
2. **Read Current State**:
```
Read:
- .aiwg/planning/iteration-plan-*.md (previous plans)
- .aiwg/requirements/ready-backlog.md (if exists)
- .aiwg/reports/iteration-*-report.md (previous iterations)
- .aiwg/metrics/velocity-tracking.md (if exists)
```
3. **Launch Iteration Planning**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="project-manager",
description="Create iteration {N} plan",
prompt="""
Create dual-track iteration plan for iteration {N}:
Based on:
- Previous iteration velocity
- Ready backlog size
- Team capacity
- Risk register
Define:
1. Delivery Track Goals (iteration N)
- Story points to commit
- Work items to complete
- Quality targets
2. Discovery Track Goals (iteration N+1)
- Requirements to refine
- Spikes to execute
- Designs to validate
3. Success Criteria
- Delivery: What defines "done"
- Discovery: What defines "ready"
4. Schedule
- Key milestones
- Synchronization points
- Review sessions
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/iteration-plan.md
"""
)
```
**Communicate Progress**:
```
✓ Initialized iteration {N} workspace
⏳ Creating iteration plan...
✓ Iteration plan complete
```
### Step 2: Kickoff Delivery Track (Iteration N)
**Purpose**: Start current iteration implementation work
**Your Actions**:
1. **Launch Delivery Planning** (parallel agents):
```
# Agent 1: Requirements Analyst
Task(
subagent_type="requirements-analyst",
description="Validate ready backlog for Delivery",
prompt="""
Read ready backlog items for iteration {N}
For each item, verify:
- Acceptance criteria complete
- Test cases defined
- Dependencies identified
- Estimates confirmed
Flag any items not meeting Definition of Ready.
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/backlog-validation.md
"""
)
# Agent 2: Software Implementer
Task(
subagent_type="software-implementer",
description="Plan implementation approach",
prompt="""
Read validated backlog items
Create implementation plan:
- Technical approach for each story
- Component assignments
- Integration points
- Testing strategy
Identify technical risks or blockers.
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/implementation-plan.md
"""
)
# Agent 3: Test Engineer
Task(
subagent_type="test-engineer",
description="Create iteration test plan",
prompt="""
Read backlog items and acceptance criteria
Create test plan:
- Test scenarios per story
- Test data requirements
- Automation opportunities
- Regression suite updates
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/test-plan.md
"""
)
```
2. **Synthesize Delivery Kickoff**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="scrum-master",
description="Finalize Delivery track kickoff",
prompt="""
Read all Delivery planning artifacts:
- backlog-validation.md
- implementation-plan.md
- test-plan.md
Create Delivery Kickoff Summary:
- Committed work items
- Team assignments
- Success criteria
- Daily standup schedule
- Blockers to watch
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/kickoff-summary.md
"""
)
```
**Communicate Progress**:
```
⏳ Kicking off Delivery track (iteration {N})...
✓ Backlog validated: {X} items ready
✓ Implementation planned
✓ Test scenarios defined
✓ Delivery track kicked off: {Y} story points committed
```
### Step 3: Start Discovery Track (Iteration N+1)
**Purpose**: Begin planning next iteration's work
**Your Actions**:
1. **Launch Discovery Planning** (parallel agents):
```
# Agent 1: Product Designer
Task(
subagent_type="product-designer",
description="Identify design needs for iteration {N+1}",
prompt="""
Read product backlog and stakeholder requests
Identify items needing design work:
- UI/UX designs
- Workflow definitions
- Information architecture
- Interaction patterns
Schedule design sessions.
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/discovery/design-plan.md
"""
)
# Agent 2: Requirements Analyst
Task(
subagent_type="requirements-analyst",
description="Plan requirements refinement for iteration {N+1}",
prompt="""
Read product backlog and priority items
Select 1.5x-2x next iteration capacity for refinement:
- User stories to elaborate
- Acceptance criteria to define
- Dependencies to investigate
- Stakeholder validation needed
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/discovery/refinement-plan.md
"""
)
# Agent 3: Architecture Designer
Task(
subagent_type="architecture-designer",
description="Identify architectural work for iteration {N+1}",
prompt="""
Read upcoming features and technical backlog
Identify architectural needs:
- Design decisions required
- Technical spikes needed
- POCs to validate
- Integration planning
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/discovery/architecture-plan.md
"""
)
```
2. **Synthesize Discovery Plan**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="iteration-coordinator",
description="Create Discovery track plan",
prompt="""
Read all Discovery planning artifacts:
- design-plan.md
- refinement-plan.md
- architecture-plan.md
Create Discovery Plan for iteration {N+1}:
- Priority items to refine
- Spikes to execute
- Stakeholder sessions
- Target ready backlog size
- Handoff date to Delivery
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/discovery/discovery-plan.md
"""
)
```
**Communicate Progress**:
```
⏳ Starting Discovery track (iteration {N+1})...
