tooluniverse-toxicology
Assess chemical and drug toxicity via adverse outcome pathways, real-world adverse event signals, and toxicogenomic evidence. Integrates AOPWiki (AOPWiki_list_aops, AOPWiki_get_aop) for mechanism- level pathway tracing, FAERS for post-market adverse event quantification, OpenFDA for label mining, and CTD for chemical-gene-disease evidence. Produces structured toxicity reports with evidence grading (T1-T4). Use when asked about toxicity mechanisms, adverse outcome pathways, AOP mapping, FAERS signal detection, or chemical-disease relationships for drugs or environmental chemicals.
Best use case
tooluniverse-toxicology is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Assess chemical and drug toxicity via adverse outcome pathways, real-world adverse event signals, and toxicogenomic evidence. Integrates AOPWiki (AOPWiki_list_aops, AOPWiki_get_aop) for mechanism- level pathway tracing, FAERS for post-market adverse event quantification, OpenFDA for label mining, and CTD for chemical-gene-disease evidence. Produces structured toxicity reports with evidence grading (T1-T4). Use when asked about toxicity mechanisms, adverse outcome pathways, AOP mapping, FAERS signal detection, or chemical-disease relationships for drugs or environmental chemicals.
Teams using tooluniverse-toxicology should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/tooluniverse-toxicology/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How tooluniverse-toxicology Compares
| Feature / Agent | tooluniverse-toxicology | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Assess chemical and drug toxicity via adverse outcome pathways, real-world adverse event signals, and toxicogenomic evidence. Integrates AOPWiki (AOPWiki_list_aops, AOPWiki_get_aop) for mechanism- level pathway tracing, FAERS for post-market adverse event quantification, OpenFDA for label mining, and CTD for chemical-gene-disease evidence. Produces structured toxicity reports with evidence grading (T1-T4). Use when asked about toxicity mechanisms, adverse outcome pathways, AOP mapping, FAERS signal detection, or chemical-disease relationships for drugs or environmental chemicals.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Toxicology Assessment via Adverse Outcome Pathways & Signal Detection
Systematic toxicology analysis that links molecular initiating events (MIEs) through adverse outcome
pathways (AOPs) to apical adverse outcomes, then triangulates with real-world FAERS signals, FDA
label data, and toxicogenomic associations.
## Domain Reasoning
Toxicity has many mechanisms, and the first interpretive question is temporal: is this acute toxicity (immediate effect from a high dose) or chronic toxicity (cumulative damage from long-term low-dose exposure)? Acute and chronic toxicity operate through different mechanisms — acute hepatotoxicity may reflect direct mitochondrial damage, while chronic hepatotoxicity may involve fibrosis from repeated low-level inflammation. They also have different regulatory frameworks: acute toxicity is captured by LD50 and emergency protocols, while chronic toxicity requires long-term carcinogenicity and repeat-dose studies.
## LOOK UP DON'T GUESS
- Adverse outcome pathways for a chemical: query `AOPWiki_list_aops` and `AOPWiki_get_aop`; do not describe mechanisms from memory.
- FAERS adverse event signals: retrieve from `FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event` and `FAERS_calculate_disproportionality`; never estimate PRR values.
- FDA label warnings: call `DailyMed_parse_adverse_reactions` and related tools; do not state boxed warnings from memory.
- CTD chemical-gene and chemical-disease associations: query `CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions` and `CTD_get_chemical_diseases`; do not infer gene targets without database evidence.
---
## COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
## When to Use This Skill
**Triggers**:
- "What are the toxicity mechanisms for [drug/chemical]?"
- "Find adverse outcome pathways for [chemical]"
- "What AOPs are relevant to [target/organ/effect]?"
- "FAERS signal analysis for [drug]"
- "Toxicogenomic profile for [chemical]"
- "What is the mechanism of hepatotoxicity / cardiotoxicity / neurotoxicity for [drug]?"
