git:attach-review-to-pr
Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API
Best use case
git:attach-review-to-pr is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API
Teams using git:attach-review-to-pr should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/attach-review-to-pr/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How git:attach-review-to-pr Compares
| Feature / Agent | git:attach-review-to-pr | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
# How to Attach Line-Specific Review Comments to Pull Requests
This guide explains how to add line-specific review comments to pull requests using the GitHub CLI (`gh`) API or `mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment` if it not available, similar to how the GitHub UI allows commenting on specific lines of code.
## Preferred Approach: Using MCP GitHub Tools
**If available**, use the `mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment` MCP tool for posting line-specific inline comments on pull requests. This approach provides better integration with GitHub's UI and is the recommended method.
**Fallback**: If the MCP tool is not available, use the GitHub CLI (`gh`) API methods described below:
- For single comments: Use the `/comments` endpoint (see [Adding a Single Line-Specific Comment](#adding-a-single-line-specific-comment))
- For multiple comments: Use the `/reviews` endpoint (see [Adding Multiple Line-Specific Comments Together](#adding-multiple-line-specific-comments-together))
## Overview
While `gh pr review` provides basic review functionality (approve, request changes, general comments), it **does not support line-specific comments directly**. To add comments on specific lines of code, you must use the lower-level `gh api` command to call GitHub's REST API directly.
## Prerequisites
1. GitHub CLI installed and authenticated:
```bash
gh auth status
```
2. Access to the repository and pull request you want to review
## Understanding GitHub's Review Comment System
GitHub has two types of PR comments:
1. **Issue Comments** - General comments on the PR conversation
2. **Review Comments** - Line-specific comments on code changes
Review comments can be added in two ways:
- **Single comment** - Using the `/pulls/{pr}/comments` endpoint
- **Review with multiple comments** - Using the `/pulls/{pr}/reviews` endpoint
## Adding a Single Line-Specific Comment
### Basic Syntax
```bash
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments \
-f body='Your comment text here' \
-f commit_id='<commit-sha>' \
-f path='path/to/file.js' \
-F line=42 \
-f side='RIGHT'
```
### Parameters Explained
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
| `body` | string | Yes | The text of the review comment (supports Markdown) |
| `commit_id` | string | Yes | The SHA of the commit to comment on |
| `path` | string | Yes | Relative path to the file being commented on |
| `line` | integer | Yes | The line number in the diff (use `-F` for integers) |
| `side` | string | Yes | `RIGHT` for new/modified lines, `LEFT` for deleted lines |
| `start_line` | integer | No | For multi-line comments, the starting line |
| `start_side` | string | No | For multi-line comments, the starting side |
### Parameter Flags
- `-f` (--field) - For string values
- `-F` (--field) - For integer values (note the capital F)
### Complete Example
```bash
# First, get the latest commit SHA for the PR
gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4 --jq '.head.sha'
# Then add your comment
gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4/comments \
-f body='Consider adding error handling here. Should we confirm the lesson was successfully marked as completed before navigating away?' \
-f commit_id='e152d0dd6cf498467eadbeb638bf05abe11c64d4' \
-f path='src/components/LessonNavigationButtons.tsx' \
-F line=26 \
-f side='RIGHT'
```
### Understanding Line Numbers
The `line` parameter refers to the **position in the diff**, not the absolute line number in the file:
- For **new files**: Line numbers match the file's line numbers
- For **modified files**: Use the line number as it appears in the "Files changed" tab
- For **multi-line comments**: Use `start_line` and `line` to specify the range
### Response
On success, returns a JSON object with comment details:
```json
{
"id": 2532291222,
"pull_request_review_id": 3470545909,
"path": "src/components/LessonNavigationButtons.tsx",
"line": 26,
"body": "Consider adding error handling here...",
"html_url": "https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pull/4#discussion_r2532291222",
"created_at": "2025-11-16T22:40:46Z"
}
```
## Adding Multiple Line-Specific Comments Together
To add multiple comments across different files in a single review, use the `/reviews` endpoint with JSON input.
