building-patch-tuesday-response-process
Establish a structured operational process to triage, test, and deploy Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates within risk-based remediation SLAs.
Best use case
building-patch-tuesday-response-process is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Establish a structured operational process to triage, test, and deploy Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates within risk-based remediation SLAs.
Teams using building-patch-tuesday-response-process should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/building-patch-tuesday-response-process/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How building-patch-tuesday-response-process Compares
| Feature / Agent | building-patch-tuesday-response-process | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Establish a structured operational process to triage, test, and deploy Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates within risk-based remediation SLAs.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Top AI Agents for Productivity
See the top AI agent skills for productivity, workflow automation, operational systems, documentation, and everyday task execution.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
AI Agents for Marketing
Discover AI agents for marketing workflows, from SEO and content production to campaign research, outreach, and analytics.
SKILL.md Source
# Building Patch Tuesday Response Process
## Overview
Microsoft releases security updates on the second Tuesday of each month ("Patch Tuesday"), addressing vulnerabilities across Windows, Office, Exchange, SQL Server, Azure services, and other products. In 2025, Microsoft patched over 1,129 vulnerabilities across the year -- an 11.9% increase from 2024 -- making a structured response process critical. The leading risk types include elevation of privilege (49%), remote code execution (34%), and information disclosure (7%). This skill covers building a repeatable Patch Tuesday response workflow from initial advisory review through testing, deployment, and validation.
## When to Use
- When deploying or configuring building patch tuesday response process capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
## Prerequisites
- Access to Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) update guide
- Vulnerability management platform (Qualys VMDR, Rapid7, Tenable)
- Patch deployment infrastructure (WSUS, SCCM/MECM, Intune, or third-party)
- Test environment mirroring production configurations
- Change management process (ITIL-based or equivalent)
- Communication channels for cross-team coordination
## Core Concepts
### Patch Tuesday Timeline
| Day | Activity | Owner |
|-----|----------|-------|
| T+0 (Tuesday 10 AM PT) | Microsoft releases patches and advisories | Microsoft |
| T+0 (Tuesday afternoon) | Security team reviews advisories and triages | Security Ops |
| T+1 (Wednesday) | Qualys/vendor scan signatures updated | VM Platform |
| T+1-T+2 | Emergency patches deployed for zero-days | IT Operations |
| T+2-T+5 | Test patches in staging environment | QA/IT Ops |
| T+5-T+7 | Deploy to Pilot group (5-10% of fleet) | IT Operations |
| T+7-T+14 | Deploy to Production Ring 1 (servers) | IT Operations |
| T+14-T+21 | Deploy to Production Ring 2 (workstations) | IT Operations |
| T+21-T+30 | Validation scanning and compliance reporting | Security Ops |
### Patch Categorization Framework
| Category | Criteria | Response SLA |
|----------|----------|-------------|
| Zero-Day / Exploited | Active exploitation confirmed, CISA KEV listed | 24-48 hours |
| Critical RCE | CVSS >= 9.0, remote code execution, no auth required | 3-5 days |
| Critical with Exploit | Public exploit code or EPSS > 0.7 | 7 days |
| High Severity | CVSS 7.0-8.9, privilege escalation | 14 days |
| Medium Severity | CVSS 4.0-6.9 | 30 days |
| Low / Informational | CVSS < 4.0, defense-in-depth | Next maintenance window |
### Microsoft Product Categories to Monitor
| Category | Products | Risk Level |
|----------|----------|------------|
| Windows OS | Windows 10, 11, Server 2016-2025 | Critical |
| Exchange Server | Exchange 2016, 2019, Online | Critical |
| SQL Server | SQL 2016-2022 | High |
| Office Suite | Microsoft 365, Office 2019-2024 | High |
| .NET Framework | .NET 4.x, .NET 6-9 | Medium |
| Azure Services | Azure AD, Entra ID, Azure Stack | High |
| Edge/Browser | Edge Chromium, IE mode | Medium |
| Development Tools | Visual Studio, VS Code | Low |
## Workflow
### Step 1: Pre-Patch Tuesday Preparation (Monday before)
```
Preparation Checklist:
[ ] Confirm WSUS/SCCM sync schedules are active
[ ] Verify test environment is available and current
[ ] Review outstanding patches from previous month
[ ] Confirm monitoring dashboards are operational
[ ] Pre-stage communication templates
[ ] Ensure rollback procedures are documented
[ ] Verify backup jobs ran successfully on critical servers
```
### Step 2: Day-of Triage (Patch Tuesday)
```
Triage Process:
1. Monitor MSRC Update Guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide)
2. Review Microsoft Security Blog for advisory summaries
3. Cross-reference with CISA KEV additions (same day)
4. Check vendor advisories (Qualys, Rapid7, CrowdStrike analysis)
5. Identify zero-day and actively exploited vulnerabilities
6. Classify each CVE by severity and applicability
7. Determine deployment rings and timeline for each patch
8. Submit emergency change request for zero-day patches
9. Communicate triage results to IT Operations and management
```
### Step 3: Scan and Gap Analysis
```python
# Post-Patch-Tuesday scan workflow
def run_patch_tuesday_scan(scanner_api, target_groups):
"""Trigger vulnerability scans after Patch Tuesday updates."""
