execution
Phase execution methodology for orchestration workflows with error handling and completion protocols
Best use case
execution is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Phase execution methodology for orchestration workflows with error handling and completion protocols
Teams using execution should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/execution/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How execution Compares
| Feature / Agent | execution | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Phase execution methodology for orchestration workflows with error handling and completion protocols
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Execution Skill
Activate this skill during Phase 3 (Execution) of Maestro orchestration. This skill defines how Maestro executes implementation phases through native subagent delegation.
## Execution Mode Gate
### Step 0 — Express bypass (early return)
If `workflow_mode` is `express` in the current session, STOP HERE. Do not proceed
to the execution mode gate. Do not prompt the user. Do not resolve execution mode.
Express always dispatches sequentially. Return to the Express Workflow and continue
from the delegation step.
<HARD-GATE>
This gate MUST resolve before ANY delegation proceeds. Do not skip it. Do not defer it. Do not begin delegating to subagents until execution_mode is recorded in session state. If you reach a delegation step and execution_mode is not set, STOP and return here.
</HARD-GATE>
### Step 1 — Read the configured mode
Read `MAESTRO_EXECUTION_MODE` (default: `ask`).
- If `parallel`: call `update_session` with `{ execution_mode: 'parallel', execution_backend: 'native' }` to record in session state. Skip to delegation.
- If `sequential`: call `update_session` with `{ execution_mode: 'sequential', execution_backend: 'native' }` to record in session state. Skip to delegation.
- If `ask`: proceed to Step 2.
### Step 2 — Analyze the implementation plan
Before prompting the user, analyze the approved plan to generate a recommendation:
1. Count total phases in the plan
2. Count phases marked `parallel: true` (parallelizable phases)
3. Count distinct parallel batches (groups of parallelizable phases at the same dependency depth)
4. Count sequential-only phases (phases with `blocked_by` dependencies that prevent parallelization)
5. Cross-check file ownership across all phases. If any two phases share a file in their `files` arrays, those phases CANNOT be parallel-eligible — subtract them from the parallelizable count. Report each overlap as an Overlapping-file Warning in the prompt.
6. If `validate_plan` was called during planning and returned a `parallelization_profile`, use its `parallel_eligible` and `effective_batches` counts as the authoritative source for items 1-5 above. These are computed from actual dependency depths and override any manual flag-based counts. If `parallelization_profile` is not available, use the counts from items 1-5 as-is.
Record these counts — they feed into the prompt.
### Step 3 — Determine the recommendation
- If parallelizable phases ≤ 1 → auto-select **sequential**. Call `update_session` with `{ execution_mode: 'sequential', execution_backend: 'native' }`. Inform the user: "All phases are sequential — no parallel batches available." Skip to delegation. Do NOT prompt with a choice. Do NOT call `ask_user`. Do NOT present options. (Parallelism requires at least 2 phases at the same dependency depth; a single parallel-eligible phase has nothing to batch with.)
<ANTI-PATTERN>
WRONG — 1 parallel-eligible phase but user still prompted:
Parallel-eligible Phases: 1
→ Presented choice: "Sequential (Recommended)" / "Parallel"
When parallelizable phases ≤ 1, there is NO choice to make. Auto-select sequential
and skip directly to delegation. Do not show a picker.
</ANTI-PATTERN>
- If parallelizable phases > 50% of total phases → recommend **parallel**
- If parallelizable phases ≤ 50% but > 1 → recommend **sequential** (limited benefit)
- The recommended option appears first in the `ask_user` options list with "(Recommended)" appended to its label. The non-recommended option MUST NOT include "(Recommended)" in its label.
### Step 4 — Prompt the user
Call `ask_user` with `type: 'choice'` using exactly one of these option sets:
**When recommending parallel:**
options:
- label: "Parallel (Recommended)"
description: "Spawn child agents for each ready batch where file ownership does not overlap."
- label: "Sequential (High Precision)"
description: "Spawn one child agent at a time in dependency order."
**When recommending sequential:**
options:
- label: "Sequential (Recommended)"
description: "Spawn one child agent at a time in dependency order."
- label: "Parallel"
description: "Spawn child agents for each ready batch where file ownership does not overlap."