**Use Cases**:
1. **AOP Tracing**: Map chemical MIE through key events to apical outcome using AOPWiki
2. **Real-World Signal Detection**: Quantify FAERS adverse event signals with PRR/ROR
3. **Label Safety Mining**: Extract FDA boxed warnings, contraindications, nonclinical toxicology
4. **Toxicogenomics**: Chemical-gene-disease associations from CTD
5. **Integrated Mechanism Report**: Combine AOP pathway + real-world signals into unified narrative
---
## KEY PRINCIPLES
1. **AOP-first thinking** - Frame all toxicity in terms of MIE → Key Events → Adverse Outcome
2. **Report-first approach** - Create report file FIRST, update progressively
3. **Evidence grading mandatory** - T1 (regulatory/clinical) through T4 (computational/AOP annotation)
4. **Distinguish mechanism from signal** - AOPWiki = mechanism; FAERS = real-world signal
5. **Disambiguation first** - Resolve drug/chemical identity before any queries
6. **English-first queries** - Always use English names in tool calls
---
## Evidence Grading
| Tier | Symbol | Criteria |
|------|--------|----------|
| T1 | [T1] | FDA boxed warning, clinical trial toxicity finding, regulatory label |
| T2 | [T2] | FAERS signal PRR > 2, AOP with high biological plausibility, CTD curated |
| T3 | [T3] | CTD inferred association, AOP annotation with moderate plausibility |
| T4 | [T4] | Text-mined CTD entry, early-stage AOP annotation |
---
## Workflow Overview
```
Chemical/Drug Query
|
+-- PHASE 0: Disambiguation
| Resolve name -> identifiers (ChEMBL, PubChem CID, SMILES)
|
+-- PHASE 1: Adverse Outcome Pathway Mapping (AOPWiki)
| List AOPs by keyword; retrieve key events, MIEs, and biological plausibility scores
|
+-- PHASE 2: Real-World Adverse Event Signals (FAERS)
| Top reactions by drug; disproportionality (PRR); serious event filter
|
+-- PHASE 3: FDA Label Safety Mining
| Boxed warnings, contraindications, nonclinical toxicology, adverse reactions
|
+-- PHASE 4: Toxicogenomics (CTD)
| Chemical-gene interactions; chemical-disease associations
|
+-- SYNTHESIS: Integrated Toxicology Report
AOP-linked mechanism + FAERS signal + CTD gene targets + Risk classification
```
---
## Phase 0: Disambiguation
**Objective**: Establish compound identity before any database queries.
Tools:
- `PubChem_get_CID_by_compound_name` (`name`: str) — get CID + SMILES
- `ChEMBL_search_drugs` (`query`: str) — get ChEMBL ID and max phase
Capture: generic name, SMILES, PubChem CID, ChEMBL ID, drug class.
---
## Phase 1: Adverse Outcome Pathway Mapping
**Objective**: Find AOPs relevant to the chemical's known or suspected toxicity mechanisms.
### Tools
**AOPWiki_list_aops**:
- **Input**: `keyword` (str) — e.g., organ ("liver", "kidney"), effect ("apoptosis", "inflammation"), or target ("AhR", "PPARalpha")
- **Output**: List of AOP IDs, titles, and short descriptions
- **Use**: Discovery scan to identify candidate AOPs
**AOPWiki_get_aop**:
- **Input**: `aop_id` (int) — ID from list_aops result
- **Output**: Full AOP details including MIE, key events (KEs), key event relationships (KERs), biological plausibility, and weight-of-evidence
- **Use**: Retrieve mechanistic pathway details for selected AOPs
### Workflow
1. Query `AOPWiki_list_aops` with organ-level keyword (e.g., "hepatotoxicity", "nephrotoxicity")
2. Query again with mechanism-level keyword (e.g., "oxidative stress", "mitochondria")
3. Select top 3-5 most relevant AOPs by title relevance
4. Call `AOPWiki_get_aop` for each selected AOP
5. Extract: MIE (molecular initiating event), key events in order, apical adverse outcome, biological plausibility score
### Decision Logic
- **AOP found**: Extract full pathway; note plausibility level (high/moderate/low)
- **No direct AOP match**: Try broader organ or mechanism terms; document as "no AOP directly mapped"
- **Multiple AOPs**: Report all; highlight shared key events as high-confidence mechanisms
