Best use case
Documentation review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Reviews documentation for factual accuracy
Teams using Documentation review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/documentation-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How Documentation review Compares
| Feature / Agent | Documentation review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Reviews documentation for factual accuracy
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
# Generating Commit Messages ## Instructions 1. Read the documentation you are instructed to review 2. Make sure that all claims about how toolhive works are accurate 3. Make sure that all examples are based in how toolhive really works, check for formatting, typos and overall accuracy 4. Make sure that all links point to existing files and the content of the links matches what it should ## Fact-checking claims in the documentation See [CHECKING.md](CHECKING.md) on instructions on how to check claims in the docs. You have some examples on how to fact-check in [EXAMPLES.md](EXAMPLES.md) ## Your report - Do not suggest inline changes - Present findings and put each into a todo list. The user will then go through them and review manually
Related Skills
woocommerce-code-review
Review WooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance. Use when reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality.
typescript-review
Review TypeScript and JavaScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing TypeScript/JavaScript code.
reviewing-pr
Use when reviewing pull requests with comprehensive code analysis, incremental or full review options, and constructive feedback - provides thorough code reviews with severity ratings
Reviewing Code
Systematically evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment. Use when reviewing PRs, assessing code quality, or verifying implementation against requirements.
reviewing-changes
Android-specific code review workflow additions for Bitwarden Android. Provides change type refinements, checklist loading, and reference material organization. Complements bitwarden-code-reviewer agent's base review standards.
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
docs-review
Review documentation changes for compliance with the Metabase writing style guide. Use when reviewing pull requests, files, or diffs containing documentation markdown files.
code-review-excellence
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
clojure-review
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
peer-review
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.
literature-review
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
zapier-workflows
Manage and trigger pre-built Zapier workflows and MCP tool orchestration. Use when user mentions workflows, Zaps, automations, daily digest, research, search, lead tracking, expenses, or asks to "run" any process. Also handles Perplexity-based research and Google Sheets data tracking.