<ANTI-PATTERN>
WRONG — Both options labeled "(Recommended)":
options:
- label: "Parallel (Recommended)"
- label: "Sequential (High Precision) (Recommended)"
Only ONE option receives the "(Recommended)" suffix. Never both.
</ANTI-PATTERN>
When parallel is recommended:
```json
{
"questions": [{
"header": "Exec mode",
"question": "Execution Mode: [N] of [M] phases are parallelizable in [B] batches. How should phases be executed?",
"type": "choice",
"options": [
{
"label": "Parallel (Recommended)",
"description": "[N] phases run concurrently in [B] batches. Faster execution but agents run autonomously."
},
{
"label": "Sequential",
"description": "All [M] phases run one at a time in plan order. Slower but allows step-by-step review."
}
]
}]
}
```
When sequential is recommended (parallelizable ≤ 1):
```json
{
"questions": [{
"header": "Exec mode",
"question": "Execution Mode: Only [N] of [M] phases can run in parallel. How should phases be executed?",
"type": "choice",
"options": [
{
"label": "Sequential (Recommended)",
"description": "Phases run one at a time in plan order. Best for this plan's dependency structure."
},
{
"label": "Parallel",
"description": "Parallel batching available for [N] phase(s). Limited benefit for this plan."
}
]
}]
}
```
Replace `[N]`, `[M]`, and `[B]` with actual counts from Step 2.
### Step 5 — Record and proceed
1. Call `update_session` with the selected `execution_mode` and `execution_backend: native`
2. The tool atomically persists both fields
3. Use the selected mode for the remainder of the session unless the user changes it
### Mode-specific behavior
- If `parallel` is selected and a ready batch has only one phase, execute it sequentially
- If `sequential` is selected, preserve plan order even when phases are parallel-safe
### Safety fallback
If `execution_mode` is not present in session state at the point where delegation is about to begin, STOP. Do not default to sequential. Return to this gate and resolve it. This catches any edge case where the gate was skipped.
## State File Access
When MCP state tools (`get_session_status`, `update_session`, `transition_phase`) are available, prefer them for state operations. They provide structured I/O and atomic transitions.
When MCP tools are not available, state lives inside `<MAESTRO_STATE_DIR>` and is accessible through `read_file` and `write_file`.
Helper scripts remain available for shell-injected command prompts:
```bash
node ${extensionPath}/scripts/read-state.js <relative-path>
node ${extensionPath}/scripts/read-active-session.js
```
## Hook Lifecycle During Execution
Hooks fire automatically at agent boundaries. The orchestrator does not invoke them directly.
- `BeforeAgent`: resolves active agent identity from the required `Agent:` header first, then falls back to legacy env/regex detection, and injects compact session context
- `AfterAgent`: validates that the response contains both `Task Report` and `Downstream Context`; requests one retry on the first malformed response
The hook state directory under `/tmp/maestro-hooks/<session-id>/` is transient and separate from orchestration state.
## Sequential Execution Protocol
For a sequential phase:
1. Verify all `blocked_by` dependencies are completed
2. Mark the phase `in_progress`
3. Update `current_phase`
4. Set `current_batch: null`
5. Update `write_todos` before delegation
6. Delegate to the assigned agent with the required header and full context
7. Parse the returned handoff
8. Update session state
9. Mark the phase `completed` or `failed`
10. Update `write_todos` after the state update
## Native Parallel Execution Protocol
Use native parallel execution only for sibling phases at the same dependency depth with non-overlapping file ownership.