✓ Design work identified
✓ Requirements selected for refinement
✓ Architectural spikes planned
✓ Discovery track started: {Z} items in refinement
```
### Step 4: Midpoint Checkpoint
**Purpose**: Assess progress and adjust both tracks
**Your Actions**:
1. **Check Delivery Progress**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="project-manager",
description="Assess Delivery track progress",
prompt="""
Evaluate iteration {N} Delivery progress:
Check:
- Work items completed vs. planned
- Velocity tracking (on track?)
- Quality gates passed
- Blockers encountered
- Risk to iteration goals
Determine:
- Status: GREEN | YELLOW | RED
- Adjustments needed
- Items to defer or drop
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/midpoint-assessment.md
"""
)
```
2. **Validate Discovery Refinement**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="requirements-analyst",
description="Validate Discovery track progress",
prompt="""
Evaluate iteration {N+1} Discovery progress:
Check:
- Requirements refined vs. planned
- Acceptance criteria completeness
- Spike results
- Stakeholder feedback received
- Definition of Ready compliance
Determine:
- Ready backlog size projection
- Items needing more work
- Risks to next iteration
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/discovery/midpoint-validation.md
"""
)
```
3. **Run Quality Gates** (parallel):
```
# Security Gate
Task(
subagent_type="security-gatekeeper",
description="Run security gate check",
prompt="""
Check Delivery work for security compliance:
- Code security scanning results
- Authentication/authorization implementation
- Data protection measures
- Security test coverage
Status: PASS | FAIL | WARNING
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/security-gate.md
"""
)
# Test Coverage Gate
Task(
subagent_type="test-engineer",
description="Run test coverage gate",
prompt="""
Check test coverage metrics:
- Unit test coverage %
- Integration test status
- Acceptance test automation
- Regression suite health
Status: PASS | FAIL | WARNING
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/test-gate.md
"""
)
```
**Communicate Progress**:
```
⏳ Midpoint checkpoint...
✓ Delivery: {percentage}% complete, status {GREEN|YELLOW|RED}
✓ Discovery: {X} items ready, {Y} in progress
✓ Quality gates: Security {PASS|FAIL}, Testing {PASS|FAIL}
✓ Checkpoint complete, adjustments identified
```
### Step 5: Discovery to Delivery Handoff
**Purpose**: Transfer ready items from Discovery to Delivery backlog
**Your Actions**:
1. **Validate Definition of Ready**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="requirements-analyst",
description="Validate items meet Definition of Ready",
prompt="""
For each Discovery item planned for handoff:
Validate DoR checklist:
- [ ] User story clear and complete
- [ ] Acceptance criteria testable
- [ ] Dependencies identified
- [ ] Estimated by team
- [ ] Design complete (if UI)
- [ ] Technical approach defined
- [ ] Test scenarios documented
Create handoff package per item.
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/discovery/dor-validation.md
"""
)
```
2. **Create Handoff Package**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="iteration-coordinator",
description="Package Discovery items for handoff",
prompt="""
Create handoff package for iteration {N+1}:
Include:
- Ready user stories
- Acceptance criteria
- Design mockups/specs
- Technical decisions (ADRs)
- Test scenarios
- Dependencies map
Organize by priority and component.
Output: .aiwg/requirements/iteration-{N+1}-ready-backlog.md
"""
)
```
3. **Conduct Handoff Meeting** (simulated):
```
Task(
subagent_type="scrum-master",
description="Document handoff meeting outcomes",
prompt="""
Simulate Discovery→Delivery handoff meeting:
Review each item:
- Clarify requirements
- Confirm estimates
- Identify risks
- Assign preliminary owners
Document:
- Items accepted
- Items needing more work
- Questions for stakeholders
- Next iteration capacity
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/handoff-meeting-notes.md
"""
)
```
**Communicate Progress**:
```
⏳ Processing Discovery→Delivery handoff...
