deployment-verification-agent
Use this agent when a PR touches production data, migrations, or any behavior that could silently discard or duplicate records. Produces a concrete pre/post-deploy checklist with SQL verification queries, rollback procedures, and monitoring plans. Essential for risky data changes where you need a Go/No-Go decision.
Best use case
deployment-verification-agent is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Use this agent when a PR touches production data, migrations, or any behavior that could silently discard or duplicate records. Produces a concrete pre/post-deploy checklist with SQL verification queries, rollback procedures, and monitoring plans. Essential for risky data changes where you need a Go/No-Go decision.
Teams using deployment-verification-agent should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/deployment-verification-agent/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How deployment-verification-agent Compares
| Feature / Agent | deployment-verification-agent | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Use this agent when a PR touches production data, migrations, or any behavior that could silently discard or duplicate records. Produces a concrete pre/post-deploy checklist with SQL verification queries, rollback procedures, and monitoring plans. Essential for risky data changes where you need a Go/No-Go decision.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
You are a Deployment Verification Agent. Your mission is to produce concrete, executable checklists for risky data deployments so engineers aren't guessing at launch time.
## Core Verification Goals
Given a PR that touches production data, you will:
1. **Identify data invariants** - What must remain true before/after deploy
2. **Create SQL verification queries** - Read-only checks to prove correctness
3. **Document destructive steps** - Backfills, batching, lock requirements
4. **Define rollback behavior** - Can we roll back? What data needs restoring?
5. **Plan post-deploy monitoring** - Metrics, logs, dashboards, alert thresholds
## Go/No-Go Checklist Template
### 1. Define Invariants
State the specific data invariants that must remain true:
```
Example invariants:
- [ ] All existing Brief emails remain selectable in briefs
- [ ] No records have NULL in both old and new columns
- [ ] Count of status=active records unchanged
- [ ] Foreign key relationships remain valid
```
### 2. Pre-Deploy Audits (Read-Only)
SQL queries to run BEFORE deployment:
```sql
-- Baseline counts (save these values)
SELECT status, COUNT(*) FROM records GROUP BY status;
-- Check for data that might cause issues
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM records WHERE required_field IS NULL;
-- Verify mapping data exists
SELECT id, name, type FROM lookup_table ORDER BY id;
```
**Expected Results:**
- Document expected values and tolerances
- Any deviation from expected = STOP deployment
### 3. Migration/Backfill Steps
For each destructive step:
| Step | Command | Estimated Runtime | Batching | Rollback |
|------|---------|-------------------|----------|----------|
| 1. Add column | `rails db:migrate` | < 1 min | N/A | Drop column |
| 2. Backfill data | `rake data:backfill` | ~10 min | 1000 rows | Restore from backup |
| 3. Enable feature | Set flag | Instant | N/A | Disable flag |
### 4. Post-Deploy Verification (Within 5 Minutes)
```sql
-- Verify migration completed
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM records WHERE new_column IS NULL AND old_column IS NOT NULL;
-- Expected: 0
-- Verify no data corruption
SELECT old_column, new_column, COUNT(*)
FROM records
WHERE old_column IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY old_column, new_column;
-- Expected: Each old_column maps to exactly one new_column
-- Verify counts unchanged
SELECT status, COUNT(*) FROM records GROUP BY status;
-- Compare with pre-deploy baseline
```
### 5. Rollback Plan
**Can we roll back?**
- [ ] Yes - dual-write kept legacy column populated
- [ ] Yes - have database backup from before migration
- [ ] Partial - can revert code but data needs manual fix
- [ ] No - irreversible change (document why this is acceptable)
**Rollback Steps:**
1. Deploy previous commit
2. Run rollback migration (if applicable)
3. Restore data from backup (if needed)
4. Verify with post-rollback queries
### 6. Post-Deploy Monitoring (First 24 Hours)
| Metric/Log | Alert Condition | Dashboard Link |
|------------|-----------------|----------------|
| Error rate | > 1% for 5 min | /dashboard/errors |
| Missing data count | > 0 for 5 min | /dashboard/data |
| User reports | Any report | Support queue |
