implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidents

实施集成事件工单系统,将 SIEM 告警对接 ServiceNow、Jira 或 TheHive, 用于结构化事件跟踪、SLA 管理、升级工作流和合规文档记录。 适用于 SOC 团队需要通过自动化工单创建、分配路由和解决跟踪来规范事件生命周期管理时。

9 stars

Best use case

implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidents is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

实施集成事件工单系统,将 SIEM 告警对接 ServiceNow、Jira 或 TheHive, 用于结构化事件跟踪、SLA 管理、升级工作流和合规文档记录。 适用于 SOC 团队需要通过自动化工单创建、分配路由和解决跟踪来规范事件生命周期管理时。

Teams using implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidents should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidents/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/main/skills/implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidents/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidents/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidents Compares

Feature / Agentimplementing-ticketing-system-for-incidentsStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

实施集成事件工单系统,将 SIEM 告警对接 ServiceNow、Jira 或 TheHive, 用于结构化事件跟踪、SLA 管理、升级工作流和合规文档记录。 适用于 SOC 团队需要通过自动化工单创建、分配路由和解决跟踪来规范事件生命周期管理时。

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# 为安全事件实施工单系统

## 适用场景

以下情况使用本技能:
- SOC 团队需要在 SIEM 重大事件管理之外规范事件跟踪
- 合规要求需要带时间戳和审计跟踪的文档化事件生命周期
- 多团队协作需要基于工单的工作流以及分配和升级机制
- SLA 跟踪需要自动测量响应和解决时间
- 事后复盘需要结构化数据进行趋势分析和报告

**不适用于**单个告警分诊——工单系统用于需要多步骤调查和修复的已确认事件,而非每一条 SIEM 告警。

## 前置条件

- 工单平台:ServiceNow ITSM、Jira Service Management 或 TheHive
- SIEM 集成能力(REST API、Webhook 或 SOAR 连接器)
- 事件分类分类法(类别、严重级别、升级路径)
- 用于分析师分配的值班轮换计划
- 与事件严重程度对齐的 SLA(服务级别协议)定义

## 工作流程

### 步骤 1:定义事件分类分类法

建立标准化事件类别和严重程度:

```yaml
incident_taxonomy:
  categories:
    - malware_infection
    - phishing_campaign
    - unauthorized_access
    - data_exfiltration
    - denial_of_service
    - ransomware
    - insider_threat
    - vulnerability_exploitation
    - account_compromise
    - policy_violation

  severity_levels:
    critical:
      definition: "活跃数据泄露、勒索软件或业务关键系统被入侵"
      response_sla: 15 minutes
      resolution_sla: 4 hours
      escalation: 立即升级至 Tier 3 并通知 CISO
      examples: ["活跃勒索软件", "域管理员被入侵", "客户数据泄露"]

    high:
      definition: "已确认的业务系统或多个用户账号被入侵"
      response_sla: 30 minutes
      resolution_sla: 8 hours
      escalation: 立即升级 Tier 2,2 小时内未解决升级 Tier 3
      examples: ["带 C2 的恶意软件", "检测到横向移动", "带凭据窃取的钓鱼攻击"]

    medium:
      definition: "已确认的需要调查和修复的安全事件"
      response_sla: 2 hours
      resolution_sla: 24 hours
      escalation: 4 小时内升级 Tier 2
      examples: ["单次钓鱼点击", "未授权软件", "策略违规"]

    low:
      definition: "影响有限的轻微安全事件"
      response_sla: 8 hours
      resolution_sla: 72 hours
      escalation: Tier 1 标准队列
      examples: ["扫描尝试", "暴力破解失败(未被入侵)", "信息披露"]
```

