multi
design
Design system architecture, API contracts, and data flows. Use when translating analyzed requirements into technical design for feature implementation.
20 stars
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/design/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/matteocervelli/llms/main/.claude/skills/design/SKILL.md"
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/design/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How design Compares
| Feature / Agent | design | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | multi | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Design system architecture, API contracts, and data flows. Use when translating analyzed requirements into technical design for feature implementation.
Which AI agents support this skill?
This skill is compatible with multi.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Feature Design Skill
## Purpose
This skill provides systematic guidance for designing software architecture, API contracts, data models, and workflows based on analyzed requirements.
## When to Use
- After requirements analysis is complete
- Need to design technical architecture for a feature
- Defining API contracts and data structures
- Planning module interactions and data flows
- Before starting implementation
## Design Workflow
### 1. Architecture Design
**Choose Architectural Pattern:**
Review `architecture-patterns.md` for appropriate patterns:
- **Layered Architecture**: UI → Business Logic → Data Access
- **Modular Architecture**: Cohesive modules with clear interfaces
- **Event-Driven**: Message-based communication
- **Microservices**: Independent, deployable services (if applicable)
**For This Project (Python):**
- Follow existing structure: `src/tools/`, `src/core/`, `src/utils/`
- Use dependency injection for testability
- Keep files under 500 lines (split if needed)
- Maintain single responsibility principle
**Define Components:**
```
Component Name: <name>
Responsibility: <what it does>
Dependencies: <what it needs>
Interfaces: <public API>
```
**Deliverable:** Component diagram with responsibilities
### 2. Data Model Design
**Define Entities:**
- Identify domain entities from requirements
- Define attributes and types
- Specify relationships (one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-many)
- Define validation rules
- Consider data lifecycle (CRUD operations)
**For Python Projects:**
```python
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from typing import Optional, List
from datetime import datetime
class EntityModel(BaseModel):
"""Entity description."""
id: Optional[int] = None
name: str = Field(..., min_length=1, max_length=255)
created_at: datetime = Field(default_factory=datetime.utcnow)
class Config:
"""Pydantic configuration."""
validate_assignment = True
```
**Deliverable:** Data models with Pydantic schemas
### 3. API Design
**Design API Contracts:**
Refer to `api-design-guide.md` for best practices
**REST API Pattern:**
```
Resource: /api/v1/resources
Methods:
GET /resources - List resources
GET /resources/{id} - Get single resource
POST /resources - Create resource
PUT /resources/{id} - Update resource (full)
PATCH /resources/{id} - Update resource (partial)
DELETE /resources/{id} - Delete resource
Request Body:
{
"field1": "value",
"field2": 123
}
Response Body:
{
"data": {...},
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z",
"version": "1.0"
}
}
Error Response:
{
"error": {
"code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
"message": "Field validation failed",
"details": [...]
}
}
```
**For Internal APIs (Python Functions/Methods):**
```python
def process_feature(
input_data: InputModel,
options: Optional[ProcessOptions] = None
) -> ProcessResult:
"""
Process feature with given input.
Args:
input_data: Input data model
options: Optional processing options
Returns:
ProcessResult with outcome
Raises:
ValidationError: If input is invalid
ProcessError: If processing fails
"""
pass
```
**Deliverable:** API specification with request/response formats
### 4. Data Flow Design
**Map Data Flows:**
- Input sources (user input, API, database, file)
- Processing steps (validation, transformation, business logic)
- Output destinations (response, database, file, external service)
- Error paths and handling
**Sequence Diagram Format:**
```
User → API Endpoint → Validator → Business Logic → Repository → Database
↓ ↓ ↓
ValidationError BusinessError DatabaseError
↓ ↓ ↓
Error Handler → Error Response → User
```
**Deliverable:** Sequence diagrams for key workflows
### 5. Module Interaction Design
**Define Module Boundaries:**
- **Interfaces**: Public API contracts (abstract classes, protocols)
- **Core Logic**: Business logic implementation
- **Utilities**: Helper functions (pure, stateless)
- **Data Access**: Repository pattern for persistence
**Python Module Structure:**
```
src/tools/feature_name/
├── __init__.py # Public exports
├── models.py # Pydantic models
├── interfaces.py # Abstract interfaces
├── core.py # Core business logic
├── repository.py # Data access layer
├── validators.py # Input validation
├── utils.py # Helper functions
└── tests/
├── test_core.py
├── test_validators.py
└── fixtures.py
```
**Dependency Injection Pattern:**
```python
class FeatureService:
"""Service with injected dependencies."""