### AOP Table Format
| AOP ID | Title | MIE | Apical Outcome | Plausibility |
|--------|-------|-----|----------------|-------------|
| 123 | ... | ... | ... | High |
---
## Phase 2: Real-World Adverse Event Signals (FAERS)
**Objective**: Quantify observed adverse events with statistical signal measures.
### Tools
**FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event**:
- **Input**: `drug_name` (str), `limit` (int, default 50)
- **Output**: Top adverse reactions with counts
- **Note**: param is `drug_name` not `drug`
**FAERS_calculate_disproportionality**:
- **Input**: `drug_name` (str), `reaction_meddra_pt` (str)
- **Output**: PRR, ROR, IC with confidence intervals
**FAERS_filter_serious_events**:
- **Input**: `drug_name` (str), `serious_type` (str: "death", "hospitalization", "life-threatening")
- **Output**: Serious event count and case details
**FAERS_stratify_by_demographics**:
- **Input**: `drug_name` (str), `reaction_meddra_pt` (str)
- **Output**: Age/sex breakdown for specific reaction
### Workflow
1. Get top 25 reactions via `FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event`
2. Filter to organ-system clusters matching the AOP outcomes from Phase 1
3. Calculate PRR for top 10 reactions via `FAERS_calculate_disproportionality`
4. Check serious events (deaths, hospitalizations) for highest-PRR reactions
### Signal Thresholds
| Signal Strength | PRR | Case Count |
|----------------|-----|------------|
| Strong | > 3.0 | >= 5 |
| Moderate | 2.0-3.0 | >= 3 |
| Weak | 1.5-2.0 | >= 3 |
| None | < 1.5 | any |
---
## Phase 3: FDA Label Safety Mining
**Objective**: Extract regulatory safety findings from approved drug labels.
### Tools
- `DailyMed_parse_adverse_reactions` (`drug_name`: str)
- `DailyMed_parse_contraindications` (`drug_name`: str)
- `DailyMed_parse_clinical_pharmacology` (`drug_name`: str)
- `DailyMed_parse_drug_interactions` (`drug_name`: str)
**Note**: These tools apply to FDA-approved drugs only. Environmental chemicals will have no label data — document explicitly.
### Workflow
1. Extract adverse reactions and note which match FAERS signals
2. Extract contraindications (highest evidence tier [T1])
3. Note pharmacological mechanism from clinical pharmacology section
---
## Phase 4: Toxicogenomics (CTD)
**Objective**: Map chemical-gene interactions and chemical-disease associations.
### Tools
**CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions**:
- **Input**: `input_terms` (str) — chemical name or MeSH ID
- **Output**: Gene targets with interaction type (increases/decreases expression)
- **Use**: Find molecular targets mediating toxicity
**CTD_get_chemical_diseases**:
- **Input**: `input_terms` (str) — chemical name or MeSH ID
- **Output**: Disease associations with evidence type (curated/inferred)
- **Use**: Find downstream disease endpoints
### Workflow
1. Query CTD with compound name; note curated (higher confidence) vs inferred entries
2. Cross-reference gene targets with Phase 1 AOP key events
3. Note which CTD disease endpoints match AOP apical outcomes
---
## Synthesis: Integrated Toxicology Report
**Structure**:
```
# Toxicology Report: [Compound Name]
**Generated**: YYYY-MM-DD
## Executive Summary
Risk tier: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / INSUFFICIENT DATA
Key finding summary (2-3 sentences)
## 1. Compound Identity
(disambiguation table)
## 2. Adverse Outcome Pathways [T3-T4]
(AOP table; pathway diagrams in text form)
## 3. Real-World Adverse Event Signals [T1-T2]
(FAERS top reactions + PRR table + serious events)
## 4. FDA Label Safety [T1]
(boxed warnings, contraindications, adverse reactions)
## 5. Toxicogenomics [T2-T4]
(CTD gene targets + disease associations)
## 6. Mechanistic Integration
(How AOP key events map to observed FAERS signals and CTD gene targets)
## 7. Risk Classification
(Final tier with rationale)
## Data Gaps & Limitations
(Missing data, confidence caveats)
```
### Risk Classification
| Tier | Criteria |
|------|----------|
| CRITICAL | FDA boxed warning OR FAERS PRR > 5 with deaths OR multiple T1 findings |
| HIGH | FAERS PRR 3-5 serious events OR FDA warning (non-boxed) OR high-plausibility AOP |
| MEDIUM | FAERS PRR 2-3 OR CTD curated associations OR moderate-plausibility AOP |
| LOW | All signals < PRR 2; no regulatory warnings; low-plausibility AOP only |
| INSUFFICIENT DATA | Fewer than 3 phases returned usable data |
---
## Fallback Chains
| Primary Tool | Fallback 1 | Fallback 2 |
