feature-benefits
Systematic codebase scanning for features and evidence-based feature-to-benefit translation. Extracts what a project does from its code and translates it into what users gain — generates features and benefits sections, "Why [Project]?" content, and feature audit reports. Use when writing a features table for a README, extracting features from code, auditing feature coverage, or answering "why should someone use this project?".
Best use case
feature-benefits is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Systematic codebase scanning for features and evidence-based feature-to-benefit translation. Extracts what a project does from its code and translates it into what users gain — generates features and benefits sections, "Why [Project]?" content, and feature audit reports. Use when writing a features table for a README, extracting features from code, auditing feature coverage, or answering "why should someone use this project?".
Teams using feature-benefits should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/feature-benefits/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How feature-benefits Compares
| Feature / Agent | feature-benefits | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Systematic codebase scanning for features and evidence-based feature-to-benefit translation. Extracts what a project does from its code and translates it into what users gain — generates features and benefits sections, "Why [Project]?" content, and feature audit reports. Use when writing a features table for a README, extracting features from code, auditing feature coverage, or answering "why should someone use this project?".
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Feature-Benefits Extraction
Scan a codebase systematically, extract concrete features with evidence, classify by impact, and translate into benefit-driven language for documentation.
## 7-Step Feature Extraction Workflow
### Step 1: Detect Project Type
Read the primary manifest to understand the ecosystem:
| File | Ecosystem | Key Fields |
|------|-----------|------------|
| `package.json` | Node.js / JavaScript / TypeScript | `dependencies`, `scripts`, `bin`, `exports`, `type` |
| `pyproject.toml` | Python | `[project.dependencies]`, `[project.scripts]`, `[tool.*]` |
| `Cargo.toml` | Rust | `[dependencies]`, `[features]`, `[[bin]]` |
| `go.mod` | Go | `require`, module path |
| `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` | Claude Code Plugin | `skills`, `commands`, `agents`, `hooks` |
Also check: `Makefile`, `Dockerfile`, `docker-compose.yml`, `.github/workflows/`, `wrangler.toml` for deployment signals.
### Step 2: Scan Signal Categories
Scan the 10 signal categories: CLI Commands, Public API, Configuration, Integrations, Performance, Security, TypeScript/DX, Testing, Middleware/Plugins, Documentation.
For each category, check file patterns, read matching files, and record what you find. For detailed file patterns and scan lists per category, load `SKILL-signals.md` from this skill directory.
### Step 3: Extract Concrete Features with Evidence
For each signal found, create a feature entry:
```
Feature: [What it does — concrete, specific]
Evidence: [File path, function name, or config that proves it]
Category: [Signal category from Step 2]
```
**Rules:**
- Every feature must have a file path or function as evidence
- No speculative features — if you can't point to code, it's not a feature
- Be specific: "Zero-config TypeScript support" not "Good developer experience"
### Step 3.5: Map to Jobs-to-be-Done (Hero features only)
For Hero features, frame the job: `When I am [situation], I want [capability], so I can [outcome]`. Classify as Functional, Emotional, or Social. Skip JTBD for Core/Supporting tiers and projects with fewer than 5 features. For full JTBD guidance, load `SKILL-signals.md`.
### Step 3.6: Persona Inference
Infer 1–2 target personas from code signals (integration surface, execution model, entry points, deploy artifacts). Map to archetypes: Solo builder, Team lead, Platform/ops engineer, Power user/automator, Compliance-aware org. Default to "Solo builder" if ambiguous. For the full persona inference table, load `SKILL-signals.md`.
### Step 4: User Benefits (the "Why?" Layer)
User benefits answer **"Why should I care?"** — the real-world reasons someone would choose this project.
**Two paths available — both produce the same output format:**
#### Path A: Auto-Scan (default)
Synthesise outcome-first benefits from Hero features + JTBD + persona:
1. Apply the **signal gate**: Standard (workflow benefits) by default; Elevated (experiential) only with mobile/async/remote/voice signals in code
2. Generate 3–7 draft benefits, tag claim strength: Strong (code directly enables), Medium (reasonable inference), Weak (discard)
3. Ship only Strong + Medium benefits
#### Path B: Conversational ("Talk it out")
Use 4 interactive questions to surface authentic use cases, then enrich with code evidence. For the full prompt sequence, load `SKILL-signals.md`.
#### Output Format
```
**[Bold user outcome]** — [mechanism/how it works]. [Constraint if needed].
```
Each benefit requires: a specific context, an enabling mechanism, and an evidence pointer.