### 步骤 2:从 SIEM 自动创建工单

**ServiceNow 通过 REST API 集成:**

```python
import requests
import json
from datetime import datetime

class IncidentTicketManager:
    def __init__(self, snow_url, snow_user, snow_password):
        self.snow_url = snow_url
        self.auth = (snow_user, snow_password)
        self.headers = {
            "Content-Type": "application/json",
            "Accept": "application/json"
        }

    def create_incident(self, alert_data):
        """从 SIEM 告警创建 ServiceNow 事件"""
        severity_map = {
            "critical": "1",
            "high": "2",
            "medium": "3",
            "low": "4"
        }

        payload = {
            "short_description": f"[SEC] {alert_data['rule_name']} — {alert_data['src']}",
            "description": self._build_description(alert_data),
            "category": "Security",
            "subcategory": alert_data.get("category", "Investigation"),
            "urgency": severity_map.get(alert_data["severity"], "3"),
            "impact": severity_map.get(alert_data["severity"], "3"),
            "assignment_group": self._get_assignment_group(alert_data["severity"]),
            "caller_id": "soc_automation",
            "u_siem_event_id": alert_data.get("notable_id", ""),
            "u_mitre_technique": alert_data.get("mitre_technique", ""),
            "u_affected_hosts": ", ".join(alert_data.get("affected_hosts", [])),
            "u_iocs": json.dumps(alert_data.get("iocs", {}))
        }

        response = requests.post(
            f"{self.snow_url}/api/now/table/incident",
            auth=self.auth,
            headers=self.headers,
            json=payload
        )
        result = response.json()["result"]
        return {
            "ticket_number": result["number"],
            "sys_id": result["sys_id"],
            "state": result["state"]
        }

    def _build_description(self, alert_data):
        return f"""
安全事件 — 由 SIEM 自动生成
================================================
告警规则:       {alert_data['rule_name']}
SIEM 事件 ID:   {alert_data.get('notable_id', 'N/A')}
检测时间:       {alert_data['detection_time']}
严重程度:       {alert_data['severity'].upper()}
MITRE ATT&CK:  {alert_data.get('mitre_technique', 'N/A')}

源地址:         {alert_data.get('src', 'N/A')}
目标地址:       {alert_data.get('dest', 'N/A')}
用户:           {alert_data.get('user', 'N/A')}

初始上下文:
{alert_data.get('description', '详见 SIEM。')}

IOC:
{json.dumps(alert_data.get('iocs', {}), indent=2)}
"""

    def _get_assignment_group(self, severity):
        if severity in ("critical", "high"):
            return "SOC Tier 2"
        return "SOC Tier 1"

    def update_incident(self, ticket_number, updates):
        """更新已有事件"""
        # 先通过工单号获取 sys_id
        response = requests.get(
            f"{self.snow_url}/api/now/table/incident",
            auth=self.auth,
            headers=self.headers,
            params={"sysparm_query": f"number={ticket_number}", "sysparm_limit": 1}
        )
        sys_id = response.json()["result"][0]["sys_id"]

        # 更新
        response = requests.patch(
            f"{self.snow_url}/api/now/table/incident/{sys_id}",
            auth=self.auth,
            headers=self.headers,
            json=updates
        )
        return response.json()["result"]

    def add_work_note(self, ticket_number, note):
        """向事件添加调查备注"""
        self.update_incident(ticket_number, {"work_notes": note})

    def escalate_incident(self, ticket_number, reason):
        """升级至下一层级"""
        self.update_incident(ticket_number, {
            "assignment_group": "SOC Tier 3",
            "urgency": "1",
            "work_notes": f"已升级:{reason}"
        })

    def resolve_incident(self, ticket_number, resolution):
        """解决并关闭事件"""
        self.update_incident(ticket_number, {
            "state": "6",  # 已解决
            "close_code": "Resolved",
            "close_notes": resolution,
            "u_incident_disposition": resolution.split(":")[0] if ":" in resolution else "Resolved"
        })
```