for group in target_groups:
print(f"[*] Scanning {group['name']}...")
scan_id = scanner_api.launch_scan(
target=group["targets"],
template="patch-tuesday-focused",
credentials=group["creds"]
)
print(f" Scan launched: {scan_id}")
# Wait for scan completion, then generate report
results = scanner_api.get_scan_results(scan_id)
missing_patches = [r for r in results if r["status"] == "missing"]
# Categorize by Patch Tuesday release
current_month = [p for p in missing_patches
if p["vendor_advisory_date"] >= patch_tuesday_date]
return {
"total_missing": len(missing_patches),
"current_month": len(current_month),
"zero_day": [p for p in current_month if p.get("actively_exploited")],
"critical": [p for p in current_month if p["cvss"] >= 9.0],
}
```
### Step 4: Ring-Based Deployment Strategy
```
Ring 0 - Emergency (0-48 hours):
Scope: Zero-day and actively exploited CVEs only
Method: Manual or targeted push (SCCM expedite)
Targets: Internet-facing servers, critical infrastructure
Approval: Emergency change, verbal CISO approval
Rollback: Immediate rollback if service degradation
Ring 1 - Pilot (Day 2-7):
Scope: All critical and high patches
Method: WSUS/SCCM automatic deployment
Targets: IT department machines, test group (5-10%)
Approval: Standard change with CAB notification
Monitoring: 48-hour soak period, check for BSOD, app crashes
Ring 2 - Production Servers (Day 7-14):
Scope: All security patches
Method: SCCM maintenance windows (off-hours)
Targets: Production servers by tier
Approval: Standard change with CAB approval
Monitoring: Application health checks, performance baseline
Ring 3 - Workstations (Day 14-21):
Scope: All security patches + quality updates
Method: Windows Update for Business / Intune
Targets: All managed workstations
Approval: Pre-approved standard change
Monitoring: Help desk ticket monitoring for issues
Ring 4 - Stragglers (Day 21-30):
Scope: Catch remaining unpatched systems
Method: Forced deployment with restart
Targets: Systems that missed prior rings
Approval: Compliance-driven enforcement
```
### Step 5: Validation and Reporting
```
Post-Deployment Validation:
1. Re-scan environment with updated vulnerability signatures
2. Compare pre-patch and post-patch scan results
3. Calculate patch compliance rate per ring and department
4. Identify failed patches and investigate root causes
5. Generate compliance report for management review
6. Update risk register with residual unpatched vulnerabilities
7. Document exceptions and compensating controls
```
## Best Practices
1. Subscribe to MSRC notifications and vendor analysis blogs for early intelligence
2. Maintain a dedicated Patch Tuesday war room or Slack/Teams channel
3. Always patch zero-day vulnerabilities outside the normal ring schedule
4. Test patches against critical business applications before broad deployment
5. Track patch compliance metrics month-over-month for trend analysis
6. Maintain rollback procedures for every deployment ring
7. Coordinate with application owners for compatibility testing
8. Document all exceptions with compensating controls and review dates
## Common Pitfalls
- Deploying all patches simultaneously without ring-based testing
- Not scanning after patching to validate remediation
- Treating all patches equally without risk-based prioritization
- Ignoring cumulative update dependencies causing patch failures
- Not accounting for server reboot requirements in maintenance windows
- Failing to communicate patch status to business stakeholders
## Related Skills
- implementing-rapid7-insightvm-for-scanning
- performing-cve-prioritization-with-kev-catalog
- implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla
- implementing-patch-management-workflowRelated Skills
processing-stix-taxii-feeds
Processes STIX 2.1 threat intelligence bundles delivered via TAXII 2.1 servers, normalizing objects into platform-native schemas and routing them to appropriate consuming systems. Use when onboarding new TAXII collection endpoints, automating bi-directional intelligence sharing with ISACs, or building pipeline validation for malformed STIX bundles. Activates for requests involving OASIS STIX, TAXII server configuration, MISP TAXII, or Cortex XSOAR feed integrations.