|--------------|------------|------------|
| `AOPWiki_list_aops` | Broaden keyword | Search by organ system |
| `FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event` | `OpenFDA_search_drug_events` | Literature search |
| `DailyMed_parse_adverse_reactions` | `OpenFDA_search_drug_events` | FAERS serious events |
| `CTD_get_chemical_diseases` | `CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions` | PubMed search |
---
## Tool Parameter Reference (Critical)
| Tool | WRONG | CORRECT |
|------|-------|---------|
| `FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event` | `drug` | `drug_name` |
| `AOPWiki_list_aops` | `query` | `keyword` |
| `CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions` | `chemical` | `input_terms` |
| `CTD_get_chemical_diseases` | `chemical` | `input_terms` |
---
## Limitations
- **AOPWiki**: AOPs are in development; many lack high plausibility scores
- **FAERS**: Observational data; confounding by indication; underreporting bias
- **CTD**: Inferred associations have high false-positive rate
- **DailyMed**: FDA-approved drugs only; no environmental chemical coverage
- **Environmental chemicals**: Primarily Phase 1 (AOP) + Phase 4 (CTD) data available
---
## References
- AOPWiki: https://aopwiki.org
- FAERS: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers
- CTD: http://ctdbase.org
- DailyMed: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov
- OpenFDA: https://open.fda.govRelated Skills
tooluniverse
Router skill for ToolUniverse tasks. First checks if specialized tooluniverse skills (105+ skills covering disease/drug/target research, gene-disease associations, clinical decision support, genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, comparative genomics, chemical safety, toxicology, systems biology, and more) can solve the problem, then falls back to general strategies for using 2300+ scientific tools. Covers tool discovery, multi-hop queries, comprehensive research workflows, disambiguation, evidence grading, and report generation. Use when users need to research any scientific topic, find biological data, or explore drug/target/disease relationships. ALSO USE for any biology, medicine, chemistry, pharmacology, or life science question — even simple factoid questions like "how many X in protein Y", "what drug interacts with Z", "what gene causes disease W", or "translate this sequence". These questions benefit from database lookups (UniProt, PubMed, ChEMBL, ClinVar, GWAS Catalog, etc.) rather than answering from memory alone. When in doubt about a scientific fact, USE THIS SKILL to verify against real databases.
tooluniverse-variant-to-mechanism
End-to-end variant-to-mechanism analysis: given a genetic variant (rsID or coordinates), trace its functional impact from regulatory context (GWAS, eQTL, RegulomeDB, ENCODE) through target gene identification (GTEx, OpenTargets L2G) to downstream pathway and disease biology (STRING, Reactome, GO enrichment, disease associations). Produces an evidence-graded mechanistic narrative linking genotype to phenotype. Use when asked "how does this variant cause disease?", "what is the mechanism of rs7903146?", "trace variant to pathway", or "connect this GWAS hit to biology".
tooluniverse-variant-interpretation
Systematic clinical variant interpretation from raw variant calls to ACMG-classified recommendations with structural impact analysis. Aggregates evidence from ClinVar, gnomAD, CIViC, UniProt, and PDB across ACMG criteria. Produces pathogenicity scores (0-100), clinical recommendations, and treatment implications. Use when interpreting genetic variants, classifying variants of uncertain significance (VUS), performing ACMG variant classification, or translating variant calls to clinical actionability.
tooluniverse-variant-functional-annotation
Comprehensive functional annotation of protein variants — pathogenicity, population frequency, structural context, and clinical significance. Integrates ProtVar (map_variant, get_function, get_population) for protein-level mapping and structural context, ClinVar for clinical classifications, gnomAD for population frequency with ancestry data, CADD for deleteriousness scores, and ClinGen for gene-disease validity. Produces a structured variant annotation report with evidence grading. Use when asked about protein variant impact, missense variant pathogenicity, ProtVar annotation, variant functional context, or combining population and structural evidence for a variant.