### 步骤 3:配置 TheHive 进行安全专项工单管理

**TheHive 案例创建(ServiceNow 的替代方案):**

```python
import requests

class TheHiveCaseManager:
    def __init__(self, thehive_url, api_key):
        self.url = thehive_url
        self.headers = {
            "Authorization": f"Bearer {api_key}",
            "Content-Type": "application/json"
        }

    def create_case(self, alert_data):
        """从 SIEM 告警在 TheHive 中创建案例"""
        case = {
            "title": f"[{alert_data['severity'].upper()}] {alert_data['rule_name']}",
            "description": self._build_markdown_description(alert_data),
            "severity": {"critical": 4, "high": 3, "medium": 2, "low": 1}.get(
                alert_data["severity"], 2
            ),
            "tlp": 2,  # TLP:AMBER
            "pap": 2,  # PAP:AMBER
            "tags": [
                alert_data.get("mitre_technique", ""),
                alert_data.get("category", ""),
                f"source:{alert_data.get('src', 'unknown')}"
            ],
            "tasks": self._generate_tasks(alert_data["severity"]),
            "customFields": {
                "siem-event-id": {"string": alert_data.get("notable_id", "")},
                "mitre-technique": {"string": alert_data.get("mitre_technique", "")},
                "detection-source": {"string": "Splunk ES"}
            }
        }

        response = requests.post(
            f"{self.url}/api/case",
            headers=self.headers,
            json=case
        )
        return response.json()

    def _generate_tasks(self, severity):
        """根据严重程度生成调查任务"""
        tasks = [
            {"title": "初始分诊", "group": "Phase 1", "description": "审查 SIEM 告警并验证发现"},
            {"title": "IOC 丰富化", "group": "Phase 1", "description": "使用 VT、AbuseIPDB 丰富所有 IOC"},
            {"title": "范围评估", "group": "Phase 2", "description": "确定受影响的系统和用户"},
        ]
        if severity in ("critical", "high"):
            tasks.extend([
                {"title": "遏制行动", "group": "Phase 2", "description": "隔离受影响系统"},
                {"title": "证据收集", "group": "Phase 3", "description": "保存取证构件"},
                {"title": "清除", "group": "Phase 3", "description": "从环境中清除威胁"},
                {"title": "恢复", "group": "Phase 4", "description": "将系统恢复正常运行"},
                {"title": "事后复盘", "group": "Phase 4", "description": "记录经验教训"},
            ])
        else:
            tasks.append(
                {"title": "解决和文档记录", "group": "Phase 2", "description": "记录发现并关闭"}
            )
        return tasks

    def add_observable(self, case_id, ioc_type, ioc_value, description=""):
        """向案例添加 IOC 可观测指标"""
        observable = {
            "dataType": ioc_type,
            "data": ioc_value,
            "message": description,
            "tlp": 2,
            "ioc": True,
            "tags": ["auto-extracted"]
        }
        response = requests.post(
            f"{self.url}/api/case/{case_id}/artifact",
            headers=self.headers,
            json=observable
        )
        return response.json()
```

### 步骤 4:实施 SLA 跟踪和升级

**Splunk SLA 监控仪表板:**
```spl
--- 即将违反 SLA 的活跃事件
index=servicenow sourcetype="snow:incident" category="Security" state IN ("New", "In Progress")
| eval sla_minutes = case(
    urgency="1", 15,
    urgency="2", 30,
    urgency="3", 120,
    urgency="4", 480
  )
| eval age_minutes = round((now() - strptime(opened_at, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")) / 60, 0)
| eval sla_remaining = sla_minutes - age_minutes
| eval sla_status = case(
    sla_remaining < 0, "BREACHED",
    sla_remaining < sla_minutes * 0.25, "AT RISK",
    1=1, "ON TRACK"
  )
| where sla_status IN ("BREACHED", "AT RISK")
| sort sla_remaining
| table number, short_description, urgency, assignment_group, assigned_to,
        age_minutes, sla_minutes, sla_remaining, sla_status
```

**自动升级逻辑:**
```python
def check_sla_breaches(ticket_manager):
    """检查 SLA 违反情况并自动升级"""
    open_incidents = ticket_manager.get_open_incidents()

    for incident in open_incidents:
        age_minutes = (datetime.utcnow() - incident["opened_at"]).total_seconds() / 60
        sla_minutes = {"1": 15, "2": 30, "3": 120, "4": 480}[incident["urgency"]]

        if age_minutes > sla_minutes and incident["state"] == "New":
            ticket_manager.escalate_incident(
                incident["number"],
                f"SLA 违反:已过 {int(age_minutes)} 分钟,SLA 为 {sla_minutes} 分钟。自动升级。"
            )
```