✓ DoR validation: {X}/{Y} items ready
✓ Handoff package created
✓ Ready backlog size: {Z} story points (target: 1.5x-2x capacity)
✓ Handoff complete for iteration {N+1}
```
### Step 6: Complete Iteration and Retrospective
**Purpose**: Finalize iteration, capture lessons learned
**Your Actions**:
1. **Finalize Delivery Work**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="test-engineer",
description="Complete iteration testing",
prompt="""
Final testing for iteration {N}:
Execute:
- Acceptance tests for completed stories
- Regression test suite
- Integration tests
- Performance validation
Document:
- Test results
- Defects found/fixed
- Coverage metrics
- Quality assessment
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/final-test-report.md
"""
)
```
2. **Generate Iteration Metrics**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="project-manager",
description="Calculate iteration metrics",
prompt="""
Generate metrics for iteration {N}:
Delivery Metrics:
- Velocity: planned vs. actual
- Completion rate: stories done/committed
- Defect density
- Quality gate pass rate
Discovery Metrics:
- Ready backlog size achieved
- DoR compliance rate
- Lead time (Discovery complete to Delivery start)
- Refinement efficiency
Synchronization Metrics:
- Handoff quality (rework rate)
- Idle time
- Wait time
- Defect leakage
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/metrics-summary.md
"""
)
```
3. **Conduct Retrospective**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="retrospective-analyzer",
description="Facilitate iteration retrospective",
prompt="""
Analyze iteration {N} for improvements:
What Went Well:
- Delivery achievements
- Discovery successes
- Synchronization wins
What Could Improve:
- Process bottlenecks
- Communication gaps
- Quality issues
Action Items:
- Specific improvements
- Owner assignments
- Implementation timeline
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/retrospective.md
"""
)
```
4. **Generate Final Report**:
```
Task(
subagent_type="project-manager",
description="Create dual-track iteration report",
prompt="""
Create comprehensive iteration {N} report:
Executive Summary:
- Overall status
- Goals achieved
- Key metrics
Delivery Track:
- Work completed
- Quality results
- Velocity analysis
Discovery Track:
- Backlog prepared
- Spikes completed
- Risks addressed
Synchronization:
- Lead time metrics
- Handoff quality
- Process efficiency
Next Iteration:
- Capacity planning
- Priority items
- Risk mitigation
Include all metrics, lessons learned, and action items.
Output: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/iteration-report.md
"""
)
```
**Communicate Progress**:
```
⏳ Completing iteration {N}...
✓ Final testing complete: {X} stories accepted
✓ Metrics calculated: Velocity {Y} points
✓ Retrospective conducted: {Z} action items
✓ Iteration {N} complete
```
### Step 7: Present Results
**Purpose**: Summarize iteration outcomes for user
**Your Actions**:
```
Read final report and present:
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Dual-Track Iteration {N} Summary
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
**Overall Status**: {COMPLETE | PARTIAL | BLOCKED}
**Delivery Track (Iteration {N})**:
✓ Completed: {X}/{Y} stories ({percentage}%)
✓ Velocity: {actual} points (planned: {planned})
✓ Quality: All gates {PASSED|FAILED}
✓ Defects: {found}/{fixed}
**Discovery Track (Iteration {N+1})**:
✓ Refined: {A} stories
✓ Ready Backlog: {B} points ({ratio}x capacity)
✓ Spikes Completed: {C}/{D}
✓ DoR Compliance: {percentage}%
**Synchronization Health**:
✓ Lead Time: {weeks} (target: 1 iteration)
✓ Handoff Quality: {percentage}% clean
✓ Defect Leakage: {percentage}% (target: <10%)
✓ Ready Buffer: {ratio}x (target: 1.5x-2x)
**Key Achievements**:
- {achievement-1}
- {achievement-2}
- {achievement-3}
**Action Items for Next Iteration**:
1. {action-1} - Owner: {name}
2. {action-2} - Owner: {name}
3. {action-3} - Owner: {name}
**Generated Artifacts**:
- Iteration Plan: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/iteration-plan.md
- Test Report: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/delivery/final-test-report.md
- Metrics: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/metrics-summary.md
- Retrospective: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/retrospective.md
- Full Report: .aiwg/iterations/iteration-{N}/iteration-report.md
- Ready Backlog: .aiwg/requirements/iteration-{N+1}-ready-backlog.md
**Next Steps**:
- Review iteration report with team
- Start iteration {N+1} planning
- Address retrospective action items
- Adjust capacity based on velocity
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
```
## Quality Gates
Before marking workflow complete, verify:
- [ ] Delivery work meets Definition of Done
- [ ] Discovery items meet Definition of Ready
- [ ] All quality gates passed or risks accepted
- [ ] Metrics calculated and within targets
- [ ] Retrospective conducted with action items
- [ ] Ready backlog sufficient for next iteration
## User Communication
**At start**: Confirm understanding and set expectations
```
Understood. I'll orchestrate dual-track iteration {N}.
