every-style-editor
This skill should be used when reviewing or editing copy to ensure adherence to Every's style guide. It provides a systematic line-by-line review process for grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and style guide compliance.
Best use case
every-style-editor is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
This skill should be used when reviewing or editing copy to ensure adherence to Every's style guide. It provides a systematic line-by-line review process for grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and style guide compliance.
Teams using every-style-editor should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/every-style-editor/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How every-style-editor Compares
| Feature / Agent | every-style-editor | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
This skill should be used when reviewing or editing copy to ensure adherence to Every's style guide. It provides a systematic line-by-line review process for grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and style guide compliance.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Every Style Editor This skill provides a systematic approach to reviewing copy against Every's comprehensive style guide. It transforms Claude into a meticulous line editor and proofreader specializing in grammar, mechanics, and style guide compliance. ## When to Use This Skill Use this skill when: - Reviewing articles, blog posts, newsletters, or any written content - Ensuring copy follows Every's specific style conventions - Providing feedback on grammar, punctuation, and mechanics - Flagging deviations from the Every style guide - Preparing clean copy for human editorial review ## Skill Overview This skill enables performing a comprehensive review of written content in four phases: 1. **Initial Assessment** - Understanding context and document type 2. **Detailed Line Edit** - Checking every sentence for compliance 3. **Mechanical Review** - Verifying formatting and consistency 4. **Recommendations** - Providing actionable improvement suggestions ## How to Use This Skill ### Step 1: Initial Assessment Begin by reading the entire piece to understand: - Document type (article, knowledge base entry, social post, etc.) - Target audience - Overall tone and voice - Content context ### Step 2: Detailed Line Edit Review each paragraph systematically, checking for: - Sentence structure and grammar correctness - Punctuation usage (commas, semicolons, em dashes, etc.) - Capitalization rules (especially job titles, headlines) - Word choice and usage (overused words, passive voice) - Adherence to Every style guide rules Reference the complete [EVERY_WRITE_STYLE.md](./references/EVERY_WRITE_STYLE.md) for specific rules when in doubt. ### Step 3: Mechanical Review Verify: - Spacing and formatting consistency - Style choices applied uniformly throughout - Special elements (lists, quotes, citations) - Proper use of italics and formatting - Number formatting (numerals vs. spelled out) - Link formatting and descriptions ### Step 4: Output Results Present findings using this structure: ``` DOCUMENT REVIEW SUMMARY ===================== Document Type: [type] Word Count: [approximate] Overall Assessment: [brief overview] ERRORS FOUND: [total number] DETAILED CORRECTIONS =================== [For each error found:] **Location**: [Paragraph #, Sentence #] **Issue Type**: [Grammar/Punctuation/Mechanics/Style Guide] **Original**: "[exact text with error]" **Correction**: "[corrected text]" **Rule Reference**: [Specific style guide rule violated] **Explanation**: [Brief explanation of why this is an error] --- RECURRING ISSUES =============== [List patterns of errors that appear multiple times] STYLE GUIDE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST ============================== ✓ [Rule followed correctly] ✗ [Rule violated - with count of violations] FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS =================== [2-3 actionable suggestions for improving the draft] ``` ## Style Guide Reference The complete Every style guide is included in [EVERY_WRITE_STYLE.md](./references/EVERY_WRITE_STYLE.md). Key areas to focus on: - **Quick Rules**: Title case for headlines, sentence case elsewhere - **Tone**: Active voice, avoid overused words (actually, very, just), be specific - **Numbers**: Spell out one through nine; use numerals for 10+ - **Punctuation**: Oxford commas, em dashes without spaces, proper quotation mark usage - **Capitalization**: Lowercase job titles, company as singular (it), teams as plural (they) - **Emphasis**: Italics only (no bold for emphasis) - **Links**: 2-4 words, don't say "click here" ## Key Principles - **Be specific**: Always quote the exact text with the error - **Reference rules**: Cite the specific style guide rule for each correction - **Maintain voice**: Preserve the author's voice while correcting errors - **Prioritize clarity**: Focus on changes that improve readability - **Be constructive**: Frame feedback to help writers improve - **Flag ambiguous cases**: When style guide doesn't address an issue, explain options and recommend the clearest choice ## Common Areas to Focus On Based on Every's style guide, pay special attention to: - Punctuation (comma usage, semicolons, apostrophes, quotation marks) - Capitalization (proper nouns, titles, sentence starts) - Numbers (when to spell out vs. use numerals) - Passive voice (replace with active whenever possible) - Overused words (actually, very, just) - Lists (parallel structure, punctuation, capitalization) - Hyphenation (compound adjectives, except adverbs) - Word usage (fewer vs. less, they vs. them) - Company references (singular "it", teams as plural "they") - Job title capitalization
Related Skills
skill-creator
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
modular-skills-architect
Map and refactor an agent context ecosystem: skills, commands/workflows, hooks, agent files, AGENTS.md templates, and docs. Output system map, module/dependency design, Register updates, and a concrete split/consolidate/rename/delete plan. Use when routing or ownership is messy.
heal-skill
This skill should be used when fixing incorrect SKILL.md files with outdated instructions or APIs.
create-agent-skills
Expert guidance for creating, writing, and refining Claude Code Skills. Use when working with SKILL.md files, authoring new skills, improving existing skills, or understanding skill structure and best practices.
agent-native-audit
Comprehensive agent-native architecture audit with scored principles and multi-slice review. Use for system-wide health checks or periodic audits.
write-judge-prompt
Design LLM-as-Judge evaluators for subjective criteria that code-based checks cannot handle. Use when a failure mode requires interpretation (tone, faithfulness, relevance, completeness). Do NOT use when the failure mode can be checked with code (regex, schema validation, execution tests). Do NOT use when you need to validate or calibrate the judge — use validate-evaluator instead.
validate-evaluator
Calibrate an LLM judge against human labels using data splits, TPR/TNR, and bias correction. Use after writing a judge prompt (write-judge-prompt) when you need to verify alignment before trusting its outputs. Do NOT use for code-based evaluators (those are deterministic; test with standard unit tests).
generate-synthetic-data
Create diverse synthetic test inputs for LLM pipeline evaluation using dimension-based tuple generation. Use when bootstrapping an eval dataset, when real user data is sparse, or when stress-testing specific failure hypotheses. Do NOT use when you already have 100+ representative real traces (use stratified sampling instead), or when the task is collecting production logs.
evaluate-rag
Guides evaluation of RAG pipeline retrieval and generation quality. Use when evaluating a retrieval-augmented generation system, measuring retrieval quality, assessing generation faithfulness or relevance, generating synthetic QA pairs for retrieval testing, or optimizing chunking strategies.
eval-audit
Audit an LLM eval pipeline and surface problems: missing error analysis, unvalidated judges, vanity metrics, etc. Use when inheriting an eval system, when unsure whether evals are trustworthy, or as a starting point when no eval infrastructure exists. Do NOT use when the goal is to build a new evaluator from scratch (use error-analysis, write-judge-prompt, or validate-evaluator instead).
error-analysis
Help the user systematically identify and categorize failure modes in an LLM pipeline by reading traces. Use when starting a new eval project, after significant pipeline changes (new features, model switches, prompt rewrites), when production metrics drop, or after incidents.
build-review-interface
Build a custom browser-based annotation interface tailored to your data for reviewing LLM traces and collecting structured feedback. Use when you need to build an annotation tool, review traces, or collect human labels.