git:attach-review-to-pr

Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API

771 stars

Best use case

git:attach-review-to-pr is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API

Teams using git:attach-review-to-pr should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/attach-review-to-pr/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit/main/plugins/git/skills/attach-review-to-pr/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/attach-review-to-pr/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How git:attach-review-to-pr Compares

Feature / Agentgit:attach-review-to-prStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# How to Attach Line-Specific Review Comments to Pull Requests

This guide explains how to add line-specific review comments to pull requests using the GitHub CLI (`gh`) API or `mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment` if it not available, similar to how the GitHub UI allows commenting on specific lines of code.

## Preferred Approach: Using MCP GitHub Tools

**If available**, use the `mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment` MCP tool for posting line-specific inline comments on pull requests. This approach provides better integration with GitHub's UI and is the recommended method.

**Fallback**: If the MCP tool is not available, use the GitHub CLI (`gh`) API methods described below:

- For single comments: Use the `/comments` endpoint (see [Adding a Single Line-Specific Comment](#adding-a-single-line-specific-comment))
- For multiple comments: Use the `/reviews` endpoint (see [Adding Multiple Line-Specific Comments Together](#adding-multiple-line-specific-comments-together))

## Overview

While `gh pr review` provides basic review functionality (approve, request changes, general comments), it **does not support line-specific comments directly**. To add comments on specific lines of code, you must use the lower-level `gh api` command to call GitHub's REST API directly.

## Prerequisites

1. GitHub CLI installed and authenticated:

   ```bash
   gh auth status
   ```

2. Access to the repository and pull request you want to review

## Understanding GitHub's Review Comment System

GitHub has two types of PR comments:

1. **Issue Comments** - General comments on the PR conversation
2. **Review Comments** - Line-specific comments on code changes

Review comments can be added in two ways:

- **Single comment** - Using the `/pulls/{pr}/comments` endpoint
- **Review with multiple comments** - Using the `/pulls/{pr}/reviews` endpoint

## Adding a Single Line-Specific Comment

### Basic Syntax

```bash
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments \
  -f body='Your comment text here' \
  -f commit_id='<commit-sha>' \
  -f path='path/to/file.js' \
  -F line=42 \
  -f side='RIGHT'
```

### Parameters Explained

| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
| `body` | string | Yes | The text of the review comment (supports Markdown) |
| `commit_id` | string | Yes | The SHA of the commit to comment on |
| `path` | string | Yes | Relative path to the file being commented on |
| `line` | integer | Yes | The line number in the diff (use `-F` for integers) |
| `side` | string | Yes | `RIGHT` for new/modified lines, `LEFT` for deleted lines |
| `start_line` | integer | No | For multi-line comments, the starting line |
| `start_side` | string | No | For multi-line comments, the starting side |

### Parameter Flags

- `-f` (--field) - For string values
- `-F` (--field) - For integer values (note the capital F)

### Complete Example

```bash
# First, get the latest commit SHA for the PR
gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4 --jq '.head.sha'

# Then add your comment
gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4/comments \
  -f body='Consider adding error handling here. Should we confirm the lesson was successfully marked as completed before navigating away?' \
  -f commit_id='e152d0dd6cf498467eadbeb638bf05abe11c64d4' \
  -f path='src/components/LessonNavigationButtons.tsx' \
  -F line=26 \
  -f side='RIGHT'
```

### Understanding Line Numbers

The `line` parameter refers to the **position in the diff**, not the absolute line number in the file:

- For **new files**: Line numbers match the file's line numbers
- For **modified files**: Use the line number as it appears in the "Files changed" tab
- For **multi-line comments**: Use `start_line` and `line` to specify the range

### Response

On success, returns a JSON object with comment details:

```json
{
  "id": 2532291222,
  "pull_request_review_id": 3470545909,
  "path": "src/components/LessonNavigationButtons.tsx",
  "line": 26,
  "body": "Consider adding error handling here...",
  "html_url": "https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pull/4#discussion_r2532291222",
  "created_at": "2025-11-16T22:40:46Z"
}
```

## Adding Multiple Line-Specific Comments Together

To add multiple comments across different files in a single review, use the `/reviews` endpoint with JSON input.