### 步骤 5:构建报告和指标

```spl
--- 月度事件指标
index=servicenow sourcetype="snow:incident" category="Security"
opened_at > "2024-03-01" opened_at < "2024-04-01"
| stats count AS total,
        avg(eval((resolved_at - opened_at) / 3600)) AS avg_resolution_hours,
        sum(eval(if(urgency="1", 1, 0))) AS critical,
        sum(eval(if(urgency="2", 1, 0))) AS high,
        sum(eval(if(urgency="3", 1, 0))) AS medium,
        sum(eval(if(urgency="4", 1, 0))) AS low
| eval avg_resolution = round(avg_resolution_hours, 1)

--- SLA 合规率
index=servicenow sourcetype="snow:incident" category="Security" state="Resolved"
| eval sla_target = case(urgency="1", 4, urgency="2", 8, urgency="3", 24, urgency="4", 72)
| eval resolution_hours = (resolved_at - opened_at) / 3600
| eval sla_met = if(resolution_hours <= sla_target, 1, 0)
| stats sum(sla_met) AS met, count AS total
| eval compliance_pct = round(met / total * 100, 1)
```

## 核心概念

| 术语 | 定义 |
|------|------|
| **事件工单(Incident Ticket)** | 已确认安全事件的正式跟踪记录,具有完整生命周期管理 |
| **SLA** | 服务级别协议,按严重程度定义最大响应和解决时间 |
| **升级路径(Escalation Path)** | 基于严重程度、耗时或分析师请求,从 Tier 1 到 Tier 2/3 的路由定义 |
| **处置(Disposition)** | 已关闭事件的最终分类(真阳性、误报、重复、策略违规) |
| **MTTR** | 平均解决时间(Mean Time to Resolve)——从工单创建到解决的跨所有事件平均时间 |
| **案例管理(Case Management)** | 通过任务、可观测指标和审计跟踪管理复杂事件的结构化方法 |

## 工具与系统

- **ServiceNow ITSM**:企业 IT 服务管理平台,含安全事件模块和 SLA 跟踪
- **Jira Service Management**:Atlassian 服务管理平台,具有可自定义的事件工作流
- **TheHive**:开源安全事件响应平台,含案例管理和 Cortex 集成
- **PagerDuty**:用于 SOC 分析师告警的值班管理和事件通知平台
- **Splunk ITSI**:IT 服务智能模块,用于 SLA 跟踪和服务健康仪表板

## 常见场景

- **SIEM 到工单自动化**:为 Splunk ES 中每个严重/高危重大事件自动创建 ServiceNow 工单
- **多团队协作**:将恶意软件事件路由至 SOC 分诊、IT 修复、法务通知
- **合规文档记录**:从工单数据生成事件报告,作为 PCI DSS、HIPAA 审计证据
- **值班告警**:下班后创建严重工单时通过 PagerDuty 呼叫值班分析师
- **事后复盘**:查询已关闭工单,识别反复出现的事件类型和系统性缺口

## 输出格式

```
事件工单 — INC0012567
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
标题:        [SEC] 检测到 Cobalt Strike C2 信标 — WORKSTATION-042
类别:        安全 > 恶意软件感染
严重程度:    严重(P1)
SLA:         响应:15 分钟 | 解决:4 小时

时间线:
  14:23  工单创建(自 Splunk ES NE-2024-08921 自动创建)
  14:25  分配给 analyst_jdoe(Tier 2)
  14:28  工作备注:"VT 确认 Cobalt Strike 信标,哈希值 a1b2c3..."
  14:35  工作备注:"主机已通过 CrowdStrike 隔离,C2 域名已封锁"
  15:00  工作备注:"企业 IOC 扫描——发现另外 2 台受影响主机"
  15:30  升级至 Tier 3 进行取证分析
  16:00  工作备注:"所有受影响主机已遏制并清除"
  18:00  已解决:"恶意软件已清除,系统已恢复,监控 72 小时"

指标:
  确认时间:     2 分钟
  遏制时间:     12 分钟
  解决时间:     3 小时 37 分钟
  SLA 状态:     已达成(在 4 小时解决目标内)
```