### Why Use Reviews for Multiple Comments?
- **Atomic operation** - All comments are added together
- **Single notification** - Doesn't spam with multiple notifications
- **Better UX** - Appears as one cohesive review
- **Same mechanism as GitHub UI** - "Start a review" → "Finish review"
### Basic Syntax
```bash
cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews --input -
{
"event": "COMMENT",
"body": "Overall review summary (optional)",
"comments": [
{
"path": "file1.tsx",
"body": "Comment on file 1",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 15
},
{
"path": "file2.tsx",
"body": "Comment on file 2",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 30
}
]
}
EOF
```
### Review Event Types
| Event | Description | When to Use |
|-------|-------------|-------------|
| `COMMENT` | General review comment | Just leaving feedback without approval |
| `APPROVE` | Approve the PR | Changes look good, ready to merge |
| `REQUEST_CHANGES` | Request changes | Issues that must be fixed before merge |
### Complete Example
```bash
cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4/reviews --input -
{
"event": "COMMENT",
"body": "Testing multiple line-specific comments via gh api",
"comments": [
{
"path": "src/components/CourseCard.tsx",
"body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 15
},
{
"path": "src/components/CourseProgressWidget.tsx",
"body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 30
},
{
"path": "src/components/LessonProgressTracker.tsx",
"body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 20
}
]
}
EOF
```
### Response
```json
{
"id": 3470546747,
"state": "COMMENTED",
"html_url": "https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pull/4#pullrequestreview-3470546747",
"submitted_at": "2025-11-16T22:42:43Z",
"commit_id": "e152d0dd6cf498467eadbeb638bf05abe11c64d4"
}
```
## Common Issues and Solutions
### Issue 1: "user_id can only have one pending review per pull request"
**Error Message:**
```
gh: Validation Failed (HTTP 422)
{"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequestReview","code":"custom","field":"user_id","message":"user_id can only have one pending review per pull request"}]}
```
**Cause:** GitHub only allows one pending (unsubmitted) review per user per PR. If you previously started a review through the UI or API and didn't submit it, it blocks new review creation.
**Solution 1: Submit the pending review**
```bash
# Check for pending reviews
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews | jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING")'
# Submit it through the UI or ask the user to submit it
```
**Solution 2: Use the single comment endpoint instead**
```bash
# Add individual comments without creating a review
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments \
-f body='Comment text' \
-f commit_id='<sha>' \
-f path='file.tsx' \
-F line=26 \
-f side='RIGHT'
```
### Issue 2: Array syntax not working with --raw-field
**Failed Attempt:**
```bash
# This does NOT work - GitHub API receives an object, not an array
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews \
--raw-field 'comments[0][path]=file1.tsx' \
--raw-field 'comments[0][line]=15' \
--raw-field 'comments[1][path]=file2.tsx' \
--raw-field 'comments[1][line]=30'
```
**Error:**
```
Invalid request. For 'properties/comments', {"0" => {...}, "1" => {...}} is not an array.
```
**Solution:** Use JSON input via heredoc:
```bash
cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews --input -
{
"comments": [...]
}
EOF
```
### Issue 3: Invalid line number
**Error Message:**
```
Pull request review thread line must be part of the diff
```
**Cause:** The line number doesn't exist in the diff for this file.
**Solutions:**
- Verify the file was actually changed in this PR
- Check the "Files changed" tab to see actual line numbers in the diff
- Ensure you're using the correct `commit_id` (the latest commit in the PR)
### Issue 4: Wrong commit_id
**Error Message:**
```
commit_sha is not part of the pull request
```
**Solution:** Get the latest commit SHA:
```bash
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number} --jq '.head.sha'
```
## Best Practices
### 1. Get PR Information First
Before adding comments, gather necessary information:
```bash
# Get PR details
gh pr view {pr_number} --json headRefOid,files
# Or use the API
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number} --jq '{commit: .head.sha, files: [.changed_files]}'
# List files changed
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/files --jq '.[] | {filename: .filename, additions: .additions, deletions: .deletions}'
```
### 2. Check for Pending Reviews
```bash
# Check if you have a pending review
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews \
--jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING" and .user.login=="YOUR_USERNAME")'
```
### 3. Use Meaningful Comment Text
- Be specific and constructive
- Reference documentation or best practices
- Suggest alternatives when requesting changes
- Use code blocks for code suggestions:
```markdown
Consider using async/await:
\`\`\`typescript
async function getData() {
const result = await fetch(url);
return result.json();
}
\`\`\`
```
### 4. Batch Related Comments
Use the review endpoint to group related comments:
- All comments for a single file/area
- All comments for a specific concern (security, performance, etc.)