### Step 5: Classify by Impact Tier
| Tier | Count | Criteria | README Placement |
|------|-------|----------|-----------------|
| **Hero** | 1–3 | Primary differentiators — why someone chooses THIS over alternatives | One-liner, Why section, first in features |
| **Core** | 4–8 | Expected by the target audience — missing these would be a deal-breaker | Features table, quick start examples |
| **Supporting** | 9+ | Nice-to-have — adds polish but isn't the reason someone adopts | Mentioned briefly or linked to docs |
### Step 6: Output Structured Feature Inventory
Output as a Markdown table with Feature, Evidence, Benefit Category, and optional JTBD columns, grouped by tier (Hero, Core, Supporting). Or use emoji+bold+em-dash bullets for direct README use.
---
## Feature-to-Benefit Translation Framework
### The Translation Pattern
```
[Technical feature] so you can [user outcome] — [evidence]
```
### 5 Benefit Categories
Use at least 3 different categories across your features table:
| Category | Pattern | Example Benefit |
|----------|---------|----------------|
| **Time saved** | "Do X in Y instead of Z" | "Generate a full README in under a minute — not an afternoon" |
| **Confidence gained** | "Know that X because Y" | "Every benefit traces to actual code — no marketing fluff" |
| **Pain avoided** | "Never worry about X" | "Never ship a repo with missing docs again" |
| **Capability unlocked** | "Now you can X" | "Scan any codebase and extract its selling points automatically" |
| **Cost reduced** | "Save X by Y" | "One plugin replaces five separate documentation tools" |
### Anti-Patterns
- **No "simple" or "easy"** — show simplicity through a short code example
- **No "powerful" without evidence** — what specifically makes it powerful?
- **No speculative benefits** — "could save you hours" requires evidence
- **No feature-as-benefit** — "Has caching" is a feature; "Responses in <50ms after first request" is the benefit
- **No benefit without context** — every user benefit needs a specific situation
- **No benefit without mechanism** — every user benefit needs an enabling mechanism
- **No ungrounded lifestyle claims** — elevated signal gate only when code proves the mechanism
For the full translation table by signal category, badge mapping, and common patterns library, load `SKILL-signals.md`.Related Skills
pitchdocs
Generate marketing-quality repository documentation from codebase analysis. Scans 10 signal categories, extracts features with file-level evidence, and produces README, CHANGELOG, ROADMAP, and 15+ more docs. Zero runtime dependencies. For AI context file management, see ContextDocs.
visual-standards
Visual formatting standards for repository documentation — emoji heading prefixes, horizontal rules, TOC anchors, callouts, screenshots (device dimensions, HTML patterns, captions, shadows), and image optimisation. Load when generating READMEs with visual elements or working with screenshots.
user-guides
Generates task-oriented user guides and how-to documentation for a repository. Creates docs/guides/ with step-by-step instructions for common workflows, integrations, and advanced usage. Links guides into README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md. Use when a project needs user-facing how-to documentation beyond the README quickstart.
roadmap
Generates ROADMAP.md from project milestones, issues, and boards (GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket). Structures content with mission statement, current milestone progress, upcoming milestones, and community involvement section. Use when creating or updating a project roadmap.
public-readme
Generates READMEs with the Daytona/Banesullivan marketing framework — hero section, benefit-driven features, quickstart, comparison tables, and compelling CTAs. Produces docs that sell as well as they inform. Use when creating or overhauling a project README.
platform-profiles
Platform-specific equivalents for GitLab and Bitbucket when generating repository documentation. Lookup tables for file paths, badges, Markdown rendering, CI/CD, and CLI tools. Load this skill when working on non-GitHub repos or generating cross-platform docs.
pitchdocs-suite
One-command generation and audit of the full public repository documentation set — README, CHANGELOG, ROADMAP, CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, SECURITY, issue templates, PR template, and discussion templates. Use when setting up a new repo or auditing an existing one.
package-registry
Documentation guidance for projects published to npm and PyPI package registries. Covers metadata fields that affect registry pages, README cross-renderer compatibility, trusted publishing, provenance badges, and audit checks. Use when a project has package.json or pyproject.toml and is published publicly.
llms-txt
Generates llms.txt and llms-full.txt files following the llmstxt.org specification. Provides LLM-friendly content curation for AI coding assistants (Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code) and AI search engines. Use when generating or updating llms.txt for a repository.
launch-artifacts
Transforms README and CHANGELOG into platform-specific launch content — Dev.to articles, Hacker News posts, Reddit posts, Twitter/X threads, and awesome list submission PRs. Keeps promotion tethered to code artifacts, not generic marketing. Use when launching or announcing a project release.
geo-optimisation
Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) patterns for documentation that surfaces correctly in AI-generated answers — citation capsules, crisp definitions, atomic sections, comparison tables, statistics, and semantic scaffolding. Load when optimising docs for AI citation (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude).
docs-verify
Validates documentation quality and freshness — checks for broken links, stale content, llms.txt sync, image issues, heading hierarchy, and badge URLs. Runs locally or in CI. Use to catch documentation decay before it reaches users.