Related Skills

implementing-zero-trust-with-hashicorp-boundary

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

使用 HashiCorp Boundary 实现具备动态凭据代理、会话录制和 Vault 集成的身份感知零信任基础设施访问管理。

implementing-zero-trust-with-beyondcorp

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

使用身份感知代理(IAP,Identity-Aware Proxy)、上下文感知访问策略、设备信任验证和 Access Context Manager,部署 Google BeyondCorp Enterprise 零信任访问控制,对 GCP 资源和内部应用强制执行基于身份和安全态势的访问。

implementing-zero-trust-network-access

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

通过配置身份感知代理、微分段、基于条件访问策略的持续验证,以及在 AWS、Azure 和 GCP 环境中以 BeyondCorp 风格的架构替代传统 VPN 访问,在云环境中实施零信任网络访问(ZTNA)。

implementing-zero-trust-network-access-with-zscaler

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

使用 Zscaler 实施零信任网络访问(Zero Trust Network Access,ZTNA),通过 Zscaler Private Access(ZPA)配置应用分段、访问策略和连接器,替代传统 VPN 架构

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

本技能指导组织按照 NIST SP 800-207 和 Google BeyondCorp 原则在云环境中实施零信任(Zero Trust)架构,涵盖以身份为中心的访问控制、微分段(Micro-Segmentation)、持续验证、设备信任评估,以及部署身份感知代理(Identity-Aware Proxy)以消除 AWS、Azure 和 GCP 环境中的隐式网络信任。

implementing-zero-trust-for-saas-applications

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

使用 CASB、SSPM、条件访问策略、OAuth 应用治理和会话控制,为 SaaS 应用实施零信任访问控制, 对云托管服务强制执行身份验证、设备合规性检查和数据保护。

implementing-zero-trust-dns-with-nextdns

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

将 NextDNS 实施为零信任 DNS 过滤层,提供加密解析、威胁情报阻断、隐私保护,以及跨所有端点的组织策略执行。

implementing-zero-standing-privilege-with-cyberark

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

部署 CyberArk Secure Cloud Access,通过基于时间、权限和审批控制的即时访问,在混合云和多云环境中消除常设权限。

implementing-zero-knowledge-proof-for-authentication

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

零知识证明(ZKP)允许证明者在不泄露秘密本身的情况下证明对某个秘密(如密码或私钥)的了解。本技能实现 Schnorr 身份识别协议和使用离散对数问题的简化 ZKPP,使服务器永远不需要获取用户密码即可完成认证。

implementing-web-application-logging-with-modsecurity

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

配置带有 OWASP 核心规则集(CRS)的 ModSecurity WAF,实现 Web 应用程序日志记录, 调整规则以减少误报,分析审计日志进行攻击检测,并为应用程序特定威胁实现自定义 SecRules。 分析师配置 SecRuleEngine、SecAuditEngine 和 CRS 偏执级别,以在安全覆盖范围和运营稳定性之间取得平衡。 适用于涉及 WAF 配置、ModSecurity 规则调整、Web 应用审计日志或 CRS 部署的场景。

implementing-vulnerability-sla-breach-alerting

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

为漏洞修复 SLA 违规构建自动化告警,包含基于严重程度的时间线、升级工作流和合规性报告仪表板。

implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla

9
from killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh

漏洞修复 SLA(服务级别协议)根据严重程度、资产重要性和漏洞利用可用性定义修补或缓解已识别漏洞的强制时限。有效的 SLA 计划推动责任落实、确保一致的修复时间线,并为漏洞管理成熟度提供可衡量的 KPI。