- Complete review session
### 5. Choose the Right Event Type
```bash
# For feedback during development
"event": "COMMENT"
# When approving
"event": "APPROVE"
# When blocking merge
"event": "REQUEST_CHANGES"
```
## Workflow Examples
### Example 1: Quick Single Comment
```bash
#!/bin/bash
OWNER="NeoLabHQ"
REPO="learning-platform-app"
PR=4
# Get latest commit
COMMIT=$(gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR --jq '.head.sha')
# Add comment
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments \
-f body='Consider extracting this into a separate function for better testability' \
-f commit_id="$COMMIT" \
-f path='src/utils/validation.ts' \
-F line=45 \
-f side='RIGHT'
```
### Example 2: Comprehensive Review
```bash
#!/bin/bash
OWNER="NeoLabHQ"
REPO="learning-platform-app"
PR=4
# Create review with multiple comments
cat <<EOF | gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews --input -
{
"event": "COMMENT",
"body": "Thanks for the PR! I've reviewed the changes and have a few suggestions.",
"comments": [
{
"path": "src/components/CourseCard.tsx",
"body": "Consider memoizing this component to prevent unnecessary re-renders",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 25
},
{
"path": "src/utils/courseProgress.ts",
"body": "This function could benefit from error handling for invalid course IDs",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 12
},
{
"path": "src/state/CourseProgressState.ts",
"body": "Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the expected behavior",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 8
}
]
}
EOF
```
### Example 3: Multi-line Comment
```bash
# Comment on a range of lines (e.g., lines 10-15)
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments \
-f body='This entire block could be simplified using array destructuring' \
-f commit_id="$COMMIT" \
-f path='src/utils/parser.ts' \
-F start_line=10 \
-f start_side='RIGHT' \
-F line=15 \
-f side='RIGHT'
```
## Helpful Helper Scripts
### Get PR Files and Lines
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# pr-files.sh - List all files changed in a PR with line counts
OWNER="$1"
REPO="$2"
PR="$3"
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/files --jq '.[] | "\(.filename): +\(.additions)/-\(.deletions)"'
```
### Check Review Status
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# check-reviews.sh - Check review status for a PR
OWNER="$1"
REPO="$2"
PR="$3"
echo "=== Reviews ==="
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews --jq '.[] | "\(.user.login): \(.state) at \(.submitted_at)"'
echo -e "\n=== Pending Reviews ==="
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews --jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING") | "\(.user.login): \(.state)"'
```
## Related Documentation
- [GitHub API: Pull Request Review Comments](https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/comments)
- [GitHub API: Pull Request Reviews](https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/reviews)
- [GitHub CLI Manual](https://cli.github.com/manual/)
- [Create PR Command](./create-pr.md)
- [Commit Command](./commit.md)
## API Reference
### POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/comments
Creates a review comment on a specific line.
**Endpoint:** `https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/comments`
**Parameters:**
- `body` (string, required): Comment text
- `commit_id` (string, required): SHA of commit
- `path` (string, required): Relative file path
- `line` (integer, required): Line number in diff
- `side` (string, required): "LEFT" or "RIGHT"
- `start_line` (integer, optional): Start line for multi-line
- `start_side` (string, optional): Start side for multi-line
### POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/reviews
Creates a review with optional line-specific comments.
**Endpoint:** `https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/reviews`
**Parameters:**
- `event` (string, required): "APPROVE", "REQUEST_CHANGES", or "COMMENT"
- `body` (string, optional): Overall review comment
- `comments` (array, optional): Array of comment objects
- `commit_id` (string, optional): SHA of commit to review
**Comment Object:**
- `path` (string, required): Relative file path
- `body` (string, required): Comment text
- `line` (integer, required): Line number in diff
- `side` (string, required): "LEFT" or "RIGHT"
- `start_line` (integer, optional): Start line for multi-line
- `start_side` (string, optional): Start side for multi-lineRelated Skills
code-review:review-pr
Comprehensive pull request review using specialized agents
code-review:review-local-changes
Comprehensive review of local uncommitted changes using specialized agents with code improvement suggestions
tech-stack:add-typescript-best-practices
Setup TypeScript best practices and code style rules in CLAUDE.md
tdd:write-tests
Systematically add test coverage for all local code changes using specialized review and development agents. Add tests for uncommitted changes (including untracked files), or if everything is commited, then will cover latest commit.
tdd:test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass; ensures tests actually verify behavior by requiring failure first
tdd:fix-tests
Systematically fix all failing tests after business logic changes or refactoring
sdd:plan
Refine, parallelize, and verify a draft task specification into a fully planned implementation-ready task
sdd:implement
Implement a task with automated LLM-as-Judge verification for critical steps
sdd:create-ideas
Generate ideas in one shot using creative sampling
sdd:brainstorm
Use when creating or developing, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through collaborative questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation. Don't use during clear 'mechanical' processes
sdd:add-task
creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent
sadd:tree-of-thoughts
Execute tasks through systematic exploration, pruning, and expansion using Tree of Thoughts methodology with meta-judge evaluation specifications and multi-agent evaluation