This will coordinate:
- Delivery Track: Implementing iteration {N} work
- Discovery Track: Refining iteration {N+1} work
- Synchronization points and handoffs
- Quality gates and metrics
I'll manage the parallel tracks with multiple specialized agents.
Expected duration: 10-15 minutes.
Starting orchestration...
```
**During**: Update progress with clear indicators
```
✓ = Complete
⏳ = In progress
⚠️ = Warning/attention needed
❌ = Blocked/failed
```
**At end**: Present comprehensive summary (see Step 7)
## Error Handling
**If Delivery Blocked**:
```
⚠️ Delivery track blocked on iteration {N}
Blocker: {description}
Impact: {stories affected}
Options:
1. Remove blocked stories from iteration
2. Find alternative implementation
3. Escalate to stakeholder
Recommendation: {suggested action}
```
**If Discovery Behind**:
```
⚠️ Discovery track behind schedule
Ready backlog: {ratio}x capacity (target: 1.5x-2x)
Risk: Iteration {N+1} may have insufficient work
Actions:
1. Accelerate refinement sessions
2. Simplify acceptance criteria
3. Pull from future backlog
Impact: Next iteration may have reduced scope
```
**If Quality Gate Failed**:
```
❌ Quality gate failed: {gate-name}
Failure reason: {details}
Impact: Cannot complete iteration without resolution
Required actions:
1. {remediation-step-1}
2. {remediation-step-2}
Escalating to technical lead...
```
**If Handoff Incomplete**:
```
⚠️ Discovery→Delivery handoff incomplete
Items not ready: {count}
DoR compliance: {percentage}%
Impact: Iteration {N+1} backlog insufficient
Options:
1. Extend Discovery refinement
2. Accept partial backlog
3. Pull buffer stories
Decision needed from Product Owner...
```
## Success Criteria
This orchestration succeeds when:
- [ ] Delivery completes ≥80% committed work
- [ ] Discovery achieves 1.5x-2x ready backlog
- [ ] Quality gates pass (or risks accepted)
- [ ] Handoff clean (≥90% DoR compliance)
- [ ] Metrics within healthy ranges
- [ ] Retrospective identifies improvements
- [ ] Next iteration has sufficient backlog
## Metrics to Track
**During orchestration, track**:
- Velocity: Story points completed vs. planned
- Lead time: Discovery completion to Delivery start
- Cycle time: Story start to done
- Defect leakage: Discovery gaps causing Delivery issues
- Ready backlog ratio: Ready items / team capacity
- Quality gate pass rate: First-time pass percentage
- Synchronization efficiency: Wait time and idle time
## References
**Templates**:
- Iteration Plan: `templates/planning/iteration-plan-template.md`
- Test Plan: `templates/test/iteration-test-plan-template.md`
- Retrospective: `templates/quality/retrospective-template.md`
- Metrics: `metrics/delivery-metrics-catalog.md`
**Workflows**:
- Discovery Track: `flows/discovery-track-template.md`
- Delivery Track: `flows/delivery-track-template.md`
- Handoff Checklist: `flows/handoff-checklist-template.md`
**Gate Criteria**:
- `flows/gate-criteria-by-phase.md` (Construction section)
**Dual-Track Guidance**:
- `docs/dual-track-agile-guide.md`
- `metrics/synchronization-metrics.md`Related Skills
Provenance Tracking
W3C PROV-O patterns for tracking media derivation chains and production history
research-workflow
Execute multi-stage research workflows
iteration-control
Manage bounded iteration loops for autonomous implementation — track retries, synthesize failure feedback, and escalate when limits hit
flow-test-strategy-execution
Orchestrate comprehensive test strategy with test suite execution, coverage validation, defect triage, and regression analysis
flow-security-review-cycle
Orchestrate continuous security validation, threat modeling, vulnerability management, and security gate enforcement across SDLC phases
flow-risk-management-cycle
Orchestrate continuous risk identification, assessment, tracking, and retirement across SDLC phases
flow-retrospective-cycle
Orchestrate systematic retrospective cycle with structured feedback collection, improvement tracking, and action item management
flow-requirements-evolution
Orchestrate living requirements refinement, change control, impact analysis, and traceability maintenance throughout SDLC
flow-performance-optimization
Orchestrate continuous performance optimization with baseline establishment, bottleneck identification, optimization implementation, load testing, and SLO validation
flow-knowledge-transfer
Orchestrate Knowledge Transfer flow with assessment, documentation, shadowing, validation, and handover
flow-incident-response
Orchestrate production incident triage, escalation, resolution, and post-incident review using ITIL best practices
flow-inception-to-elaboration
Orchestrate Inception→Elaboration phase transition with architecture baselining and risk retirement