### Batch Rules
1. Verify all blocking phases for every phase in the batch are completed
2. Slice the ready batch into the current dispatch chunk using `MAESTRO_MAX_CONCURRENT`
3. Mark only the current chunk phases `in_progress`
4. Set `current_batch` in session state for that chunk
5. Write one in-progress todo item for the chunk
6. In the next turn, emit only agent tool calls for that chunk
7. Do not mix shell commands, validation commands, file writes, or narration between those agent calls
8. `MAESTRO_MAX_CONCURRENT=0` means emit the entire ready batch in one turn
### Native Constraints
- The runtime only parallelizes contiguous agent calls in one turn
- Native subagents currently run without user approval gates
- `ask_user` remains available; a batch may pause while waiting for user input
- If execution is interrupted, restart unfinished `in_progress` phases on resume instead of attempting to restore in-flight subagent interactions
## Progress Context
Include the following in every delegation query body:
```text
Progress: Phase [N] of [M]: [Phase Name]
Session: [session_id]
```
For native parallel batches, also include the batch identifier in the required header:
```text
Agent: <agent_name>
Phase: <id>/<total>
Batch: <batch_id>
Session: <session_id>
```
## Error Handling Protocol
Record all errors in session state with:
- `agent`
- `timestamp`
- `type`
- `message`
- `resolution`
### Retry Logic
- Maximum retries per phase: `MAESTRO_MAX_RETRIES` (default `2`)
- First failure: analyze, adjust context/scope, retry automatically
- Subsequent failures up to the limit: continue retrying with clearer constraints
- Limit exceeded: mark the phase `failed` and escalate to the user
Increment `retry_count` on each retry.
### Timeout / Termination Handling
When a native subagent terminates early or exceeds its configured timeout:
1. Record any useful partial output in session state
2. Report what the agent was attempting
3. Retry with narrower scope when reasonable
4. Escalate if repeated failures continue
### File Conflict Handling
When a subagent reports a file conflict:
1. Stop execution immediately
2. Record the conflicting files and phases
3. Do not attempt automatic merge resolution
4. Ask the user how to proceed
## Subagent Output Processing
Native subagent results are wrapped. Do not assume the handoff begins at byte 0.
### Parsing Rules
1. Locate `## Task Report` (or `# Task Report`) inside the returned text
2. Locate `## Downstream Context` (or `# Downstream Context`) inside the returned text
3. Parse:
- status
- files created / modified / deleted
- downstream context fields
- validation result
- reported errors
4. Persist the full raw output plus the parsed fields into session state
### State Update Sequence
After processing each handoff:
1. Update the phase file manifests
2. Update `downstream_context`
3. Append any errors
4. Aggregate token usage
5. If validation passed, mark the phase `completed`
6. If validation failed, trigger retry logic
7. Update `updated`
8. Advance or clear `current_batch` as each chunk finishes
## Completion Protocol
When all phases are completed:
1. Verify there are no `failed` or `pending` phases
2. Confirm plan deliverables are accounted for
3. Run the final code-review gate for non-documentation changes
4. Archive the session through `session-management`
5. Present a final summary with deliverables, files changed, token usage, deviations, and review statusRelated Skills
validation
Cross-cutting validation methodology for verifying phase outputs and project integrity
session-management
Manages orchestration session state, tracking, and resumption
implementation-planning
Generates detailed implementation plans from finalized designs
design-dialogue
Guides structured design conversations for complex engineering tasks
delegation
Agent delegation best practices for constructing effective subagent prompts with proper scoping
code-review
Standalone code review methodology for structured, severity-classified code assessment
terminal-command-execution
Execute terminal commands safely and reliably with clear pre-checks, output validation, and recovery steps. Use when users ask to run shell/CLI commands, inspect system state, manage files, install dependencies, start services, debug command failures, or automate command-line workflows.
task-execution-engine
Execute implementation tasks from design documents using markdown checkboxes. Use when (1) implementing features from feature-design-assistant output, (2) resuming interrupted work, (3) batch executing tasks. Triggers on 'start implementation', 'run tasks', 'resume'.
test-execution-patterns
test execution patterns
securing-aws-lambda-execution-roles
Securing AWS Lambda execution roles by implementing least-privilege IAM policies, applying permission boundaries, restricting resource-based policies, using IAM Access Analyzer to validate permissions, and enforcing role scoping through SCPs.
hunting-for-lolbins-execution-in-endpoint-logs
Hunt for adversary abuse of Living Off the Land Binaries (LOLBins) by analyzing endpoint process creation logs for suspicious execution patterns of legitimate Windows system binaries used for malicious purposes.
hunting-for-anomalous-powershell-execution
Hunt for malicious PowerShell activity by analyzing Script Block Logging (Event 4104), Module Logging (Event 4103), and process creation events. The analyst parses Windows Event Log EVTX files to detect obfuscated commands, AMSI bypass attempts, encoded payloads, credential dumping keywords, and suspicious download cradles. Activates for requests involving PowerShell threat hunting, script block analysis, encoded command detection, or AMSI bypass identification.