def __init__(
self,
repository: FeatureRepository,
validator: FeatureValidator
):
self.repository = repository
self.validator = validator
```
**Deliverable:** Module dependency graph
### 6. Error Handling Design
**Define Error Hierarchy:**
```python
class FeatureError(Exception):
"""Base exception for feature."""
pass
class ValidationError(FeatureError):
"""Input validation failed."""
pass
class ProcessingError(FeatureError):
"""Processing failed."""
pass
class NotFoundError(FeatureError):
"""Resource not found."""
pass
```
**Error Handling Strategy:**
- Validate early (fail fast)
- Catch specific exceptions
- Log errors with context
- Return meaningful error messages
- Don't expose internal details
**Deliverable:** Error handling specification
### 7. Configuration Design
**Externalize Configuration:**
```python
from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings
class FeatureConfig(BaseSettings):
"""Feature configuration from environment."""
api_key: str
timeout: int = 30
max_retries: int = 3
debug: bool = False
class Config:
env_prefix = "FEATURE_"
case_sensitive = False
```
**Configuration Sources:**
1. Environment variables (highest priority)
2. .env files
3. Configuration files (JSON/YAML)
4. Default values (lowest priority)
**Deliverable:** Configuration specification
## Output Format
Use the `templates/architecture-doc.md` template to generate:
```markdown
# Architecture Design: [Feature Name]
## Overview
Brief description of the feature and design approach.
## Architecture Pattern
[Chosen pattern] with rationale.
## Component Design
### Component 1: [Name]
- **Responsibility**: [What it does]
- **Dependencies**: [What it needs]
- **Interface**: [Public API]
## Data Model
### Entity: [Name]
```python
class EntityModel(BaseModel):
field: str
```
## API Specification
### Endpoint: [Method] [Path]
- **Request**: [Schema]
- **Response**: [Schema]
- **Errors**: [Error codes]
## Data Flows
[Sequence diagrams or descriptions]
## Module Structure
```
src/tools/feature/
├── ...
```
## Error Handling
[Exception hierarchy and strategy]
## Configuration
[Required configuration with defaults]
## Testing Strategy
- Unit tests: [What to test]
- Integration tests: [What to test]
- Mocking strategy: [What to mock]
## Security Considerations
[From security-checklist.md in analysis phase]
## Performance Considerations
- Expected throughput: [N req/s]
- Response time: [< N ms]
- Resource usage: [Memory, CPU]
## Implementation Notes
[Any specific guidance for implementation]
## Open Questions
- [ ] Question 1
- [ ] Question 2
```
## Best Practices
**Architecture:**
- Prefer composition over inheritance
- Design for testability (dependency injection)
- Keep modules loosely coupled
- Follow SOLID principles
- Keep files under 500 lines
**Data Models:**
- Use Pydantic for validation
- Type hint everything
- Provide sensible defaults
- Document field constraints
- Consider backward compatibility
**APIs:**
- RESTful for external APIs
- Clear function signatures for internal APIs
- Consistent naming conventions
- Version APIs from the start
- Document all parameters and return values
**Error Handling:**
- Create specific exception types
- Log errors with sufficient context
- Don't catch exceptions you can't handle
- Provide actionable error messages
- Consider retry strategies
## Supporting Resources
- **architecture-patterns.md**: Common architectural patterns
- **api-design-guide.md**: API design best practices
- **templates/architecture-doc.md**: Output template
## Example Usage
```bash
# 1. Review analysis report from previous phase
Read docs/implementation/feature-name-analysis.md
# 2. Choose architecture pattern
Review architecture-patterns.md
# 3. Design data models
Create models.py with Pydantic schemas
# 4. Design API contracts
Use api-design-guide.md for REST/function APIs
# 5. Design module structure
Follow project conventions (src/tools/...)
# 6. Generate architecture document
Use templates/architecture-doc.md template
# 7. Review and validate
Check design meets requirements from analysis phase
```
## Integration with Feature Implementation Flow
**Input:** Requirements analysis report
**Process:** Systematic design using patterns and guidelines
**Output:** Architecture document with specs
**Next Step:** Implementation skill for coding
## Design Review Checklist
Before proceeding to implementation:
- [ ] Architecture pattern chosen and justified
- [ ] All components identified with clear responsibilities
- [ ] Data models defined with Pydantic schemas
- [ ] API contracts specified (endpoints or function signatures)
- [ ] Data flows documented (sequence diagrams)
- [ ] Module structure follows project conventions
- [ ] Error handling strategy defined
- [ ] Configuration externalized
- [ ] Testing strategy outlined
- [ ] Security considerations addressed
- [ ] Performance requirements documented
- [ ] Design reviewed by peer (if applicable)
- [ ] Stakeholder sign-off (if required)