tooluniverse-variant-analysis
Production-ready VCF processing, variant annotation, mutation analysis, and structural variant (SV/CNV) interpretation for bioinformatics questions. Parses VCF files (streaming, large files), classifies mutation types (missense, nonsense, synonymous, frameshift, splice, intronic, intergenic) and structural variants (deletions, duplications, inversions, translocations), applies VAF/depth/quality/consequence filters, annotates with ClinVar/dbSNP/gnomAD/CADD via ToolUniverse, interprets SV/CNV clinical significance using ClinGen dosage sensitivity scores, computes variant statistics, and generates reports. Solves questions like "What fraction of variants with VAF < 0.3 are missense?", "How many non-reference variants remain after filtering intronic/intergenic?", "What is the pathogenicity of this deletion affecting BRCA1?", or "Which dosage-sensitive genes overlap this CNV?". Use when processing VCF files, annotating variants, filtering by VAF/depth/consequence, classifying mutations, interpreting structural variants, assessing CNV pathogenicity, comparing cohorts, or answering variant analysis questions.
tooluniverse-vaccine-design
Design and evaluate vaccine candidates using computational immunology tools. Covers epitope prediction (MHC-I/II binding via IEDB), population coverage analysis, antigen selection, adjuvant matching, and immunogenicity assessment. Integrates IEDB for epitope prediction, UniProt for antigen sequences, PDB/AlphaFold for structural epitopes, BVBRC for pathogen proteomes, and literature for clinical precedent. Use when asked about vaccine design, epitope prediction, immunogenicity, MHC binding, T-cell epitopes, B-cell epitopes, or population coverage for vaccine candidates.
tooluniverse-target-research
Gather comprehensive biological target intelligence from 9 parallel research paths covering protein info, structure, interactions, pathways, expression, variants, drug interactions, and literature. Features collision-aware searches, evidence grading (T1-T4), explicit Open Targets coverage, and mandatory completeness auditing. Use when users ask about drug targets, proteins, genes, or need target validation, druggability assessment, or comprehensive target profiling.
tooluniverse-systems-biology
Comprehensive systems biology and pathway analysis using multiple pathway databases (Reactome, KEGG, WikiPathways, Pathway Commons, BioModels). Performs pathway enrichment, protein-pathway mapping, keyword searches, and systems-level analysis. Use when analyzing gene sets, exploring biological pathways, or investigating systems-level biology.
tooluniverse-structural-variant-analysis
Comprehensive structural variant (SV) analysis skill for clinical genomics. Classifies SVs (deletions, duplications, inversions, translocations), assesses pathogenicity using ACMG-adapted criteria, evaluates gene disruption and dosage sensitivity, and provides clinical interpretation with evidence grading. Use when analyzing CNVs, large deletions/duplications, chromosomal rearrangements, or any structural variants requiring clinical interpretation.
tooluniverse-structural-proteomics
Integrate structural biology data with proteomics for drug target validation. Retrieves protein structures from PDB (RCSB, PDBe), AlphaFold predictions, antibody structures (SAbDab), GPCR data (GPCRdb), binding pocket analysis (ProteinsPlus), and ligand interactions (BindingDB). Use when asked to find structures for a drug target, identify binding site ligands, cross-validate drug binding with structural data, assess structural druggability, or compare experimental vs predicted structures.
tooluniverse-stem-cell-organoid
Research stem cells, iPSCs, organoids, and cell differentiation using ToolUniverse tools. Covers pluripotency marker identification, differentiation pathway analysis, organoid model characterization, cell type annotation, and disease modeling. Integrates CellxGene/HCA for single-cell atlas data, CellMarker for cell type markers, GEO for stem cell datasets, and pathway tools for differentiation signaling. Use when asked about stem cells, iPSCs, organoids, cell reprogramming, pluripotency, differentiation protocols, or 3D culture models.
tooluniverse-statistical-modeling
Perform statistical modeling and regression analysis on biomedical datasets. Supports linear regression, logistic regression (binary/ordinal/multinomial), mixed-effects models, Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimation, and comprehensive model diagnostics. Extracts odds ratios, hazard ratios, confidence intervals, p-values, and effect sizes. Designed to solve BixBench statistical reasoning questions involving clinical/experimental data. Use when asked to fit regression models, compute odds ratios, perform survival analysis, run statistical tests, or interpret model coefficients from provided data.