conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow
Best use case
conductor-implement is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow
Teams using conductor-implement should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/conductor-implement/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How conductor-implement Compares
| Feature / Agent | conductor-implement | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Implement Track
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan, following the workflow rules defined in `conductor/workflow.md`.
## Use this skill when
- Working on implement track tasks or workflows
- Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for implement track
## Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to implement track
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
## Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open `resources/implementation-playbook.md`.
## Pre-flight Checks
1. Verify Conductor is initialized:
- Check `conductor/product.md` exists
- Check `conductor/workflow.md` exists
- Check `conductor/tracks.md` exists
- If missing: Display error and suggest running `/conductor:setup` first
2. Load workflow configuration:
- Read `conductor/workflow.md`
- Parse TDD strictness level
- Parse commit strategy
- Parse verification checkpoint rules
## Track Selection
### If argument provided:
- Validate track exists: `conductor/tracks/{argument}/plan.md`
- If not found: Search for partial matches, suggest corrections
### If no argument:
1. Read `conductor/tracks.md`
2. Parse for incomplete tracks (status `[ ]` or `[~]`)
3. Display selection menu:
```
Select a track to implement:
In Progress:
1. [~] auth_20250115 - User Authentication (Phase 2, Task 3)
Pending:
2. [ ] nav-fix_20250114 - Navigation Bug Fix
3. [ ] dashboard_20250113 - Dashboard Feature
Enter number or track ID:
```
## Context Loading
Load all relevant context for implementation:
1. Track documents:
- `conductor/tracks/{trackId}/spec.md` - Requirements
- `conductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md` - Task list
- `conductor/tracks/{trackId}/metadata.json` - Progress state
2. Project context:
- `conductor/product.md` - Product understanding
- `conductor/tech-stack.md` - Technical constraints
- `conductor/workflow.md` - Process rules
3. Code style (if exists):
- `conductor/code_styleguides/{language}.md`
## Track Status Update
Update track to in-progress:
1. In `conductor/tracks.md`:
- Change `[ ]` to `[~]` for this track
2. In `conductor/tracks/{trackId}/metadata.json`:
- Set `status: "in_progress"`
- Update `updated` timestamp
## Task Execution Loop
For each incomplete task in plan.md (marked with `[ ]`):
### 1. Task Identification
Parse plan.md to find next incomplete task:
- Look for lines matching `- [ ] Task X.Y: {description}`
- Track current phase from structure
### 2. Task Start
Mark task as in-progress:
- Update plan.md: Change `[ ]` to `[~]` for current task
- Announce: "Starting Task X.Y: {description}"
### 3. TDD Workflow (if TDD enabled in workflow.md)
**Red Phase - Write Failing Test:**
```
Following TDD workflow for Task X.Y...
Step 1: Writing failing test
```
- Create test file if needed
- Write test(s) for the task functionality
- Run tests to confirm they fail
- If tests pass unexpectedly: HALT, investigate
**Green Phase - Implement:**
```
Step 2: Implementing minimal code to pass test
```
- Write minimum code to make test pass
- Run tests to confirm they pass
- If tests fail: Debug and fix
**Refactor Phase:**
```
Step 3: Refactoring while keeping tests green
```
- Clean up code
- Run tests to ensure still passing
### 4. Non-TDD Workflow (if TDD not strict)
- Implement the task directly
- Run any existing tests
- Manual verification as needed
### 5. Task Completion
**Commit changes** (following commit strategy from workflow.md):
```bash
git add -A
git commit -m "{commit_prefix}: {task description} ({trackId})"
```
**Update plan.md:**
- Change `[~]` to `[x]` for completed task
- Commit plan update:
```bash
git add conductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md
git commit -m "chore: mark task X.Y complete ({trackId})"
```
**Update metadata.json:**
- Increment `tasks.completed`
- Update `updated` timestamp
### 6. Phase Completion Check
After each task, check if phase is complete:
- Parse plan.md for phase structure
- If all tasks in current phase are `[x]`:
**Run phase verification:**
```
Phase {N} complete. Running verification...
```
- Execute verification tasks listed for the phase
- Run full test suite: `npm test` / `pytest` / etc.
**Report and wait for approval:**
```
Phase {N} Verification Results:
- All phase tasks: Complete
- Tests: {passing/failing}
- Verification: {pass/fail}
Approve to continue to Phase {N+1}?