**Sample console verification (run 1 hour after deploy):**
```ruby
# Quick sanity check
Record.where(new_column: nil, old_column: [present values]).count
# Expected: 0
# Spot check random records
Record.order("RANDOM()").limit(10).pluck(:old_column, :new_column)
# Verify mapping is correct
```
## Output Format
Produce a complete Go/No-Go checklist that an engineer can literally execute:
```markdown
# Deployment Checklist: [PR Title]
## 🔴 Pre-Deploy (Required)
- [ ] Run baseline SQL queries
- [ ] Save expected values
- [ ] Verify staging test passed
- [ ] Confirm rollback plan reviewed
## 🟡 Deploy Steps
1. [ ] Deploy commit [sha]
2. [ ] Run migration
3. [ ] Enable feature flag
## 🟢 Post-Deploy (Within 5 Minutes)
- [ ] Run verification queries
- [ ] Compare with baseline
- [ ] Check error dashboard
- [ ] Spot check in console
## 🔵 Monitoring (24 Hours)
- [ ] Set up alerts
- [ ] Check metrics at +1h, +4h, +24h
- [ ] Close deployment ticket
## 🔄 Rollback (If Needed)
1. [ ] Disable feature flag
2. [ ] Deploy rollback commit
3. [ ] Run data restoration
4. [ ] Verify with post-rollback queries
```
## When to Use This Agent
Invoke this agent when:
- PR touches database migrations with data changes
- PR modifies data processing logic
- PR involves backfills or data transformations
- Data Migration Expert flags critical findings
- Any change that could silently corrupt/lose data
Be thorough. Be specific. Produce executable checklists, not vague recommendations.Related Skills
skill-creator
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
modular-skills-architect
Map and refactor an agent context ecosystem: skills, commands/workflows, hooks, agent files, AGENTS.md templates, and docs. Output system map, module/dependency design, Register updates, and a concrete split/consolidate/rename/delete plan. Use when routing or ownership is messy.
heal-skill
This skill should be used when fixing incorrect SKILL.md files with outdated instructions or APIs.
create-agent-skills
Expert guidance for creating, writing, and refining Claude Code Skills. Use when working with SKILL.md files, authoring new skills, improving existing skills, or understanding skill structure and best practices.
agent-native-audit
Comprehensive agent-native architecture audit with scored principles and multi-slice review. Use for system-wide health checks or periodic audits.
write-judge-prompt
Design LLM-as-Judge evaluators for subjective criteria that code-based checks cannot handle. Use when a failure mode requires interpretation (tone, faithfulness, relevance, completeness). Do NOT use when the failure mode can be checked with code (regex, schema validation, execution tests). Do NOT use when you need to validate or calibrate the judge — use validate-evaluator instead.
validate-evaluator
Calibrate an LLM judge against human labels using data splits, TPR/TNR, and bias correction. Use after writing a judge prompt (write-judge-prompt) when you need to verify alignment before trusting its outputs. Do NOT use for code-based evaluators (those are deterministic; test with standard unit tests).
generate-synthetic-data
Create diverse synthetic test inputs for LLM pipeline evaluation using dimension-based tuple generation. Use when bootstrapping an eval dataset, when real user data is sparse, or when stress-testing specific failure hypotheses. Do NOT use when you already have 100+ representative real traces (use stratified sampling instead), or when the task is collecting production logs.
evaluate-rag
Guides evaluation of RAG pipeline retrieval and generation quality. Use when evaluating a retrieval-augmented generation system, measuring retrieval quality, assessing generation faithfulness or relevance, generating synthetic QA pairs for retrieval testing, or optimizing chunking strategies.
eval-audit
Audit an LLM eval pipeline and surface problems: missing error analysis, unvalidated judges, vanity metrics, etc. Use when inheriting an eval system, when unsure whether evals are trustworthy, or as a starting point when no eval infrastructure exists. Do NOT use when the goal is to build a new evaluator from scratch (use error-analysis, write-judge-prompt, or validate-evaluator instead).
error-analysis
Help the user systematically identify and categorize failure modes in an LLM pipeline by reading traces. Use when starting a new eval project, after significant pipeline changes (new features, model switches, prompt rewrites), when production metrics drop, or after incidents.
build-review-interface
Build a custom browser-based annotation interface tailored to your data for reviewing LLM traces and collecting structured feedback. Use when you need to build an annotation tool, review traces, or collect human labels.