Testing Code

Write automated tests for features, validate functionality against acceptance criteria, and ensure code coverage. Use when writing test code, verifying functionality, or adding test coverage to existing code.

153 stars

Best use case

Testing Code is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Write automated tests for features, validate functionality against acceptance criteria, and ensure code coverage. Use when writing test code, verifying functionality, or adding test coverage to existing code.

Teams using Testing Code should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/testing-code/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Microck/ordinary-claude-skills/main/skills_all/testing-code/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/testing-code/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How Testing Code Compares

Feature / AgentTesting CodeStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Write automated tests for features, validate functionality against acceptance criteria, and ensure code coverage. Use when writing test code, verifying functionality, or adding test coverage to existing code.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Testing Code

## Core Workflow

Test writing follows a systematic approach: determine scope, understand patterns, map to requirements, write tests, verify coverage.

### 1. Determine Test Scope

**Read project documentation:**
- `docs/user-stories/US-###-*.md` for acceptance criteria to test
- `docs/feature-spec/F-##-*.md` for technical requirements
- `docs/api-contracts.yaml` for API specifications
- Existing test files to understand patterns

**Choose test types needed:**
- **Unit tests:** Individual functions, pure logic, utilities
- **Integration tests:** Multiple components working together, API endpoints
- **Component tests:** UI components, user interactions
- **E2E tests:** Complete user flows, critical paths
- **Contract tests:** API request/response validation
- **Performance tests:** Load, stress, benchmark testing

### 2. Understand Existing Patterns

**Investigate current test approach:**
- Test framework (Jest, Vitest, Pytest, etc.)
- Mocking patterns and utilities
- Test data fixtures and setup/teardown
- Assertion styles

Use `code-finder` agents if unfamiliar with test structure.

### 3. Map Tests to Requirements

Convert 3-5 acceptance criteria to specific test cases across test types:

**Example mapping:**
```markdown
## User Story: US-101 User Login

### Test Cases
1. **Unit: Authentication service**
   - validateCredentials() returns true for valid email/password
   - validateCredentials() returns false for invalid password
   - checkAccountStatus() detects locked accounts

2. **Integration: Login endpoint**
   - POST /api/login with valid creds returns 200 + token
   - POST /api/login with invalid creds returns 401 + error
   - POST /api/login with locked account returns 403

3. **Component: Login form**
   - Submitting form calls login API
   - Error message displays on 401 response
   - Success redirects to /dashboard

4. **E2E: Complete login flow**
   - User enters credentials → submits → sees dashboard
   - User enters wrong password → sees error → retries successfully
```

### 4. Write Tests

**Unit Test Structure:**
```javascript
describe('AuthService', () => {
  describe('validateCredentials', () => {
    it('returns true for valid email and password', async () => {
      const result = await authService.validateCredentials(
        'user@example.com',
        'ValidPass123'
      );
      expect(result).toBe(true);
    });

    it('returns false for invalid password', async () => {
      const result = await authService.validateCredentials(
        'user@example.com',
        'WrongPassword'
      );
      expect(result).toBe(false);
    });
  });
});
```

**Integration Test Structure:**
```javascript
describe('POST /api/auth/login', () => {
  beforeEach(async () => {
    await resetTestDatabase();
    await createTestUser({
      email: 'test@example.com',
      password: 'Test123!'
    });
  });

  it('returns 200 and token for valid credentials', async () => {
    const response = await request(app)
      .post('/api/auth/login')
      .send({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'Test123!' });

    expect(response.status).toBe(200);
    expect(response.body).toHaveProperty('token');
    expect(response.body.token).toMatch(/^eyJ/); // JWT format
  });

  it('returns 401 for invalid password', async () => {
    const response = await request(app)
      .post('/api/auth/login')
      .send({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'WrongPassword' });

    expect(response.status).toBe(401);
    expect(response.body.error).toBe('Invalid credentials');
  });
});
```

**Component Test Structure:**
```javascript
describe('LoginForm', () => {
  it('submits form with valid data', async () => {
    const mockLogin = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ success: true });
    render(<LoginForm onLogin={mockLogin} />);

    await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText(/email/i), 'user@example.com');
    await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText(/password/i), 'Password123');
    await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /log in/i }));

    expect(mockLogin).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
      email: 'user@example.com',
      password: 'Password123'
    });
  });

  it('displays error message on API failure', async () => {
    const mockLogin = jest.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('Invalid credentials'));
    render(<LoginForm onLogin={mockLogin} />);

    await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText(/email/i), 'user@example.com');
    await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText(/password/i), 'wrong');
    await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /log in/i }));

    expect(await screen.findByText(/invalid credentials/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});
```

**E2E Test Structure:**
```javascript
test('user can log in successfully', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('/login');

  await page.fill('[name="email"]', 'test@example.com');
  await page.fill('[name="password"]', 'Test123!');
  await page.click('button:has-text("Log In")');

  await page.waitForURL('/dashboard');
  expect(page.url()).toContain('/dashboard');
});
```

