30-analyze-impact-150
[30] ANALYZE. Understand how changes impact the system — what's the core, what's affected, what depends on what. Use when planning changes, analyzing systems, debugging issues, or anytime you need to see the full picture of cause and effect. Triggers on "what's affected", "impact analysis", "dependencies", "scope mapping", or when you need to understand ripple effects.
Best use case
30-analyze-impact-150 is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
[30] ANALYZE. Understand how changes impact the system — what's the core, what's affected, what depends on what. Use when planning changes, analyzing systems, debugging issues, or anytime you need to see the full picture of cause and effect. Triggers on "what's affected", "impact analysis", "dependencies", "scope mapping", or when you need to understand ripple effects.
Teams using 30-analyze-impact-150 should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/30-analyze-impact-150/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How 30-analyze-impact-150 Compares
| Feature / Agent | 30-analyze-impact-150 | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
[30] ANALYZE. Understand how changes impact the system — what's the core, what's affected, what depends on what. Use when planning changes, analyzing systems, debugging issues, or anytime you need to see the full picture of cause and effect. Triggers on "what's affected", "impact analysis", "dependencies", "scope mapping", or when you need to understand ripple effects.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Analyze-Impact 150 Protocol
**Core Principle:** Understand the ripple effects. See how changes in one part affect the whole system.
## What This Skill Does
When you invoke this skill, you're mapping:
- **Core** — What exactly is being changed
- **Impact** — What will be affected by the change
- **Dependencies** — What the core depends on and what depends on it
- **Boundaries** — Where the effects stop
## The Impact Model
```
[UPSTREAM]
What the core depends on
↓
[CORE] ←── What we're changing
↓
[DOWNSTREAM]
What depends on the core
↓
[BOUNDARIES]
Where effects fade out
```
## The 150% Impact Rule
- **100% Core:** Complete understanding of what's being changed
- **50% Enhancement:** Clear view of dependencies and downstream effects
## When to Use This Skill
**Universal trigger:** Anytime you need to understand impact and dependencies.
**Specific triggers:**
- Before making changes to code/systems
- When debugging to understand cause chains
- Planning features that touch multiple parts
- Refactoring decisions
- Risk assessment
- Understanding legacy systems
- When you hear "why did changing X break Y?"
**Key insight:** Impact mapping prevents surprises. Changes don't happen in isolation.
## The Impact Layers
| Layer | Description | Coverage |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| **Core** | What's directly changing | 100% — must fully understand |
| **Immediate** | Direct dependencies and users | 50% — must assess |
| **Extended** | Secondary effects | 25% — should consider |
| **System** | Full ecosystem | 10% — be aware |
## Execution Protocol
### Step 1: DEFINE CORE
Clearly identify what's changing:
- What exactly is being modified?
- What files/components/systems?
- What's the nature of the change?
### Step 2: MAP UPSTREAM
Identify dependencies (what the core needs):
- What does this component use?
- What must exist for this to work?
- What configurations/data/services?
### Step 3: MAP DOWNSTREAM
Identify dependents (what uses the core):
- Who/what uses this component?
- What breaks if this changes?
- What needs to be updated?
### Step 4: TRACE RIPPLES
Follow the effects outward:
- What do the downstreams depend on?
- Where do effects stop?
- What's the blast radius?
### Step 5: MARK BOUNDARIES
Define where impact ends:
- What's definitely NOT affected?
- Where can we safely stop analyzing?
- What's the "fence" around the change?
## Impact Mapping Questions
**About the Core:**
- "What exactly is changing?"
- "What's the nature of the change?"
- "Is it additive, modifying, or removing?"
**About Upstream (Dependencies):**
- "What does this use/import/call?"
- "What must exist for this to work?"
- "What configs/data does it need?"
**About Downstream (Dependents):**
- "What uses/imports/calls this?"
- "What would break if this changes?"
- "Who relies on this behavior?"
**About Boundaries:**
- "Where do the ripples stop?"
- "What's definitely unaffected?"
- "What's the maximum blast radius?"
## Output Format
When using Impact-Map 150:
```
🗺️ **Impact-Map 150 Complete**
**Core Change:**
[What exactly is being changed]
**Upstream Dependencies:**
- [What this needs to work]
- [Required services/data/configs]
**Downstream Impact:**
- 🔴 Critical: [What definitely breaks]
- 🟡 Affected: [What needs checking]
- 🟢 Monitor: [What might be touched]
**Boundaries:**
- Impact stops at: [clear boundary]
- Definitely safe: [unaffected areas]
**Blast Radius:** [Small/Medium/Large/System-wide]
**Risks Identified:**
- [What could go wrong]
Ready to proceed with awareness.
