nw-roadmap-review-checks
Roadmap-specific validation checks for architecture reviews. Load when reviewing roadmaps for implementation readiness.
Best use case
nw-roadmap-review-checks is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Roadmap-specific validation checks for architecture reviews. Load when reviewing roadmaps for implementation readiness.
Teams using nw-roadmap-review-checks should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/nw-roadmap-review-checks/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How nw-roadmap-review-checks Compares
| Feature / Agent | nw-roadmap-review-checks | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Roadmap-specific validation checks for architecture reviews. Load when reviewing roadmaps for implementation readiness.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Startups
Explore AI agent skills for startup validation, product research, growth experiments, documentation, and fast execution with small teams.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
SKILL.md Source
# Roadmap Review Checks
Six mandatory checks for every roadmap review. Each produces a finding block.
## Check 1: External Validity
Verify completing all steps produces an INVOCABLE feature, not just existing code.
Criteria: at least one step targets entry point integration | acceptance tests invoke through driving ports | clear user invocation path after completion
Severity: BLOCKER if no integration step or invocation path. HIGH if tests at wrong boundary.
```
EXTERNAL VALIDITY CHECK: PASSED|FAILED
Issue: {missing wiring}
Consequence: {what happens without fix}
Required Action: {integration step to add}
```
## Check 2: AC Implementation Coupling
Scan AC for implementation details locking crafter into predetermined structure.
Detection: underscore-prefixed identifiers | method signatures with params | internal class references | specific return types
Severity: HIGH. Flag each coupled AC with rewrite.
- Coupled: `_install_des_module() copies src/des/`
- Rewritten: `DES module importable from installation target after install`
Rationale: AC = WHAT (observable behavior), never HOW (internal structure). Crafter decides during GREEN + REFACTOR.
## Check 3: Step Decomposition Ratio
Calculation: implementation steps / unique production files in `files_to_modify`
Thresholds: acceptable <= 2.0 | warning 2.0-2.5 | reject > 2.5
Identical pattern check: 3+ steps with identical AC differing by substitution -> require batching.
## Check 4: Implementation Code in Roadmap
Verify no implementation code. BLOCKER.
Detection: code snippets/algorithms in descriptions | method implementations in AC | pseudocode/logic | variable names, loops, conditionals
Architect defines WHAT; crafter decides HOW. Roadmap code prevents better solutions via TDD.
## Check 5: Roadmap Concision and Precision
Quantitative thresholds: total words 500 (1-3 steps) / 1500 (4-8) / 3000 (9-15) | step description max 50 words | AC max 5 per step, 30 words each | notes max 100 words
Verbosity detection: multi-sentence blocks -> bullets | qualifiers (comprehensive, robust) -> delete | motivational language -> delete | redundancy -> state once | tutorials -> delete, assume expertise
Precision: every AC single interpretation | testable outcome | business over technical jargon
Severity: BLOCKER if word count exceeds threshold.
## Check 6: Unit Test Boundary Validation
Verify unit tests respect hexagonal boundaries.
Rules: invoke through driving ports only | no domain entity unit tests | behavior focus | never import internal/private modules
- Wrong: `Tests verify TemplateValidator._validate_schema() handles edge cases`
- Right: `When invalid template provided to render_prompt(), ValidationError raised with clear message`
Severity: HIGH.Related Skills
nw-tr-review-criteria
Review dimensions and scoring for root cause analysis quality assessment
nw-tdd-review-enforcement
Test design mandate enforcement, test budget validation, 5-phase TDD validation, and external validity checks for the software crafter reviewer
nw-sc-review-dimensions
Reviewer critique dimensions for peer review - implementation bias detection, test quality validation, completeness checks, and priority validation
nw-roadmap
Creates a phased roadmap.json for a feature goal with acceptance criteria and TDD steps. Use when planning implementation steps before execution.
nw-review
Dispatches an expert reviewer agent to critique workflow artifacts. Use when a roadmap, implementation, or step needs quality review before proceeding.
nw-review-workflow
Detailed review process, v2 validation checklist, and scoring methodology for agent definition reviews
nw-review-output-format
YAML output format and approval criteria for platform design reviews. Load when generating review feedback.
nw-por-review-criteria
Review dimensions and bug patterns for journey artifact reviews
nw-po-review-dimensions
Requirements quality critique dimensions for peer review - confirmation bias detection, completeness validation, clarity checks, testability assessment, and priority validation
nw-pdr-review-criteria
Evidence quality validation and decision gate criteria for product discovery reviews
nw-par-review-criteria
Quality dimensions and review checklist for devop reviews
nw-dr-review-criteria
Critique dimensions, severity framework, verdict decision matrix, and review output format for documentation assessment reviews