condition-based-waiting
Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses
Best use case
condition-based-waiting is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses
Teams using condition-based-waiting should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/condition-based-waiting/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How condition-based-waiting Compares
| Feature / Agent | condition-based-waiting | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Condition-Based Waiting
## Overview
Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI.
**Core principle:** Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes.
## When to Use
```dot
digraph when_to_use {
"Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond];
"Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond];
"Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box];
"Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box];
"Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"];
"Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"];
"Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"];
}
```
**Use when:**
- Tests have arbitrary delays (`setTimeout`, `sleep`, `time.sleep()`)
- Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load)
- Tests timeout when run in parallel
- Waiting for async operations to complete
**Don't use when:**
- Testing actual timing behavior (debounce, throttle intervals)
- Always document WHY if using arbitrary timeout
## Core Pattern
```typescript
// ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50));
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();
// ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition
await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined);
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();
```
## Quick Patterns
| Scenario | Pattern |
|----------|---------|
| Wait for event | `waitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))` |
| Wait for state | `waitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')` |
| Wait for count | `waitFor(() => items.length >= 5)` |
| Wait for file | `waitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))` |
| Complex condition | `waitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)` |
## Implementation
Generic polling function:
```typescript
async function waitFor<T>(
condition: () => T | undefined | null | false,
description: string,
timeoutMs = 5000
): Promise<T> {
const startTime = Date.now();
while (true) {
const result = condition();
if (result) return result;
if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) {
throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`);
}
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms
}
}
```
See @example.ts for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (`waitForEvent`, `waitForEventCount`, `waitForEventMatch`) from actual debugging session.
## Common Mistakes
**❌ Polling too fast:** `setTimeout(check, 1)` - wastes CPU
**✅ Fix:** Poll every 10ms
**❌ No timeout:** Loop forever if condition never met
**✅ Fix:** Always include timeout with clear error
**❌ Stale data:** Cache state before loop
**✅ Fix:** Call getter inside loop for fresh data
## When Arbitrary Timeout IS Correct
```typescript
// Tool ticks every 100ms - need 2 ticks to verify partial output
await waitForEvent(manager, 'TOOL_STARTED'); // First: wait for condition
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 200)); // Then: wait for timed behavior
// 200ms = 2 ticks at 100ms intervals - documented and justified
```
**Requirements:**
1. First wait for triggering condition
2. Based on known timing (not guessing)
3. Comment explaining WHY
## Real-World Impact
From debugging session (2025-10-03):
- Fixed 15 flaky tests across 3 files
- Pass rate: 60% → 100%
- Execution time: 40% faster
- No more race conditionsRelated Skills
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment - applies TDD to process documentation by testing with subagents before writing, iterating until bulletproof against rationalization
workflow-security-audit
Comprehensive security assessment and remediation. Use for security reviews, compliance checks, vulnerability assessments.
workflow-performance
Systematic performance analysis and optimization. Use when things are slow, need optimization, or preparing for scale.
workflow-feature
Complete feature development workflow from design to deployment. Use when implementing new features or functionality.
workflow-feature-development
Complete workflow for developing new features from design to deployment. Use when starting a new feature, adding functionality, or building something new.
workflow-bug-fix
Systematic approach to identifying, fixing, and validating bug fixes. Use when fixing bugs, resolving issues, or addressing errors.
wiring-audit
User-triggered audit that finds wiring drift between a project's UI surfaces and backend capabilities — orphan surfaces (UI calls endpoints/hooks/procedures that no longer exist), unwired capabilities (backend routes/exports that nothing surfaces), shape drift (both exist but contracts mismatch), method drift (URL matches, HTTP verb does not), validation drift (frontend vs backend rules diverged), permission drift (UI exposes what backend forbids or vice versa), stale labels (UI text references renamed backend concepts), and unsurfaced configuration (env vars or flags that gate behavior with no UI or CLI to control them). This skill should be used when the user asks to "audit our wiring," "find UI/backend drift," "find unwired capabilities," "find stale surfaces," "check for contract violations," "find unused endpoints," "find unused hooks," "what mismatches between UI and backend," or any similar request whose deliverable is a prioritized findings report rather than a descriptive snapshot. Generic across UI frameworks but optimized for React applications (hooks, fetch, react-query, SWR, tRPC, server actions, react-router, Next.js). Not for descriptive architectural snapshots (use architectural-analysis), security audits (use security-auditor), or performance audits (use workflow-performance).
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Use when verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
web-researcher
Use this skill when you need to research a topic online, gather information from multiple sources, or evaluate source credibility. Trigger phrases: 'research', 'find information about', 'look up', 'investigate'. Not for academic systematic reviews (use literature-reviewer) or fact-checking specific claims (use fact-checker).
visual-modes
Use when activating visual showcase modes (supersaiyan, kamehameha, over9000) for UI or interaction design - provides mode-specific enhancement checklists.
vibe-security
Comprehensive secure coding guide covering OWASP web vulnerabilities with prevention patterns and checklists. Use when writing or reviewing web application code to prevent XSS, CSRF, SSRF, SQL injection, access control flaws, and other common security vulnerabilities.
verification-before-completion
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always