```
## Visual Impact Map
```
Example: Changing User Authentication
[Config Files] [Environment Vars]
↓ ↓
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ 🎯 CORE: Auth Module │
└─────────────────────────────┘
↓ ↓ ↓
[Login API] [Session Mgmt] [Token Gen]
↓ ↓ ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ 🔴 CRITICAL: All Authenticated │
│ Endpoints, User Sessions │
└──────────────────────────────────┘
↓ ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ 🟡 AFFECTED: Mobile App, Web App │
│ Admin Panel, API Clients │
└──────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ 🟢 BOUNDARY: Analytics, Logging │
│ (may need token format update)│
└──────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Operational Rules
1. **CORE FIRST:** Always clearly define what's changing before mapping impact
2. **TRACE BOTH WAYS:** Map upstream (dependencies) AND downstream (dependents)
3. **MARK BOUNDARIES:** Know where the impact stops
4. **ESTIMATE BLAST RADIUS:** Understand the scale of potential effects
5. **DOCUMENT SURPRISES:** Note unexpected connections discovered
6. **VALIDATE WITH CODE:** Don't guess — check actual imports/usage
## Examples
### ❌ Without Impact Mapping
```
Task: "Update the date format in utils.js"
Action: Changed format from 'MM/DD/YYYY' to 'YYYY-MM-DD'
Result: 47 pages broke, 3 API integrations failed, customer reports corrupted
Why: Didn't map what used that utility
```
### ✅ With Impact-Map 150
```
Task: "Update the date format in utils.js"
🗺️ Impact-Map 150:
Core: formatDate() in utils.js
Upstream Dependencies:
- moment.js library
- locale config
Downstream Impact:
- 🔴 Critical: Invoice generation (uses formatDate)
- 🔴 Critical: API responses (15 endpoints)
- 🟡 Affected: All UI date displays (23 components)
- 🟢 Monitor: Log timestamps
Boundaries:
- Database stores as ISO, unaffected
- External APIs have their own formatting
Blast Radius: Large — touches most of UI
Action: Create formatDateNew(), migrate gradually, deprecate old
```
## Failure Modes & Recovery
| Failure | Detection | Recovery |
|---------|-----------|----------|
| **Missed dependency** | Something breaks unexpectedly | Expand upstream mapping |
| **Missed dependent** | Users complain after change | Trace all usages with grep/IDE |
| **Underestimated blast** | "Small change" causes chaos | Re-map with wider scope |
| **Unclear boundaries** | Don't know what's safe | Explicitly mark boundaries |
## Relationship to Other Skills
| Skill | Focus |
|-------|-------|
| **goal-clarity-150** | WHAT we want to achieve |
| **deep-think-150** | HOW to think about it |
| **impact-map-150** | WHAT it affects |
| **max-quality-150** | HOW to do it well |
**Workflow:**
```
goal-clarity-150 → impact-map-150 → deep-think-150 → max-quality-150
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Understand Map what's Think Execute
the goal affected through well
```
## Session Log Entry (MANDATORY)
After completing this skill, write to `.sessions/SESSION_[date]-[name].md`:
```
### [HH:MM] Analyze-Impact 150 Complete
**Core Change:** <what is changing>
**Blast Radius:** <Small/Medium/Large>
**Key Dependencies:** <critical up/downstream>
**Risks:** <identified risks>
```
---
**Remember:** Every change has ripple effects. The question isn't "will something else be affected?" but "what will be affected and how much?" Impact mapping turns surprises into planned awareness.Related Skills
acc-analyze-test-coverage
Analyzes PHP codebase for test coverage gaps. Detects untested classes, methods, branches, exception paths, and edge cases. Provides actionable recommendations.
acc-analyze-solid-violations
Analyzes PHP codebase for SOLID principle violations. Detects God classes (SRP), type switches (OCP), broken contracts (LSP), fat interfaces (ISP), and concrete dependencies (DIP). Generates actionable reports with severity levels and remediation recommendations.
acc-analyze-coupling-cohesion
Analyzes coupling and cohesion metrics in PHP codebases. Calculates Afferent/Efferent coupling (Ca/Ce), LCOM metrics, instability index, and abstractness. Identifies highly coupled modules and low cohesion classes.
ac-stop-hook-analyzer
Analyze context and decide on continuation via Stop hook. Use when determining if work should continue, analyzing completion status, making continuation decisions, or implementing the Two-Claude pattern.
ab-testing-analyzer
全面的AB测试分析工具,支持实验设计、统计检验、用户分群分析和可视化报告生成。用于分析产品改版、营销活动、功能优化等AB测试结果,提供统计显著性检验和深度洞察。
ab-test-analyzer
Ab Test Analyzer - Auto-activating skill for Data Analytics. Triggers on: ab test analyzer, ab test analyzer Part of the Data Analytics skill category.
32-analyze-verify-150
[32] ANALYZE. Ensure every critical claim has verifiable evidence with confidence levels. Each fact must have source + confidence percentage. If confidence <85%, enter Loop150 to find more sources. Use for critical decisions, factual claims, legal/compliance work, or any situation where unverified claims are dangerous.
31-analyze-think-150
[31] ANALYZE. Universal deep thinking methodology for any situation requiring quality reasoning. Use when solving problems, debugging, making decisions, analyzing code, planning, reviewing, or anytime you need thorough thinking instead of surface-level responses. Triggers on "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", "reason carefully", "deep thinking", "understand completely", or any task requiring careful thought.
meeting-insights-analyzer
Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.
chrome-debug
This skill empowers AI agents to debug web applications and inspect browser behavior using the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP), offering both collaborative (headful) and automated (headless) modes.
thor-skills
An entry point and router for AI agents to manage various THOR-related cybersecurity tasks, including running scans, analyzing logs, troubleshooting, and maintenance.
modal-deployment
Run Python code in the cloud with serverless containers, GPUs, and autoscaling using Modal. This skill enables agents to generate code for deploying ML models, running batch jobs, serving APIs, and scaling compute-intensive workloads.