### Why Use Reviews for Multiple Comments?

- **Atomic operation** - All comments are added together
- **Single notification** - Doesn't spam with multiple notifications
- **Better UX** - Appears as one cohesive review
- **Same mechanism as GitHub UI** - "Start a review" → "Finish review"

### Basic Syntax

```bash
cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews --input -
{
  "event": "COMMENT",
  "body": "Overall review summary (optional)",
  "comments": [
    {
      "path": "file1.tsx",
      "body": "Comment on file 1",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 15
    },
    {
      "path": "file2.tsx",
      "body": "Comment on file 2",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 30
    }
  ]
}
EOF
```

### Review Event Types

| Event | Description | When to Use |
|-------|-------------|-------------|
| `COMMENT` | General review comment | Just leaving feedback without approval |
| `APPROVE` | Approve the PR | Changes look good, ready to merge |
| `REQUEST_CHANGES` | Request changes | Issues that must be fixed before merge |

### Complete Example

```bash
cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4/reviews --input -
{
  "event": "COMMENT",
  "body": "Testing multiple line-specific comments via gh api",
  "comments": [
    {
      "path": "src/components/CourseCard.tsx",
      "body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 15
    },
    {
      "path": "src/components/CourseProgressWidget.tsx",
      "body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 30
    },
    {
      "path": "src/components/LessonProgressTracker.tsx",
      "body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 20
    }
  ]
}
EOF
```

### Response

```json
{
  "id": 3470546747,
  "state": "COMMENTED",
  "html_url": "https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pull/4#pullrequestreview-3470546747",
  "submitted_at": "2025-11-16T22:42:43Z",
  "commit_id": "e152d0dd6cf498467eadbeb638bf05abe11c64d4"
}
```

## Common Issues and Solutions

### Issue 1: "user_id can only have one pending review per pull request"

**Error Message:**

```
gh: Validation Failed (HTTP 422)
{"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequestReview","code":"custom","field":"user_id","message":"user_id can only have one pending review per pull request"}]}
```

**Cause:** GitHub only allows one pending (unsubmitted) review per user per PR. If you previously started a review through the UI or API and didn't submit it, it blocks new review creation.

**Solution 1: Submit the pending review**

```bash
# Check for pending reviews
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews | jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING")'

# Submit it through the UI or ask the user to submit it
```

**Solution 2: Use the single comment endpoint instead**

```bash
# Add individual comments without creating a review
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments \
  -f body='Comment text' \
  -f commit_id='<sha>' \
  -f path='file.tsx' \
  -F line=26 \
  -f side='RIGHT'
```

### Issue 2: Array syntax not working with --raw-field

**Failed Attempt:**

```bash
# This does NOT work - GitHub API receives an object, not an array
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews \
  --raw-field 'comments[0][path]=file1.tsx' \
  --raw-field 'comments[0][line]=15' \
  --raw-field 'comments[1][path]=file2.tsx' \
  --raw-field 'comments[1][line]=30'
```

**Error:**

```
Invalid request. For 'properties/comments', {"0" => {...}, "1" => {...}} is not an array.
```

**Solution:** Use JSON input via heredoc:

```bash
cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews --input -
{
  "comments": [...]
}
EOF
```

### Issue 3: Invalid line number

**Error Message:**

```
Pull request review thread line must be part of the diff
```

**Cause:** The line number doesn't exist in the diff for this file.

**Solutions:**

- Verify the file was actually changed in this PR
- Check the "Files changed" tab to see actual line numbers in the diff
- Ensure you're using the correct `commit_id` (the latest commit in the PR)

### Issue 4: Wrong commit_id

**Error Message:**

```
commit_sha is not part of the pull request
```

**Solution:** Get the latest commit SHA:

```bash
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number} --jq '.head.sha'
```

## Best Practices

### 1. Get PR Information First

Before adding comments, gather necessary information:

```bash
# Get PR details
gh pr view {pr_number} --json headRefOid,files

# Or use the API
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number} --jq '{commit: .head.sha, files: [.changed_files]}'

# List files changed
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/files --jq '.[] | {filename: .filename, additions: .additions, deletions: .deletions}'
```

### 2. Check for Pending Reviews

```bash
# Check if you have a pending review
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews \
  --jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING" and .user.login=="YOUR_USERNAME")'
```

### 3. Use Meaningful Comment Text

- Be specific and constructive
- Reference documentation or best practices
- Suggest alternatives when requesting changes
- Use code blocks for code suggestions:

```markdown
Consider using async/await:

\`\`\`typescript
async function getData() {
  const result = await fetch(url);
  return result.json();
}
\`\`\`
```

### 4. Batch Related Comments

Use the review endpoint to group related comments:

- All comments for a single file/area
- All comments for a specific concern (security, performance, etc.)
- Complete review session

### 5. Choose the Right Event Type

```bash
# For feedback during development
"event": "COMMENT"

# When approving
"event": "APPROVE"

# When blocking merge
"event": "REQUEST_CHANGES"
```

## Workflow Examples

### Example 1: Quick Single Comment

```bash
#!/bin/bash
OWNER="NeoLabHQ"
REPO="learning-platform-app"
PR=4

# Get latest commit
COMMIT=$(gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR --jq '.head.sha')

# Add comment
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments \
  -f body='Consider extracting this into a separate function for better testability' \
  -f commit_id="$COMMIT" \
  -f path='src/utils/validation.ts' \
  -F line=45 \
  -f side='RIGHT'
```