1. Yes, continue
2. No, there are issues to fix
3. Pause implementation
```
**CRITICAL: Wait for explicit user approval before proceeding to next phase.**
## Error Handling During Implementation
### On Tool Failure
```
ERROR: {tool} failed with: {error message}
Options:
1. Retry the operation
2. Skip this task and continue
3. Pause implementation
4. Revert current task changes
```
- HALT and present options
- Do NOT automatically continue
### On Test Failure
```
TESTS FAILING after Task X.Y
Failed tests:
- {test name}: {failure reason}
Options:
1. Attempt to fix
2. Rollback task changes
3. Pause for manual intervention
```
### On Git Failure
```
GIT ERROR: {error message}
This may indicate:
- Uncommitted changes from outside Conductor
- Merge conflicts
- Permission issues
Options:
1. Show git status
2. Attempt to resolve
3. Pause for manual intervention
```
## Track Completion
When all phases and tasks are complete:
### 1. Final Verification
```
All tasks complete. Running final verification...
```
- Run full test suite
- Check all acceptance criteria from spec.md
- Generate verification report
### 2. Update Track Status
In `conductor/tracks.md`:
- Change `[~]` to `[x]` for this track
- Update the "Updated" column
In `conductor/tracks/{trackId}/metadata.json`:
- Set `status: "complete"`
- Set `phases.completed` to total
- Set `tasks.completed` to total
- Update `updated` timestamp
In `conductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md`:
- Update header status to `[x] Complete`
### 3. Documentation Sync Offer
```
Track complete! Would you like to sync documentation?
This will update:
- conductor/product.md (if new features added)
- conductor/tech-stack.md (if new dependencies added)
- README.md (if applicable)
1. Yes, sync documentation
2. No, skip
```
### 4. Cleanup Offer
```
Track {trackId} is complete.
Cleanup options:
1. Archive - Move to conductor/tracks/_archive/
2. Delete - Remove track directory
3. Keep - Leave as-is
```
### 5. Completion Summary
```
Track Complete: {track title}
Summary:
- Track ID: {trackId}
- Phases completed: {N}/{N}
- Tasks completed: {M}/{M}
- Commits created: {count}
- Tests: All passing
Next steps:
- Run /conductor:status to see project progress
- Run /conductor:new-track for next feature
```
## Progress Tracking
Maintain progress in `metadata.json` throughout:
```json
{
"id": "auth_20250115",
"title": "User Authentication",
"type": "feature",
"status": "in_progress",
"created": "2025-01-15T10:00:00Z",
"updated": "2025-01-15T14:30:00Z",
"current_phase": 2,
"current_task": "2.3",
"phases": {
"total": 3,
"completed": 1
},
"tasks": {
"total": 12,
"completed": 7
},
"commits": [
"abc1234: feat: add login form (auth_20250115)",
"def5678: feat: add password validation (auth_20250115)"
]
}
```
## Resumption
If implementation is paused and resumed:
1. Load `metadata.json` for current state
2. Find current task from `current_task` field
3. Check if task is `[~]` in plan.md
4. Ask user:
```
Resuming track: {title}
Last task in progress: Task {X.Y}: {description}
Options:
1. Continue from where we left off
2. Restart current task
3. Show progress summary first
```
## Critical Rules
1. **NEVER skip verification checkpoints** - Always wait for user approval between phases
2. **STOP on any failure** - Do not attempt to continue past errors
3. **Follow workflow.md strictly** - TDD, commit strategy, and verification rules are mandatory
4. **Keep plan.md updated** - Task status must reflect actual progress
5. **Commit frequently** - Each task completion should be committed
6. **Track all commits** - Record commit hashes in metadata.json for potential revert
## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.Related Skills
notion-spec-to-implementation
Turn Notion specs into implementation plans, tasks, and progress tracking; use when implementing PRDs/feature specs and creating Notion plans + tasks from them.
figma-implement-design
Translates Figma designs into production-ready application code with 1:1 visual fidelity. Use when implementing UI code from Figma files, when user mentions "implement design", "generate code", "implement component", provides Figma URLs, or asks to build components matching Figma specs. For Figma canvas writes via `use_figma`, use `figma-use`.
slo-implementation
Framework for defining and implementing Service Level Indicators (SLIs), Service Level Objectives (SLOs), and error budgets.
rag-implementation
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) implementation workflow covering embedding selection, vector database setup, chunking strategies, and retrieval optimization.
observability-monitoring-slo-implement
You are an SLO (Service Level Objective) expert specializing in implementing reliability standards and error budget-based engineering practices. Design comprehensive SLO frameworks, establish meaningful SLIs, and create monitoring systems that balance reliability with feature velocity.
hybrid-search-implementation
Combine vector and keyword search for improved retrieval. Use when implementing RAG systems, building search engines, or when neither approach alone provides sufficient recall.
cqrs-implementation
Implement Command Query Responsibility Segregation for scalable architectures. Use when separating read and write models, optimizing query performance, or building event-sourced systems.
conductor-validator
Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.
conductor-status
Display project status, active tracks, and next actions
conductor-setup
Configure a Rails project to work with Conductor (parallel coding agents)
conductor-revert
Git-aware undo by logical work unit (track, phase, or task)
conductor-new-track
Create a new track with specification and phased implementation plan