performing-ransomware-response
Executes a structured ransomware incident response from initial detection through containment, forensic analysis, decryption assessment, recovery, and post-incident hardening. Addresses ransom negotiation considerations, backup integrity verification, and regulatory notification requirements. Activates for requests involving ransomware response, ransomware recovery, crypto-ransomware, data encryption attack, ransom payment decision, or ransomware containment.
implementing-patch-management-workflow
Patch management is the systematic process of identifying, testing, deploying, and verifying software updates to remediate vulnerabilities across an organization's IT infrastructure. An effective patc
implementing-patch-management-for-ot-systems
This skill covers implementing a structured patch management program for OT/ICS environments where traditional IT patching approaches can cause process disruption or safety hazards. It addresses vendor compatibility testing, risk-based patch prioritization, staged deployment through test environments, maintenance window coordination, rollback procedures, and compensating controls when patches cannot be applied due to operational constraints or vendor restrictions.
implementing-ot-incident-response-playbook
Develop and implement OT-specific incident response playbooks aligned with SANS PICERL framework, IEC 62443, and NIST SP 800-82 that address unique ICS challenges including safety-critical systems, limited downtime tolerance, and coordination between IT SOC, OT engineering, and plant operations teams.
hunting-for-process-injection-techniques
Detect process injection techniques (T1055) including CreateRemoteThread, process hollowing, and DLL injection via Sysmon Event IDs 8 and 10 and EDR process telemetry
detecting-t1055-process-injection-with-sysmon
Detect process injection techniques (T1055) including classic DLL injection, process hollowing, and APC injection by analyzing Sysmon events for cross-process memory operations, remote thread creation, and anomalous DLL loading patterns.
detecting-process-injection-techniques
Detects and analyzes process injection techniques used by malware including classic DLL injection, process hollowing, APC injection, thread hijacking, and reflective loading. Uses memory forensics, API monitoring, and behavioral analysis to identify injection artifacts. Activates for requests involving process injection detection, code injection analysis, hollowed process investigation, or in-memory threat detection.
detecting-process-hollowing-technique
Detect process hollowing (T1055.012) by analyzing memory-mapped sections, hollowed process indicators, and parent-child process anomalies in EDR telemetry.
conducting-phishing-incident-response
Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages across the organization, and remediating affected accounts. Covers email header analysis, URL/attachment sandboxing, and mailbox-wide purge operations. Activates for requests involving phishing response, email incident, credential phishing, spear phishing investigation, or phishing remediation.
conducting-malware-incident-response
Responds to malware infections across enterprise endpoints by identifying the malware family, determining infection vectors, assessing spread, and executing eradication procedures. Covers the full lifecycle from detection through containment, analysis, removal, and recovery. Activates for requests involving malware response, malware eradication, trojan removal, worm containment, malware triage, or infected endpoint remediation.
conducting-cloud-incident-response
Responds to security incidents in cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP) by performing identity-based containment, cloud-native log analysis, resource isolation, and forensic evidence acquisition adapted for ephemeral cloud infrastructure. Activates for requests involving cloud incident response, AWS security incident, Azure compromise, GCP breach, cloud forensics, or cloud identity compromise.