### Example 2: Comprehensive Review

```bash
#!/bin/bash
OWNER="NeoLabHQ"
REPO="learning-platform-app"
PR=4

# Create review with multiple comments
cat <<EOF | gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews --input -
{
  "event": "COMMENT",
  "body": "Thanks for the PR! I've reviewed the changes and have a few suggestions.",
  "comments": [
    {
      "path": "src/components/CourseCard.tsx",
      "body": "Consider memoizing this component to prevent unnecessary re-renders",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 25
    },
    {
      "path": "src/utils/courseProgress.ts",
      "body": "This function could benefit from error handling for invalid course IDs",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 12
    },
    {
      "path": "src/state/CourseProgressState.ts",
      "body": "Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the expected behavior",
      "side": "RIGHT",
      "line": 8
    }
  ]
}
EOF
```

### Example 3: Multi-line Comment

```bash
# Comment on a range of lines (e.g., lines 10-15)
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments \
  -f body='This entire block could be simplified using array destructuring' \
  -f commit_id="$COMMIT" \
  -f path='src/utils/parser.ts' \
  -F start_line=10 \
  -f start_side='RIGHT' \
  -F line=15 \
  -f side='RIGHT'
```

## Helpful Helper Scripts

### Get PR Files and Lines

```bash
#!/bin/bash
# pr-files.sh - List all files changed in a PR with line counts

OWNER="$1"
REPO="$2"
PR="$3"

gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/files --jq '.[] | "\(.filename): +\(.additions)/-\(.deletions)"'
```

### Check Review Status

```bash
#!/bin/bash
# check-reviews.sh - Check review status for a PR

OWNER="$1"
REPO="$2"
PR="$3"

echo "=== Reviews ==="
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews --jq '.[] | "\(.user.login): \(.state) at \(.submitted_at)"'

echo -e "\n=== Pending Reviews ==="
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews --jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING") | "\(.user.login): \(.state)"'
```

## Related Documentation

- [GitHub API: Pull Request Review Comments](https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/comments)
- [GitHub API: Pull Request Reviews](https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/reviews)
- [GitHub CLI Manual](https://cli.github.com/manual/)
- [Create PR Command](./create-pr.md)
- [Commit Command](./commit.md)

## API Reference

### POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/comments

Creates a review comment on a specific line.

**Endpoint:** `https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/comments`

**Parameters:**

- `body` (string, required): Comment text
- `commit_id` (string, required): SHA of commit
- `path` (string, required): Relative file path
- `line` (integer, required): Line number in diff
- `side` (string, required): "LEFT" or "RIGHT"
- `start_line` (integer, optional): Start line for multi-line
- `start_side` (string, optional): Start side for multi-line

### POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/reviews

Creates a review with optional line-specific comments.

**Endpoint:** `https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/reviews`

**Parameters:**

- `event` (string, required): "APPROVE", "REQUEST_CHANGES", or "COMMENT"
- `body` (string, optional): Overall review comment
- `comments` (array, optional): Array of comment objects
- `commit_id` (string, optional): SHA of commit to review

**Comment Object:**

- `path` (string, required): Relative file path
- `body` (string, required): Comment text
- `line` (integer, required): Line number in diff
- `side` (string, required): "LEFT" or "RIGHT"
- `start_line` (integer, optional): Start line for multi-line
- `start_side` (string, optional): Start side for multi-line

Related Skills

code-review:review-pr

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Comprehensive pull request review using specialized agents

code-review:review-local-changes

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Comprehensive review of local uncommitted changes using specialized agents with code improvement suggestions

tech-stack:add-typescript-best-practices

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Setup TypeScript best practices and code style rules in CLAUDE.md

tdd:write-tests

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Systematically add test coverage for all local code changes using specialized review and development agents. Add tests for uncommitted changes (including untracked files), or if everything is commited, then will cover latest commit.

tdd:test-driven-development

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass; ensures tests actually verify behavior by requiring failure first

tdd:fix-tests

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Systematically fix all failing tests after business logic changes or refactoring

sdd:plan

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Refine, parallelize, and verify a draft task specification into a fully planned implementation-ready task

sdd:implement

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Implement a task with automated LLM-as-Judge verification for critical steps

sdd:create-ideas

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Generate ideas in one shot using creative sampling

sdd:brainstorm

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Use when creating or developing, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through collaborative questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation. Don't use during clear 'mechanical' processes

sdd:add-task

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent

sadd:tree-of-thoughts

771
from NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

Execute tasks through systematic exploration, pruning, and expansion using Tree of Thoughts methodology with meta-judge evaluation specifications and multi-agent evaluation