### 5. Edge Cases & Error Scenarios

Include boundary conditions and error paths:

```javascript
describe('Edge cases', () => {
  it('handles empty email gracefully', async () => {
    await expect(
      authService.validateCredentials('', 'password')
    ).rejects.toThrow('Email is required');
  });

  it('handles extremely long password', async () => {
    const longPassword = 'a'.repeat(10000);
    await expect(
      authService.validateCredentials('user@example.com', longPassword)
    ).rejects.toThrow('Password too long');
  });

  it('handles network timeout', async () => {
    jest.spyOn(global, 'fetch').mockImplementation(
      () => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 10000))
    );

    await expect(
      authService.login('user@example.com', 'pass')
    ).rejects.toThrow('Request timeout');
  });
});
```

**Edge cases to always include:**
- Empty/null inputs
- Minimum/maximum values
- Invalid formats
- Network failures
- API errors (4xx, 5xx)
- Timeout conditions
- Concurrent operations

### 6. Test Data & Fixtures

Create reusable test fixtures:

```javascript
// tests/fixtures/users.ts
export const validUser = {
  email: 'test@example.com',
  password: 'Test123!',
  name: 'Test User'
};

export const invalidUsers = {
  noEmail: { password: 'Test123!' },
  noPassword: { email: 'test@example.com' },
  invalidEmail: { email: 'not-an-email', password: 'Test123!' },
  weakPassword: { email: 'test@example.com', password: '123' }
};

// Use in tests
import { validUser, invalidUsers } from './fixtures/users';

it('validates user data', () => {
  expect(validate(validUser)).toBe(true);
  expect(validate(invalidUsers.noEmail)).toBe(false);
});
```

### 7. Parallel Test Implementation

When tests are independent (different modules, different test types), spawn parallel agents:

**Pattern 1: Layer-based**
- Agent 1: Unit tests for services/utilities
- Agent 2: Integration tests for API endpoints
- Agent 3: Component tests for UI
- Agent 4: E2E tests for critical flows

**Pattern 2: Feature-based**
- Agent 1: All tests for Feature A
- Agent 2: All tests for Feature B
- Agent 3: All tests for Feature C

**Pattern 3: Type-based**
- Agent 1: All unit tests
- Agent 2: All integration tests
- Agent 3: All E2E tests

### 8. Run & Verify Tests

**Execute test suite:**
```bash
# Unit tests
npm test -- --coverage

# Integration tests
npm run test:integration

# E2E tests
npm run test:e2e

# All tests
npm run test:all
```

**Verify coverage:**
- Aim for >80% code coverage
- 100% coverage of critical paths
- All acceptance criteria have tests
- All error scenarios tested

## Quality Checklist

**Coverage:**
- [ ] All acceptance criteria from user stories tested
- [ ] Happy path covered
- [ ] Edge cases included
- [ ] Error scenarios tested
- [ ] Boundary conditions validated

**Structure:**
- [ ] Tests follow existing patterns
- [ ] Clear test descriptions
- [ ] Proper setup/teardown
- [ ] No flaky tests (consistent results)
- [ ] Tests are isolated (no interdependencies)

**Data:**
- [ ] Test fixtures reusable
- [ ] Database properly seeded/reset
- [ ] Mocks used appropriately
- [ ] No hardcoded test data in production

**Integration:**
- [ ] Tests run in CI/CD
- [ ] Coverage thresholds enforced
- [ ] Fast feedback (quick tests)
- [ ] Clear failure messages

Related Skills

webapp-testing

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

web3-testing

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Test smart contracts comprehensively using Hardhat and Foundry with unit tests, integration tests, and mainnet forking. Use when testing Solidity contracts, setting up blockchain test suites, or validating DeFi protocols.

testing

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Run and troubleshoot tests for DBHub, including unit tests, integration tests with Testcontainers, and database-specific tests. Use when asked to run tests, fix test failures, debug integration tests, or troubleshoot Docker/database container issues.

testing-anti-patterns

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Use when writing or changing tests, adding mocks, or tempted to add test-only methods to production code - prevents testing mock behavior, production pollution with test-only methods, and mocking without understanding dependencies

temporal-python-testing

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.

python-testing-patterns

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Implement comprehensive testing strategies with pytest, fixtures, mocking, and test-driven development. Use when writing Python tests, setting up test suites, or implementing testing best practices.

javascript-testing-patterns

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Implement comprehensive testing strategies using Jest, Vitest, and Testing Library for unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end testing with mocking, fixtures, and test-driven development. Use when writing JavaScript/TypeScript tests, setting up test infrastructure, or implementing TDD/BDD workflows.

e2e-testing-patterns

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.

database-testing

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Database schema validation, data integrity testing, migration testing, transaction isolation, and query performance. Use when testing data persistence, ensuring referential integrity, or validating database migrations.

bats-testing-patterns

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Master Bash Automated Testing System (Bats) for comprehensive shell script testing. Use when writing tests for shell scripts, CI/CD pipelines, or requiring test-driven development of shell utilities.

activitypub-testing

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Testing patterns for PHPUnit and Playwright E2E tests. Use when writing tests, debugging test failures, setting up test coverage, or implementing test patterns for ActivityPub features.

zapier-workflows

153
from Microck/ordinary-claude-skills

Manage and trigger pre-built Zapier workflows and MCP tool orchestration. Use when user mentions workflows, Zaps, automations, daily digest, research, search, lead tracking, expenses, or asks to "run" any process. Also handles Perplexity-based research and Google Sheets data tracking.