build
Build features with AI coding tools (Claude Code, Lovable, Replit, Cursor). Use when implementing specs, iterating on AI code, or choosing tools. Focuses on tool selection, effective prompting, and iteration workflows for non-technical founders.
Best use case
build is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Build features with AI coding tools (Claude Code, Lovable, Replit, Cursor). Use when implementing specs, iterating on AI code, or choosing tools. Focuses on tool selection, effective prompting, and iteration workflows for non-technical founders.
Teams using build should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/3-build/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How build Compares
| Feature / Agent | build | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Build features with AI coding tools (Claude Code, Lovable, Replit, Cursor). Use when implementing specs, iterating on AI code, or choosing tools. Focuses on tool selection, effective prompting, and iteration workflows for non-technical founders.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
ChatGPT vs Claude for Agent Skills
Compare ChatGPT and Claude for AI agent skills across coding, writing, research, and reusable workflow execution.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Build ## Tool Selection **Starting from scratch?** → Lovable (fastest MVP) **Existing codebase?** → Claude Code (best context) **Learning to code?** → Replit (educational) **Already code?** → Cursor (power features) See [TOOLS.md](TOOLS.md) for detailed comparison. --- ## Build Workflow ``` - [ ] Start with spec (use scope skill) - [ ] Give spec to AI tool - [ ] Test happy path + edge cases - [ ] Give specific feedback on issues - [ ] Iterate (expect 2-4 rounds) - [ ] Deploy when working ``` --- ## Giving AI Your Spec ### Claude Code ``` Build this feature: [paste spec] Codebase: React + TypeScript + Tailwind Reference: src/components/Button.tsx for button patterns ``` ### Lovable ``` Build: [paste simplified spec focusing on outcome] Make it look like Linear (minimal, clean) ``` ### Replit ``` Create: [paste spec emphasizing what user sees] Use React. Keep simple. ``` See [PROMPTS.md](PROMPTS.md) for patterns. --- ## Reviewing What AI Built Test, don't just run: ``` - [ ] Looks right? - [ ] Happy path works? - [ ] Edge cases work? - [ ] Works on mobile? - [ ] Error messages clear? ``` --- ## Giving Feedback **Bad:** "This doesn't work" **Good:** "Clicking 'Save' does nothing. Expected: 'Saved!' message" **Template:** ``` What I tried: [action] Expected: [outcome] Got: [what happened] ``` --- ## Iteration Expectations **Normal:** 2-4 rounds per feature **First build:** AI builds from spec, you find 3-5 issues **Second build:** Fixes those, you find 1-2 more **Third build:** Final polish **Stop when:** - Happy path works - Edge cases handled - Mobile works - No obvious bugs **Don't iterate for:** - Perfection - Features beyond spec - Premature optimization --- ## Common Mistakes | Mistake | Fix | |---------|-----| | No spec | Use scope skill first | | "Build a dashboard" | Specify what's on it | | Skip edge case testing | Try breaking it | | Accept without review | Always test | | Add features mid-build | Finish current feature first | | Fix code yourself | Describe problem, let AI fix | --- ## Right-Sizing Work **Too big:** "Build entire app" **Too small:** "Add one button" **Right:** "Build user auth flow" (1-3 hours) **Good chunks:** - User login/signup flow - Dashboard with 4 metrics - Settings page with profile editing --- ## When Stuck **AI keeps breaking things:** → Break into smaller piece, start fresh session **Can't figure out complex feature:** → Ask: "What's simplest way?" Accept simpler solution **Each fix breaks something else:** → Stop. Ask: "Better approach?" Consider starting over --- ## Working with Existing Code ``` Add [feature] to existing project. Stack: [React, Next.js, etc] Patterns: Check src/components for examples Style: Tailwind + custom design system Follow existing code style ``` --- ## Prompting Patterns **Reference existing:** ``` Build Settings page. Reference Dashboard page layout. Use same Card/Button components. ``` **Provide examples:** ``` Pricing page with 3 tiers. Like Linear's pricing - clean, minimal. ``` **Specify constraints:** ``` Build profile page. Must work offline. Load under 2 seconds. WCAG AA accessible. ``` See [PROMPTS.md](PROMPTS.md) for more. --- ## Review for Non-Technical Founders **Check:** - Does it match spec? - Buttons work? - Forms validate? - Looks like design reference? - Works on mobile? - Error messages clear? **Don't check:** - Code cleanliness - Optimization - "Best practices" AI handles code quality. You handle requirements. --- ## Success Looks Like ✅ Features match specs ✅ 2-4 iterations (not 10+) ✅ Can explain what's wrong ✅ Building faster each week
Related Skills
admin-panel-builder
Expert assistant for creating and maintaining admin panel pages in the KR92 Bible Voice project. Use when creating admin pages, building admin components, integrating with admin navigation, or adding admin features.
adk-agent-builder
Build production-ready AI agents using Google's Agent Development Kit with AI assistant integration, React patterns, multi-agent orchestration, and comprehensive tool libraries. Use when appropriate context detected. Trigger with relevant phrases based on skill purpose.
adb-builder
No description provided.
action-builder-skill
Use when creating or refactoring Nango integration actions to be thin API wrappers - provides patterns for minimal transformation logic, direct proxy calls, and standardized structure
acc-create-test-builder
Generates Test Data Builder and Object Mother patterns for PHP 8.5. Creates fluent builders with sensible defaults and factory methods for test data creation.
acc-create-builder
Generates Builder pattern for PHP 8.5. Creates step-by-step object construction with fluent interface and validation. Includes unit tests.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
Build Your LiveKit Agents Skill
Create your LiveKit Agents skill from official documentation, then learn to improve it throughout the chapter
Build Your Agent Integration Skill
Create your agent-integration skill from OpenAI SDK and LiteLLM documentation before learning framework integration
Build Your Model Serving Skill
Create your model-serving skill from Ollama documentation before learning deployment theory
artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
Build Your Evaluation Skill
Create a reusable skill for evaluating fine-tuned models, benchmarking performance, and detecting quality regressions